• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

DRF: Trainers respond to Irwin's comments

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • DRF: Trainers respond to Irwin's comments

    http://www.drf.com/news/kentucky-der...nt-about-lying

    This whole Irwin thing prods me to bring up an issue I've had for some time now.

    Having had experience owning a piece of a minor partnership in recent years, and having seen a lot of finger pointing, (managing partner to trainer and back - I side with the trainer), I'm curious how much others have experienced this kind of dissension. I've read a bit about Irwin's comments, and on the web there have been some grumblings about accounts outstanding, etc. - true or untrue.

    As sig other once said in a TOBA introduction to racing forum, "So what happens when someone bails out of the partnership? Who pays the bills?"

    I love that partnerships are a viable option for owning, when you couldn't otherwise pay for a race horse. However, I now see so much room for manipulation of funds, and even Bernie Maddox/pyramid schemes where partnership number 1 hasn't paid its bills, so they seek new members for partership number 2, and so on. Not good for the industry on top of other issues at the present time.

    These thoughts are NOT to detract from AK's win nor as an affront to Team Valor - I'm ecstatic that Graham Motion won, and my wallet is happy as well. I'm just curious about others' experiences and thoughts on dysfunctional partnerships.
    But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson

  • #2
    I just think his comments (considering the time and place) were inappropriate for the circumstances. The comments made it a little bit tougher to be happy for Team Valor winning the Derby. (Although this in NO way diminished the feeling of happiness for the trainer, jockey and horse winning).
    www.springwillowsfarm.com

    Comment


    • #3
      Are you talking about his comments on the way to the winner's circle? It seemed like he just answered the reporter's question a little more candidly than anyone might have expected!

      Or did he make more comments later? If so, is there a link to a transcript or video?

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm talking about on the way to the winner's circle. Candid or not, they seemed a little un-sportsmanlike.
        www.springwillowsfarm.com

        Comment


        • #5
          MOST trainers are honest with their owners.

          But in this day of partnerships and factory style training of multiple strings? There have been some high profile cases of bad behavior, questionable aquisitions and head scratching choices of big races for said aquisitions. At the expense of the various syndicate/partnerships. Probably because nobody is in charge excpt some CPA or in a position to advocate for the horses and what is actually best for them.

          It may have been blunt and off the cuff along with a bit of poor sportsmanship/playing the blame game. But there was some truth to it and it should not be dismissed.
          When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

          The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

          Comment


          • #6
            More details:
            http://www.drf.com/news/kentucky-der...nt-about-lying

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by MHM View Post
              yeah...but somebody should point out to that NYT sports guy that Irwin was not referring to "corruption".

              Just misleading owners about the quality of their purchases, their training progress (or lack thereof) and putting them in races where they don't belong.

              That is, unfortunately, business as usual in too many race and show barns to keep the income stream going.


              And good for Team Valor for getting their own training center so the horses can have an actual home base.
              When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

              The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

              Comment


              • #8
                More comments from Irwin:
                http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/13/sp...ef=todayspaper

                Comment


                • #9
                  Y'all ought to read this, thanks MHM.

                  Much truth there, he can speak out of turn if he wants...maybe some feelings and egos need a little bruising from within the industry before the powers that be outside do it for them.

                  Imagine that, an actual training center instead of life at one track after another-and telling the truth to an owner. Astonishing.
                  When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

                  The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by findeight View Post
                    Much truth there, he can speak out of turn if he wants...maybe some feelings and egos need a little bruising from within the industry before the powers that be outside do it for them.
                    From Bill Finley (ESPN/NYT) 5-10-11

                    OK, Barry Irwin is not the most diplomatic person, maybe he picked the wrong time and place to make his infamous "I got tired of trainers lying to me" comment, and if you called him arrogant or a pain in the butt you wouldn't be alone. And I wish this sport had about 1,000 more just like him.
                    Long before Animal Kingdom came around, Irwin gave a bunch of horses to trainer Ralph Nicks. Nicks and veterinarian David Bryant were suspended 15 days and fined $500 after the vet was caught injecting a Team Valor horse before a 2004 race at Belmont. Immediately, Nicks was fired.

                    "Team Valor has a zero-tolerance policy with regards to drugs," Irwin said at the time. "We had no choice other than to do what we did. This was the most difficult business decision I've ever had to make, because we like Ralph and we think he is an outstanding horseman."

                    Nicks is hardly the sport's worst miscreant and has stayed out of trouble since. But he did something wrong, was caught and had to go.
                    That said having gone through 40-trainers in 5-years suggests that Irwin won't stop with Graham, no matter how much of a public boy scout he is and even with success. Irwin might garner applause on his remarks in general - although nobody should say it was the right time whatsoever - I still think at best its worthy of a golf clap in the context of who is saying it.

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #11
                      Originally posted by findeight View Post
                      MOST trainers are honest with their owners.

                      nobody is in charge excpt some CPA or in a position to advocate for the horses and what is actually best for them.

                      It may have been blunt and off the cuff along with a bit of poor sportsmanship/playing the blame game. But there was some truth to it and it should not be dismissed.
                      Sadly those in charge are often now big time gamblers, not just CPAs. And the bottom line is getting the horse to pay for himself, NOT what's best for the horse, even though in the long run, it may be best for the partnership. And those who "know everything" because they've read all the books, can quote all the stats, and drop sire's names...yet cannot identify a hoof pick. They are running the show as managing partners.

                      I'm no longer, but sig other still is, in a partnership group with a former "possible Classic horse", now running every 2 weeks for 10k, with known issues on the track. Said managing partner consistently blamed classic trainer, saying he (managing partner) "didn't know" about horse's issues... said the same about horses in previous partnerships, whenever there was a change in plans, a delay in running, or attending a particular meet. As for sig other's current 10k claimer, when we got to chat with the trainer before horse was moved, found the horse had some injury concerns, so we confronted managing partner directly - he still played dumb. Managing partner found "new trainer", and is repeating the same scenario. This, in spite of the fact that those I brought into the partnership would have been fine hearing the truth, and waiting to see what happened.

                      Others continue to compliment the emperors' new clothes.


                      I'm frankly on the fence about Barry Irwin, and thought there probably is a lot of truth to what he said, as there certainly are trainers who hide issues. Just not ours, and managing partner placed all the blame on an outstanding trainer...

                      From today's NY Times article, “A lot of trainers do not have the confidence in themselves to give out bad news,” Irwin said. “They hide stuff and hope against hope that they can resolve a bad situation before having to tell you about it. I can’t have that.”

                      I'm afraid that the same is true of some managing partners, who also can't tell the truth about unpaid bills, continue to look for new funds for more new partnerships, brag about the good times they can all have at the track, what it's like being in the paddock and the winner's circle, and pay token donations to rescues... but meanwhile not put the horses' welfare as a priority.

                      And that is what I want in a partnership.
                      But he thought, "This procession has got to go on." So he walked more proudly than ever, as his noblemen held high the train that wasn't there at all. H.C.Anderson

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X