• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Spinoff- Under what conditions do YOU donate to Equine rescue efforts?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Spinoff- Under what conditions do YOU donate to Equine rescue efforts?

    So, after all of the discussion about donating to rescues- of one stripe, or another- what would it take to cause you to part with some $$ to help a horse, or horses, in need?
    When someone shows you who they are, BELIEVE them- Maya Angelou
    www.americansaddlebredsporthorse.net
    http://www.asbsporthorse.blogspot.com/

  • #2
    That is a good question, as we are not made of money, so we have to make it count for what we need out of our lives.

    I have a budget and have learned that you can't help all and every time, so you just do what you can within it and when you are at the limit you set, you just have to let others support the rescues in need.

    Even with a carefully assigned budget, you have to be flexible, as the unexpected tends to be more common than any plans we may want to depend on.

    I definitely try not to support those that are not only working for the direct rescue of horses, but use their rescue for political purposes, taking stances in other our horse industry is debating, like being completely against slaughter, or supporting animal rights groups.

    Fine if individuals do so, but when they represent their rescue, that is questionable in my eyes, if they are for or against what I think we should do, BOTH.
    A rescue is not a pulpit for one's own agendas, other than directly helping the horses in need of rescue.

    That is what rescue used to be and I understand people are changing that meaning today, but I don't have to go along with it and don't want to be supporting them with my money.

    Coming from the dog world, rescue is more specific there, you don't go telling others how to run their rescues, but you have set ideas of what is sensible or not.
    An example, no kill shelters, that end up warehousing unadoptable dogs, are in my eyes not fair to the dogs there for years and the ones that missed because there is not enough resources for all.
    But, I don't go telling no kill shelters how to handle their efforts to help dogs.
    Each one does what they can the way they see best.

    Comment


    • #3
      Mission

      Organization

      Financials

      Reputation

      Donor relations
      Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
      Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
      -Rudyard Kipling

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        I am looking for specifics here- not general topics. What does their mission need to be? How do you KNOW? Etc. Concrete standards under which you get on board. Reputation, as an exampe, is an interesting one, because there is always someone with another opinion...
        When someone shows you who they are, BELIEVE them- Maya Angelou
        www.americansaddlebredsporthorse.net
        http://www.asbsporthorse.blogspot.com/

        Comment


        • #5
          Uh -I'm not overly enthused about giving a lecture on Development/fundraising - especially with the hostility displayed by some rescues and their associates on this BB.

          But very generally - for any nonprofit

          Mission.

          Is the mission of the organization something I support or am interested in? (save the whales versus save the 3 toe yellow bellied salamander)

          Organization.

          How the nonprofit organized? Who is on their Board and what are their bios? Who are the leaders within the organization and what are their bios? Do they have clear policies and procedures? Is there transparency?

          Financials.

          How does the organization handle money? Do they file returns on time and do they make them available to the public as required? Are their financials easily available to the public (including the balance sheet).

          Reputation.

          I disagree with you here - the nonprofit is in charge of its reputation. No one gives it the reputation it has - the nonprofit earns it. For better or worse.

          Is the nonprofit reputed to be run by reasonable, informed people? Do their volunteers or employees (if any) have a standard of conduct they're expected to conform to?

          Donor Relations

          This is sort of an umbrella - this is often the determining factor for a potential donor. They'll forgive many things in a nonprofit - except being treated poorly.

          This area touches on all the rest. A nonprofit with staff or volunteers that are hostile, political or partisan, act unprofessionally in public (including bb's) is turning away donors they don't even know are out there.

          A nonprofit should avoid even the appearance of impropriety. This is especially true of small nonprofits, who rely on a very small pool of donors.

          Volunteers or staff that goad members of the public, accuse the public of "not loving horses's enough" or engage in acts which place potential donors on the defensive are not only losing a potential donor; they're damaging their reputation and efficacy.

          A nonprofit can learn a great deal about its effectiveness by looking over its records and seeing how many repeat donors there are - and if those repeat donors give greater amounts over time.

          If you're not seeing repeat donors giving more and more over time - and that pool of donors is not growing at a steady rate.... something is very wrong and it's not with the donors.
          Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
          Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
          -Rudyard Kipling

          Comment


          • #6
            ^^^^
            What Jswan said

            If I have to work at donating to a group...I just do not donate. Make it easy and people will give.

            And drama...if there is drama, I walk away. There is ALWAYS drama, but I am talking the type of drama that just transpired with the now long gone "rescuer" dragging a non-profit into the mire. No thanks.
            I Loff My Quarter Horse & I love Fenway Bartholomule cliques

            Just somebody with a positive outlook on life...go ahead...hate me for that.

            Comment


            • #7
              I prefer to go through local organizations that I have a connection with; I can directly see how well their actions mirror their mission statement and how they deal with tough decisions. The money that I donate also stays here...it goes to the feed stores, or the local vets, farriers, and trainers. Although I will personally try to adopt an OTTB when the time comes to get another horse, I'm more compelled to save the horses in my own back yard with my donation dollars.

              Comment


              • #8
                In very general terms, I am most impressed with the rescues that give the horses training to make them marketable. It takes a lot of energy and staff to not only feed a horse up and tend to his medical needs, but to go further and train the horse. A rescue like this can help a lot of horses.

                Other rescues operate more like retirement homes and have a lot of companion animal type horses.Although these damaged and old timer horses can pull on your heart strings, they are harder to adopt out.

                I understand how you can get caught up with one horse that needs $1,000s of dollars to rehab but would rather see that money spent to give several horses a chance.

                So i would be more inclined to help out a rescue that operates more like a business and keeps the horses moving.
                from sunridge1 Go get 'em Roy! Stupid clown shoe nailing, acid pouring bast@rds.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Personally I feel much better if a rescue has actually rescued something that needed to be rescued--ie done the heavy lifting of actually taking possession of a horse that was starving in a field, done rehab and retraining and then worked with the possible future owners to match them to this horse's needs . That to me is rescue. Of course that is expensive and long and some people just like the drama of the save. Paying board bills is pretty pedestrian stuff.

                  I'm NOT saying this was the situation recently but my warning bells go off when the rescue doesn't own the horse, uses emotionally manipulative and urgent words like slaughter and bail and ransom, wants a multitude of people on the Internet to chip in small amounts for that specific horse the rescue does not own and those people will never see, when the price of the horse appears to be above meat price not to mention the going rate for that kind of horse and the rescue has a longstanding and maybe even exclusive arrangement with a broker/ dealer who actually owns these animals.

                  To me anyway, that relationship is just begging for exploitation to occur--maybe of the rescue and maybe of the donors and maybe both. It's just a small step between helping a horse at a brokers to "I gotta move 10 horses a month at $X and I'll make it worth your while to do that."

                  Again I have no knowledge about the recent "save" and I'm not implying anything specific but that scenario is not farfetched and its the reason why the whole broker thing gives some of us pause.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    The rescue itself should be the only one discussing its own business practice / model / process. Really. If people have questions, resist the urge to leap all over the person asking them, alert the person running the rescue and let them address it.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Coreene View Post
                      The rescue itself should be the only one discussing its own business practice / model / process. Really. If people have questions, resist the urge to leap all over the person asking them, alert the person running the rescue and let them address it.
                      Thankfully AC4H was alerted to this most recent drama and they did answer the questions asked. It was pretty simple really...the OP/Fundraiser/"rescuer" needed to go through the proper channels and be approved as an adoptive home. Just like any other potential adopter.

                      The OP REALLY owes AC4H an apology for the nonsense they caused, but I see they have disappeared now that the "free" horse is no longer available.
                      I Loff My Quarter Horse & I love Fenway Bartholomule cliques

                      Just somebody with a positive outlook on life...go ahead...hate me for that.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Amen, sister. And all her buddies, too.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by ASB Stars View Post
                          So, after all of the discussion about donating to rescues- of one stripe, or another- what would it take to cause you to part with some $$ to help a horse, or horses, in need?
                          well


                          it would be a really really really hard thing to do....
                          Production Acres,Pro A Welsh Cobs
                          I am one of the last 210,000 remaining full time farmers in America.We feed the others.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Everything Jswan wrote, but will add

                            -I only work with and donate [mostly my time these days] to local rescues I know [having seen with my own eyes] the good works they do. That came about after insisting I knew the good CBER was doing... OY did I learn!

                            -I prefer rescues who have other sources of funds besides online bb donation drives- and in fact those who get the majority of their funds that way.

                            -PR work: the rescue I vol. with does booths at so many public events all summer- it's exhausting, but it gets their name out there, gets word out that the need exists and helps find new adopters/fosters/donors.

                            -honestly I avoid rescues who pay for their horses.... the rescue I vol. with rarely has to buy the horse to 'save' it and at times gets the person giving up the animal to cover some care [let me tell you she could teach diplomacy 101!]. Besides keeping costs to the rescue down, in a way I see it as showing the owner their responsibility to the animal and perhaps reinforcing that they are not in a place to get another.

                            - I also am against those who go to dramatic lengths to save a horse who's prognosis is poor. Euthanasia is not the worst thing that can happen to an animal.
                            Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                            http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              I look at each situation individually, even within the same rescue organization. Often I can be more helpful by offering services rather than a small amount of money. As I value my time equally, if not more, than money, I take that just as seriously.

                              I am disinclined to donate to a rescue whose policy is to keep unsound horses alive and eating up funds. I am also disinclined to donate to any rescue who fundraises to have surgery on an animal that has an unlikely prognosis of being anything other than pasture sound. I am more inclinded to donate to a rescue who is comfortable with euthanasia in those cases and is not afraid to say so.

                              I am more inclined to donate to rescues who try to place animals as quickly as possible with the least amount of placement criteria. Rescues who have no-resell contracts for all horses do not get my money. I understand that some horses may need to be adopted out as such but I don't think all should be.

                              I am directly contacted by reputable rescues on a fairly regular basis and asked to help with individual situations. One of my criteria for doing so, is that if I am going to foster a horse that it is not an open ended foster - meaning, there has to be a definate time frame in which the horse will be coming and then leaving. Willy-nilly buying/rescuing with no idea what to do w/the horse next leaves a bad taste in my mouth and I won't participate in that.
                              "Kindness is free" ~ Eurofoal
                              ---
                              The CoTH CYA - please consult w/your veterinarian under any and all circumstances.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                What J Swan said and adding in that I don't donate to rescues that don't handle money in a way *I* find wasteful.
                                As in I will not donate to a rescue that saves a 25 yo horse that requires expensive surgery or a younger horse that requires expensive surgery and it will probably never be sound afterwards. In my personal opinion I think this is wasteful although I do understand 100% that it does tug at the heart strings. However I think a GOOD rescue is someone who wants to do rescue because of the size of their heart but *runs* the rescue with their heads and not their hearts. But I will discontinue donating to a rescue that spends the income on an expensive procedure for one horse when they could have used that same amount to save, rehab and rehome multiple other horses.
                                I know a lot of people are "we can save them one at a time" but I prefer to use the same amount of money more wisely and save them "5 at a time." Since there isn't any shortage of horses in need in this country I prefer quantity over heart strings.
                                I also don't tend to donate to rescues that retire horses for long periods, taking up valuable room and resources for many others over the years. Foster them out as companions or euthanize them after they've enjoyed the good life for a while.
                                And I never donate to rescues where the rescuers ever are "OMG I'm crying" or ranting or otherwise emotional cases. As stated before...rescue is a business. get into it from your heart, run it with your head.


                                FWIW...I have an AC4H horse here. Got him last October or November (darned crappy memory of mine). I knew he was from the broker, understood the connection fully. Still had no issues buying him because:
                                a) I wanted to own my horse, not adopt him
                                b) I wanted something particular and the broker had what I wanted
                                c) could have gotten same thing, same price or possibly cheaper from other brokers out of state but knew some of the proceeds from purchasing through AC4H's broker went to help AC4H with the poor souls they do save from NH auction.

                                I've noticed the horses with issues or needing a lot of time and rehab are the AC4H horses, they give them the space, time and care they might need before adopting them out. The ready to ride and only somewhat rough (or not( horses through their site are the broker horses...which either go to private buyers with AC4H helping and getting a tiny portion for their rescue or they do go through the auction, some do ship to slaughter or go to other auctions. AC4H seems to go for the more desperate cases and the broker horses have the best chance of private home sales at the auction where the sad cases the rescue bids on wouldn't have much of a chance. Sometimes AC4H seems to accept donations to stop a broker horse going through auction so it can be housed for a while longer until a buyer is found and that's fine with me too. It's a numbers game to me...and the broker and AC4H is in it for the numbers. Seems to save more over time so I'm definitely keeping them on my list as future horse purchases come up. And those will be through the broker and not adopted.
                                For *me* it's a win/win. AC4H gets a portion of the sales price as a donation. The broker gets a sale and I don't begrudge someone their income or profit since it;s my choice to purchase or not. I get the horse I wanted for a price I couldn't touch here in CT...and AC4H does do a very credible job evaluating the broker and auction horses considering the volume they do. My horse came exactly as advertised. And as bad as the horse market is right now, there still isn't anywhere in my state to get a 5 yo dead broke safe sane and sound registered QH gelding for $650.
                                You jump in the saddle,
                                Hold onto the bridle!
                                Jump in the line!
                                ...Belefonte

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by MistyBlue View Post
                                  For *me* it's a win/win. AC4H gets a portion of the sales price as a donation.
                                  As I understand it they get $25/horse? Every dribble helps I guess.
                                  Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                  http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by EqTrainer View Post
                                    I look at each situation individually, even within the same rescue organization. Often I can be more helpful by offering services rather than a small amount of money. As I value my time equally, if not more, than money, I take that just as seriously.

                                    I am disinclined to donate to a rescue whose policy is to keep unsound horses alive and eating up funds. I am also disinclined to donate to any rescue who fundraises to have surgery on an animal that has an unlikely prognosis of being anything other than pasture sound. I am more inclinded to donate to a rescue who is comfortable with euthanasia in those cases and is not afraid to say so.

                                    I am more inclined to donate to rescues who try to place animals as quickly as possible with the least amount of placement criteria. Rescues who have no-resell contracts for all horses do not get my money. I understand that some horses may need to be adopted out as such but I don't think all should be.

                                    I am directly contacted by reputable rescues on a fairly regular basis and asked to help with individual situations. One of my criteria for doing so, is that if I am going to foster a horse that it is not an open ended foster - meaning, there has to be a definate time frame in which the horse will be coming and then leaving. Willy-nilly buying/rescuing with no idea what to do w/the horse next leaves a bad taste in my mouth and I won't participate in that.
                                    I couldn't have said it any better and the reasons above are what made me get involved with CANTER Mid Atlantic. I have no money to donate but have a lot of skills in retraining ottb's and how to transition them from track to riding homes. CANTER is able to move horses fairly quickly with a bit of retraining into them which allows us to put a bit of that money back into the program to keep the cycle going. They are sold for market value and do have a contract but not a no-resale clause. I am involved in selling a lot of the horses that do get retraining and I am really strict on the right homes. Getting a look at what types of decisions have to be made behind the scenes has been an eye opening experience for me but one that I am very supportive of. Horses that will not have quality of life are given a peaceful end and I believe that is the right thing to do for them and for managing the limited budget.

                                    There is never a shortage of trainers who want to "donate" horses to the program but in many cases those horses have injuries that require a lot of time off. The are accepted based on funding but also keeping in mind that those horses may either need to be euthanized or kept for a long period of time until they are rideable. For each one of those we take it reduces the funding for the sound horses who can be transitioned into new homes quickly without a big drain on funding.

                                    I am just a volunteer but I have a lot of respect for these types of program and the people who run them. I am a strong supporter of programs that help transition ottb's into new homes.
                                    http://www.benchmarksporthorses.com/

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Sunkissed Acres ;-)
                                      Approved helmet: Every time; every ride.
                                      "When a sport gets to be predictable it ceases to be fun." - RAR's wise brother

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by Risk-Averse Rider View Post
                                        Sunkissed Acres ;-)
                                        It is pretty obvious how much I love Sunkissed Acres
                                        I Loff My Quarter Horse & I love Fenway Bartholomule cliques

                                        Just somebody with a positive outlook on life...go ahead...hate me for that.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X