• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

2013 Kentucky Derby 139th Edition: congrats to Orb (Shug, Joel, Phipps/Janney)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • 2013 Kentucky Derby 139th Edition: congrats to Orb (Shug, Joel, Phipps/Janney)

    After 139-years this is perhaps the most significant overhaul of the Kentucky Derby - and its unlikely everyone will be happy.

    One of the key elements is that not all 2-yr and 3-yr graded races globally (approx 185 acres) will have any means, even if a horse is victorious, to gain eligibility. Rather Churchill Downs has culled it down to about only 36-races which is a move likely is really get some tracks irate.

    From those 36-races there will be a points system interwoven into four "seasons" or phases. For a host of reasons the CD folks think emulating a NASCAR type of program will endear fans to the sport and make then follow the path to the Derby more.

    From the Courier-Journal to explain the phases:

    The first is called the Kentucky Derby Prep Season, typically spanning stakes from late September through late February. That will offer a 10-4-2-1 point scale for the top four finishers.

    Next is the first of a three-phase Kentucky Derby Championship Season, which typically will span the 10-week run-up to the Derby. Races in the first phase of the Championship Season will offer a 50-20-10-5 point scale.

    That’s followed by the most important part of the Championship Season. These races will encompass the biggest events: the Florida Derby, Wood Memorial, Santa Anita Derby, Arkansas Derby, Toyota Blue Grass and Louisiana Derby, while also including the $2 million UAE Derby in Dubai. Those races will offer a 100-40-20-10 point scale.

    Finally, there’s a last chance “wild-card setup” — Keeneland’s Lexington Stakes two weeks before the Derby and Churchill Downs’ opening-night Derby Trial a week before the Run for the Roses. Those points (20-8-4-2) could put a “bubble” horse over the top.
    As is notable:

    1 - Still max field of 20-horses
    2 - No races restricted to fillies will generate Derby points
    3 - No races under 1-mile are part of the 36-races
    4 - Winning a single mega-pursed race on the list but that alone ensures nothing
    5 - Only 1 grass race is recognized is in Britain: Newmarket’s Royal Lodge Stakes
    6 - Aside from the grass race above, only 2 additional races outside of the US will be recognized (with points): Canada’s Grey Stakes for 2-year-olds and Dubai’s U.A.E. Derby in late March.

    As noted some tracks will be rather unhappy - example Hawthorne in Chicago (long time rival to Arlington Park, owned by CD) gets the shaft as the $500k Grade 2 Illinois Derby, held during the height of the prep-races, is not among the list of points-earning races. Despite having sent both a Kentucky Derby winning horse and a few runners in recent years.
    Last edited by Glimmerglass; May. 5, 2013, 05:34 PM. Reason: Road to the 2013 Kentucky Derby

  • #2
    t is very lightly veiled boycott of competitor's race tracks. They lost out on cash by withholding their signal so instead they create a system where unfavored track's races don't count. I hope this bites them in the butt big time.
    McDowell Racing Stables

    Home Away From Home

    Comment


    • #3
      Considering the Derby's 12 furlongs on honest-to-God dirt, I don't see WHY they should include shorter races or more grass races.

      And I'd love it if the Derby Trial were actually, you know, a Derby TRIAL again.
      Author Page
      Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
      Steampunk Sweethearts

      Comment


      • #4
        I'd worry about anti-trust implications if the majority of the point winning races come on CD owned tracks or HRTV affiliated tracks.
        "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
        Thread killer Extraordinaire

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          (pdf) Here are the races 'recognized' and the respective points'

          e.g. Finishing 4th in the Blue Grass Stakes (Apr @ Keeneland) yields 10-points. Whereas finishing 4th in the Remsen Stakes (Nov @ Aqueduct) is just 1-point

          Comment


          • #6
            Which is ridiculous, because the Remsen has traditionally been at the very top of the two year races. This has a huge potential to change the way two year olds and three years carry out their campaigns. And it will have an enormous impact on tracks.

            Why couldn't they just put in a point system that gives a different number of points for the grades of races. G1 is worth x points; G2, x-5; G-3 x-10. That way it wouldn't look as if CD is picking and choosing among its competitors.
            "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
            Thread killer Extraordinaire

            Comment


            • #7
              Wow - The Hopeful is out?!?
              But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                Why couldn't they just put in a point system that gives a different number of points for the grades of races. G1 is worth x points; G2, x-5; G-3 x-10. That way it wouldn't look as if CD is picking and choosing among its competitors.
                Exactly!
                But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson

                Comment


                • #9
                  Have you decoded the pattern yet? It's pretty obvious.
                  McDowell Racing Stables

                  Home Away From Home

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Originally posted by CVPeg View Post
                    Wow - The Hopeful is out?!?
                    Indeed as it looks like no Saratoga races have any relevance. However, the upside is that the Kentucky Derby history rich laden Grey up in Woodbine on polytrack is a recognized race
                    Last edited by Glimmerglass; Jun. 14, 2012, 11:38 AM.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Laurierace View Post
                      t is very lightly veiled boycott of competitor's race tracks. They lost out on cash by withholding their signal so instead they create a system where unfavored track's races don't count. I hope this bites them in the butt big time.
                      ^^ this.
                      www.laurienberenson.com

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Seems to me this new system would also eliminate quite a few overseas contenders?
                        ************************
                        \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Seems to me this would open up scheduling a race the same day elsewhere in competition to the KD without all these restrictions and with a bigger purse.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            They might as well stop the sham and say that only races at tracks they own will count.
                            McDowell Racing Stables

                            Home Away From Home

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Does the Kentucky Racing Commission have any say in this? How about the JC?

                              Yet another reason for federal regulation of horse racing, since the interstate implications are huge.

                              The announcement isn't official yet, is it? The Courier-Journal broke the story, so there is still time for CD to rethink.
                              "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                              Thread killer Extraordinaire

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                This somewhat says it all: DRF tweet:

                                CD prez Flanery: Under old system, "Someone else [was] controlling the path to the Derby."
                                I'm not sure who they thought was driving the bus before. Looking over the last few years outside of a few anomalies most horses in the Derby appeared in the races they identified. Now it just appears they want any outsider to be totally shut down. Whatever happened to love for the Win and You're In synthetic race in England?

                                An example of a decent running Derby starter:

                                Dullahan (3rd in the Derby) would've come in with 111 points.
                                1 from the BC JV; 0 from the Palm Beach; 100 from the Blue Grass win; 0 from the With Anticipation Stakes; and 10 points from the Breeders' Futurity (Keene)

                                Union Rags (7th in the Derby) would've come in with points with 84 points.
                                0 from the Saratoga Special; 10 for the Champagne; 4 for the BC JV; 50 for the Fountain of Youth; 20 in the FL Derby

                                Fillies already few and far between will be just even more so:

                                1980 winner - Genuine Risk - likely would've been on the bubble at best with just a total of 20 points by way of 3rd place in the Wood Memorial.

                                1988 winner - Winning Colors - I suspect would've made the cut with 100 points via her Santa Anita Derby victory

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  #17
                                  Another Derby runner who was a winner: Funny Cide would've had just 60 points.

                                  (no applicable races at 2); 0 for Holy Bull; 20 for Louisiana Derby; 40 for Wood Memorial

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    CD owned tracks have not ever played a big role and don't appear to under this set of rules. Their 2yo races (Iroquios and Jockey Club S) are not going to have much punch.

                                    No sprints will count so 2yo races prior to September are meaningless. Filly races don't count so fillies will have to take on males before the Derby to become eligible.

                                    As silly as this plan is, Churchill Downs owns the Derby and can do as it pleases with it. As much as I'd prefer more unity and consistency, the last thing I'd favor is some government entity plunging it's fist into racing. As a racing participant in NY I can assure you, it's not a good idea.

                                    Also, applying the points system retroactively doesn't work because trainers most likely would have taken slightly different paths has the points system been in place. My big issue is that CD is influencing the significance of other tracks' major events.
                                    F O.B
                                    Resident racing historian ~~~ Re-riders Clique
                                    Founder of the Mighty Thoroughbred Clique

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      I know they own the Fairgrounds in NOLA.

                                      What relationship do the tracks that got selected have with HRTV? Which, as I understand it, is owned by CD and others.
                                      "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                                      Thread killer Extraordinaire

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #20
                                        DRF 6-14-12 "Trainers skeptical of Kentucky Derby eligibility changes" examples ...
                                        Steve Asmussen was adamant in his opinion that the new rules are overwrought and unnecessary. Graham Motion said he was particularly puzzled by the downgrading of the Vinery Racing Spiral Stakes at Turfway Park, a race he used the last two years with Animal Kingdom (winner of the 2011 Derby) and Went the Day Well (fourth in 2012).

                                        Todd Pletcher: “I guess my question is this: ‘Was the previous system really flawed where it left someone out?’ A couple of years ago [in 2006], I had Sunriver, who was 21st (on the earnings list). I didn’t feel like I had a gripe. He was third in the Florida Derby, he didn’t get in, we moved on.

                                        “I see the potential for this to leave out a good horse. Maybe, I’ll be proven wrong, but the previous system didn’t leave out the winner.”
                                        Btw I was incorrect on Funny Cide having just 60. I forgot that while he finished 3rd in the Louisiana Derby he was actually moved up to 2nd for interference. His total would've been 80 points.

                                        In regards to Mine That Bird - trainer Chip Wooley isn't a fan of the new system:

                                        Chip Wooley, who trained Mine That Bird to win the Derby, finish second in the Preakness Stakes (G1), and third in the Belmont Stakes (G1), expressed displeasure with the new system on his Facebook page.

                                        "Under this new system, Mine That Bird, who ran 1-2-3 in the Triple Crown and beat the [Santa Anita, Arkansas, Florida, and Louisiana Derby winners] in consecutive races would not have gotten to run in the Derby," Wooley wrote. "In Nascar you can change tires, rebuild your engine, and run week to week. Horses have a very limited number of races in them. Especially horses at this level."
                                        Other recent year horses that won the Derby but were otherwise unremarkable in their preps and likely would've been a bubble horse at best.

                                        1999 — Charismatic — 34 points
                                        El Camino Real Derby (G3) — second, four points
                                        Santa Anita Derby (G1) — fourth, ten points
                                        Lexington Stakes (G2) — first, 20 points

                                        2002 — War Emblem — 0 points
                                        LeComte Stakes — fifth, zero points
                                        Risen Star Stakes (G3) — sixth, zero points

                                        2005 — Giacomo — 36 points
                                        Hollywood Futurity (G1) — second, four points
                                        Sham Stakes — third, two points
                                        San Felipe Stakes (G2) — second, 20 points
                                        Santa Anita Derby (G1) — fourth, ten points

                                        2011 — Animal Kingdom — 50 points
                                        Vinery Racing Spiral Stakes (G3) — first, 50 points

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X