Originally posted by greysandbays
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
Forum rules and no-advertising policy
As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.
Board Rules
1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.
This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.
Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.
Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.
2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.
3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.
4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.
Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.
Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.
Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:
Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.
Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.
Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.
Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.
Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.
Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.
Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.
5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.
6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.
If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.
Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.
7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.
8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.
Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.
Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!
(Revised 2/8/18)
Board Rules
1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.
This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.
Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.
Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.
2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.
3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.
4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.
Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.
Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.
Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:
Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.
Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.
Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.
Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.
Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.
Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.
Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.
5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.
6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.
If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.
Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.
7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.
8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.
Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.
Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!
(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less
Euthanizing Healthy Horses - What do you think?
Collapse
X
-
Not really. The worst possible scenario with the vet and the best possible scenario with the truck just about balance each other out.Originally posted by mayhew View PostYou don't see the difference between having the vet come out and put him down in his own pasture, and trucking him three days to be held in a feedlot for a few weeks before killing him in a process never intended for horses?
Comment
-
I think that killing a healthy animal for convenience is a terrible, immoral thing to do. I believe that every possible effort should be made to allow the horse to live out a happy and healthy life.
My mom gave my first horse to a semi-retirement home when I outgrew her when we were both 14. We kept in touch and she was doing great. Six years later, the woman called and said that the mare was not doing well and she was going to have her put down. I drove a few hours to the farm to say my goodbyes to find a bright-eyed and busy-tailed mare who ran around the pasture with the vim and vigor of a three-year-old. A week later, I came back and got her and found out in a circumspect way that the owner really just wanted to free up a stall in her barn for a fancy new horse.
Four years later the mare is still going strong, healthy and happy baby-sitting weanlings and yearlings at her forever-retirement home.
There are extreme circumstances and so I will not say that it is never okay to euthanize a healthy horse. But I believe that in most cases when any healthy animal is euthanized, it is purely for human convenience and has nothing to do whatsoever with the animal. People should take responsibility for caring for the animals they breed or own - they shouldn't dump them for slaughter or kill them when they become a nuisance.
I also do not believe it is okay to say "oh, they would suffer a worse fate of abuse/neglect/slaughter." One wrong does not negate another wrong. None of those should be options. I refuse to compromise my morals and endores something that is immoral (unnecessary death) because I am afraid of something else that is immoral. We must strive to live in that perfect world, or we will never get closer to it being a reality.Last edited by Zevida; Sep. 28, 2006, 04:17 PM.
Comment
-
FWIW, I could only bring myself to put a healthy horse down if it was dangerous. I do worry, however, about what would happen to my horses if I was unable to care for them. There's a good chance that the majority of my horses will outlive me...then I have to trust that my executor will do the best he can to find them a safe place.DON'T MAKE ME COME DOWN THERE!!! - God
Comment
-
I don't know what the answer is - euthanizing a healthy horse really disturbs me - as does the whole slaughter issue. However, there needs to be some kind of process for unwanted horses. If transport and slaughter could be done in a humane manner I would almost prefer that - horses lead such useful lives - why shouldn't they be useful in death? I know we don't eat horse meat, but others do . . . and if euthanized the bodies are mostly useless, or so I believe - what about the effects on our landfills and water systems??http://fromdressagehorsetocowpony.blogspot.com/
"I am still under the impression that there is nothing alive quite so beautiful as a thoroughbred horse." -- John Galsworthy
Comment
-
I agree, but the fact is, most people will not go without for a horse they don't want. If they can't find someone else willing to carry the burden within their timeframe, they just want the problem "solved." Believe me, if I thought I could browbeat (or just beatOriginally posted by Zevida View PostBut I believe that in most cases when any healthy animal is euthanized, it is purely for human convenience and has nothing to do whatsoever with the animal. People should take responsibility for caring for the animals they breed or own - they shouldn't dump them for slaughter or kill them when they become a nuisance.
I also do not believe it is okay to say "oh, they would suffer a worse fate of abuse/neglect/slaughter." One wrong does not negate another wrong. None of those should be options. I refuse to compromise my morals and endores something that is immoral (unnecessary death) because I am afraid of something else that is immoral. We must strive to live in that perfect world, or we will never get closer to it being a reality.
) people into providing for a horse's retirement, I would.
"If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you." -Don Marquis
**CEO of the TQ "Learn How To Ride or MOVE OVER!!" Clique**
Comment
-
Did not read all the post but.. I think to say it is ok to euthanize a healthy useable horse just because you don’t want it any more is wrong. I think horses with issues like unsoundness or pain are a different issue. Horses that need training or retraining should not be euthanized IMO either. Send them off for training and sell them.
I have a dog that I got from a local vet that was brought in to him to be euthanized and he refused and got the woman to give the dog up. Look at my Buddy's picture and tell me this dog could not have found a good home!No hour of life is wasted that is spent in the saddle. ~Winston Churchill
Comment
-
Well- I can't honestly see too many sound horses being euthanized for convenience. A sound horse (mind and body) still has some value on the market and therefore I find it hard pressed for an owner not to attempt to sell and getting some $. There are also many rescues that would gladly take a sound horse so they may adopt out and raise money for their general purposes.
So while I *would* take issue with someone putting down a sound horse- I also would give the owner the benefit of the doubt for a horse that may have problems.
I hope people realize the stress horses take when going through sales and travelling from lot to lot. It's not a straight shot from the home barn to the plant. It's common that a horse may go through multiple sales and lots before reaching the end- hence the hides coming off the belt with more than one 'butt sticker'. I find it ironic that some people worry about feeding schedules, hay and grain quality, and colic while they own the horse but think it's okay to send him on the journey to the kill plant where the horse will certainly not get any grain, little rest, and a chance at hay if lucky for certainly more than 24 hrs.
Comment
-
I am not saying you are wrong for feeling that, but what's the answer? For the person who says they can't afford training, or board, or care and cannot find an immediate buyer--what are their options? Not being confrontational, but the issue of who is going to take these horses is a valid one. I've been spanked on this board more than once for telling people they are selfish for passing along their problems, but my concern is valid: where are all these horses to go? I don't believe there are enough homes for them, but I hope I am wrong....Originally posted by MSP View PostI think to say it is ok to euthanize a healthy useable horse just because you don’t want it any more is wrong. I think horses with issues like unsoundness or pain are a different issue. Horses that need training or retraining should not be euthanized IMO either. Send them off for training and sell them."If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; but if you really make them think, they'll hate you." -Don Marquis
**CEO of the TQ "Learn How To Ride or MOVE OVER!!" Clique**
Comment
-
In some parts of the country, people are having a tough time -giving- horses away, let alone selling them. I know when our rescue still took in donated horses (we now work primarily with l aw enforcement on neglect cases), we had several horses who were in good shape come to us after the owners tried for months to sell or even give them away. So while it isn't common, it isn't unheard of either..Originally posted by SuperSTB View PostWell- I can't honestly see too many sound horses being euthanized for convenience. A sound horse (mind and body) still has some value on the market and therefore I find it hard pressed for an owner not to attempt to sell and getting some $. There are also many rescues that would gladly take a sound horse so they may adopt out and raise money for their general purposes.Visit us at Bluebonnet Equine Humane Society - www.bluebonnetequine.org
Want to get involved in rescue or start your own? Check out How to Start a Horse Rescue - www.howtostartarescue.com
Comment
-
Originally posted by cowgirljenn View PostIn some parts of the country, people are having a tough time -giving- horses away, let alone selling them. I know when our rescue still took in donated horses (we now work primarily with l aw enforcement on neglect cases), we had several horses who were in good shape come to us after the owners tried for months to sell or even give them away. So while it isn't common, it isn't unheard of either..
I agree. I know of an 18 year old 16+h registered gelding right now that does a beautiful solid second level dressage test, will pack almost anyone around a cross-country course, totally sound, has nevery spooked or bucked in his life and is gorgeous to boot. Owners have been trying to find him a good home for months with no luck. He's totally free, the new owners just have to commit to continuing to ride him dressage because he loves it & supplying basic joint supplements. No takers. And he's just the most recent.
If it's sellable in the $7,500-12,000 range, there's ton of demand. Other than that, you literally can't give them away around here. And with the hay shortage, people don't have a lot of options left.
And then there's issues like my mare Zarah. She's pasture sound, but not rideable. I can afford to keep her...finances are not the issue. The issue is that this is a horse who really, really needs daily human attention. Without it, she becomes severely depressed. It's almost impossible to find a pasture mate that doesn't beat her up. I can't find anyone who wants to just fuss over her without being able to ride. I don't have time to spend more than a few minutes a day with her. After watching her depression increase steadily for several years now, I wish I would have put her down when it first became clear that she would never be rideable again. It would have been better for both of us. I don't expect Zarah will be with us next summer; when a chow-hound horse becomes so depressed that they ignore their grain I believe they're ready. I'll will no doubt feel guilty & my vet talked me out of putting her down once already. But I know my horse & if I can't find anyone to give her attention (not even take her to their property; she can stay with me; they just need to pet her & love on her), I'll be euthanizing her this fall.
Comment
-
A couple of years ago I would have said that it's a horrible thing to put down a healthy horse. But now, seeing how hard it is to find good homes for even giveaways, I've had to change my opinion.
A person I know sent a horse out on free lease- he'd been a dear member of the family, but was older and with lots of horses to feed, finding another place for him was just to everyone's benefit. He'd get attention, while saving the owner a little money for a while, and also freeing up time for her to work with her other horses. Even after checking out the leaser, and doing everything right, the horse came back way underweight and looking awful. And it's not the first time. Another friend did something similar and the horse came back in HORRIBLE shape, the person who took him saying that he couldn't catch the horse or get his halter on. It's hard. And finding another home for a horse just isn't always a guarantee of the horse's well being.
Should these owners have just kept the horses? Maybe.
Should they not have bought other horses to ride, instead keeping ONLY the older ones and waiting for things to get bad enough for euthanasia before purchasing younger models? Maybe.
But even if those bases are covered, there are always situations that come up... nothing in life is guaranteed- the stable income and mutual fund you have one day can turn into unemployment and a market crash the next. And in the event of something like that... well do you just hope for the best for your horse? Or do you put him down?
After seeing how these horses came back, I can't honestly say I wouldn't consider putting a horse down if I was in a bad situation. Technically, yes, it would be "killing for convenience." And that part feels bad... but after seeing how giveaways even to reputable people can turn out... *sigh*
Comment
-
If she is in a farm area try a large animal farm vet rather than equine vet. They then to be a bit more grounded in economic reality. Ot a local foxhunt might take them.Originally posted by VivaBaby View PostShe wanted to make an appointment to let both girls cross the bridge on a good day. The vet refused. He believes if she would spend the money on treatment they can both be kept comfortable and pasture sound for a couple more years. She's now called two more clinics and has yet been able to find vet who will help her.
IMHO that is wrong in so many ways. Two horses with no chance of improving, a stressed financial situation and an owner being force to find someone who can properly shoot her beloved horses because a vet refuses to help her give them a peaceful end.
Where's the mounting block? This short chick needs off her soapbox now.I wasn't always a Smurf
Penmerryl's Sophie RIDSH
"I ain't as good as I once was but I'm as good once as I ever was"
The ignore list is my friend. It takes 2 to argue.
Comment
-
Well said!Originally posted by catknsn View PostIf you can think up a law to enact to give people a freakin' heart or a sense of responsibility, you are more creative then I am. In the meantime...we need to continue to put good procedures in place for cleaning up the messes left by bad pet owners.
This question wasn't directed to me, but I'll answer it. In a world where everything is relative, you bet I believe euthanizing a horse is "morally superior" to sending him to slaughter.Originally posted by greysandbays View PostBut you DO admit that keeping him/euthanizing him makes you feel morally superior to somebody who would send him for slaughter, though, right?
Comment
-
A sound healthy sane horse isn't going to be hard to place. I highly doubt any of those would be put down for convenience. I don't blame a vet for not doing that either. BUT an older horse who needs joint supplements isn't really "sound" and anything with "strings attached" is going to be a harder sell. (for example) many of the riders who ride 2nd level will be beyond that older horse and need one younger and sounder. And if I take a horse he's mine, I'm not doing dressage if I don't like it because the owner thinks the horse likes it. Whose to say the horse wouldn't be JUST as happy getting lots of attention and getting to trail ride every day? As long as I give him the medicine to keep him comfy I'm riding him however I want.
Even the older horses who have some soundness issues have value if they are packers. there are MANY people who want a nice dead broke horse and don't mind going that extra mile for supplements if they can catch the horse, get on and just go ride without fear of being dumped or run off with.
SO if the horse cannot be placed then it is probably not rideable, has mental issues or has soundness issues. If the owner truly cannot afford the horse and it does have such issues then I'd rather see them put down because such a horse is on a really slippery slope sold down the road. A dangerous horse should be put down period. There are too many nice horses out there to risk people's or animal's lives on keeping one that is dangerous (and there some out there who are just born with screws loose, I know one!). No vet would not put down such a horse that I know of. In fact since he's the one who probably risks his life to treat him he'd probably be relieved to! The farrier might help for free!
IMO a horse that is in pain 24/7 is NOT pasture sound. She's not any kind of sound. She's suffering. She's marking time. How much is too much depends entirely on the horse. But if an animal is suffering and there is no way to relieve it then I have no problem putting that one down even if it is otherwise healthy. I don't know of any vets who would not do that either, any that do are not doing what is best for the animals. Or just dislike putting them down.
unless a vet openly denounces slaughter I would find their refusal to euthanize ANY horse somewhat hypocritical. because most of the slaughter bound horses are healthy and sound.
So eliminating all that we are down to the mostly healthy, mostly sound but older and just not used any more horses, probably in their late teens or 20s or more. While it is not the best thing to do I would not object to them being put down provided a real effort was made to place them somewhere. But at that age and questionable level/length of usefulness they are better off put down then sold down the road to just anyone and sometimes nobody DOES want them. But putting in a real effort means real work! personally I dread the day when I am FORCED to put down the horse but I understand that everyone is just not like me.Every mighty oak was once a nut that stood its ground.
Proud Closet Canterer! Member Riders with Fibromyalgia clique.
Comment
-
That is one of the more remarkably inaccurate statements I've seen here recently.Originally posted by I'm EBO View PostSad but true, euthanasia is often the least of all evils that can befall a horse.
AAEP as an organization is in the pocket of AQHA, ."It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay
...just settin' on the Group W bench.
Comment
-
In this case, I agree the horse should be euthanized. He's dangerous and will only end up in a bad situation, if you elect to get rid of him.Originally posted by arabhorse2 View PostYou're more than welcome to take on my 8 y/o gelding then, should I become financially unable to care for him.
However, do NOT try to ride him, stay out of his way or he will run you over, don't get in between him and his pasture mate, and be sure to stay away from his hooves when he rears up while you're leading him.
This horse has had training, and never been abused. He's not right in the head, period. I'd rather euthanize him than sell him.
If you think that makes me feel saintly, then you're sadly mistaken. Emotionally distraught is closer to the truth.
Comment
-
Seriously....are you KIDDING?Originally posted by greysandbays View PostNot really. The worst possible scenario with the vet and the best possible scenario with the truck just about balance each other out.
You don't think any horse would feel more at ease being at home, with people he knows,a kind hand and a little needle prick rather than....on a semi with probably 40 other horses crammed in, terrified, hungry and having no idea what was going on? And that's before ever reaching a plant?
The problem I'm seeing is more with the racing industry (well, I'm involved in it so it's where I see it the most anyway). There are just so many that are sent to killer sales....what happens once slaughter is banned? Do you actually think people will start humanely euthanizing the unwanteds? Or will they be dumped in some field somewhere to fend for themselves?
Personally I would want to see the owners to put their horses down. Take some responsibility rather than squeeking out the last hundred dollars on the horse that they can get.
I'm so tired of running around in a panic trying to find homes for these horses. Meanwhile the trainer or owner taps their fingertips on the table and says, "you have three days or he goes on the truck...." har-dee-har-har.
So yes, in my opinion putting a horse down humanely would be okay if all other options have been exhausted.
That's my opinion and I'm stickin' to it.RIP Spider Murphy 4/20/02 - 10/31/10
Comment
-
been there...
I've had a similar problem - on multiple occasions.Originally posted by VivaBaby View PostShe wanted to make an appointment to let both girls cross the bridge on a good day. The vet refused. He believes if she would spend the money on treatment they can both be kept comfortable and pasture sound for a couple more years. She's now called two more clinics and has yet been able to find vet who will help her
One, a seriously crippled gelding that we'd taken in decided he'd had enough and went down in his paddock. The vet refused to euthanize and instead tried to push an expensive multi-year treatment program. (The horse had been examined by 2 world-class vets - before we moved to the middle of nowhere - and we all agreed against attempting treatment) We finally got the boy up and luckily (yeah, a crazy statement) he soon colicked and the vet was willing to euthanize at that point.
The incident that most likely set the stage for the first one was a foal that was born deformed and very sick. We requested euthanasia and the (same) vet refused, demanding to pursue expensive treatments. We agreed and the foal lived - w/ highly questionable quality of life - for a year before a catostrophic injury resulting from his deformities forced him to be euthanized. Of course, the vet was unwilling to perform the euthanasia b/c it was the weekend, so we had to shoot him. Not fun.
Unfortunately, vets can make more $ treating horses than they can euthanizing them. Certainly, I think it's the minority of vets that view things this way, but if I can't get a horse that really needs it euthanized, I would hate to try to get a healthy horse put down!
Comment


Comment