• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

The ANTI-Anti-anti-slaughter activist thread... (case example)

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The ANTI-Anti-anti-slaughter activist thread... (case example)

    The recent discussion about slaughter here, got me thinking about what I'm seeing recently. I am on the Board of Directors of a nonprofit rescue, and I'll also volunteer to help out other Rescues when I can. Sorry this post is a little long.

    Just yesterday our Rescue picked up a pair of Belgians out of a kill-pen, literally a day or so from being shipped one-way to the final feedlot and then slaughter. These horses are in good health, not ancient. They're sane, polite, and trained to ride & drive.

    Photo

    Their "crime" was that their owner wanted a bigger team of horses to do logging. So he traded him in at this big New York dealer's yard who coincidentally is also a big-time slaughterhouse supplier. Had the broker not had the easy out of slaughter, he would've either (1) forced the seller to be more responsible and not taken the trade-in so easily or (2) been required to find a home himself. In other words, the broker wouldn't isn't going to shoot or starve the incoming horses; selling horses is his livelihood.

    Some might argue "without slaughter horses would starve in the field" but this is an unproven, emotional angle. In CA when it was banned, neglect did not go up AND horse theft dropped significantly. In Maryland it is still legal and in the past month or so there were three big neglect cases (over 70 horses, a dozen or so, and 19 horses) so bad Animal Control is seizing horses. That doesn't account for all the ones I'm not aware of. Also right now there's a farm 5 miles from me that's going into foreclosure and the owner walked away -- leaving 4 horses behind with nobody to feed them. She knows slaughter exists. These kind of people just don't care.

    Our society makes it so easy for people to trade-in horses, like a car dealer. This Ford truck isn't to my liking anymore, so can I trade it in for a Chevy? Except for horses, we have a system that pays you more to junk the Ford for parts than try to resell that almost-new Ford to someone else. In some ways, Americans take better care of their cars then they do their horses.

    These above-mentioned horses are not unwanted. Sponsors paid $1,100 to buy this pair out of the feedlot (broker said it was his meat price). If slaughter was illegal, it wouldn't have cost nearly as much to gain these guys their freedom. Or if it was illegal, the original owner wouldn't have gotten so much for his trade-in and he might've tried to find a home for them himself instead of doing a quick drop-off.

    They are not useless: I have a waiting list of people wanting to see these guys, as soon as quarantine is over. These boys load & trailer nice, lead, stand, tie, stay out of personal space, come when called, and don't have any vices I can find. I load the pair of them all by myself in about 5 minutes onto a 2-horse bumper pull. These are NICE horses.

    And had the sponsors not gotten the tip about this pair, they would've been on a one-way trip to the main feedlot. The horses would've vanished off all radar when it comes to minimum care standards, enforcing cruelty laws, or requiring them even the least bit of vet care. If they'd gotten hurt in transit, nobody wouldn't noticed or cared. Kicked by another in the truck and leg fractured? Irrelevant. The trip from my region is at least 1,000 miles to either TX or IL kill plants: no spacious truck, no unloading to rest, no medical care, no vet care, no separating really aggressive ones out, etc. And then they can sit on the USDA feedlot for days or weeks.

    The public has begged, pleaded, argued, and demanded the horse slaughter system (from drop-off at auction/broker to day of the kill) be changed. Nothing does change, and the industry is adamant about keeping the status quo. Some in the general public think there are laws in place to protect the animals but the only one who can touch "meat" horses is the USDA. However, all the USDA enforces is food safety and protecting the price of the final product.

    How many more years of this broken system do we need to endure before we see significant changes?

    Isn't there some better balance between "right to use" a horse and unnecessary cruelty?

    Thanks for hearing me out.
    Veterinarians for Equine Welfare

  • #2
    I'm not sure I see your point? Someone sold their livestock to someone else. That person sold them again if I understand you right. It happens everyday accross the country in the livestock industry with many differant species of healthy livestock. Many animals are then used as food. Not exactly anything new.
    Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

    Comment


    • #3
      Wow...what nice looking horses. I'm tempted to get on the list for them. My Stepdad loves drafties and grew up working horses. He'd love them! No, I would certainly not call them "unwanted!"

      I agree with the points of your post. Somehow change must be enacted to stop this broken system fraught with abuse. The status quo is not working and in 40 years nothing has improved despite many efforts to make positive changes.

      Comment


      • #4
        I firmly believe that everyone has a right to an oi\pinion, even if I vehemently disagree, which is why I do not have county on an ignore list.
        Last edited by DressageGeek "Ribbon Ho"; Jan. 23, 2007, 02:57 PM.
        www.specialhorses.org
        a 501(c)3 organization helping 501(c)3 equine rescues

        Comment


        • #5
          Same deal as always. Horse slaughter needs to stop because of abuse. Carry on with the samne system for other species because some like eating them. Can't understand the concept its fine as long as I like eating certain ones.
          Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

          Comment


          • #6
            County, can you please go back to your platform on the anti-anti slaughter thread? We were asked to leave that thread so that you all could jump on your bandwagons over there; give us the same courtesy here. Plus, you say the same thing over and over, and until you have something new to offer, you are boring.
            SPAY/NEUTER/RESCUE/ADOPT!
            Little Star Chihuahua Rescue
            The Barkalicious Bakery
            On Facebook!!!

            Comment


            • #7
              And you also say the same thing over and over and are also boring. I don't see where I've asked anyone to not post any where. This is a public forum perhaps you need to look up the definition of that. As I've said before talk to the moderators if you think theres any rules being broken. If not then live with life as it is.
              Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

              Comment


              • #8
                Yes, but THIS thread is for people AGAINST SLAUGHTER, which we all know you are FOR. Let me explain a little clearer: do you post information on the dressage forum? the racing forum?I didn't think so. Therefore, please realize your opinion is not wanted on threads you don't have anything to contribute to. WE ALL KNOW you are pro-slaughter! So go where you can be embraced!
                SPAY/NEUTER/RESCUE/ADOPT!
                Little Star Chihuahua Rescue
                The Barkalicious Bakery
                On Facebook!!!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by MayS View Post
                  Our society makes it so easy for people to trade-in horses, like a car dealer. This Ford truck isn't to my liking anymore, so can I trade it in for a Chevy? Except for horses, we have a system that pays you more to junk the Ford for parts than try to resell that almost-new Ford to someone else. In some ways, Americans take better care of their cars then they do their horses.

                  These above-mentioned horses are not unwanted. Sponsors paid $1,100 to buy this pair out of the feedlot (broker said it was his meat price). If slaughter was illegal, it wouldn't have cost nearly as much to gain these guys their freedom. Or if it was illegal, the original owner wouldn't have gotten so much for his trade-in and he might've tried to find a home for them himself instead of doing a quick drop-off.

                  They are not useless: I have a waiting list of people wanting to see these guys, as soon as quarantine is over. These boys load & trailer nice, lead, stand, tie, stay out of personal space, come when called, and don't have any vices I can find. I load the pair of them all by myself in about 5 minutes onto a 2-horse bumper pull. These are NICE horses.

                  And had the sponsors not gotten the tip about this pair, they would've been on a one-way trip to the main feedlot. The horses would've vanished off all radar when it comes to minimum care standards, enforcing cruelty laws, or requiring them even the least bit of vet care. If they'd gotten hurt in transit, nobody wouldn't noticed or cared. Kicked by another in the truck and leg fractured? Irrelevant. The trip from my region is at least 1,000 miles to either TX or IL kill plants: no spacious truck, no unloading to rest, no medical care, no vet care, no separating really aggressive ones out, etc. And then they can sit on the USDA feedlot for days or weeks.
                  You are operating from the premise that YOU have a god-given right to get good horses cheap. Hence your whine about having to pay as much as $1100 to "rescue" them -- damn horse killers, you should have been able to get them for free 'cuz you're so special, I guess. But you didn't "rescue" them; you merely purchased them. Just like anybody else who ever buys a horse and either has to pay what the seller wants or negotiate a better deal. Only thing different on this deal is you did your buying with money you'd begged from somebody else. Unless your "sponsor" gets their money back when you sell these horses to any of the people on your "waiting list" for them; in that case your "sponsor" is just a "horse dealer" -- pretty much like the guy YOU got the horses from.

                  You are also operating from the premise that people shouldn't have the right to do what YOU don't want them doing. Hence your whine about the logger being "irresponsible". He needs bigger horses to do his job. The meat man was willing to pay as much as the seller was willing to accept. Just like every time anybody ever sells a horse.

                  Again, the "I worship horses and the behavior of all must reflect my beliefs" argument.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by county View Post
                    Same deal as always. Horse slaughter needs to stop because of abuse. Carry on with the samne system for other species because some like eating them. Can't understand the concept its fine as long as I like eating certain ones.
                    American horses are not raised as food. They are brought into this world as pets, working horses and friends. Then when no longer "usuable", some people find that slaughter is an acceptable way to dump their burdens. The same horses that worked for them, allowed them to ride or drive them, became their friend and trusted them.
                    How can you compare a horse to other livestock (cows, pigs, etc) that is raised in a field and bred specifically with the intent to use for food?
                    County, I hope you don't own any horses.

                    Proud CANTER foster mommy
                    RIP Barbaro
                    In loving memory of Blitzen 1993-1/28/2007

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      This is not a forum for anti-slaughter only, I don't think, but for general horse discourse.

                      ---"Sponsors paid $1,100 to buy this pair out of the feedlot (broker said it was his meat price). If slaughter was illegal, it wouldn't have cost nearly as much to gain these guys their freedom."---

                      So you buy you some nice horses from a dealer and want credit for "rescuing" them?
                      He sells some nice horses, makes his profit and uses that money to buy some more.

                      How is that affecting slaughter bound horses in general, other than in your mind?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by moonriverfarm View Post
                        Yes, but THIS thread is for people AGAINST SLAUGHTER, which we all know you are FOR. Let me explain a little clearer: do you post information on the dressage forum? the racing forum?I didn't think so. Therefore, please realize your opinion is not wanted on threads you don't have anything to contribute to. WE ALL KNOW you are pro-slaughter! So go where you can be embraced!
                        That attitude always works really well for the board. LOL
                        "smile a lot can let us ride happy,it is good thing"

                        My CANTER blog.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Folks, please knock off with the "But I don't want you here" whining.

                          What you want is irrelevant. Anyone can post on a public forum, provided they follow the rules. Everyone appears to be following the rules, which tells me that objections are based on the arbitrary assumption that anyone speaking on the issue should share your views for the discussion to "have meaning."

                          They don't share your view, and not addressing their viewpoints intelligently just weakens your own arguments (and that is addressed to all, no matter what "side" they are on).

                          If you want to champion a controversial cause, then I suggest you learn how to articulate your opinion intelligently in the face of opposition, no matter how unpleasant. Simply ignoring it will not make you a very strong advocate, and may actually hurt your credibility.

                          Just a thought.
                          "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you." -Don Marquis
                          **CEO of the TQ "Learn How To Ride or MOVE OVER!!" Clique**

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by MayS View Post
                            If slaughter was illegal, it wouldn't have cost nearly as much to gain these guys their freedom. Or if it was illegal, the original owner wouldn't have gotten so much for his trade-in and he might've tried to find a home for them himself instead of doing a quick drop-off.
                            From my experience if there isn't a slaughter price base line these horses remain out in a pasture and starve to death because the owner has no insentive to take them to market. Even the increase in gas prices is coming into play when people are deciding to drop off horses at market. If they don't think they can get their gas money/hauling fee back the leave the horses out in the pasture to starve. I know one trader has 35 in a feild with one moldy round bale but gas prices are too high to justify him making a trip to market with them. He has some of last years hay left over and that may tide some of them over until spring. These aren't the people who are going to go out and look for good homes for their horses.
                            I've picked up horses at auctions and tracks and rehabbed them. I'm not saying something doesn't need to be done. But banning euthanasia at some humane societies hasn't helped the number of stay dogs or the condition you find some of them in.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by greysandbays View Post
                              You are operating from the premise that YOU have a god-given right to get good horses cheap. Hence your whine about having to pay as much as $1100 to "rescue" them
                              Methinks the whine you are hearing is all in your head... as the way I read it was that for a MERE $1100 thesehoress were rescued. I also read that the author believes that when slaughter is illegal that price will probably be cheaper without the bargain basement "slaughter" minimum price set.
                              Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                              http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by smilton View Post
                                From my experience if there isn't a slaughter price base line these horses remain out in a pasture and starve to death because the owner has no insentive to take them to market.
                                His incentive was he logs for a living and needed bigger horses to do so.. so in this case I would think he would have advertised them for sale and I also think it would have been in his best interest to keep them healthy and fit to see the most money for them so that he could afford the bigger models he needs. Otherwise, leaving them out in a field to starve, he's shot himself in the foot.
                                Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by smilton View Post
                                  But banning euthanasia at some humane societies hasn't helped the number of stay dogs or the condition you find some of them in.
                                  And having lots of shelters who DO euthanise animals routinely has also not made a dent in the number of animals abused and neglected. One does not necessarily preclude the other.
                                  Last edited by Angela Freda; Jan. 23, 2007, 02:05 PM. Reason: spelling of course!
                                  Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                  http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    No it does not. Neither is a quick fix. I just don't think banning without other measures in place is the answer. But at the same time it is hard to put restrictions on what an individual can do with their personal property.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      If you paid $1100 for 2 belgians that were headed for the kill pen you got ripped off. You can buy them for 200 - 300 at the auctions all of the time.
                                      Lapeer ... a small drinking town with a farming problem.
                                      Proud Closet Canterer!

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        A question for the original poster:

                                        Are you now going to call those horses you bought "rescues", sell them to someone as an "adoption" for a hefty "donation" and still keep ownership of them, so they have to return them to you?

                                        Who would fall for that, tell me?

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X