• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

When slaughter is banned;

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by equinelaundry View Post
    No need for an economic model as the past clearly shows the balance of supply & demand.
    What am I missing here? I barely remember Econ 101 but if there's a large supply of something and the demand decreases or is stable, the price goes down. If there's a lot of demand for something, and the supply of it decreases or is stable, the price goes up.

    - There will be a higher demand for euthanasia.
    - Unless we start allowing lay people to perform euthanasia, the supply (vets) will not go up, it will remain the same.

    Doesn't this lead one to conclude that the cost of euthanasia will go UP?
    Shall I tell you what I find beautiful about you? You are at your very best when things are worst.
    Starman

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by JoZ View Post
      Doesn't this lead one to conclude that the cost of euthanasia will go UP?
      No, because the "supply" of euthanasia is not limited in any practical way.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by RoseBud143 View Post
        I have only skimmed through this, but county your views are very abrupt to say the least, and personally i dont see how a person can love and respect a horse as a companion and friend when there so uncarring about such a cruel end, would you feel any differnet if it was YOUR horse that was poss. stolen or ended up at a slaughter house and still alive while being butchered?, or still think of it as a usefull way of disposal??? or are you the type of person that belives in it so much that even you send your horses to slaughter after they dilligently tried so hard to please you only to be disposed of in this fashion?? never understood people who had the thought concept of "use it or loose it" and if this is not your piont o veiw than please explain this is just what i got out of the posts you posted on this topic
        There are several other threads on the topic here. I recommend you read them thoroughly and then state that those who oppose this slaughter bill are uncaring.

        Your comments about "still alive while being butchered" underscore the need for stricter rules governing slaughterhouses. No animal deserves this. I don't care if it's a horse or a cow. NO ANIMAL DESERVES THIS! And it makes me sad that the matter of horse slaughter makes this somehow an issue, while so many people don't give a crap what happens to the animal that ends up on their plate. I buy family-raised, locally slaughtered beef for a reason.

        Fix the slaughter industry. Hold them accountable. Then tell me that a captive bolt is a million times worse than euthanasia - and tell me why.

        Comment


        • #64
          Paragon, I am curious about the apparent mutual exclusivity of your position. Why would banning horse slaughter preclude reform of the slaughter industry?

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by LarkspurCO View Post
            No, because the "supply" of euthanasia is not limited in any practical way.
            Hmmm. Just availability of vets I guess.

            But my vet isn't going to reduce the price of a farm call, and the renderer isn't going to be any cheaper, or the backhoe guy, or the crematorium. Maybe the big pink shot... maybe. I very much doubt it.

            Euthanizing my old horse was $350 (emergency vet call included). I was lucky, the backhoe guy charged me $100. It probably wasn't legal to bury him but I wasn't inclined to search out the regulations at the time. At least the option was available to me -- I live on a farm. In my previous 20 years of horse ownership I've never before been in a situation where burial was a possibility... nor did I know anyone with a gun. I'd bet that's the case for many, many horse owners. And really, $450 would be a financial hardship for many of them too. Say all you want that people need to accept responsibility and the costs that come with it -- I will, and you will, but many others won't or can't or don't think that way. And no law is going to make them do so.
            Shall I tell you what I find beautiful about you? You are at your very best when things are worst.
            Starman

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by LarkspurCO View Post
              Paragon, I am curious about the apparent mutual exclusivity of your position. Why would banning horse slaughter preclude reform of the slaughter industry?
              I never said it did, and I apologise if I made it seem that way.

              I'm continuing to fall back on what I've always believed, and what seems to be represented on this forum: It's not the slaughter that upsets people - horses are euthanised with regularity. It's the fact that these animals are abused, neglected, and emotionally destroyed. Much of this happens before the horses ever get to slaughter.

              Nobody has provided a satisfactory answer for the question of what will happen to all these animals when they are no longer allowed to be slaughtered. Who will buy them from the low-end auctions when they're injured or on their last legs? Will they be purchased to be killed, but in a 'socially acceptable' way?

              And finally, again, what makes euthanasia - or taking your old friend out back to shoot him - so much more humane and acceptable than a captive bolt?

              I think it's a healthy helping of romanticism, chased down with a bit of hero complex. Yes, we can rescue horses. Yes, we can save them from death and abuse, and I hope we will all continue! I was blessed by my rescue, who was bought from under a kill buyer. He taught me a great deal. But overbreeders around the country are cranking out more than we can save. What will happen?

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Paragon View Post
                But overbreeders around the country are cranking out more than we can save.
                Ah, yes. that's kind of hte problem...

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by Paragon View Post
                  There are several other threads on the topic here. I recommend you read them thoroughly and then state that those who oppose this slaughter bill are uncaring.

                  Your comments about "still alive while being butchered" underscore the need for stricter rules governing slaughterhouses. No animal deserves this. I don't care if it's a horse or a cow. NO ANIMAL DESERVES THIS! And it makes me sad that the matter of horse slaughter makes this somehow an issue, while so many people don't give a crap what happens to the animal that ends up on their plate. I buy family-raised, locally slaughtered beef for a reason.

                  Fix the slaughter industry. Hold them accountable. Then tell me that a captive bolt is a million times worse than euthanasia - and tell me why.
                  no were am i sating tat a bolt is less or etter than the pink juice, only that it was apperant that "fix" the slaughtering issues" wasnt doing any thing and animal welfare was being stretched when you have animals eyes gauged out to behave better yet ok to travel?????? yes there may be an increase in horses BUT im sure that to will level out as one person said just b/c you wernt wanted ther doesnt mean no one wants you, the divorce one, BUT that aside trying to hold the slaughter industry accountable didnt work so this was the next step and i think it coundnt come soon enough

                  and im sure if a person could afford to care for a horse while it was being of use for thm tat they could put out the extra $$$ for a humane death Pink or bolt, instead of on that just lead to a dinner plate

                  you dont see Animal control killing our dogs and cats and shipping them overseas... they are humanly disposed off, and that at least is a step in th right direction for our equine friends.
                  Posted with my Android smartphone.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by RoseBud143 View Post
                    no were am i sating tat a bolt is less or etter than the pink juice, only that it was apperant that "fix" the slaughtering issues" wasnt doing any thing and animal welfare was being stretched when you have animals eyes gauged out to behave better yet ok to travel??????
                    Okay, what? Who's talking about gouging eyes out, and how does that relate to slaughter?

                    Originally posted by RoseBud143 View Post
                    yes there may be an increase in horses BUT im sure that to will level out as one person said just b/c you wernt wanted ther doesnt mean no one wants you, the divorce one
                    I'm not sure where human relationships and horse rescue correlate. It's comparing apples and peaches.

                    You know, maybe this is such a curious issue for me because I grew up in a town that had a slaughterhouse. It was a very small building, right on Main Street in this population-3,000 town, sandwiched between a bar and a bank. When sitting at the drive-thru on Tuesday mornings, the truck would pull up and four or five little brown cows would be herded into the building. The local meat market was a few blocks away, and they sold fresh, local everything. It smelled amazing and had a great reputation. Before my family moved away, my son, in kindergarten in 2002, went on a field trip there. All the classes go at some point, to see gross things like cow guts, and to see where their food comes from. They don't watch slaughters take place, but they know it's there, and they understand.

                    That's what happens when slaughter is a local affair. The cows come from just down the street, right out of Farmer Bill's pasture. They're killed quickly and easily. It's a reputable operation, owned by families. In some areas, local legislation shuts these places down. Cattle are forced to go on longer trips to meet their end, travelling to large, impersonal houses with shady reputations. It's really too bad.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      I'm on a h/j group on myspace and someone said that the AQHA is for slaughter houses?? Anyone know anything about this?

                      One of the news articles I read is why I think horse slaughter should be banned. Ranchers want a "quick and cheap" way to put down horses. However they're killed, they have already done their duties...ropers, show horses, pets, pleasure horses... they were bred and raised to be at their human's right hand, not to be discarded when they're all used up. I say give them the respect at the end of their life that they deserve after working for us for so many years.
                      aka Amanda
                      "For by the love that guides my pen, I know great horses live again."

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        I'm on a h/j group on myspace and someone said that the AQHA is for slaughter houses??
                        Kalele,

                        The AQHA is against anti-slaughter legislation; so is the APHA for that matter. Other breed associations may feel likewise, but those are the two that I know of that don't want slaughter outlawed.
                        Equus Keepus Brokus

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          RoseBud your post isn't even worth answering. Your certainly entitled to your opinion but then so am I.
                          Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Agreed.



                            Originally posted by poltroon View Post
                            In the end I think the only noticable change for the horses will be that there are fewer internet discussions on horse slaughter.
                            Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                            Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                            -Rudyard Kipling

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by MayS View Post
                              Do you have any idea how much the government spends our tax dollars toying with farm businesses? Imagine if crops sold for *actual* prices and not the subsidized prices (eg. cash row crops) or actual prices to produce (eg. milk). Your government spends tax $ to promote certian farm industries while ignoring others. They back crop insurance. They dictate how much in property tax farmers pay, but then they play favorites if you sign away some of your rights (PA's "Clean and Green", selling development rights, etc). They spend tax dollars on studying wetlands, and then they declare some of your fields "wetlands" effectively taking use away from the farmer. Government plays all sorts of games with crop prices by doing import embargos or conversely allowing dumping of some farm products on our market. Dont tell me this doesn't affect you; every thing from your own horse farm's value to horse grain prices to availability of hay can all be linked to government's meddling. If you object to the government meddling, banning inhumane horse treatment is the least of your worries.
                              Yes, I do want the government out of farming. Let fair market determine the cost of food. People in the US pay the least percentage of their income for food of any country in the world. But that is besides the point. Horses with the exception of a very small few (a few Amish and ranchers) it not farming it is a hobby or sport. There are those that make a living in the horse industry but it is for others entertainment not farming.

                              This entire subject evolves around are horses livestock or pets. The anti-slaughter folks believe that horses are pets and therefor protected and special critters. Becareful on that slippery slope!

                              I would love to go on but must attend to the milking of my livestock. LF
                              Lostfarming in Idaho
                              http://i512.photobucket.com/albums/t...etPleasure.jpg

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Paragon View Post
                                Okay, what? Who's talking about gouging eyes out, and how does that relate to slaughter?

                                Here is the link to the article, and you can find the related thread on COTH if you search for Texarkana.

                                http://www.saplonline.org/news/texarkana.htm

                                Edited to add: for the faint hearted, the pix are very disturbing.
                                ************************
                                \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

                                Comment


                                • #76
                                  Originally posted by Kalele View Post
                                  I'm on a h/j group on myspace and someone said that the AQHA is for slaughter houses?? Anyone know anything about this?
                                  .
                                  AQHA states it's position and why in several publications, including the July/Aug 06 Americas Horse, pg. 14. They take no position on the consumption of horse meat, outside their scope. They do state that "by allowing animal rights activist to determine how we manage our horses opens the door to letting them put limits on what we can or cannot do with our horses". They have activily supported legislation to ensure safe and humane transport to the 3 Federal plants along w/ guidelines as to how the horses must be treated. They have also donated milions upon millions of dollars for equine reserach, which benefits all horses.

                                  Here is more from AQHA www.aqha.com/association/who/unwantedhorses.html

                                  Hope this answers your question, and more importantly, provides the facts in this debate.

                                  Comment


                                  • #77
                                    Originally posted by luvmytbs View Post
                                    Here is the link to the article, and you can find the related thread on COTH if you search for Texarkana.

                                    http://www.saplonline.org/news/texarkana.htm

                                    Edited to add: for the faint hearted, the pix are very disturbing.
                                    Interesting, but I wonder if this is a normal, documented occurrence? Because I could take a look at the breeding operation that sent my boy to auction, emaciated and stunted, and say that breeding leads to neglect. It doesn't, of course, because there are jillions of competent breeders in the world. I like to think that most horses out there, slaughterbound or otherwise, are allowed to live without this kind of horrific incident.

                                    I read this article and I'm not sickened because these horses are going to slaughter. I'm saddened, of course - I think it's a damned shame when people discard any animal. That's why I have three rescue cats. (Hubby said no more. Boo!) But I'm absolutely sickened by the treatment they received. No animal deserves that, and I think this further supports the idea that animals bound for slaughter need to be treated with respect. Reforming slaughter is a step in the right direction.

                                    Comment


                                    • #78
                                      Originally posted by SLW View Post
                                      AQHA states it's position and why in several publications, including the July/Aug 06 Americas Horse, pg. 14. They take no position on the consumption of horse meat, outside their scope. They do state that "by allowing animal rights activist to determine how we manage our horses opens the door to letting them put limits on what we can or cannot do with our horses". They have activily supported legislation to ensure safe and humane transport to the 3 Federal plants along w/ guidelines as to how the horses must be treated. They have also donated milions upon millions of dollars for equine reserach, which benefits all horses.

                                      Here is more from AQHA www.aqha.com/association/who/unwantedhorses.html

                                      Hope this answers your question, and more importantly, provides the facts in this debate.

                                      Yep, there is the key....."animal rights". Nice little spin to cover up the welfare of animals by cloaking it with a PETA mentality.

                                      As an owner of an American Quarter Horse, but non-supporter, I would hope they support research other than reproduction.
                                      "Concern for animals is a matter of taking the side of the weak against the strong, something the best people have always done." Harriet Beecher Stowe 1811-1896

                                      Ponies are cool!

                                      Comment


                                      • #79
                                        I don't think animals going to slaughtered are being discarded at all people have been eating them saince the dawn of time. I think theres no excuse to abuse them but slaughter is as american as apple pie like it or not its a fact.
                                        Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                                        Comment


                                        • #80
                                          Originally posted by Kalele View Post
                                          I'm on a h/j group on myspace and someone said that the AQHA is for slaughter houses?? Anyone know anything about this?
                                          Yes ma'am, they make absolutely no attempt to deny it. Here's their latest press release on how "disappointed" they are will the passage of the bill...

                                          Now, I was only ever an AQHA member for about 4 years b/c I was catch-riding on that circuit and had to be.

                                          But if I were a member right now, I'd very soon not be.
                                          "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X