• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.



Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

rags to riches?

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • rags to riches?

    Maybe I missed the thread.. but does anyone know what is up with Rags to Riches? Is she coming back or is she retired?

    I just watched the 07 belmont stakes... what a stretch run!!

  • #2
    I have been wondering about her, too. I don't think she's retired. But I haven't heard anything about her being in training or returning to the races, either.

    Maybe Glimmerglass will dig up some info for us.

    On a related note, she has a 3-year-old half-brother (by Mineshaft). His name is Casino Drive. He is supposed to be heading for the Belmont.


    • #3
      I wouldn't be shocked if she never returns to racing, but for right now she is galloping and will put in a formal work someday but not yet - Jan 2008:

      Trainer Todd Pletcher reported that Belmont Stakes winner Rags to Riches galloped for the first time since rejoining his stable at Palm Beach Downs last week.

      "She looks great but will probably need at least 30 days before we think about having her work," said Pletcher.
      Those comments just sound like Todd giving fair warning not to expect anything, anytime soon.

      Nothing new since Oct 2007 with her blog


      • Original Poster

        THanks for the updates!


        • #5
          My friend saw her last week in FLA with Pletcher's operation. I think she's at Palm Meadows.
          F O.B
          Resident racing historian ~~~ Re-riders Clique
          Founder of the Mighty Thoroughbred Clique


          • #6
            She posted her first official workout:

            DRF: 3-11-08 Location: PBD Distance: 3F Time: 0:38.40 Surface: Dirt


            • #7
              Rags To Riches retired

              I can't believe no one has posted this yet!!!

              Rags to Riches retired, DRF 3/24/08

              Rags to Riches retired
              By MIKE WELSCH
              HALLANDALE BEACH, Fla. – Rags To Riches, the champion 3-year-old filly in 2007, has been retired, trainer Todd Pletcher confirmed Monday.

              Rags to Riches, who defeated Horse of the Year Curlin to win the 2007 Belmont Stakes, was sidelined by a hairline fracture in her right front pastern suffered during the Gazelle Stakes at Belmont on Sept. 15. The Gazelle was her only defeat in six career starts.

              Rags to Riches, who is owned by Michael B. Tabor and Derrick Smith, returned to training with Pletcher at Palm Beach Downs earlier this winter and was scheduled to have her third work Tuesday.

              "It's the same injury, a hairline P1 fracture, and it just looked like it wasn't going to hold up," Pletcher said. "I wasn't happy with the way she galloped yesterday [Sunday], we took some additional X-rays, and after discussing the situation with Mr. Tabor, we agreed it wasn't worth the risk of continuing on with her."

              Pletcher said Rags To Riches will be bred to Giant's Causeway later this spring.
              So who's surprised?
              Don't fall for a girl who fell for a horse just to be number two in her world... ~EFO


              • #8
                Zero shock.

                In fact I'm more shocked she returned at all to racing even the one time.


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Glimmerglass View Post
                  In fact I'm more shocked she returned at all to racing even the one time.
                  You and me both.
                  Don't fall for a girl who fell for a horse just to be number two in her world... ~EFO


                  • #10
                    I wanto to know who proof reads this stuff. Rags was beaten twice in her career, the Gazelle and her debut.
                    F O.B
                    Resident racing historian ~~~ Re-riders Clique
                    Founder of the Mighty Thoroughbred Clique


                    • #11
                      Well I'm not surprised...but I have to say I did expect her to race again. The connections seemed to have every intention of bringing her back (ie, she was in training). There's much to be cynical about in the TB world, but I do try to take some things at face value. And since I didn't foresee that she would be injured, I also didn't foresee an early retirement.

                      At any rate, I'm sorry we won't get to see her race at four.


                      • Original Poster

                        Not at all surprised as that is the "way of things" it seems..

                        Breeding her to giant's causeway...? wow!


                        • #13
                          Not suprised either but after all the talk before and after the Belmont about how the owners race for the fans etc etc (I'm sure you all remember), this sure makes all that talk BS. On the other hand, she did re-injure that thing, so what can you do? Oh well, to me, she'll just be another flash in the pan, ala Smarty. Too bad


                          • #14
                            Not surprised, but it is still a letdown. It makes you not want to get excited about a talented horse, because most of them don't stay around past their three-year-old year. That's why it is such a treat that Curlin is running this year. We should all write thank-you notes to Jess Jackson.


                            • #15
                              With all due respect to those of you who are so critical of the owners and trainer, the horse apparently is not sound. If you owned her, would you tell Pletcher to just ice the ankle, give her plenty of bute, and run her sore?


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by ejm View Post
                                With all due respect to those of you who are so critical of the owners and trainer, the horse apparently is not sound.
                                If I sounded critical of Pletcher, et al let me be clear - I'm not with respect to the decision not to run her and retire her.

                                What I am saying is that I've always thought deep down since she came out injured in September was that she was done there and then. No need to draw it out and play games suggesting she'll return. I've always thought that was a hollow sentiment and it only became that much more of a farce as time went on.

                                I think they've observed the ire of fans with regards to early retirement and how others are praised for keeping horses going. So they held off her retirement. Yet the must've known she'd never perform again as she did at the Belmont. Another loss would (aside from further injury) only going to continue to take the luster off that historic, monumental, and inspiring duel against Curlin.

                                Re-read my posting (#3) above with the quotes from Pletcher a month ago. He knew then she wasn't going to return to racing. Her final workout was simply for public relations.
                                Last edited by Glimmerglass; Mar. 25, 2008, 11:50 AM.


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by ejm View Post
                                  With all due respect to those of you who are so critical of the owners and trainer, the horse apparently is not sound. If you owned her, would you tell Pletcher to just ice the ankle, give her plenty of bute, and run her sore?
                                  I can't speak for everyone, but I'm not "critical" per se. Of course nobody wants them racing an unsound horse.

                                  But this is not a life or death injury we're dealing with. Nor is it a career ending injury. Even if she is ever so slightly NQR on it now (which I doubt), a little more time and it would be good as gone.

                                  However, there's that risk that Rags might not run back at her previous level. Heaven forbid she gets beat again and deflates her record, even slightly. Especially when she could be on the farm producing one more foal that will sell for 6 figures.

                                  Racing is barely about the races anymore, but rather the race to the breeding shed and sales ring. And that's not Pletcher or Tabor's fault necessarily. But it is very frustrating for the fans when this happens again, and again, and again...
                                  Don't fall for a girl who fell for a horse just to be number two in her world... ~EFO


                                  • #18
                                    If they had really planned to retire her with no 2008 campaign, they would have sent her to the farm last fall to let down, bred her February 15, and she'd be in foal now. By industry standards she is retiring really late in the breeding season, and if they can't get her in foal in the next 3-4 weeks I'd bet they'll let her go until the 2009 breeding season anyway.


                                    • #19
                                      While it is sad she won't be returning to racing- lets all look at the broghter side of things that these trainers didn't push this filly to do more than her legs could handle. At least they arn't going to risk her life on the track on a fragile leg like many trainers do trying to squeeze out every last dollar, instead she'll live a happy retirement making foals. Happy retirement!


                                      • #20
                                        the slightest fracture to any animals leg isn't every going tobe just "good a new" especially when your dealing with the demand racing has on a horse's legs. I can only imagine if this filly had a life or death situation after returning to racing and hearing everyone complain about how sad that story could've been. Its for the better and she deserves it.