• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Notes from Springfield, IL...

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by BoysNightOut View Post
    That's the most absolutely disgusting thing I've ever heard. You sound just like a PETA member. Using children to support your own cause, who prolly had no idea about all the politics behind it.

    If I was one of the parents, I'd be pissed off as all hell. That makes me think even LESS of your cause.

    (And for the record, I think the actions taken by the men behind the rally were digusting as well, so it's not even about Pro vs Anti slaughter.)
    Amen, BoysNightOut.

    I was appalled that someone would tell children something like that. They'll find out the harsh realities of life soon enough, without hysterical people pushing an agenda.
    Homeopathy claims water can cure you since it once held medicine. That's like saying you can get sustenance from an empty plate because it once held food.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
      Aren't you all blowing this a little out of proportions?

      If you want kids sheltered from what happens in the real world, why don't you stick them in bubble wrap and don't allow them on a field trip.

      Worse stuff happens AT schools these days.
      No, not out of proportion.
      It shows you what kind of people you are supporting there.
      Not only to do such things, but to brag about doing them.

      That fellow may have asked for permission to give the kids the stick horses, but I doubt so, the way those protesters get in people's faces.

      Whatever was done wrong on his side, the other is absolutely inexcusable.

      Comment


      • #43
        No, I don't think so.

        When a parent allows their child to go on a field trip, it is reasonable for the parent to expect that their child will not be used, without their knowledge or consent, for political demonstrations.

        The field trip was not for participation in a political demonstration. The kids were used by strangers for their own purposes.

        Tell me - if your child came home crying and saying some lady gave him a bloody toy baby and told him his mommy was a murderer - don't you think you might raise an eyebrow?

        I'm the last person who advocates wrapping kids in bubble wrap. No one in that demonstration had the right to involve children in their argument.







        Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
        Aren't you all blowing this a little out of proportions?

        If you want kids sheltered from what happens in the real world, why don't you stick them in bubble wrap and don't allow them on a field trip.

        Worse stuff happens AT schools these days.
        Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
        Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
        -Rudyard Kipling

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #44
          Fyi...the teacher/leader of the group gave consent to tell the kids what the issue was about. These were not little kids, but were young adults in high school. The teacher also indicated she would use the experience to teach the kids how to properly write letters to their representatives.

          And to set the record straight, it was not anyone from our side that chose to "use these kids". We simply told them what the rally was all about and what the stick horses were "supposed" to symbolize. The kids did not "participate in a political demonstration" as JSwan has insinuated. Lets keep this in perspective.

          Here is todays newsletter from Loos. You will notice the numbers have now swelled to "hundreds"!
          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
          Whether we like it or not, the business of lawmaking is a game. Unfortunately, I am not really sure those who play the game understand the impact they have on the lives of others.

          Yesterday's experience at the Illinois State Capitol truly illustrated the rules of the game. The old cliché certainly comes to mind - the world is ruled by those who show up and, honestly, we have not shown up often enough.

          My plan was to testify against banning horse harvesting in the state of Illinois but my testimony was not heard by anyone because as I headed to the chair, the chairperson called for a vote. The vote was 7-0 in favor sending HB 1711 to the entire Senate for vote, which will likely happen next week.

          Frank Bowman did get the opportunity to testify, though, and presented tremendous information that no member of the committee wanted to hear. The horse species stands to suffer greatly if we do not continue to harvest horses in the U.S. Even though those sentiments were not heard by the members of the Illinois Senate Public Health Committee, hundreds did hear the message in front of the state capitol a couple of hours earlier.

          Click here to watch a short video of the rally.
          www.horse-protection.org

          No Horses to Slaughter Clique

          Comment


          • #45
            You were the one who called them "children" in your initial post. Not once did you say "teenagers" or "young adults".

            If they were indeed teenagers, they probably gave the stick horses back to get you away from them. I can just picture it, "Those men are eeevvviiillll! You must not take those stick horses! It would be eevvviiiilll!"

            Seriously, I see crooked fingers, slavering, and wild eyes when I envision that scenario. If I were a teen, I'd have run like Hades from you.
            Homeopathy claims water can cure you since it once held medicine. That's like saying you can get sustenance from an empty plate because it once held food.

            Comment


            • #46
              Now changing your story to big kids, too big to be given stick horses and care about it and be disappointed they had to give them back, as you told it?

              I would be ashamed, the way you put it in the first post, not try to change the story now.

              That is what is wrong with fanatics, they don't even know when they do wrong.
              Fanatics are out to destroy things in the name of "causes".
              Stop slaughter with measures that don't make sense and hurts horses, just so it stops.
              Harass "kids" and brag about it.
              No sense to such people, they lost measure of what is right long ago.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by J Swan View Post
                At least you'll reply to me.
                Of course I will. It would be out of character not to. Besides, we're basically on the same page.
                Gail's silence speaks volumes - and the gloating - that really takes the cake.
                It is hard to defend the indefensible. And you are absolutely correct. Her silence does indeed speak volumes.

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by kcgold View Post
                  you seem to have a lot of anger
                  Thanks Dr. Freud. Send the bill to my office or staple it to the hide of one of those pelts bound for Cavel. Besides, I'm not angry, I'm amused.
                  - calling anyone that doesn't agree with your view a lot of names....whacko, sick, depraved, etc.
                  The truth is an absolute defense.
                  It would be nice if we could all stick to the discussion without resorting to that.
                  Truth getting your panties a bit wadded up? C'est la vie.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Wow. PETA's just a stone's throw away, isn't it? Wonder when someone will begin distributing images of freshly-slaughtered horses to "young adults" in playgrounds, printed up as collectible trading cards?

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      #50
                      oh you are just so very funny Bluey! The original post was a humerous account of the events in Springfield..need I repost it for you?

                      Spin it whatever way you like.. you always do.

                      oh yes Arabhorse..the kids were just mortified while chatting with a few people about an issue that was being addressed in the legislature..ooooh the HORROR of it all. They will probably need a lifetime of therapy just to overcome the terror of it all!
                      www.horse-protection.org

                      No Horses to Slaughter Clique

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by onthebit12000 View Post
                        You will notice the numbers have now swelled to "hundreds"!
                        Well, why is that so unbelievable? While there may only have been 17 people +/- at the rally, how many others, passing by heard all or part of the message? You don't know, and neither does anyone else. So here we are left with a SWAG.

                        And while the kids involved may have been older that at first believed, I saw the video and many of them looked pretty young , even if they were teenagers. So, your dog won't hunt. Though I would have loved to see you and your group in action with those kids. Why do I get the image of a group of screeching hens? ROTFLMAO!

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Again, onthebit, just responding to what you posted initially.

                          You told the children/young adults/teenagers/etc. that those men were EVIL and slaughtered LIVE HORSES, so people over in Europe could EAT THEM.

                          Not quite a direct quote, but when someone posts things like that, then yes, I imagine slavering, wild-haired harpies in stretch pants and Hello Kitty sweatshirts.
                          Homeopathy claims water can cure you since it once held medicine. That's like saying you can get sustenance from an empty plate because it once held food.

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Uh Gail - I'm not buying it. Humorous account? It reads just like all your other accounts you've posted here.

                            And suddenly children on a field trip have become high school students? Hmmm..... never knew high school students to be that attached to a free stick horse given by a stranger.

                            You backpeddle as well as a slick politician. And you're about as trustworthy.

                            I don't give a darn if the protest was about horses, AIDS, gay rights or anything else. Get it?

                            And I don't think the childish poking makes you look good either. If you are so "ethical" and responsible - you'd be above it. And you'd be above manipulating schoolchildren and then bragging about it on the Internet.
                            Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                            Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                            -Rudyard Kipling

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #54
                              Originally posted by J Swan View Post
                              At least you'll reply to me.

                              Gail's silence speaks volumes - and the gloating - that really takes the cake.
                              You are truly something JSwan. So lets see, I dont immediately reply to you and you attack me for that.

                              Newsflash...unlike you, I have a JOB. I have a farm full of horses to tend to among other things, and cannot sit at my computer all day waiting to respond to you or anyone else for that matter.

                              Now, it is turn-in and feed time here, so please forgive me almighty JSwan while I tend to business.
                              www.horse-protection.org

                              No Horses to Slaughter Clique

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Keep in mind that the kids have no idea on what is actually at stake in this. It is actually very stupid for EITHER side to care what the kids think or not. The results of these laws will not NOTHING to help horses.

                                If the plants close, horses will be shipped much farther to either Canada or Mexico.

                                These laws do nothing to prevent slaughter. It just makes it worse on the horses. There are more horses than homes. W/hay prices in certain parts of the country, many people simply can NOT afford to keep horses.

                                There are MILLIONS of unwanted dogs and cats, why do you refuse to believe that the same is for horses?

                                What will happen to those horses?? Doesnt it seem logical that w/out slaughter, the numbers will only increase? Horses will be neglected since it will be harder to get rid of them. Would you rather make it extremely difficult to get rid of unwanted horses? Auctions may not be great, but they did do their part of reducing unwanted horses.

                                Depending on which part of the country, slaughter will still be a big part of that happens to them. They will still be slaughtered, just shipped to either Mexico or Canada.


                                I watched a video on horse slaughter. Let me tell you, the plants in the USA were MUCH more humane than the ones in Mexico. In Mexico, they stab over and over, trying to sever their spinal cord. Once that happened, the horse was still AWARE, but couldnt move. It was then, slid to a table. Then, had its leg put in around a hook, and lifted in the air. Next, the horse is slit open, and left to bleed out. The horse I watched, was repeated stabbed for over TWO minutes before it finally dropped down. It was really awful.

                                I am not anti slaughter, but ANTI MEXICAN slaughter. Canada shoots them. The USA used a bolt gun. The horse did not suffer once it was hit.

                                The rescued are already full or close to it. The hay prices are on a HUGE increase. Horses are expensive.

                                Horse slaughter is similiar to animal shelters for cats and dogs. They are needed, or the numbers will get completely out of control.

                                That said, I have NEVER bred an animal. I have only had ONE horse. I will keep him as long as I possible can. I do not take having a pet lightly. All of my pets are spayed/neutered. Most are adopted from our shelter.

                                I am not uneducated on animal issues. Horse slaughter is necessary to prevent a worse death for those horses that are not wanted.

                                The USA plants are a fairly humane way for them to pass. MEXICO is a HEL-LISH way for them to go. I want to stop horses from going to Mexico. These laws have only made it increase. It will only get worse.

                                I find that soooo very sad. Can't any of you anti slaughter see what will result in these laws??? Just a little???
                                Riding is NOT meant as an inside sport, GET out of that arena!!!

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  "Oh what a tangled web we weave when we but practice to deceive"....

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    You seem to have had plenty of time to respond to those who already agreed with your position.

                                    almighty JSwan? That's the best you can do? I didn't even have any intention of responding to this thread. I just read it and thought it was interesting. Until your post about the kids.

                                    I think you just crossed the line. And guess what - this isn't about slaughter, or horses, or animal welfare.

                                    It's about using children for your own political ends. And yes - that's what I think you did. Backpeddle some more - but I have no doubt that your post about the children was a truer version of the incident than what you are now asserting. Because your initial version is more in keeping with the style, language and attitude of all your other posts on this BB.

                                    And unless you haven't noticed, I'm not happy with the pro-side either. Wow - it's not all about you.


                                    Originally posted by onthebit12000 View Post
                                    You are truly something JSwan. So lets see, I dont immediately reply to you and you attack me for that.

                                    Newsflash...unlike you, I have a JOB. I have a farm full of horses to tend to among other things, and cannot sit at my computer all day waiting to respond to you or anyone else for that matter.

                                    Now, it is turn-in and feed time here, so please forgive me almighty JSwan while I tend to business.
                                    Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                                    Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                                    -Rudyard Kipling

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Originally posted by hoofrx1 View Post
                                      Thanks Dr. Freud. Send the bill to my office or staple it to the hide of one of those pelts bound for Cavel. Besides, I'm not angry, I'm amused.

                                      The truth is an absolute defense.

                                      Truth getting your panties a bit wadded up? C'est la vie.

                                      Rick - go read Rule #1 of the Forum rules. Somehow I think calling anyone who does not agree with your viewpoint "sick, depraved, whacko", etc would not fit under "Be nice, be respectful, be polite."

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by kcgold View Post
                                        Rick - go read Rule #1 of the Forum rules. Somehow I think calling anyone who does not agree with your viewpoint "sick, depraved, whacko", etc would not fit under "Be nice, be respectful, be polite."
                                        What? Who Knew? I really did tone down my remarks from what I really think of those sick, whacko, depraved people. I was trying to be nice. Honest I was. And, remember, the truth is an absolute defense. And I've given each and every one of them the respect they are due. And I haven't cursed or spit on the street or keyboard. Why I'm even wearing white gloves when I reply. So really, I'm trying to attain the highest degree of politeness the subject and the anti's deserve and have earned.

                                        If you'd like, I could perhaps wear a crinoline pettycoat while at the keyboard. Would that help with my politeness in your eyes?

                                        But wait, the original crinoline pettycoats were made with a weft of horsehair and the only place I'd be comfortable obtaining that material is at Cavel. But that might seem rude to you(such a conundrum, what's a fella to do?), so I guess I'll forgo wearing the crinoline petty coat. How about if I wear a 30X beaver top hat? Would it be impolite to wear a hat made in part with the fur of a trapped and then either drowned or clubbed to death, beaver? Or is the plight of the beaver of no concern to you? Where do you stand on the use of "Decon" and snap traps? How about Tyson chicken? Pate de foie gras?

                                        By the way, are you aware that politeness has a cultural bias? IOW, what may be considered polite in one group/culture, may not be so in another. And, vice versa.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          I've been told lots of times that people who aren't anti-slaughter (like me) shouldn't own animals, are inhumane, are horrible people, etc etc. Some people have informed another poster - who has several rescues - that she'd hate to be his horses, because he's not anti-slaughter.

                                          It all gets pretty ridiculous.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X