• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

and we thought cows were bad

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • and we thought cows were bad

    Polluting pets: the devastating impact of man's best friend
    by Isabelle Toussaint and Jurgen Hecker Isabelle Toussaint And Jurgen Hecker Sun Dec 20, 3:23 pm ET

    PARIS (AFP) – Man's best friend could be one of the environment's worst enemies, according to a new study which says the carbon paw print of a pet dog is more than double that of a gas-guzzling sports utility vehicle.

    But the revelation in the book "Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living" by New Zealanders Robert and Brenda Vale has angered pet owners who feel they are being singled out as troublemakers.

    The Vales, specialists in sustainable living at Victoria University of Wellington, analysed popular brands of pet food and calculated that a medium-sized dog eats around 164 kilos (360 pounds) of meat and 95 kilos of cereal a year.

    Combine the land required to generate its food and a "medium" sized dog has an annual footprint of 0.84 hectares (2.07 acres) -- around twice the 0.41 hectares required by a 4x4 driving 10,000 kilometres (6,200 miles) a year, including energy to build the car.

    To confirm the results, the New Scientist magazine asked John Barrett at the Stockholm Environment Institute in York, Britain, to calculate eco-pawprints based on his own data. The results were essentially the same.

    "Owning a dog really is quite an extravagance, mainly because of the carbon footprint of meat," Barrett said.

    Other animals aren't much better for the environment, the Vales say.

    Cats have an eco-footprint of about 0.15 hectares, slightly less than driving a Volkswagen Golf for a year, while two hamsters equates to a plasma television and even the humble goldfish burns energy equivalent to two mobile telephones.

    But Reha Huttin, president of France's 30 Million Friends animal rights foundation says the human impact of eliminating pets would be equally devastating.

    "Pets are anti-depressants, they help us cope with stress, they are good for the elderly," Huttin told AFP.

    "Everyone should work out their own environmental impact. I should be allowed to say that I walk instead of using my car and that I don't eat meat, so why shouldn't I be allowed to have a little cat to alleviate my loneliness?"

    Sylvie Comont, proud owner of seven cats and two dogs -- the environmental equivalent of a small fleet of cars -- says defiantly, "Our animals give us so much that I don't feel like a polluter at all.

    "I think the love we have for our animals and what they contribute to our lives outweighs the environmental considerations.

    "I don't want a life without animals," she told AFP.

    And pets' environmental impact is not limited to their carbon footprint, as cats and dogs devastate wildlife, spread disease and pollute waterways, the Vales say.

    With a total 7.7 million cats in Britain, more than 188 million wild animals are hunted, killed and eaten by feline predators per year, or an average 25 birds, mammals and frogs per cat, according to figures in the New Scientist.

    Likewise, dogs decrease biodiversity in areas they are walked, while their feces cause high bacterial levels in rivers and streams, making the water unsafe to drink, starving waterways of oxygen and killing aquatic life.

    And cat poo can be even more toxic than doggy doo -- owners who flush their litter down the toilet ultimately infect sea otters and other animals with toxoplasma gondii, which causes a killer brain disease.

    But despite the apocalyptic visions of domesticated animals' environmental impact, solutions exist, including reducing pets' protein-rich meat intake.

    "If pussy is scoffing 'Fancy Feast' -- or some other food made from choice cuts of meat -- then the relative impact is likely to be high," said Robert Vale.

    "If, on the other hand, the cat is fed on fish heads and other leftovers from the fishmonger, the impact will be lower."

    Other potential positive steps include avoiding walking your dog in wildlife-rich areas and keeping your cat indoors at night when it has a particular thirst for other, smaller animals' blood.

    As with buying a car, humans are also encouraged to take the environmental impact of their future possession/companion into account.

    But the best way of compensating for that paw or clawprint is to make sure your animal is dual purpose, the Vales urge. Get a hen, which offsets its impact by laying edible eggs, or a rabbit, prepared to make the ultimate environmental sacrifice by ending up on the dinner table.

    "Rabbits are good, provided you eat them," said Robert Vale.
    Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
    I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.

  • #2
    so if I ditch 2 cellphones I can get 2 goldfish...aight! Got it....
    Originally posted by BigMama1
    Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
    GNU Terry Prachett

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
      so if I ditch 2 cellphones I can get 2 goldfish...aight! Got it....
      rabbit...the other white (pet) meat
      Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
      I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Tamara in TN View Post
        rabbit...the other white (pet) meat

        Mama's wittle baby woves wabbit wabbit
        Mama's wittle baby woves wabbit stew

        I'd love to see how they arrive at such numbers - how many acres does it take to feed a human - not to mention my dogs happily rode in the truck, but never alone...I am sure I got that all wrong tho....
        Originally posted by BigMama1
        Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
        GNU Terry Prachett

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Tamara in TN View Post
          <snip>
          But the best way of compensating for that paw or clawprint is to make sure your animal is dual purpose, the Vales urge. Get a hen, which offsets its impact by laying edible eggs, or a rabbit, prepared to make the ultimate environmental sacrifice by ending up on the dinner table.

          "Rabbits are good, provided you eat them," said Robert Vale.

          Since I am doing everything wrong - even feeding Fancy Feast - I guess I will have to eat my cats and dogs when their time comes. Anyone have any good recipes? Good thing they will have been so well fed.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by lcw579 View Post
            Since I am doing everything wrong - even feeding Fancy Feast - I guess I will have to eat my cats and dogs when their time comes. Anyone have any good recipes? Good thing they will have been so well fed.
            stew and BBQ is always a winner
            Originally posted by BigMama1
            Facts don't have versions. If they do, they are opinions
            GNU Terry Prachett

            Comment


            • #7
              So, am I better off if I feed my dogs that cheap dog food that's mostly corn?
              "One person's cowboy is another person's blooming idiot" -- katarine

              Spay and neuter. Please.

              Comment


              • #8
                To Hades with the environmentalists - I'm putting my dogs on a raw diet.

                Comment


                • #9
                  My cat just farted in Al Gore's general direction

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by lcw579 View Post
                    Since I am doing everything wrong - even feeding Fancy Feast - I guess I will have to eat my cats and dogs when their time comes. Anyone have any good recipes? Good thing they will have been so well fed.
                    I have Pugs. At least I really like Chinese food.
                    http://www.tbhsa.com/index.html

                    Originally Posted by JSwan
                    I love feral children. They taste like chicken.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by gieriscm View Post
                      To Hades with the environmentalists - I'm putting my dogs on a raw diet.
                      raw diet is more sustainable than packaged dog food, provided you pasture raise rabbits. They produce fast enough to provide a healthy raw diet for most canines or felines for that matter with a relatively low environmental footprint.
                      If i'm posting on Coth, it's either raining so I can't ride or it's night time and I can't sleep.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by LarkspurCO View Post
                        My cat just farted in Al Gore's general direction
                        "I fart in your general direction" Just picturing your cat saying this with a French accent.

                        I think I will work on other things to lower my own carbon foot print. I am not giving up my animals. And I am certainly not eating them Although I have threatened the goat a time or 2. I keep telling her that she is lucky that I am mostly vegetarian

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          My neighbors let their dogs leave "carbon footprints" in my yard quite often...
                          "Farming looks mighty easy when your plow is a pencil, and you're a thousand miles from the corn field." --Dwight D Eisenhower

                          Boston Terrier Rescue of NC - www.btrnc.org - Adopt for Life!

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Anyone have any good bosingtang recipes?
                            Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                            Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                            -Rudyard Kipling

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Alagirl View Post
                              Mama's wittle baby woves wabbit wabbit
                              Mama's wittle baby woves wabbit stew

                              I'd love to see how they arrive at such numbers - how many acres does it take to feed a human - not to mention my dogs happily rode in the truck, but never alone...I am sure I got that all wrong tho....
                              Me too. I'd like to know what formula they used to decide that say (purely an example for illustration that I made up in my head, not the data stated) "100 kilos of Science Diet lamb & rice formula has 60 kilos of meat and 40 kilos of cereal" etc.
                              Michael: Seems the people who burned me want me for a job.
                              Sam: A job? Does it pay?
                              Michael: Nah, it's more of a "we'll kill you if you don't do it" type of thing.
                              Sam: Oh. I've never liked those.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by lcw579 View Post
                                I guess I will have to eat my cats and dogs when their time comes. Anyone have any good recipes? Good thing they will have been so well fed.
                                Lcw, you have an IM.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  <Sylvie Comont, proud owner of seven cats and two dogs -- the environmental equivalent of a small fleet of cars -- >

                                  If 7 cats and 2 dogs is a small fleet then I have an international army......

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Science Diet? Sheesh. Outside of a few select, already animal- and environmentally-conscious people, who can afford to feed that? I'd imagine that those who most contribute to this "problem" are using low quality dog food that ironically, probably has a lower footprint.

                                    Whoops.

                                    However, my dogs are happily feasting on remnants of the deer from hunting season that my husband butchered out... if that's a carbon footprint, I blame the deer.
                                    _________________________

                                    http://iamthesprinklerbandit.blogspot.com/

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      What's next on the "too polluting" list? I think its moving up a list here. We'll break it to them slowly, first the pets, then farting cows (methane), then..
                                      Soilent green anyone?
                                      What kind of people come up with this stuff anyway? Malthus anyone? Yuck, I sure don't want to hang out with the authors of those publications.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Thanks, Tamara. I needed a chuckle this morning. These studies are just too much.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X