• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

What is the missing link?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What is the missing link?

    So another year and no TC. Curious what you all think the racing world is missing. By this I mean back in the 70's the Triple Crown had numerous winners, and years before that too. We have had many almost theres, many excuses too. What did the horses of yester-year have that we dont have now? More heart? Different training? Better breeding? Lets hear your thoughts.
    "To my Gub... Godspeed my friend, till we meet again." 1996-2007.
    Runway (Sasha) 2009 Zweibrucker filly by Redwine.

    "Silence is golden...and duct tape is silver."

  • #2
    IMHO they raced more/harder. By the time we saw T.C contenders the were excactly that horses that had earned the right to be there. Not won two big purse races with no idea how they would react to distances pressure fatigue etc.

    I don't know many sports where the best get better by doing less.

    Also although it seems like we've not had a T.C winner in a long time the gap between Citation and Secretariat was 1948-1973 The gap between Sir Barton and Gallant Fox 1919-1930. In total there have only been 11 T.C winners vs 92 years of racing. Odds are against it. Something special will come along some day .. maybe
    "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"


    • #3
      I personally think that in this country we are (and have been) perpetually breeding horses that have major conformation defaults, and that are really only bred for major speed in short distance races, not for horses that have the type of breeding that should be able to handle distances AND handle a full race schedule without having their feet and legs fall apart.
      I really like Animal Kingdom's bloodlines...I can only hope he continues to be a very successful racehorse, and that he will stand at stud (even if only part time) here in the US. His infusion of rare to the US blood (with no Mr. Prospector, Native Dancer or Storm Cat, just to name a few) would be a huge boon for diversifying the gene pool and maybe we'd start to get some more horses out there who can handle distance, can run well on multiple surfaces, and who don't have glass ankles.
      I also think there ought to be more criteria than JUST graded stakes earnings to get into the Triple Crown fields. Just because a horse runs one or two big races and wins, doesn't mean that they honestly have any business running in a classic (Uncle Mo, Midnight Interlude, et al).
      Last edited by ottb_dressage; May. 23, 2011, 12:20 PM.


      • #4
        I think part of the problem is that horses are now being bred for their commercial value-- looks matter more now than ever, and things are being done to these babies at a very young age to ensure that when they go to the yearling sales, that they are the very best physical specimens they can be at that time-- ie: leg straightening procedures being done as short weanlings. To me this is doing the breed a great disservice, as these horses are being surgically altered from their natural skeletal positions, which is then passed on to the foals they produce, which is then passed on yet again. I feel the toughness of the "old school" type that it takes to win 3 races at Classic distances in a 5 week stretch has been bred out of the breed. Don't even get me started on the whole "medication" issue. The skeletal altering of foals I believe is the crux of the problem.

        That's my two cents... I have an opinion on how to halt this situation, and will gladly share it with you if you care to hear it-- I have devised a breeding system that I think could help bring both the overpopulation and the fragility of the thoroughbred breed back under control-- it's too bad it would never fly in the industry though.
        Last edited by pinkdiamondracing; May. 23, 2011, 12:09 PM. Reason: dyslexic fingers
        The only difference between a runaway and a fast gallop is nothing but a SMILE
        Most horses cross the Rainbow Bridge, but TEDDY JUMPED IT!!!
        Member of the COTH Enabler Clique


        • #5
          There was a very long TC drought between Citation and Secretariat. Just as in the years immediately preceding Citation, there was a brief period of Triple Crown winners--3 in 4 or 5 years and I'd add The Bid, even if he didn't win. Then back to the drought. But during it, we had a period where there were truly legitimate contenders-- Silver Charm, Charismatic, and Real Quiet. (1997-2002) IMO, we haven't had what I'd call a legitimate contender since.

          Why? I'd suggest that the vast majority of TBs simply are not being bred for classic distances, so the pool of horses to run in those races is thin at best. We're getting the biggest frog in a little pond; rather than the best frog in the vasty deep.
          "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
          Thread killer Extraordinaire


          • #6
            I don't know a lot about TB racing but my gut would say maybe the opposite of what others have said: now there are so many colts who CAN go as much as is required for the larger stake races. No? Yes? Speed records aren't being set much anymore on the TB racing side, no? The last two were Affirmed and Secretariat. I don't think anyone here will argue that Secretariat was a freak. That being the case..when's the last time we had a "freak" on our hands? Affirmed and Alydar slugged it out and where were the rest of them?

            Another thing: IMHO, the Kentucky Derby is such a crapshoot bc just too much can happen with so many horses. My honest opinion? Slightly cleaner trip and Afleet Alex would have been your most recent TC winner.


            • #7
              Afleet Alex was for real, and I think maybe Smarty Jones and Funny Cide, too. I think there are alot of factors that come into play. Where there 20 horses in the Derby 30 yrs ago? I was thinking there were 15? 20 horses leaves alot of the race up to "trip", though it was not a factor this year, IMO.

              The commercial breeding programs have darn near killed us. Trying to train these "hothouse orchids" to actually race and hold up is a nightmare.

              I am not sure, however, that our problems are not exacerbated by the speeding up of the track surfaces. Speed = Force, one of the basic laws of physics. So, now we have flawed conformation and weaker bred horses running faster that they should be do to ultra-tight surfaces. More of a problem out here in the west, but still a problem most places.


              • Original Poster

                Great input, thanks guys. Would love to hear more. i know there were big gaps in the TC's, but it seems that the past horses were just stronger, ran more, and longer. Now they lose and are retired at 3 yrs old. I also recall some great horses with gastly conformation faults being some of the best! Pretty is as pretty does! lol
                "To my Gub... Godspeed my friend, till we meet again." 1996-2007.
                Runway (Sasha) 2009 Zweibrucker filly by Redwine.

                "Silence is golden...and duct tape is silver."


                • #9
                  Alot of those TC winners only face a 2-3 other horses in the Belmont, think of how many near misses would have won had you taken one horse out of that race?

                  I think it's funny that how many years of near misses follow a trend....

                  -The Longshot or at least not so highly regarded horse upset wins the Derby.
                  -The favorite in that race usually has traffic trouble or some other excuse and often ends up running 2nd.
                  -The underdog wins the Preakness easily, often by a number of lengths and in good time
                  -The Derby favorite comes back and finally gets retribution or a bad ride does in the almost TC winner in the Belmont


                  • #10
                    Hard to forget Sunday Silence, as well. What if there were no Easy Goer? But I'm so glad I got to see SS on TV in the TC races, even if he was only 2 out of 3 for them, man what a crazy-gorgeous horse.

                    And seeing Afleet Alex get back up from his knees is one of the all-time best athletic performance memories for me, so far. There has still been some good stuff since the '70s, at least.
                    Fear is the rocket sauce.
                    Jack Black


                    • #11
                      It's not really the races that are so attractive to a lot of owners, one might speculate, but the added value in the breeding shed for a KY Derby winner. As long as racing revolves around breeding/sales values rather than racing value, there will be far more horses to try the Derby than would ever have a legitimate chance.
                      "I'm a lumberjack, and I'm okay."
                      Thread killer Extraordinaire


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by vineyridge View Post
                        It's not really the races that are so attractive to a lot of owners, one might speculate, but the added value in the breeding shed for a KY Derby winner. As long as racing revolves around breeding/sales values rather than racing value, there will be far more horses to try the Derby than would ever have a legitimate chance.
                        Yep. It's kind of sad to see half the field in a TC race with really no credentials other than having finished 3rd in a Grade II prep race.


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Mara View Post
                          Yep. It's kind of sad to see half the field in a TC race with really no credentials other than having finished 3rd in a Grade II prep race.
                          ahh but look at how many horses truly just blossomed during the TC. I mean, Sir Barton was a MAIDEN in the Ky Derby! And he went on to become one of the greatest runners of his time. There have been plenty of horses who didn't do their best running until the TC races. BUT...how many of those horses actually did anything BEYOND the TC?

                          It does seem that the majority of the TC winners were spectacular 2 year olds. Assault, Omaha and Sir Barton however, were lightly regarded going into the Derby and all of them were able to prove their worth as champions post TC.

                          Look at many of the near misses. How many of them actually carried on as champions AFTER the TC races. Seems many of them either faded away or never quite rose to the highest ranks of racing, that would prove they deserved the right to be TC winners.

                          Nowadays there is so much breeding speed and precocity vs stamina and longevity that is why we don't see those champion 2 year olds going on to win the TC races. They have become 2 totally separate kinds of horses, when back in the day, those horses were bred for speed AND stamina. They had it all.

                          ETA: Are Derby winners really more valuable at stud? Doesn't seem to me they are all that cherished by breeders, specially in a world of breeding for speed and precocity....


                          • #14
                            "Alot of those TC winners only face a 2-3 other horses in the Belmont, think of how many near misses would have won had you taken one horse out of that race?" (BansheeBreeze).

                            With the increase in value of the purses, there are a lot more horses entered in all of the triple crown races than in previous times. What were the sizes of the fields for the triple crown winners? (Darn small, I'll bet).

                            If all of those "almosts" had faced smaller fields we might have had several triple crown winners.


                            • #15
                              So many of our well-bred TBs spend months or years on end in sales prep now, instead of running in pastures with their buddies. A colt may go through the sales ring as a weanling, yearling, and 2YO, spending most of his life in a stall. When he's put into training, conditioners try to make up for a lack of bone density that would have occurred naturally if the colt was out with his pasturemates moving around all the time, running and playing.

                              We're raising blemish-free stall babies, not tough pasture colts. To some extent, it's like raising a child in a bathroom, only letting him out for team basketball practice, and expecting him to become the next Michael Jordan.


                              • #16
                                Nerud smiled mischievously and added, “You know what the cause of most unsoundness is these days? Commercial breeding. Breeders are trying to sell the most expensive yearlings they can, so they choose a stallion with the most market appeal, not because he was the best mate for their mare...”


                                • #17
                                  Breeding and sales theories aside (and I don't disagree with them), I'll throw this thought out there...and this is just for discussion, not a statement of fact.

                                  I can't get away from the fact that those earlier and closer together TC winners came during the Great Depression or the WWII and recovery years. Don't think there was alot of depth in those days. Oh, the great ones were, and still are, great ones. Maybe there wasn't alot of "bench strength" in those bloated fields...in fact, IIRC, that was part of the reason they limited entries, too many that didn't belong in the way of those that did.

                                  You might even say that the last three TC winners had similar benefit, that I do not know, you'd need to research who else they faced. I know some of those years were not economic gems either and I know I remember Seretariat being labeled "the best of the worst 3 year old crop in years" (yeah I do remember correctly, sad to say as an adult. heard and read that several times). But the pundits always say stuff like that, or used to anyway. Now they all but throw glitter on the horse du jour handled by a celeb trainer or focus on some Cinderella story that is fun and good enough but ultimately not going to live up to the hype. We get distracted from the fact there are many that can do it some years, like this year of alot of very good horses.

                                  If the industry has disintegrated as much as it sometimes seems, it would not have produced those 3 recent near misses by 3 good horses in years with, obviously, enough depth to beat them in very close races.

                                  Maybe we DO breed more and better horses and that means more depth of quality? More get to the gate that belong there?

                                  And, suppose that the foal crop is smaller in these bad economic times? Less depth? More chance a high quality colt has a better chance to sweep??

                                  Like I said, just something to think about and maybe research of you are bored enough. I don't have the answers, just the thoughts.
                                  When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                                  The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.