• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Jingles for Charles Town Racing

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Originally posted by Laurierace View Post
    Sealed means they flatten it down instead of the usual fluffing up that they do to help the water run off.


    thx. sounds scary.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Today I will be happier than a bird with a french fry.

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by Glimmerglass View Post
      To suggest my remarks are advocating censorship is patently wrong.

      I thought it patently apropos.

      "Supervision and control of the information and ideas that are circulated among the people within a society. In modern times, censorship refers to the examination of books, periodicals, plays, films, television and radio programs, news reports, and other communication media for the purpose of altering or suppressing parts thought to be objectionable or offensive."
      -- Funk & Wagnalls New World Encyclopedia
      "Absent a correct diagnosis, medicine is poison, surgery is trauma and alternative therapy is witchcraft" A. Kent Allen
      http://www.etsy.com/shop/tailsofglory

      Comment


      • #23
        Ugggg poor horses, poor jockeys…

        I have to say, when I saw the headline, I thought, why are we jingling for Charels Town? Everything I have heard makes that place sound less the favorable for horses. I thought this thread was going to be about a possible shut down of the track..

        But no, it is about more lives lost at a less than stellar facility. Yes, I will jingle for the VICTIMs of Charles Town… but not for the track itself.

        And I don’t think they should take the video down… why? To hide what happened? To keep people from being outraged that lives, horse and human are being put at risk? Sorry, but I think there should be outrage. Thats great that “Charles Town is not the meat grinder it used to be” and that they don’t have “break downs every night” any more. Maybe with some additional outrage they can improve even more. Or think twice before running horses in poor conditions on a “sealed” track.

        I think an incident like this, and given the record of this track, deserve some back lash.

        Found the note under the YouTube video of the race interesting:

        Charles Town Racetrack Feb 29th 2012, Race 8. All the horses went down in the race except one, #3 Miss Fifty. Unbelievably, the stewards refused to declare the race a no contest. All win/place/show money placed by bettors on all the other horses (except #3) was lost.
        Horses and greed are a terrible mix.
        APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

        Comment


        • #24
          "Found the note under the YouTube video of the race interesting:

          Quote:
          Charles Town Racetrack Feb 29th 2012, Race 8. All the horses went down in the race except one, #3 Miss Fifty. Unbelievably, the stewards refused to declare the race a no contest. All win/place/show money placed by bettors on all the other horses (except #3) was lost.
          Horses and greed are a terrible mix."
          __________________________________________________ __________________________________________________ ______________________________
          That it wasn't declared a no contest has nothing to do with greed as the owner of the horse that did finish should be entitled to his share of the purse. The bettors that bet on the horse that finished should also be entitled to cash in their winning tickets.

          Somewhat the same thing happened at Aqueduct on 3/4/09 with a 5 horse spill and that race was also not declared a no contest.


          If a gate failure or other racetrack related occurrence caused an accident or failure to finish,then the track may call a no contest. There are rules they must follow as to when they can and/or cannot call a race no contest.

          Comment


          • #25
            I admit, I am not up on track rules... some would say poor footing, poor track conditions would be a "racetrack related occurrence" but obviously it is not under the rule books.

            But I am also going to admit, I just don't like racing as a whole. I find that all too often profits and horse welfare end up mutally exclusive.

            But I am also going to admit, I just don't like racing as a whole. I find that all too often profits and horse welfare end up mutually exclusive. (and yes yes other sports are bad, I agree, I stick with the same principle, when you have big prize money etc… welfare of the horse doesn’t always maintain top priority).
            APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

            Comment


            • #26
              JINGLES FOR THE HORSES AND JOCKEYS ```

              JINGLES FOR THE HORSES AND JOCKEYS ````
              Zu Zu Bailey " IT'S A WONDERFUL LIFE ! "

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by Appsolute View Post

                But I am also going to admit, I just don't like racing as a whole. I find that all too often profits and horse welfare end up mutually exclusive. (and yes yes other sports are bad, I agree, I stick with the same principle, when you have big prize money etc… welfare of the horse doesn’t always maintain top priority).
                Horses do not make money if you do not make their welfare the top priority in your stable.

                A trainer can choose to not run over an off track. The gate getting stuck across the track where the horses had to pull up, was a reason I have seen a no contest declared.

                Comment


                • #28
                  So all the trainers ran their horses in this slop on a track known for breakdowns because it was in the best interest of their horses wellfare? Not because there was money to be lost or made?
                  APPSOLUTE CHOCKLATE - Photo by Kathy Colman

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Originally posted by Appsolute View Post
                    So all the trainers ran their horses in this slop on a track known for breakdowns because it was in the best interest of their horses wellfare? Not because there was money to be lost or made?
                    You run your horse because if you scratch you lose your date and it could take weeks to draw back in, or have the race go. You hope that the track makes the right call in running after checking the surface. Often, in bad conditions, the jocks will band together and refuse to tide. Given that it was the 8th, I would say conditions gradually deteriorated and unfortunately this was realized too late.
                    Originally posted by The Saddle
                    Perhaps I need my flocking adjusted.

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Originally posted by Appsolute View Post
                      So all the trainers ran their horses in this slop on a track known for breakdowns because it was in the best interest of their horses wellfare? Not because there was money to be lost or made?
                      Thousands of races have been run over sloppy and/or sealed tracks without incident. You are reading a bit too much into the limited information you have received about racing.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by rustbreeches View Post
                        You run your horse because if you scratch you lose your date and it could take weeks to draw back in, or have the race go. You hope that the track makes the right call in running after checking the surface. Often, in bad conditions, the jocks will band together and refuse to tide. Given that it was the 8th, I would say conditions gradually deteriorated and unfortunately this was realized too late.
                        or it was a bad step/unknown previous injury. It is hard to tell what happened based on the information out there so far.

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by Appsolute View Post

                          But I am also going to admit, I just don't like racing as a whole. I find that all too often profits and horse welfare end up mutally exclusive.
                          I find it interesting that you event yet think so poorly of racing and racehorse trainers.

                          Appsolute says:
                          "I have prior experience as a full working student in a large eventing barn, rode to prelim myself, and groomed for CCI** (back when it was long format). I am also a former pony clubber, who made it to the B prep level."

                          http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...d.php?t=264705

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            According to Thoroughbred Times a horse named Wild Mambo was eased in the 5th and vanned off. In the race just before the spill a horse named Disclosure broke down and was vanned off and he broke down at around the same spot as Sharp Beauty. I do not know whether these two horses are going to be OK or not. I think the breakdown in the previous race should have convinced them to cancel racing. Just because horses do not break down every time a track is sloppy does not mean it is safe. Changing a horses shoes prior to the race to queens plates or mud caulks can give the horse increased traction. A sloppy or muddy track is slippery and some horses cannot handle it. Fatal and non fatal breakdowns are most frequent on sloppy or muddy tracks. In the interests of safety it would be best if all races were canceled when there is mud,snow or ice on the track. I do not think much of any trainer who runs a horse on a slippery track especially if he knows the horse cannot handle it. It is better to wait weeks than to have a dead or lame horse.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Originally posted by lifesabreeze View Post
                              Thousands of races have been run over sloppy and/or sealed tracks without incident.
                              True, but horses are statistically more likely to breakdown on a sloppy or sealed surface, as the JC's own EID studies have shown.
                              Combining a sloppy track, with a race over the insanely short distance of 4 1/2f (in other words insanely fast speed), and on a 6f bullring.... seems to me like you are setting yourself up for a perfect storm of ingredients.

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                I don't see how Queen's plates would help in the slop, they are as plain as shoes come. Mud caulks aren't legal anywhere as far as I know but definitely not at CT.
                                McDowell Racing Stables

                                Home Away From Home

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  Originally posted by Pristine View Post
                                  According to Thoroughbred Times a horse named Wild Mambo was eased in the 5th and vanned off. In the race just before the spill a horse named Disclosure broke down and was vanned off and he broke down at around the same spot as Sharp Beauty. I do not know whether these two horses are going to be OK or not. I think the breakdown in the previous race should have convinced them to cancel racing. Just because horses do not break down every time a track is sloppy does not mean it is safe. Changing a horses shoes prior to the race to queens plates or mud caulks can give the horse increased traction. A sloppy or muddy track is slippery and some horses cannot handle it. Fatal and non fatal breakdowns are most frequent on sloppy or muddy tracks. In the interests of safety it would be best if all races were canceled when there is mud,snow or ice on the track. I do not think much of any trainer who runs a horse on a slippery track especially if he knows the horse cannot handle it. It is better to wait weeks than to have a dead or lame horse.
                                  Having ridden many a race over a nasty track, I agree that tracks should be quicker to shut down racing when it appears unsafe. Since I do not know the horse that went down, I will not presume to know what caused the fall.

                                  I am also not a fan of CT as I shipped in a few times during the 80's so know what some of these posters are referring to.

                                  But I will defend racing in general against someone who posts that they dislike racing and think race trainers do not care about the welfare of their horses.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    Originally posted by Drvmb1ggl3 View Post
                                    True, but horses are statistically more likely to breakdown on a sloppy or sealed surface, as the JC's own EID studies have shown.
                                    Combining a sloppy track, with a race over the insanely short distance of 4 1/2f (in other words insanely fast speed), and on a 6f bullring.... seems to me like you are setting yourself up for a perfect storm of ingredients.
                                    Very true and I agree wholeheartedly.

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      I watch a lot of the racing channel as a keen armchair fan. Was sadden to see the spill and pile-up with only 1 horse finishing. Jingles to all those lovely steeds and brave riders.

                                      Wake up call for CT (among others).

                                      Honestly, if a viewer can see the alarming degree of slop and mayhem why on earth wouldn't they cancel the card or at least the remainder.

                                      I keep my pasture-puff horses off their turn-out in that condition and slop to save ligament injuries!

                                      Sigh.

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        The remainder of the card was cancelled.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          But I will defend racing in general against someone who posts that they dislike racing and think race trainers do not care about the welfare of their horses.
                                          Your comments are really appreciated, LAB.

                                          For the life of me I don't understand what it is that drives people to comment how much they hate racing ... on a racing forum.

                                          FWIW I've visited CT regularly since the mid-80s and back then it was a serious dump, the absolute bottom of the barrel on every front - horses, trainers, purses, infrastructure/facilities.

                                          It's come a long way since then and while it's never going to be top tier I'm sorry to hear so many who've worked horses there in the last 5 - 10 years express concerns about the track itself when it's sloppy.

                                          ETA: wishing for a full and speedy recovery for both people and horses injured in what sounds like a really horrific accident.
                                          Last edited by Flashy Gray VA; Mar. 1, 2012, 11:21 PM.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X