• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Churchill and synthetic

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Churchill and synthetic

    Do you think this will push the issue?
    We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
    www.dleestudio.com

  • #2
    No. There is an unknown right now about synthetic tracks because of Santa Anita and the increase in soft tissue injuries.

    From a betting perspective I despise synthetic tracks. The races are flukey and you might as well not buy a racing form.

    Comment


    • #3
      I hope not. It would be a knee-jerk reaction and there is not yet conclusive evidence that any of the synthetics are a superior surface.

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        I think that racing, like eventing, can not afford to appear to not be doing 'everything' to make the sport safer for the horses. And that is how that appears.
        We're spending our money on horses and bourbon. The rest we're just wasting.
        www.dleestudio.com

        Comment


        • #5
          I would like to see more study over time on synthetics - there is still much we don't know, as Santa Anita's problems proved. And like a comment I read somewhere but can't remember the citation for, if as much money was put into studying and making the best dirt track possible as has been put into replacing surfaces with synthetics, what kind of difference would that make?

          However, if I were going to put one thing at the top of my "racing needs to change this" list, it would not be the track surface. It would be breeding and then further breeding and then inbreeding on unsoundness.

          Comment


          • #6
            Here's a link to an article talking about this (article ran prior to the Derby):

            http://sports.espn.go.com/sports/hor...ory?id=3372741

            Quote: "The new materials are designed to better protect animals and jockeys from catastrophic injuries, a necessity no one disputes. A new on-track injury reporting program seems to indicate the surface is having the desired effect.

            Reports by veterinarians at 34 tracks across the country between June 2007 and early this year showed synthetic tracks averaged 1.47 fatalities per 1,000 starts, compared with 2.03 fatalities per 1,000 starts for horses that ran on dirt."

            Comment


            • #7
              Unfortunately that kind of statistic contains an inherent bias: All things are not equal across all tracks, so comparing the mortality/injury statistics across them with only the track surface used as the variable is unreliable. What needs to be studied is over time what impact has the surface change had on the mortality/injury statistics for the given tracks, with a control group of tracks not making the conversion. If those with the synthetic demonstrate that that one change significantly lessened the number of 'events' per thousand horses, it would be meaningful, as long as the control group didn't demonstrate the same or comparable lessening.
              Arendal Arabians and Sanctuary

              Comment


              • #8
                Oh, I'm sure all that is being studied, but all things will never be equal at all tracks. One track could be full of trainers who condition their horses superbly and would never ever run a sore horse, while another track might have more than its share of two-bit trainers who don't. That will certainly skew the results. But if injuries and fatalities start dropping at the synthetic tracks far more than at the others, that's something. Have to admit, though, that I'll really miss "that sound" of all those galloping hoofs. Worth the trade-off for welfare issues, but you do what you gotta do.

                Comment


                • #9
                  It's entirely possible that preventing catastrophic breakdowns may result in more mild injuries being reported, because instead of a catastrophic injury, a mild injury occurs.

                  When motorcycle helmet legislation came out, many people sited the increased neck injuries that the statistics showed. Supporters countered that of course, people aren't dying of catastrophic head crushing injuries - so we wind up with a live person and a neck injury. And then the debates started about which was better....to be alive with a neck injury or dead with a crushed skull.

                  It's quite possible that a catastrophic injury IS very often just a mild injury, until the animal hits a deep or hard spot (even with the most skilled track preparation in the world, it's still a natural surface and subject to some variation). It's quite possible that if you prevent the severe injury, you still are going to see a mild injury. It's quite possible that the synthetic surfaces prevent a mild injury from exploding.

                  If you have 2 breakdowns instead of 24 during a race meet, as one track did, you might wind up with 12 or 18 or even 24 mild injuries. That may make perfect sense.

                  That's the sort of thing statistics have a very hard time showing - that severe injuries just become mild injuries, rather than what is being charged, that a whole new group of mild injuries are occuring.

                  You can't have a real 'control' group in that sort of study, and you can't have two groups of identical horses, one group on synthetic and one on natural surfaces.

                  There is a very natural and well-established habit of horsepeople to resist change and new materials. However....the numbers in favor of synthetic surfaces are completely overwhelming. It does in fact vastly reduce the number of severe breakdowns. It usually takes time to perfect new technology - human athletic surfaces did take some time. But they still may be the solution.

                  We may have to embrace this new technology. Otherwise, we may see horse racing be completely banned. THe general public does not like these things - young horses breaking down and euthenized in front of millions of people. Racing is by its own reports struggling to draw in an audience these days, especially among young people.

                  Horse racing lovers may have no choice but to embrace new technology. It may be the only way to keep racing around.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    There is also a real question that needs to be answered before we put synthetics down everywhere about the impact to both the horses (and people) of breathing the surface in. It's reminiscent of asbestos (not saying it is, but the concept of the debris byproduct in the air) and there has been some serious discussion of that and it needs to be monitored.
                    "To understand the soul of a horse is the closest human beings can come to knowing perfection."

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      I think that can be managed. I have asthma and am very badly affected by any particulate matter, and I do very well around synthetic riding surfaces....HOWEVER....I think we also have to accept that synthetic surfaces ARE coming...already 1 state is mandating their use....I also think we have to accept that it may be that or kiss racing goodbye....and that the synthetic surfaces will improve with time. Synthetics are already being used for other riding sports...they can be developed and improved for racing.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        You can view a report on synthetic turf from the December '07 issue of The Horse by clicking here. You must register to view it, but that can be done in a moment's time.


                        There is also a detailed report on synthetic surfaces from The Bloodhorse available here.
                        The inherent vice of Capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings. The inherent virtue of Socialism is the equal sharing of miseries.
                        Winston Churchill

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          According to talk around CD, they will NEVER install polytrack. It would diminish what they are so proud of: Fast numbers on the track.

                          While I am no expert on either surface, I found that River Downs' dirt track seems to be one of the safest surfaces around. This is coming from trainers who run their horses at various venues in the area.
                          ************************
                          \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                            According to talk around CD, they will NEVER install polytrack. It would diminish what they are so proud of: Fast numbers on the track.

                            While I am no expert on either surface, I found that River Downs' dirt track seems to be one of the safest surfaces around. This is coming from trainers who run their horses at various venues in the area.

                            Actually if they want fast numbers, they should go to Polytrack. AP and Keeneland are ridiculous in cool weather or rain. They have had 3 new track records in two days at AP. Maiden claimers ran 6 furlongs in 1:08.2.

                            I wish all the tracks would keep their tracks deep, a lot of the cheap tracks are deeper and have a lot less breakdowns thanks to the extra cushion.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              i don't feel a lot of cushion and real deep is the answer either. You may not get as many fractures but it is very hard on tendons.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X