Stallion Spotlight

BushyGeneology copy

Real Estate Spotlight

Grand 2 story entry
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You�re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it�details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums� policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it�s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users� profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses � Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it�s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who�s selling it, it doesn�t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions � Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services � Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products � While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements � Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be �bumped� excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues � Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators� discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you�d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user�s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

Preakness is today! How do you think it will go?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by McVillesMom View Post

    Because the starter didn't let go...
    The starter had a hold of BE because he was being an A** in the gate & John was slammed up against the side, didn’t even have both feet in the irons.
    Obviously they weren’t expecting the starter to open the gates at that moment.
    I think the starter was paying more attention to Improbable & his antics & missed BE’s

    Comment


    • #42
      Miss Utility is sponsoring this...?
      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
      Today I will be happier than a bird with a french fry.

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by charismaryllis View Post

        ”Wait for meeeee!”
        "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in a confederacy against him."

        Comment


        • #44
          BLEH
          With WoW winning, well never hear the end of it now

          I was rooting for ANY horse other than him.

          Comment


          • #45
            Hopefully the horse won't have issues the next time he's in the gate.

            Comment


            • #46
              That WSJ article

              https://www.wsj.com/articles/man-beh...s&page=1&pos=2


              eta: effing paywall. Have to read it at the office on our library account.


              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
              Today I will be happier than a bird with a french fry.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by charismaryllis View Post

                I think they’re on for next year, but after that is anyone’s guess.
                You can't put 100,000 people in a building with no flushing toilets. It won't pass inspection for next year unless they replumb the whole building, and that's not going to happen. There were big problems towards the end of the day yesterday, and today there were NO womens bathrooms open and most of the mens bathrooms had issues too.
                "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in a confederacy against him."

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by mommy peanut View Post
                  BLEH
                  With WoW winning, well never hear the end of it now

                  I was rooting for ANY horse other than him.


                  Really???




                  If that horse weren't incredibly athletic, we'd have had a 19-horse pile-up in the homestretch of the Derby two weeks ago. And somehow that warrants a grudge against him and his connections?

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Well, that may be. She just looked so totally disinterested. Not that she should have been jumping and leaping around like those in the infield... I dunno, I just think she would have been a bit happier about the win. And speaking of the infield, holy moly, can someone please explain to me why an adult wants their picture taken while they are sticking out their tongue and behaving like little children???

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Palm Beach: I read somewhere that the contract has been signed for next year. Now, if the grandstand collapses before that, they won’t hold it there.
                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                      Today I will be happier than a bird with a french fry.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by Dispatcher View Post
                        Well, that may be. She just looked so totally disinterested. Not that she should have been jumping and leaping around like those in the infield... I dunno, I just think she would have been a bit happier about the win. And speaking of the infield, holy moly, can someone please explain to me why an adult wants their picture taken while they are sticking out their tongue and behaving like little children???
                        Alcohol.
                        “A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still.”

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by Dispatcher View Post
                          Good grief--what is wrong with the wife of the winning trainer?? She looked about as disinterested as if she'd just had a MacDonalds cheesburger.
                          She wasn't disinterested - just the opposite. Her body language told me that she had *** many things to say *** about the Derby trip --- which is the first thing they brought up after her horse gets a good clean win. She was biting her tongue hard, as it were. As soon as they stopped talking about the Derby she relaxed and smiled.

                          I thought that the wife was probably thinking what I was thinking while the interviewer was pounding on about the Derby, and it was the last thing she & her husband both wanted to think about in the moment of victory. IMO the interference in the Derby stopped War of Will from running his race, a race he was very ready to run. IMO he was the primary victim, and not the horse who came under the wire second. War of Will was coming forward and running strong, and who knows how well he might have done had the swerve not happened.

                          I don't expect people who aren't television and performance professionals to have all the perfect facial expressions and interview techniques on hand.

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Originally posted by Palm Beach View Post

                            You can't put 100,000 people in a building with no flushing toilets. It won't pass inspection for next year unless they replumb the whole building, and that's not going to happen. There were big problems towards the end of the day yesterday, and today there were NO womens bathrooms open and most of the mens bathrooms had issues too.
                            Time for a bond election and the state can start work.
                            “A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still.”

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              You know, WoW looked ouchy on his off hind in the winner's circle, and he just looked ouchy again on the way to his stall...
                              ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                              Today I will be happier than a bird with a french fry.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by charismaryllis View Post
                                Palm Beach: I read somewhere that the contract has been signed for next year. Now, if the grandstand collapses before that, they won’t hold it there.
                                It's a state law that the Preakness has to be held at Pimlico except in an emergency. No contract involved. But if the plumbing doesn't work, the building will get condemned or something. They won't be allowed to hold it at Pimlico and it will have to be held at Laurel. The plumbing there has been an issue for years, and it's reliably showing that it does not hold up to big race days. The last few times I went to Preakness I had to go out into the barn area and use the womens bathrooms there.
                                "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in a confederacy against him."

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by charismaryllis View Post
                                  You know, WoW looked ouchy on his off hind in the winner's circle, and he just looked ouchy again on the way to his stall...
                                  I was just about to ask if anyone else saw that, in both of those situations. I saw a lot of steps on the back legs that didn't look good. But I didn't know if I was judging too closely, horse just won a big race, went through all the winner's circle folderol, and was walking around on varying surfaces from grass to dirt to whatever. I wondered, though.

                                  In every other way I thought War of Will looked like a very classy, quality, look of eagles horse. Grand looking horse, will now be a fan.

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Awesome win, WoW! On the other hand, his stud fee probably just went up. Rats. I wouldn't mind a dressage horse by him. What a looker!

                                    Now available in Kindle as well as print: C-Sharp Minor: My Mother's Seventeen-Year Journey through Dementia. 10% of my proceeds will be donated to the Alzheimer's Association.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      If the state vets think he looked off after the race, they can put him on the vets list, and he has to get off it before he runs again. I think they normally have 3-4 stationed around the track, and this year MD added 4 additional vets for the Preakness. Lots of eyeballs on those horses today.

                                      But I think he'd have to look pretty questionable to put him on the vets list - you usually have to work in front of the vet, they pull blood, and the test has to come back clean before you are allowed to race again.
                                      "When a true genius appears in the world, you may know him by this sign, that the dunces are all in a confederacy against him."

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by dressagetraks View Post
                                        Awesome win, WoW! On the other hand, his stud fee probably just went up. Rats. I wouldn't mind a dressage horse by him. What a looker!
                                        Before the Race I was really admiring his butt.
                                        “A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still.”

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by OverandOnward View Post

                                          She wasn't disinterested - just the opposite. Her body language told me that she had *** many things to say *** about the Derby trip --- which is the first thing they brought up after her horse gets a good clean win. She was biting her tongue hard, as it were. As soon as they stopped talking about the Derby she relaxed and smiled.

                                          I thought that the wife was probably thinking what I was thinking while the interviewer was pounding on about the Derby, and it was the last thing she & her husband both wanted to think about in the moment of victory. IMO the interference in the Derby stopped War of Will from running his race, a race he was very ready to run. IMO he was the primary victim, and not the horse who came under the wire second. War of Will was coming forward and running strong, and who knows how well he might have done had the swerve not happened.

                                          I don't expect people who aren't television and performance professionals to have all the perfect facial expressions and interview techniques on hand.
                                          Well, there is truth to that. I certainly was not expecting an Oscar winning speech. I just thought she may have shown some joy rather that looking away with a blank expression. No matter, I it's just my personal opinion that a winner should show some happiness.!


                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X