• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

Scared For Riders Who Dont Wear Helmets

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • [QUOTE]Originally posted by GatoGordo:
    Tosca and others, I hope you realize 2 things:
    1. Any researcher who gave a placebo to a seriously depressed person in an outpatient setting would get his a$$ sued off if they were hospitalized or killed themselves. Most studies don't want to touch anyone who is at serious risk for suicide. Sure, maybe antidepressants do increase risk of suicidal ideation in people who were moderately depressed, but it would be a crime to prevent teens who really need antidepressants from gaining access, as they are trying to do in Britain. That's like banning helmets or seatbelts because they exacerbate some accidents. Sure, maybe set guidelines for more cautious use, but there are significant #'s of minors (under 18) who WOULD be dead or unable to function if it weren't for these drugs.
    2. Various estimates of eventual mortality rates (due to suicide) for bipolar disorder are in the neighborhood of 15-20%. Unipolar depression is harder to get a handle on because a lot of depressed people are not as badly off as the severely depressed people, and they are all lumped together in one category. Risk of suicide is much higher in those who are untreated, and therapy does NOT always work! It is an essential part of treatment for severely affected individuals, but it is NOT enough for many. To those that are citing HRT, last I heard there were arguments on both sides. We are not trying to ban HRT, are we?

    [QUOTE]


    I'm not sure if it's appropriate to answer here but...

    I have no objections to antidepressants for depressed people. Prozac does seem to be associated with an increased risk of suicide though. People on it should be monitored more closely than they are. The drug company has been accused of trying to suppress data which shows the drug can be harmful in some cases. The company has been trying to market the drug to children and adolescents. It has now been accused of hiding data which shows that the drug does not work in these age groups. There was an announcement in 'Science' that an independent investigation will be conducted. No one connected with the drug company will be allowed to participate in the research.

    This part is horse related, sort of.

    Until recently HRT was considered to be healthy. This work was conducted by drug companies. Two independent studies have now shown that HRT is associated with high rates of breast cancer and stroke. As a matter of fact, the results so frightened the researchers that both studies were stopped early. As a result, the bottom has fallen out of the PMU market. I believe that HRT is still being prescribed, but at the moment it is recommened for short term use.

    Tosca

    Comment


    • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>uh oh, Bea thinks evil thought about her SO's mother and slinks off to H/J trying to find someone along the way she can ask what a GPA is. Sometimes it's hard being a western rider on an english forum <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
      Bea, a GPA is one of the more popular approved helmets worn by H/J riders. It's also known as a "skunk helmet" because of the vent on the front. You can find a picture on this link...Helmets.

      The GPA Titanium Helmet is the 7th listing down the page, I think.

      (You will often see threads here about people "striping" or "studding" their GPAs, which means that they have decorated the stripe with decals or rhinestones.)

      _____________________________________
      Any coupon works! Beware of paper cuts!

      Comment


      • Well, there were two reasons why I brought up the Prozac thing. One... to mention that Studies change. Two... there are things that are just not worth getting up in arms about. I'm sure that the mother of the dead boy would agree with me. I am also a little concerned that DMK has a hard time making sense of my posts. I was thinking I was doing an okay job of putting my thoughts through cyberspace. Perhaps I'm better after a cocktail or two.... I'm gonna go try that and get back to you later. Everyone can vote.

        Comment


        • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>El Grande- Just becuase YOU think something is a so-what, doesn't mean the rest of us do. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

          So what?

          Comment


          • Tosca, I think some of our reliance on approved helmets comes from the fact that the standards are developed and monitored by the SEI and ASTM... which are, to the best of my knowledge, independent "standards bodies" that are concerned with the safety of many, many protective products, not just riding helmets. And they help set the standard for and do some of the product testing. It is pretty concrete stuff, like "helmet must withstand a blow of X lbs of pressure under such and such condition." Unlike the FDA, which just looks at the "results" of clinical trials.

            That, along with an understanding of basic physics, is why I trust my well-padded ATH better than my little velvet-covered plastic shell.

            Comment


            • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Bea:
              Approved by what or whom on the label.

              I bought my new helmet from the tack shop owned by the mother of my SO. And I asked if it was approved and she said yes. But it only cost around $50. And I just read Erin mentioning $100. So I want to check the label. Yes, I think my SO's mother likes me. At least I think she does . . .<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

              I'm pretty sure an approved helmet can be purchased for as little as $35 or so (the plastic schooling Troxels)... both approved and unapproved helmets come in budget and deluxe models.

              An "approved" helmet will have a label inside that will say it meets an ASTM standard. ASTM is who sets the standards, and SEI is who tests to be sure that helmets meet the standards... so technically "approved" helmets are ASTM/SEI approved.

              Comment


              • I am not a helmet nazi, but I am a medical reference librarian Equestrian related ER visits have been studied repeatedly in peer-reviewed literature. Most ER visits are not head injuries. However, over 60% of serious injuries (meaning requiring a hospital stay) are head injuries.

                Comment


                • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by El Grande Stimpendo:

                  OK but unless you know how many of each group played and didnt win, it's a big so-what. A REALLY big so-what. It's also whats at the heart of every helmet advocate's arguement, here and elsewhere.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                  Funny, I thought the fact that an approved helmet protects your head best was at the heart of every helmet advocate's argument.

                  What exactly are you arguing here, El Grande? That riding isn't as dangerous as it's made out to be, so we don't need to worry about helmets?

                  Frankly, I've already had one concussion from a fall without a helmet, so I don't need anyone to tell me riding is the most dangerous, second-most-dangerous, or eighteenth-most-dangerous sport... we all fall off. I'd prefer to have something on my head in case I do.

                  Comment


                  • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by wanderlust:
                    Tosca, I think some of our reliance on approved helmets comes from the fact that the standards are developed and monitored by the SEI and ASTM... which are, to the best of my knowledge, independent "standards bodies" that are concerned with the safety of many, many protective products, not just riding helmets. And they help set the standard for and do some of the product testing. It is pretty concrete stuff, like "helmet must withstand a blow of X lbs of pressure under such and such condition." Unlike the FDA, which just looks at the "results" of clinical trials.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                    The fact that a helmet can withstand X lbs of pressure is not proof that it prevents or lessens brain damage via concussion. We could do an experiment and throw people wearing both approved and non approved helmets on their heads from a great height and compare the groups for brain damage. I doubt we'll find volunteers for either group.

                    Please do not flame me. I am simply responding to a post directed at me. I am not trying to convince anybody not to wear an approved helmet. I just want to be able to make the choice not to wear one. As I seem to inflame people, why don't we leave it at that. ...or should I just leave?

                    Tosca

                    Comment


                    • Don't go Tosca!!!! I need to know if you think my posts are hard to understand.

                      Comment


                      • not sure if anyone looked at the link i posted about how they test helmets

                        they decided blah blah blah gravity plus impact=x head injury and each helmet had to protect the contents of the helmet before it could be called approved

                        so i think that shows something.....

                        ******************************
                        molly
                        **proud member of the calendar- CBW FOR LIFE !!**
                        http://community.webshots.com/user/mavw1971
                        www.oasisequestrian.com
                        Co-founder of White Trash Dressage (WTD)
                        http://www.lulu.com/mavw1971
                        also available on Amazon.com
                        http://www.cafepress.com/wtdressage

                        Comment


                        • Horsepoor, where the hell have you been today? Do you think my posts are hard to understand?

                          Comment


                          • Are we SERIOUSLY having THIS discussion again? How many more times do we have to fight this thing out? Some wear approved, and some don't.

                            Can't we all just get along (and stop pissing each other off)?

                            Comment


                            • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>What exactly are you arguing here, El Grande? That riding isn't as dangerous as it's made out to be, so we don't need to worry about helmets? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                              Not really. More like nobody really knows how much safer you are with a helmet than without a helmet. And the (in)ability of the rider is blithely ignored. If you do have a helmet, it may well be the case that you add more years to your life expectancy by wearing it in the bathtub than by wearing it on a horse. Or when walking on the sidewalk in winter etc.

                              Your concussion story is dangerously close to a my friend susy tale if you ask me, but anyway - if you'd had your concussion with a helmet on, you'd say that was a reason to wear a helmet. The helmet safety believers think everything that happens illustrates the importance of wearing a helmet.

                              Quiz: Which of the following illustrates the importance of wearing a helmet?

                              friend falls off not wearing helmet and gets hurt
                              friend falls off not wearing helmet and doesnt get hurt
                              friend falls off wearing helmet and gets hurt
                              friend falls off wearing helmet and doesnt get hurt
                              friend falls off down stairs
                              friend gets kicked by horse while not mounted
                              friend gets in car accident

                              Answer: If you are a helmet crusader, all of the above. And many more.

                              It makes no sense.

                              Comment


                              • where have i been? i have been spring cleaning horse paraphaenelia and packing away winter blankets and performing water bucket nazi duties and am now currently eatting aa pasta salad and getting ready to go on a cig run?

                                are your posts hard to understand?......lemme ponder this during my ciggy run

                                will get back to you

                                ******************************
                                molly
                                **proud member of the calendar- CBW FOR LIFE !!**
                                http://community.webshots.com/user/mavw1971
                                www.oasisequestrian.com
                                Co-founder of White Trash Dressage (WTD)
                                http://www.lulu.com/mavw1971
                                also available on Amazon.com
                                http://www.cafepress.com/wtdressage

                                Comment


                                • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by pacificsolo:
                                  Are we SERIOUSLY having THIS discussion again? How many more times do we have to fight this thing out? Some wear approved, and some don't.

                                  Can't we all just get along (and stop pissing each other off)? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                  I agree completely! Let's call a truce.

                                  Tosca

                                  Comment


                                  • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by xegeba:
                                    Don't go Tosca!!!! I need to know if you think my posts are hard to understand.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                    I find your posts cogent and coherent!

                                    Tosca

                                    Comment


                                    • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by tosca4711:
                                      <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by pacificsolo:
                                      Are we SERIOUSLY having THIS discussion again? How many more times do we have to fight this thing out? Some wear approved, and some don't.

                                      Can't we all just get along (and stop pissing each other off)? <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                      I agree completely! Let's call a truce.

                                      Tosca<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                      Personally, I don't care if anyone wears approved, unapproved, or a baseball cap. It just bugs me when people say things that aren't accurate.

                                      As I said earlier, if you don't want to wear a helmet or an approved helmet, fine... just don't delude yourself in the face of a large body of evidence that says an approved helmet will best protect your head in a fall, and say that an unapproved offers just as much protection. It doesn't.

                                      Comment


                                      • PHEW! Thanks Tosca... DMK was starting to make me feel, uh , stupid and I have a problem with that. Feeling Stupid, that is. Meaning to say , that I quite frequently feel stupid.... Perhaps DMK is on to something.....

                                        Comment


                                        • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by El Grande Stimpendo:

                                          Your concussion story is dangerously close to a my friend susy tale if you ask me, but anyway - if you'd had your concussion with a helmet on, you'd say that was a reason to wear a helmet. <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                          I think you missed my point...

                                          I could, actually, point to my concussion story as a reason NOT to wear a helmet. I fell off (my bombproof horse slipped and fell on grass while we were cantering in a pasture at home) and hit my head. I blacked out. I received no medical attention. Yet here I am. See... who needs a helmet!

                                          My point was to say that that experience was a wake up call to me, personally, that, gee, this horse is tall and it's a long way down. And it's not inconceivable that I could fall off and hit my head. (Especially since I already did it once.) Gee, it might be a good idea to wear a helmet.

                                          No statistics necessary. Just a personal realization of risk.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X