Stallion Spotlight

Vitalis_img_4461skawx LL_Fotos

Real Estate Spotlight

1
  • Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You�re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it�details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums� policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it�s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users� profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses � Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it�s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who�s selling it, it doesn�t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions � Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services � Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products � While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements � Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be �bumped� excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues � Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators� discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you�d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user�s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

The Triple Crown Races 2019

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Yeah, it was in the 80s, I think. Long time ago. As stated, I don't follow baseball, but I couldn't have missed this. People were MAD about that game.

    Back to horse racing, the owner I feel sorriest for this year has to be Rick Porter. But he and Mandella handled their disappointment with class.

    Turning to Saturday's Preakness, I always pick three horses in TC races to root for. This Saturday, I'm choosing War of Will, Alwaysmining, and Owendale. Hope it's a great race.
    Now available in Kindle as well as print: C-Sharp Minor: My Mother's Seventeen-Year Journey through Dementia. 10% of my proceeds will be donated to the Alzheimer's Association.

    Comment


    • I think whoever gave MS’s jockey a 15 day suspension (rather than 3-5) is the entity acting without class. The heavy suspension was clearly designed to strike back and send a message, not to act within the boundary of what’s considered normal (comparing other recent suspensions)


      Originally posted by Pronzini View Post
      In all probability, the court will dismiss this indicating that it has no standing to adjudicate a sport's rules when the participants explicitly agreed to abide by the steward's rulings and the stewards actually ruled which is the Due process. Even the most ardent Maximum Security advocate isn't claiming that the stewards didn't consider its ruling. The stewards took 22 minutes to consider the ruling--the Wests are simply saying they came to the wrong conclusion. That is where I predict a court won't go and shouldn't.

      Can you imagine the precedent? Someone always doesn't like what the umpire, referee, steward, or placing judge decides. There is usually one howler in every national championship. Are they all going to end up in court?

      I think an analogy the court might appreciate is in private arbitration. Many times in litigation, the parties agree to a private arbitrator and take the dispute outside the court system to save money and time. They then agree to the rules of the private arbitration forum. Once that happens, an aggrieved party can't appeal the decision absent overt bias or fraud--which is a tremendous burden to overcome.

      The Wests need to accept the decision gracefully and get their revenge in the time honored sportsman manner. They need to put that horse back on the track and beat the stuffings out of all the other contenders. This is just making them look small and frankly potentially hurting their horse's second career because perception rules stallion selection. Their horse's class needs to overcome their lack of class IMO.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Pronzini View Post
        (...) The Wests need to accept the decision gracefully and get their revenge in the time honored sportsman manner. They need to put that horse back on the track and beat the stuffings out of all the other contenders. This is just making them look small and frankly potentially hurting their horse's second career because perception rules stallion selection. Their horse's class needs to overcome their lack of class IMO.
        ^^^ Yes to this.

        As Bob Baffert said, sometimes you need to "Take your ass-kickings with dignity." The Wests need to listen to Bob.
        “A man convinced against his will, is of the same opinion still.”

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Sparrowette View Post

          ^^^ Yes to this.

          As Bob Baffert said, sometimes you need to "Take your ass-kickings with dignity." The Wests need to listen to Bob.
          Yes.

          Although ironically when Baffert said that, he was referring to the jockeys who initiated the inquiry that led the MS being taken down.
          www.laurienberenson.com

          Comment


          • Originally posted by SnicklefritzG View Post
            I think whoever gave MS’s jockey a 15 day suspension (rather than 3-5) is the entity acting without class. The heavy suspension was clearly designed to strike back and send a message, not to act within the boundary of what’s considered normal (comparing other recent suspensions)



            YES. Exactly. That is far less graceful and far more lacking in dignity, fairness, sportsmanship, class, etc. than the Wests' behaviors. By far.
            If thou hast a sorrow, tell it not to the arrow, tell it to thy saddlebow, and ride on, singing. -- King Alfred the Great

            Comment


            • I could not agree more with everyone who said Saez got a raw deal. His suspension is a travesty, in my opinion. The reason for the suspension was noted as "Failure to control his mount and make the proper effort to maintain a straight course." What a bunch of nonsense. I wonder how many of the people involved in the decision have been on a horse spooking at a dead gallop? It's clear to me from watching every video I could find that MS just spooked, plain and simple. Did MS interfere with other horses making a DQ necessary? Yes, I think so. That being said, I think the suspension of Saez is going way too far, and doesn't recognize the fact that horses are not robots. A spooking horse is going to go somewhere - to the side, backwards, up, whatever. You can do your best to react quickly and get them back on course (which Saez did), but at that speed there's no way you're going to be able to instantaneously stop them from going the direction they first choose. It definitely seems like the suspension was an unnecessary effort to shore up the DQ decision.

              On to the Preakness! Who does everybody like? I love Bourbon War - hoping he has a big race.

              Comment


              • My opinion on Saez’s suspension is that it is a piece of the commission’s foundation in the upcoming case defending against the Wests. You have to make Saezs actions especially egregious to substantiate their decision.
                When someone shows you who they are, BELIEVE them- Maya Angelou
                www.americansaddlebredsporthorse.net
                http://www.asbsporthorse.blogspot.com/

                Comment


                • Ding ding ding!!!!

                  thats it. They aren’t acting in the best interest of racing. The suspension is to cover their —- in light of the upcoming lawsuit.

                  i hope this gives the west’s more action against them.


                  Originally posted by ASB Stars View Post
                  My opinion on Saez’s suspension is that it is a piece of the commission’s foundation in the upcoming case defending against the Wests. You have to make Saezs actions especially egregious to substantiate their decision.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by ASB Stars View Post
                    My opinion on Saez’s suspension is that it is a piece of the commission’s foundation in the upcoming case defending against the Wests. You have to make Saezs actions especially egregious to substantiate their decision.
                    I suppose the West's attorneys can counter that, with videos of other interference resulting in the jockeys suspension and compare the infractions with the penalties.

                    Comment


                    • Just one lawyer's thoughts here, but the difference between filing suit over an NFL/NBA/MLB game and the Derby is that the decision maker for the Derby is a state agency and its employees, so there are some protections in law that don't exist for major league sports (which I believe are presided over by private organizations, so employment law governs more than anything).

                      I still think it's wild to file a lawsuit about this, but... I'll certainly be following along.

                      Comment


                      • But, to Nestor's point (and I am certainly no attorney), some of the "decisions" made by professional sports are sometimes challenged and changed (depending on what the actual infraction is) by the different sports players' unions.

                        How often have I seen a decision to "penalize" a player for some activity that is then reduced when challenged by the union.
                        Maybe the reason I love animals so much is because the only time they have broken my heart is when they've crossed that rainbow bridge

                        Comment


                        • OP ed by an attorney; http://www.thoroughbreddailynews.com...ays-no-chance/

                          Comment


                          • I laughed when I saw who that attorney has represented in the past


                            Originally posted by skydy View Post

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by SnicklefritzG View Post
                              I laughed when I saw who that attorney has represented in the past



                              He very well qualified to express an opinion. Not sure what you are laughing at.
                              Mystic Owl Sporthorses
                              www.mysticowlsporthorses.com

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                I like Anothertwistafate in the Preakness. Seems pretty consistent, has run some good times, well bred.

                                Comment


                                • Go back and read the article...then take into account the negative tone and it should be no surprise to you

                                  Originally posted by clint View Post

                                  He very well qualified to express an opinion. Not sure what you are laughing at.

                                  Comment


                                  • The Wests need to accept the decision gracefully and get their revenge in the time honored sportsman manner. They need to put that horse back on the track and beat the stuffings out of all the other contenders. This is just making them look small and frankly potentially hurting their horse's second career because perception rules stallion selection. Their horse's class needs to overcome their lack of class IMO.
                                    In other words, this is a case of a Thoroughbred being managed by non-Thoroughbreds who barely make the "grade"?
                                    Rack on!

                                    Comment


                                    • I always had the impression that the Wests were respected and well thought of. I don't know them but was a little surprised by the lawsuit. I'll never been in the dilemma in which they find themselves so I can't really second guess them.

                                      Hopefully this controversy will die down soon, Santa Anita will not be on the front page of the mainstream papers, and as the season goes on, racing will be back "as usual".

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by skydy View Post
                                        I always had the impression that the Wests were respected and well thought of. I don't know them but was a little surprised by the lawsuit. I'll never been in the dilemma in which they find themselves so I can't really second guess them.

                                        Hopefully this controversy will die down soon, Santa Anita will not be on the front page of the mainstream papers, and as the season goes on, racing will be back "as usual".
                                        It probably will be back as usual after the Preakness. The interest of the general public is about as constant as the moon (to borrow from Shakespeare).

                                        I just wish they could have done a do-over the first sunny day after the Derby.
                                        Rack on!

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by skydy View Post
                                          Thank you for this. I think it is well reasoned and supported.

                                          As for West, I'm all for the full employment of lawyers but to imply that you are the "little guy" in this dispute when you have four of them representing you is pretty funny.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X