• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

Governor names Bo Derek to horse board

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    I have very few problems with Bo Derek being named to the board. As a complete outsider to racing, I am not overly impressed with what I am seeing overall. Don't see her appointment as a major improvement or damage to the board. Unless they are so blinded by her beauty that they let her have complete control!

    Regarding Reagan - I voted in 1980 & 1984 not so much for him as against the other candidate. I first voted in 1972 and am still awaiting the presidential candidate I am excited to vote 'FOR".
    As far as the economy - Let's go back to our civic classes. Congress maintains the government pocket-book. The Pres can only approve (sign) or dis-approve (veto) their bills/laws. So boys and girls look at who is representing you in Congress - many of them have been in office longer than you have been alive.

    Finally - I have lived and voted in 6 states (East & West, North & South) since 1972. In small towns and large cities - never have I had to wait for hours on end to vote. Maximum wait has been 1 hour, usually when I voted after work. Keep in mind I have been a registered R in communities that were and are predominatley D.
    "Never do anything that you have to explain twice to the paramedics."
    Courtesy my cousin Tim

    Comment


    • #42
      hope

      I hope Bo shows up for every meeting they have with a low cut dress! those guys will vote anyway she wants, and she'll get better rules on drugs and injuries and benefit the horses. I assume she has common sense, and is intelligent enough to learn about racing and what her responsibilities are. Is she getting flamed here cause she wasn't born on the backstretch, or cause she's a sexy woman? if this were some guy like, darn, who's a goodlooking guy who ride who is an actor? would you then flame his appointment? And maybe her animal rights position doesn't sit well with some people. well just read the results of the break downs during races again. maybe she'll make a difference in horse welfare and also promote safe racing, which I hope everyone would be in favor of.

      Comment


      • #43
        Driving past the Rez with the glittering casino on our way home from town this afternoon, I mentioned to my dh this discussion as regards slots at the tracks, and he agreed it wouldn't happen here because the tribes didn't want it to happen here. I then mentioned that the tribes should build racetracks on their generally poor land, and he thought that would be spending more money than they'd like on an iffy investment, BUT they could buy some of the tracks that are in trouble, have them declared tribal lands and, Tah Dum, racing in CA is on its feet again. There is precedent for locating casinos off traditional tribal lands, so there you have it.

        I think I'll write to Bo.
        Barbaro Cultist, Metabolic Nazi

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by I'm EBO View Post
          Driving past the Rez with the glittering casino on our way home from town this afternoon, I mentioned to my dh this discussion as regards slots at the tracks, and he agreed it wouldn't happen here because the tribes didn't want it to happen here. I then mentioned that the tribes should build racetracks on their generally poor land, and he thought that would be spending more money than they'd like on an iffy investment, BUT they could buy some of the tracks that are in trouble, have them declared tribal lands and, Tah Dum, racing in CA is on its feet again. There is precedent for locating casinos off traditional tribal lands, so there you have it.

          I think I'll write to BO.
          So basically you are proposing they waste some of their Casino profits on welfare for racing? Good luck trying to convince the tribes, or any racing-free casino, of that.

          I don't think you understand the economics/politics of Racinos. Most would love to dump the racing end of things, it's a drain on their profits. If it weren't for state laws they'd already have done so.

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Drvmb1ggl3 View Post
            I don't think you understand the economics/politics of Racinos. Most would love to dump the racing end of things, it's a drain on their profits. If it weren't for state laws they'd already have done so.
            Unfortunately, this is very true. We have the slot palace, Twin Rivers, here. While there is no horse racing they do have the greyhounds. Live Greyhound racing has lost money for years and there have been numerous proposals to shut it down (which somehow never happens).

            Greyhound racing suffers from the same appalling overall lack of concern for the animals' welfare as horse racing. A similar rate of catastrophic injury to the legs occurs with the additional bonus of what happens when a dog hits the inner high voltage fence after a bump or stumble. Can you say crispy critter?

            As long as money, greed and human egos are involved this will always be the case, IMO. You can't legislate kindness or compassion.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by JER
              You mean, like, bankrupt it? Or do you mean increasing the wealth of corporations and the rich? Or a ballooning budget and a huge deficit? Voodoo economics? Or maybe you just mean a lack of accountability.
              Those are your words. I meant he is known as a great President that was elected by a HUGE majority to a 2nd term. That's what I meant.
              Randee Beckman ~Otteridge Farm, LLC (http://on.fb.me/1iJEqvR)~ Marketing Manager - The Clothes Horse & Jennifer Oliver Equine Insurance Specialist

              Comment


              • #47
                I don't think you understand the economics/politics of Racinos. Most would love to dump the racing end of things, it's a drain on their profits. If it weren't for state laws they'd already have done so.
                It's a good probability that I don't understand the economics, but I think I understand the politics.

                From my pov, I think horse racing would be a draw to get more people into the casinos' venues. Not everybody, as one would presume by reading this racing forum, gets his/her kicks from pulling the handle on a slot machine. The casinos in CA are constantly adding different games and constantly booking big name entertainers (as well as cage fighting bouts) to attract new customers and keep their regulars. In addition, our local casino has recently built a 200 room hotel, is planning a golf course, hosts high school proms in the ballroom, operates a high end restaurant, etc.
                http://www.thepalace.net/

                Allowing the tribes to operate casinos on their own lands was, and is, not a slam/dunk operation; there is still much entrenched opposition to legal gambling within the state--not all of it coming from Nevada interests. There are people who want to protect the public from the siren call of gambling, there are people who think it's opening a door to organized crime (like it's not already here), there are religious people who oppose it just because, and there are people who can't stand the idea of a Rich Injun. The tribes make great efforts to present the casinos and surrounds as "entertainment". They make great efforts to improve the nearby communities.

                If actually building a new racetrack is cost prohibitive, why not sell a portion of the existing racetracks to a single tribe, or consortium of tribes? Everybody wins. The tribes get new players and grow even richer; horse racing gets more money.

                But tell me this: If horse racing is such a losing proposition, why are upwards of 20,000 foals born every year? How do owners manage to pay the trainers? How do the trainers manage to pay their assistants and periferial people? How do the tracks manage to pay their electricity bills?

                Inquiring minds. . . . .
                Barbaro Cultist, Metabolic Nazi

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by I'm EBO View Post
                  From my pov, I think horse racing would be a draw to get more people into the casinos' venues. Not everybody, as one would presume by reading this racing forum, gets his/her kicks from pulling the handle on a slot machine.
                  Good in theory but in reality - as proven by many, many racinos - the live racing is not the draw whatsoever. Sadly the notion of sitting among thousands of banks of slot machines with that constant and annoying ringing and flashing is like a moth to a flame for the vast majority.

                  You'll never find hoards of people on the trackside of the house and the slot machines barely used. I don't care if they announced that Secretariat was going to do one final parade lap. It wouldn't get them to leave from pulling the lever like a monkey in a science experiment.

                  I don't think its a marketing thing either. You could try to make every day of racing a 'derby day' with promotions and celebration yet the majority of visitors to these racinos are the one-armed bandit crowd and they simply gravitate towards the slots.

                  Business wise, as said, the folks running these racinos despite having gotten their approval by having living racing and only continue because of it too do loathe the obligatory horse racing side. Why? Because in most cases (although not all) the casino side of the house is making all the money and subsidizing the live racing portion. Drop the racing then that money can be either plowed back into gaming operations or paid out to the owners.

                  One nice win in Illinois was this summer although yet to be worked out is the long battle between the tracks and the riverboat casinos. The casinos were approved years ago only if the money they were going to be taking away from racing (at the time the sole legal form of gambling in the state) was kicked back 3% of their revenue. The riverboats all said "ok" and as soon as they were up and running they sued saying the obligation to subsidize Illinois race tracks was illegal. So payments have never been made. The state supreme court ruled in favor of the race tracks this summer and that could bring a windfall of new money to racing in the state.

                  Of course the casinos have appealed so we'll see what happens

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by I'm EBO View Post
                    But tell me this: If horse racing is such a losing proposition, why are upwards of 20,000 foals born every year? How do owners manage to pay the trainers? How do the trainers manage to pay their assistants and periferial people? How do the tracks manage to pay their electricity bills?

                    Inquiring minds. . . . .
                    The million dollar question to be sure. I for one wonder why we haven't seen a more sharp drop in the quantity of registered TB horses being born in the US. I think the output has been in the mid 30k range in recent years in general.

                    Although lets be clear about how many actually start in a race, using some older but consistant numbers: from Not By A Long Shot, T.D. Thornton

                    1997: 35,139 registered TB foaled in NA, of that, 23,014 would make it to the races; 15,886 would eventually graduate to the winners circle. Just 1,140 would win in a stakes race. A mere 223 would win any graded stakes race.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      GG, I'm almost afraid to ask, but what happens to the 12,000+ tbs who don't go to the race world?

                      You wrote:

                      Good in theory but in reality - as proven by many, many racinos - the live racing is not the draw whatsoever. Sadly the notion of sitting among thousands of banks of slot machines with that constant and annoying ringing and flashing is like a moth to a flame for the vast majority.

                      You'll never find hoards of people on the trackside of the house and the slot machines barely used. I don't care if they announced that Secretariat was going to do one final parade lap. It wouldn't get them to leave from pulling the lever like a monkey in a science experiment.
                      I must have an surprisingly optimistic view of my fellow man. Of course, I can't believe people think that drilling off shore and in the Alaskan reserve will knock a dollar off the gasoline prices by tomorrow, either.
                      Barbaro Cultist, Metabolic Nazi

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X