Sport Horse Spotlight

Real Estate Spotlight

1

Sale Spotlight

COTH_without Subscribe
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You�re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it�details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums� policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it�s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users� profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses � Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it�s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who�s selling it, it doesn�t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions � Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services � Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products � While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements � Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be �bumped� excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues � Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators� discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you�d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user�s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Ortiz Brothers

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • snaffle1987
    started a topic Ortiz Brothers

    Ortiz Brothers

    Did anyone see this video? Wait until the top 3 turn for home and look what happens. How did this not get caught by the stewards? How is this tolerated? You can obviously see elder Ortiz intentionally steering Carom in to Paco's horse on the final turn Not once, but multiple times.

    that was downright dirty and just plain dangerous
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_c...ture=emb_title

  • Nikki^
    replied
    Originally posted by McGurk View Post
    I watched the replay multiple times, and I didn't see a jockey intentionally steer a horse into another horse. I saw a tired horse not in the bridle under a lot of right handed whip pressure lugging into towards the rail because he was *done.* If I were going to criticize the jock, it would be for either 1.) not switching his whip hand to straighten the horse up a little or 2.) continuing to pressure a tired horse.

    But that's just my smurfy opinion.

    What do the actual racetrackers think?
    Are you blind? You see the jockey on the horse 7 looks at horse 1 (at 1:53) and PULLS his horse's head right into #1 horse. The jockey of #7 LEANS into horse #1. This was intentional and it could have ended up in a nasty accident.

    Leave a comment:


  • Palm Beach
    replied
    Originally posted by punchy View Post

    If they had put up the inquiry sign tho, they could have spoken to the riders on the phone right after the race and established a record. Waiting to investigate means the rider’s memories aren’t fresh, they have an opportunity to manufacture their responses, and their attorneys will be standing next to them when they talk to the stewards.
    There was no reason to delay in making the race official since there would be no change in order of finish. No point in making everyone stand around unnecessarily waiting for the trophy presentation that usually happens with a stakes race plus holding up millions of dollars in payouts. They had video, they watch the replays before talking to the riders, and they would always hold a hearing before suspending a rider, so the rider always has a chance to be represented. These riders are professionals and they had their explanations decided before they pulled up. And do you know for a fact that they did not call down to the clerk of scales and have the riders on the phone as soon as they weighed out? That is what usually happens when the stewards see questionable riding.

    Leave a comment:


  • punchy
    replied
    Originally posted by Palm Beach View Post

    No, it’s not. The stewards can review any action on or off the track regarding a licensee.
    If they had put up the inquiry sign tho, they could have spoken to the riders on the phone right after the race and established a record. Waiting to investigate means the rider’s memories aren’t fresh, they have an opportunity to manufacture their responses, and their attorneys will be standing next to them when they talk to the stewards.

    Leave a comment:


  • smoofox
    replied
    I finally watched the video... and from some posts here I was expecting a full on Head Play/Broker's Tip brawl.
    Not even close.

    Leave a comment:


  • On the Farm
    replied
    Originally posted by Palm Beach View Post
    I think he tugged the horse pretty hard to maintain his position. Whether or not that was necessary is irrelevant, but he did not seem to come in on the inside horse. BUT I have not seen the head on, which would show a lane change by either horse, so I'm not completely vested in my position. The jockey's JOB is to get the best possible finish for the owner. Keeping a horse boxed in that you know is going to finish in front of you is part of that JOB. If anything, the inside rider was aggressively trying to go outside the front runner.
    I watched the head on multiple times on my RTN subscription. The only thing that bothered me about Irad was that finishing the turn he was hanging on the inside pretty hard. Makes me wonder if Lopez turned Irad's horse trying to get out of the box he had allowed himself to be trapped in but that was not determinable in the head on views. Also if one follows the harrow tracks, Irad's horse pretty much stayed in line and Lopez was the one who came out a couple of paths in the stretch. It was rough race riding, but I feel that Irad was trying to keep the other horse boxed in to improve his chances of holding second. Just my opinion.

    Leave a comment:


  • Palm Beach
    replied
    I think he tugged the horse pretty hard to maintain his position. Whether or not that was necessary is irrelevant, but he did not seem to come in on the inside horse. BUT I have not seen the head on, which would show a lane change by either horse, so I'm not completely vested in my position. The jockey's JOB is to get the best possible finish for the owner. Keeping a horse boxed in that you know is going to finish in front of you is part of that JOB. If anything, the inside rider was aggressively trying to go outside the front runner.

    Leave a comment:


  • McGurk
    replied
    I watched the replay multiple times, and I didn't see a jockey intentionally steer a horse into another horse. I saw a tired horse not in the bridle under a lot of right handed whip pressure lugging into towards the rail because he was *done.* If I were going to criticize the jock, it would be for either 1.) not switching his whip hand to straighten the horse up a little or 2.) continuing to pressure a tired horse.

    But that's just my smurfy opinion.

    What do the actual racetrackers think?
    Last edited by McGurk; Jan. 7, 2020, 09:14 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • findeight
    replied
    Originally posted by skydy View Post

    It's a good thing that you aren't a jockey or otherwise involved in racing. Violence solves nothing and certainly doesn't help the sport.
    Well, feeding your stick to another jockey right after the race would certainly not require much replay of the race, contemplation or review of the complete situation before setting you down.

    Leave a comment:


  • skydy
    replied
    Originally posted by snaffle1987 View Post

    Yes very classy. Have to say; if I was Paco Lopez, Mr Ortiz would be pulling my riding whip out of his face after the finish.,.
    It's a good thing that you aren't a jockey or otherwise involved in racing. Violence solves nothing and certainly doesn't help the sport.

    Leave a comment:


  • snaffle1987
    replied
    Originally posted by Where'sMyWhite View Post

    The incident happened barely a week ago with a holiday bundled in that week...

    Post-race reviews may take a few weeks to actually be published if action is taken.
    I wasn't saying I was expecting something to come from it immediately. Most post-race decisions like this often take some time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Where'sMyWhite
    replied
    Originally posted by snaffle1987 View Post
    I was expecting something to come from it as far as sanctions. Not to change the outcome of the race but to maintain the integrity of the sport and enforce the safety aspect. There was little regard for either horse's safety that day.
    The incident happened barely a week ago with a holiday bundled in that week...

    Post-race reviews may take a few weeks to actually be published if action is taken.

    Leave a comment:


  • snaffle1987
    replied
    I was expecting something to come from it as far as sanctions. Not to change the outcome of the race but to maintain the integrity of the sport and enforce the safety aspect. There was little regard for either horse's safety that day.

    Leave a comment:


  • JJ'sLuckyTrain
    replied
    I haven't heard an update but the action did not effect the outcome of the race. They could still sanction him later.

    Leave a comment:


  • Palm Beach
    replied
    Originally posted by punchy View Post

    The stewards should have put up the inquiry sign right after the race. They could have chosen to not taken any action at that time, but that’s how the ball should get rolling.
    No, it’s not. The stewards can review any action on or off the track regarding a licensee.

    Leave a comment:


  • punchy
    replied
    Originally posted by Palm Beach View Post

    You have to watch the head-on view. How do you know the stewards did not react? I guarantee they looked very closely at the event and will probably discuss whether or not they will hold a hearing and possibly discipline Irad, if they have not done so already. They meet regularly to review issues and hold hearings. They raced Sunday, and are dark today and were dark yesterday. Tomorrow is New Years Day and they are racing. It’s possible they’ve already called him in and nobody knows about it.
    The stewards should have put up the inquiry sign right after the race. They could have chosen to not taken any action at that time, but that’s how the ball should get rolling.

    Leave a comment:


  • Palm Beach
    replied
    Originally posted by snaffle1987 View Post

    Yes very classy. Have to say; if I was Paco Lopez, Mr Ortiz would be pulling my riding whip out of his face after the finish.

    I understand Paco's horse eventually beat Ortiz on his mount after the interference which is likely why stewards did not react but there is no question in my mind that type of behavior put 2 horses in jeopardy and cost Paco's horse a potential win.

    Paco's horse is pretty classy. Despite the intense interference from the Ortiz horse; Paco's horse held his ground and barely bobbled. They should all be luck Paco's horse didn't end up in the rail. scary,.
    You have to watch the head-on view. How do you know the stewards did not react? I guarantee they looked very closely at the event and will probably discuss whether or not they will hold a hearing and possibly discipline Irad, if they have not done so already. They meet regularly to review issues and hold hearings. They raced Sunday, and are dark today and were dark yesterday. Tomorrow is New Years Day and they are racing. It’s possible they’ve already called him in and nobody knows about it.

    Leave a comment:


  • snaffle1987
    replied
    Originally posted by LaurieB View Post
    Classy comment from the trainer and co-owner of the second place finisher in response to the article on Paulick Report:

    [/COLOR]

    https://www.paulickreport.com/news/t...ok-for-racing/
    Yes very classy. Have to say; if I was Paco Lopez, Mr Ortiz would be pulling my riding whip out of his face after the finish.

    I understand Paco's horse eventually beat Ortiz on his mount after the interference which is likely why stewards did not react but there is no question in my mind that type of behavior put 2 horses in jeopardy and cost Paco's horse a potential win.

    Paco's horse is pretty classy. Despite the intense interference from the Ortiz horse; Paco's horse held his ground and barely bobbled. They should all be luck Paco's horse didn't end up in the rail. scary,.

    Leave a comment:


  • LaurieB
    replied
    Classy comment from the trainer and co-owner of the second place finisher in response to the article on Paulick Report:

    As a trainer and co-owner (my son Nick) of Shazier all we can do is move on, Its horse racing and Saturday we fell on the short end of the stick.
    My dream was win that race just because the love and respect that I have for Allen Jerkens.
    The Ortiz brothers are amazing jockeys and gentlemen in every way.
    Shazier ran a great race and came out the race healthy, that’s what the important thing is here.
    Congratulations to Todd and Jose.


    https://www.paulickreport.com/news/t...ok-for-racing/

    Leave a comment:


  • LaurieB
    replied
    Unfortunately this is not the first time.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X