• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

No more tat searches...petty people

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • No more tat searches...petty people

    Due to someone getting there britches in a bunch over me supplying people with tatoo searches, I am no longer able to do that. Someone notified my resource that I was doing this outside of my job and was asked not to anymore.
    I still have access to the info (it’s part of my job) I can’t do it for anyone else. I’m amazed at how petty some people can be. The info supplied was only helpful to the horse and owner. But someone who pays for the service just couldn’t stand that people were getting their info for nothing
    I’m sorry for the horses that may never get identified and their connections. I hope the others who have supplied the info are able to continue to do so
    Success is a journey not a destination.

  • #2
    I am so sorry that happened. I can't thank you enough tirnanog for finding out who the new gelding I got in was. He didn't come with papers, no history, someone bought him and sent him here to be started. Now we all know who he is and it's just really comforting. The owner was told he was a Two Punch baby but who knows, without that tattoo. That was just awesome what you did for us and the horse! I am just really sorry that someone was so petty.

    Thank you again!
    WestWind Farms
    Love means attention, which means looking after the things we love. We call this stable management.
    - George H. Morris

    Comment


    • #3
      ditto, thank you so much for helping us all. what a shitty thing to do to you.you are just trying to help the horses!
      www.camaloufarms.com

      ride it like you stole it! "ralph hill"

      Comment


      • #4
        Takes all kinds, doesn't it? Gotta feel pity for someone so miserable within their own skin and so jealous that someone has or can get something they can't that they have to be hateful and lash out at someone they don't even know. Was your providing this information to an individual harming the informant in some way? Taking something out of their pocket? No, I certainly don't think so. Sure would hate to be the informant and have to look at myself in the mirror every morning.
        In an age when scientists are creating artificial intelligence, too many of our educational institutions seem to be creating artificial stupidity.—Thomas Sowell, Is Thinking Obsolete?

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by tirnanog View Post
          Due to someone getting there britches in a bunch over me supplying people with tatoo searches, I am no longer able to do that. Someone notified my resource that I was doing this outside of my job and was asked not to anymore.
          I still have access to the info (it’s part of my job) I can’t do it for anyone else. I’m amazed at how petty some people can be. The info supplied was only helpful to the horse and owner. But someone who pays for the service just couldn’t stand that people were getting their info for nothing
          I’m sorry for the horses that may never get identified and their connections. I hope the others who have supplied the info are able to continue to do so
          That sucks! What kind of petty person would want to get you into trouble for being nice? That's just stupid...
          View my photographs at www.horsephotoguy.zenfolio.com

          Comment


          • #6
            Not to pee in anyone's cheerio's here but tatoo lookups through the JC (whatever they call the website now) are just not that expensive. Yes, it's nice to be the hero, but yes, all us regular people have to shell out our $5 or $10 for the information on tatoo, name, pedigree, whatever. It's just not that much. I actually wondered how someone that didn't work for the JC had "free" access to that information. I don't think that if in the course of someone's employment, they have access to information, not available to the general public for free, that it should be "given away" no matter how well intentioned a reason. Anyone with access to this bb also can access the JC information system. Doing it all under the onus of "helping poor horses and owners" doesn't really fly. Nice to know what old suchafuss did while racing and who his daddy was, but it's not a life or death matter, and it apparently is proprietary information that the JC compiles, maintains, and expects to be compensated for regurgitating. I always thought that a tat lookup and pedigree should be free, but apparently the JC doesn't and they do have administrative costs for maintaining this data base. It would be a bit like going to an apple orchard after hours, picking apples that don't belong to you and taking them to your barn and giving them to all your friends. Sure, THEY think you are wonderful, but the apple guy doesn't like it much. So it isn't really about someone with their panties in a wad, it's about not doing something that you really aren't supposed to be doing in the first place. If you worked for my company, under our corporate policy, you'd be terminated.

            Comment


            • #7
              re: sourpuss

              Well, I guess we figured out who just "couldn't stand for it", on ethical grounds of course. BTW. the search is for either $35 or $50, not $5 or $10 and I don't think you need to back up your displeasure because of the poor Jockey Club needing to be paid because of "administration" fees. This service could and should be made available to the general public since all of the original fees to document this were paid by the owner/breeders in any case. Entering them into a database is done at the time of registration and the Jockey Club holds a monopoly on this information. Not that I recommend the Robin Hood approach, but really, do you think they were being robbed?
              "We, too, will be remembered not for victories or defeats in battle or in politics, but for our contribution to the human spirit." JFK

              Comment


              • #8
                It doesn't matter to me one way or the other, really, except that the OP was griping about her employers not letting her use her access to company information to do freebee searches for her bb buddies. She could have just said "hey, I got caught, can't do it anymore", but no, she has to tell everyone how "wronged" she is and how hateful and petty people are being because she is giving information away that isn't supposed to be free. She got a warning, which was fortunate. There are places that are not so forgiving.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Actually I agree with 2ndy...

                  It's really not that hard to call up the people with that information and get the research done. I've done it twice, both times when I was a teenager with no income, LOL

                  It sucks, but there is a system, it's not that hard or expensive to use. It seems that if you have access to a system that usually costs money, and are giving the info out, you are undermining the people you work for (or however it is you have access to that information). It's basically a database, and it's owned by certain people- so giving it out for free is cheating them, IMO.

                  It's like me working for the agency I work for. I'd be fired for giving out information outside the regulated channels (if not prosecuted). Of course I get asked all the time if I can provide certain info- and it might be "nice" of me to do so, but highly unethical.

                  It was nice of you, but honestly isn't it sort of unethical? I dunno. I didn't care enough about it to "report you" or anything, and maybe I'm biased by my own workplace rules, but... *shrug*
                  "smile a lot can let us ride happy,it is good thing"

                  My CANTER blog.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    As I said the only reason the Jockey Club "owns" the information is because it has already been paid for, after all, all we are talking about is being able to identify a horse. It does not give you the ownership of the horse or anything else. They monopolize information, but I suppose that goes with the new ideology of the "Information Age". Not really helping out the horses are they? I do not see her committing some ethics violations to simply tell someone who their horse is, the principle reason for the database is to promote the integrity of the Thoroughbred bloodlines and maintain the honesty of the industry as far as racing/breeding/showing. But some people just do not have such a charitable outlook. Sorry that someone believed this to be such a problem that they had to tattle to her employer.
                    "We, too, will be remembered not for victories or defeats in battle or in politics, but for our contribution to the human spirit." JFK

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Personally, I have a lot of heartburn with the way the jockey club does business in the first place. The fees to register are exorbitant, $200. to register a foal, $550. to register a yearling, $750 to register a 2 year old - and I think something like $2k for an older horse???? Give me a break! Why on earth should the fees be THAT much more expensive for an older horse. And what do you get for this money, what kind of service? NADA! I lost a mare several years back and learned she had 2 full sisters. I tried to get the name of the last owner of record from the jockey club. They don't divulge that information, "not their job". DUH! I bought her race record, tracked down the last listed trainer who gave me the name of the owner who told me she'd been sold to "somebody" from Tennessee to breed paints. So, I contacted the paint horse association, gave them the name of the mare and asked for any progeny and who the breeder would be. They gave me the breeder's name, town and state, names of the foals she'd had and enough pertinent information I was able to track her down, contacted the owners and bought her. And I wasn't even a paying member! And their registration fees are a fraction of the thoroughbreds. I have, on occasion, had to jump through hoops to get a foal registered and had to jump through hoops to get one named. If I'm not mistaken, all that information is on a computer, how much administration fees can it be to type in a tattoo number and find a freakin' name???????? And I really don't have a problem at paying $10. or so for an answer, but $35.? Give me a break. So, if someone who works there wants to do something as innocuous as providing a name to match a tattoo to some new owner, sure isn't any skin of my nose. Might even be a money maker for the jockey club as they might then pay for the race record for said horse which is substantially cheaper than tracking down a tattoo. So, yeah, I think whoever reported op was being a little petty.
                      In an age when scientists are creating artificial intelligence, too many of our educational institutions seem to be creating artificial stupidity.—Thomas Sowell, Is Thinking Obsolete?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        The Jockey Club has very high standards, and much like logging on to websites to do research on individuals, some information is free and some information you have to pay for. Was it petty for someone to narc on the OP, maybe, but the fact remains that if you have access to information that is not supposed to be made available for free and you give it away, just because you can, then you are wrong. This is black and white. Not gray. It does not keep anyone from knowing "who" their horse is. It keeps them from finding out for "free". Nice? Maybe not, but considering the scope and amount of records the JC keeps, should we just presume it doesn't have any overhead? And someone, is PAYING the OP for whatever job it is she does. I guess if she were a nurse and you wanted to find out where your low life ex husband was so you could get your child support check, she'd just access his medical records and let you know where he lives and where he works now. And who else is on his insurance. It isn't really any different, the reason for needing to know information does not outweigh the fact that the dissemination of it was wrong.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          This is a horse not a person, very poor comparison. High standards? I think it is purely a money making proposition. The owner of a horse has to pay them to identify their own horse. That is a high standard? This is a silly debate, the Jockey Club is notorious for it's outrageous fees, pure and simple. It is as bad as the AKC and just about as helpful to the animals. Perhaps she did not exercise good judgement but she was not doing so to make herself "heroic", she just thought it was a decent thing to do. How cynical can you get.
                          "We, too, will be remembered not for victories or defeats in battle or in politics, but for our contribution to the human spirit." JFK

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            And I would bet, that petty person accesses COTH and other internet sites, while he/she is at work. That's a no-no too.
                            ************************
                            \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I think the point here is that, regardless of how one feels about the OP's actions, it does seem a bit overboard to potentially negatively impact someone's career over something fairly minor they are doing on a BB.

                              To the OP, I'm sorry and I hope it didn't cause any problems for you.

                              I've always found the JC reasonable for fees, dealing with, etc. Now, the AQHA - that's a ripoff IMO. I think it's just what you're used to. The JC has a slightly different mindset than some of the other registries. They encourage horses to be registered early to prevent people from only registering horses just prior to racing. Also, despite being the breed registry, it really is a race-oriented registry - hence the spinoff of the PHR. Their system works really well for what it is designed for - but, admittedly is not so user-friendly for OTTB owners.
                              Last edited by SleepyFox; Jan. 16, 2008, 08:14 AM. Reason: failed Eng 101

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I think it's incredibly petty that someone "reported" you.

                                The JC tattoo look up is more expensive than it needs to be.

                                Thanks for you help with tattoo look up in the past.
                                True North Dressage
                                Select Cheval Canadiens for dressage and eventing
                                www.TrueNorthDressage.com

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  I'm not saying it wasn't nice or helpful, but isn't it essentially stealing?

                                  Yeah, someone may have been "petty" in reporting it, but honestly now, you got asked to stop because you were doing something wrong (nice, helpful, but wrong). It's like blaming the cops for pulling you over when you were the one speeding in the first place.
                                  "smile a lot can let us ride happy,it is good thing"

                                  My CANTER blog.

                                  Comment

                                  • Original Poster

                                    #18
                                    I actually wondered how someone that didn't work for the JC had "free" access to that information.
                                    I do NOT work for the Jockey Club, don't make ASSumptions.

                                    I don't think that if in the course of someone's employment, they have access to information, not available to the general public for free, that it should be "given away" no matter how well intentioned a reason.
                                    Why not?

                                    Doing it all under the onus of "helping poor horses and owners" doesn't really fly.
                                    Why not, what's the problem?


                                    Nice to know what old suchafuss did while racing and who his daddy was, but it's not a life or death matter,
                                    Sometimes it is.

                                    and it apparently is proprietary information that the JC compiles, maintains, and expects to be compensated for regurgitating.
                                    I suppose the Jockey club does, but since I don't get my info from them, how does that apply?


                                    It would be a bit like going to an apple orchard after hours, picking apples that don't belong to you and taking them to your barn and giving them to all your friends.
                                    Not at all...I have complete permission to pick all the apples I want, whenever I want. The apples are there for me to use for the sole purpose of identifying those apples and occasionally share that info.
                                    The problem came about because of 1 disgruntled person/s who couldn't stand that they BOUGHT there apples and and subsequently told the farmer that they didn't think it was fair and I shouldn't be allowed to share my apples.
                                    Hence, the new policy is to not share the apples.
                                    IT ONLY TAKES ONE BAD APPLE TO RUIN IT FOR EVERYONE ELSE.


                                    So it isn't really about someone with their panties in a wad, it's about not doing something that you really aren't supposed to be doing in the first place.
                                    Another false ASSumption. Let me reiterate, NO ONE, not the farmer, not my boss, not the program from which I get my info, had a problem with me sharing the info until someone made a stink about it.

                                    If you worked for my company, under our corporate policy, you'd be terminated
                                    .

                                    Thank God I don't work for your company.
                                    Success is a journey not a destination.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by 2ndyrgal View Post
                                      The Jockey Club has very high standards, and much like logging on to websites to do research on individuals, some information is free and some information you have to pay for. Was it petty for someone to narc on the OP, maybe, but the fact remains that if you have access to information that is not supposed to be made available for free and you give it away, just because you can, then you are wrong. This is black and white. Not gray. It does not keep anyone from knowing "who" their horse is. It keeps them from finding out for "free". Nice? Maybe not, but considering the scope and amount of records the JC keeps, should we just presume it doesn't have any overhead? And someone, is PAYING the OP for whatever job it is she does. I guess if she were a nurse and you wanted to find out where your low life ex husband was so you could get your child support check, she'd just access his medical records and let you know where he lives and where he works now. And who else is on his insurance. It isn't really any different, the reason for needing to know information does not outweigh the fact that the dissemination of it was wrong.


                                      You are a real wanker.

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #20
                                        Jan. 15, 2008 07:01
                                        PM2ndyrgal
                                        It doesn't matter to me one way or the other, really, except that the OP was griping about her employers not letting her use her access to company information to do freebee searches for her bb buddies. She could have just said "hey, I got caught, can't do it anymore", but no, she has to tell everyone how "wronged" she is and how hateful and petty people are being because she is giving information away that isn't supposed to be free. She got a warning, which was fortunate. There are places that are not so forgiving
                                        I wouldn't call it "griping", just stating a heartfelt fact.

                                        Can I just say that you are an idiot.
                                        I didn't get "caught" doing anything. IT'S WHAT I DO!!! The only wronged person here is the one who would like to know who there horse is and can't afford to do multiple searches when they're not sure about the tat.
                                        I DIDN'T GET A WARNING....A new policy has been implemented to not share the info,which is at my fingertips,because of some stingy, cold hearted, jealous moron.
                                        But that is life... It only take one jerk to ruin for everyone.


                                        DO NOT BEGIN TO PRETENT YOU KNOW WHAT MY COMPANY'S POLICY IS.
                                        Success is a journey not a destination.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X