• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

A Letter

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A Letter

    Dear Spelling Police on this lovely BB,

    STOP CORRECTING PEOPLES MISHAPS IN SPELLING. Perhaps, the person just typed to fast. Perhaps the person was writing late at night. Perhaps the person writing didn't reference a dictionary. Maybe they don't have auto spell check and didn't proof read their post. You don't need to get "all up in their business".

    If you can still read the post and on the whole there is nothing AWFULLY ATROCIOUS THROUGHOUT then don't comment. It's a waste of your time and you come off looking snippity. In fact, when i'm wasting my one day off a week browsing this lovely board, if I see a post start off with "PONY word is spelled PONY not PONIE" then I don't even read the rest of your post.

    I am sure you have never had a spelling error in your life. I bet that if you just write the word correctly in your response such as "I like getting acupuncture done on my horse." They will catch on that acupuncture does not have two c's.

    The only exception to this rule is when it comes to names such as the McClay..Maclay spelling issue.

    Now, this is my second rant on COTH and people will probably think I have anger management issues. FYI, I really don't .

  • #2
    Personally, I don't really see the harm in gently correcting spelling/grammar mistakes. Perhaps the person was typing fast or it was a typo...but I think we owe it to the people who spent time (and money) educating us to attempt to use the english language correctly. Maybe they really don't know how it is spelled and will appreciate learning the correct spelling. However, I do NOT see any mean to be mean, rude, or snarky about correcting someone's spelling/grammar. But I really don't see what it hurts to correct the mistake?
    Are people really that offended by it?

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Most of the mistakes I see are not corrected nicely and the people come off as somewhat nasty. But then again it is typed and there can be no actual inflections put upon the words.

      Comment


      • #4
        I kinda agree (ETA: with the OP) - some people type fast and don't check, and some people just aren't good at spelling. Just like some aren't good at math, drawing, singing or whatever. No reason to get all excited about it.

        It's usually pretty obvious what they mean, like loose vs lose. Or less obvious, but funny once you figure it out...like ocelots affecting a horse... LOL
        Last edited by twofatponies; Apr. 11, 2010, 10:12 PM. Reason: two more posts since I started writing my reply...

        Comment


        • #5
          No need to halt at X. Anywhere near X is okay.
          "No matter how well you perform there's always somebody of intelligent opinion who thinks it's lousy." - Laurence Olivier

          Comment


          • #6
            Your post here comes off as relatively hostile, though you might not intend it as such.
            Do you see how it might be similar with the posts you take offense at?
            (And your grammar could use some work )
            "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

            ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Ghazzu View Post
              Do you see how it might be similar with the posts you take offense at?
              (And your grammar could use some work )
              I hope you are being tounge and cheek, otherwise- your grammar could use some work too! (ending a sentance with a preposition- oh, the horror!!!)

              It's a vicious cycle.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Ghazzu View Post
                Your post here comes off as relatively hostile, though you might not intend it as such.
                Do you see how it might be similar with the posts you take offense at?
                (And your grammar could use some work )

                Your second sentence should read "similar to", not "similar with".

                The only grammar corrections I feel comfortable making are of posts critiquing other people's grammar.


                I firmly agree with the O.P.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by gloriginger View Post
                  I hope you are being tounge and cheek, otherwise- your grammar could use some work too! (ending a sentance with a preposition- oh, the horror!!!)

                  It's a vicious cycle.
                  Actually, ending a sentence with a preposition has become "legal". It happened several years back. I don't remember the detail, I just remember wondering to what the world has come, that bad grammar is now considered acceptable by those who make the rules.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by apcohrs View Post
                    Your second sentence should read "similar to", not "similar with".

                    The only grammar corrections I feel comfortable making are of posts critiquing other people's grammar.


                    I firmly agree with the O.P.
                    Mea culpa.Sloppy editing on my part.

                    I have to admit that my spelling/grammar bias comes from spending far too much time attempting to grade student work that has such ambiguous spelling and grammar that it is often difficult to comprehend.

                    Besides the fact that it is difficult to evaluate for grading purposes, I have students in a program designed to educate them for a profession which will put them in the position of making entries in medical records, which are legal documents.

                    To me, making a habit of correct spelling is much akin to making a habit of sitting properly in the saddle.

                    Besides, sometimes the posters are asking about subjects they'd be able to google if they could spell...
                    "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                    ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Ghazzu View Post
                      Mea culpa.Sloppy editing on my part.

                      I have to admit that my spelling/grammar bias comes from spending far too much time attempting to grade student work that has such ambiguous spelling and grammar that it is often difficult to comprehend.

                      Besides the fact that it is difficult to evaluate for grading purposes, I have students in a program designed to educate them for a profession which will put them in the position of making entries in medical records, which are legal documents.

                      To me, making a habit of correct spelling is much akin to making a habit of sitting properly in the saddle.

                      Besides, sometimes the posters are asking about subjects they'd be able to google if they could spell...
                      I thought you did it on purpose, teasingly, of course.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by gloriginger View Post
                        I hope you are being tounge and cheek, otherwise- your grammar could use some work too! (ending a sentance with a preposition- oh, the horror!!!)

                        It's a vicious cycle.
                        It was.
                        I believe the expression is tongue in cheek.

                        The business about not ending a sentence with a preposition is not a grammatical rule, but an excellent example of pretentiousness.
                        "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                        ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Oh, and while we're at it, people--

                          it's Dormosedan, not Dermosedan.
                          "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                          ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            I find it easier to read something if it has been written with correct spelling (especially the to/too, where/were type mistakes where I have to think what is actually meant - thereby having to strain my poor old brain LOL), but I generally don't bother correcting people as I realise there can be all sorts of reasons for the mistake/s occurring. However, I do feel it's sad when the reason turns out to be "can't be bothered/any old way will do" rather than "late night/typo/was never taught correctly and no-one's ever offered to help me".

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Hampton Bay View Post
                              Actually, ending a sentence with a preposition has become "legal". It happened several years back. I don't remember the detail, I just remember wondering to what the world has come, that bad grammar is now considered acceptable by those who make the rules.
                              Um, only when the preposition is needed for the structure of the sentance- in the above situation- one could easily say "Do you see how it might be similar with the posts you take offense?" leaving the "at" off and the sentance still makes sense.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by gloriginger View Post
                                Um, only when the preposition is needed for the structure of the sentance- in the above situation- one could easily say "Do you see how it might be similar with the posts you take offense?" leaving the "at" off and the sentance still makes sense.
                                Not really.
                                Even if you correct my poor editing (I made some major changes in the sentence, but missed substituting "to" for "with"), the sentence scans better as

                                "...it might be similar to the posts you take offense at?"

                                than "...it might be similar to the posts you take offense?"
                                "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                                ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                                Comment


                                • #17


                                  I am guilty of loose/lose. I HATE them. I can never figure out which is correct.

                                  I *can* usually google though.

                                  The thing with spellcheck, is it doesn't help loose/lose, which/witch, there/their/they're.


                                  Hemhoragh... Hemmorrha.... Profuse, uncontrollable bleeding is another one of my epic fails.

                                  That, and back door trots. (I was going to say loose stools, but maybe it's lose... )
                                  InnisFailte Pinto Sporthorses & Coloured Cobs
                                  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                                  Bits are like cats, what's one more? (Petstorejunkie)

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Ghazzu. I was joking with you with the "tounge and cheek" because it is another common mistake. I was also joking with the ending a sentance with a preposition (thus my stating "oh the horror!")

                                    However, your sentance was poorly constructed and in your sentance, and the "at" is definitely not needed!

                                    iIn seriousness, IMO, what would be best is to say, "Do you see how it might be similar to the posts that you take offense?"

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Bwhahahaa...



                                      So really, is Eats Shoots and Leaves worth the read? Or is this better?

                                      At.
                                      InnisFailte Pinto Sporthorses & Coloured Cobs
                                      ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

                                      Bits are like cats, what's one more? (Petstorejunkie)

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by gloriginger View Post
                                        Um, only when the preposition is needed for the structure of the sentance- in the above situation- one could easily say "Do you see how it might be similar with the posts you take offense?" leaving the "at" off and the sentance still makes sense.
                                        I'm sorry... Correct in theory, but your edit of the sentence doesn't quite make sense. I can't help myself:

                                        "Do you see how it might be similar to the posts at which you take offense?"

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X