Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You're responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the Forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it--details of personal disputes may be better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts, though are not legally obligated to do so, regardless of content.

Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting. Moderators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts unless they have been alerted and have determined that a post, thread or user has violated the Forums' policies. Moderators do not regularly independently monitor the Forums for such violations.

Profanity, outright vulgarity, blatant personal insults or otherwise inappropriate statements will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Users may provide their positive or negative experiences with or opinions of companies, products, individuals, etc.; however, accounts involving allegations of criminal behavior against named individuals or companies MUST be first-hand accounts and may NOT be made anonymously.

If a situation has been reported upon by a reputable news source or addressed by law enforcement or the legal system it is open for discussion, but if an individual wants to make their own claims of criminal behavior against a named party in the course of that discussion, they too must identify themselves by first and last name and the account must be first-person.

Criminal allegations that do not satisfy these requirements, when brought to our attention, may be removed pending satisfaction of these criteria, and we reserve the right to err on the side of caution when making these determinations.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it's understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users' profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses -- Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it's related to a horse for sale, regardless of who's selling it, it doesn't belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions -- Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services -- Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products -- While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements -- Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be "bumped" excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues -- Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators' discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the �alert� button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your �Ignore� list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you'd rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user's membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 5/9/18)
See more
See less

The Triple Crown Races 2019

  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Who would he sue? (Honest question—I don’t know the ins and out of racing.)
    Today I will be happier than a bird with a french fry.


      Very disappointed that the stewards overturned this. Yes, he spooked a bit, but Country House did not seem to be affected. Poorly done!


        I can’t believe this call. I won’t be watching the rest of the races. That objection was nothing but sour grapes and they ended up with a stolen win.


          Sorry but that’s a totally BS call.
          Country House was not impeded at all, by Maximum Security. There’s no way he would have won.


            I think Long Range Toddy would have finished a lot better if this hadn't happened.
            Today I will be happier than a bird with a french fry.


              I had a bad feeling in the minutes before this race. I thought it was a hunch that someone would get hurt.

              And so they have, but not physically.

              What a crap decision.

              I remember when Dancer's Image got disqualified but as they are saying today that was a whole different thing. This just sucks.
              Rack on!



                Just wow.
                "I'm not always sarcastic. Sometimes I'm asleep." - Harry Dresden


                  Originally posted by rollingabout View Post
                  I think $$$ was involved cause he wasn’t the favorite. The trainer of Country House is a POS sore loser. I hope the trainer of Max sues.
                  Very much my thoughts too, rollingabout. Very bad sportsmanship.
                  Rack on!


                    Originally posted by lcw579 View Post
                    I can’t believe this call. I won’t be watching the rest of the races. That objection was nothing but sour grapes and they ended up with a stolen win.
                    You put my feelings into words I couldn’t. Now that it’s sinking in, I’m so effing pissed, what a BS call. Sour grapes indeed. BM sure made a show to the media about how terrified he was for everyone’s safety.

                    The crowd seems to agree....
                    Talking to some people is like folding a fitted sheet.


                      For those decrying the disqualification of Maximum Security, how would you have felt if War of Wills hadn't managed to contort himself enough to avoid clipping heels and had gone down?


                        And Dancer's Image's wikipedia page has already been updated....
                        Today I will be happier than a bird with a french fry.


                          I thought War of Will was very clever with his stride during the final turn. I don’t know the rules for didn’t look to me like Country House was terribly impacted. War of Will more so - did the Stewards factor in War of Will, even though they didn’t file the objection? I’m so heartbroken for Maximum Security’s connections. Young horses racing - it wasn’t an manoeuvre made with evil intent. I guess that’s racing?
                          Last edited by Ace; May. 4, 2019, 10:44 PM. Reason: War of Will, not War of Wills! Right?


                            WTFruit bat did I just watch??! IDK what to think...


                              Wonder why War of Wills' ppl didn't file an objection...?
                              Today I will be happier than a bird with a french fry.


                                Yeah- it does seem like a case of sour grapes. In the replay you can see that the other horses were hindered but at the same time, how can one know that CH would’ve won had that not happened? I ask these questions as someone who watches the derby but admittedly knows very little about racing and would like to know more.

                                As as an aside- I liked both horses but winning due to a questionable DQ leaves a bad taste in my mouth


                                  Agree it's an incomprehensible & BS call. When is it illegal to spook anyway? Plus what was said about Country House receiving a boost, not impediment.
                                  At 65 to 1, hmmm ... someone just made a boatload o' bucks.


                                    I'm meeting friends out for dinner so I shut the TV off as soon as the race and that I didn't watch all the post-race hoopla I was so sick and tired of all of the pre-race hoopla so I won't get to see the replay till I get home but it sounds like it was a bad thing I'm pretty disgusted with it too I'm disgusted with the whole way they do it I'm just not a fan of racing anymore and I know they're doing it for the money but they drag it all out to go on and on and on until it's like just run the Damn Race and get it over with and now wait for another whole year
                                    Another killer of threads


                                      Did Mott lodge the objection, or the stewards?
                                      Mott’s a pretty classy guy all round, but why would you want to win a Derby like this? You were beaten fair and square.


                                        I felt like Saez was pulling on the inside rein, and in my riding, that would send a horse sideways. But do jockeys tend to pull a rein thinking the horse will go that direction? I only know about retraining TBs, not actually riding on the track. In my riding, jockey's actions looked like he was intending to move him off the rail, but I wanted to ask if it looked like he was trying to pull a spooking horse back to the rail, to those who may know more about actual race riding?


                                          Flavien Prat just sealed his fate for this season
                                          Go, Baby, Go......
                                          Aefvue Farms Footing Inspector