• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

When slaughter is banned;

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    Forgive me if this has been covered in one of the numerous other threads on the slaughter topic. I was curious to know what the legality of horse slaughter is in Europe. I understand that the slaughterhouses here are owned by Europeans, such as the one in Texas that is owned by a Belgium company. If approximately 90,000 U.S. horses are sent to slaughter each year here, how many are killed in Europe for food?? Are there as many horses in Europe that are meeting the same fate, or are their horses protected in some manner? Does it vary by country? I'm curious if the number of slaughter-bound horses are equal or greater in Europe.

    And will horses in the U.S. still be slaughtered for pet food? This bill is aimed at stopping human consumption only, correct?

    Found the answer to my own question regarding pet food-

    "The horse-slaughter industry is distinct from the rendering business, which turns horse carcasses into products such as paint thinner, soap, or pet food. (In dog food, horse is sometimes labeled "animal by-products.")

    Anti-slaughter advocates say they are not opposed to rendering, because the animals are put down painlessly, usually with a shot of sodium pentobarbital. Because meat from animals killed in this fashion is unfit for human consumption, the horse-meat business employs traditional slaughter methods--the same used for cattle, pigs, and goats."
    Last edited by Cammie; Sep. 7, 2006, 06:38 PM.

    Comment


    • #22
      Really? Making something illegal makes people responsible? So why is there so much child abuse and neglect?

      And where did you come up with euthanasia costs coming down? It can cost up to 2K to euthanize and dispose of a horse carcass where I live. It ain't the shot that is expensive.

      No - people won't pay the consequences. Horses will. People pay fines, get embarrassed or vilified, or get convicted and spend some time in jail with all the comforts of home.

      Horses pay the consequences.

      I don't have a problem with slaughter ending in ths US - I have a problem with the fact that there is no safety net for these animals - rescues cannot absorb them all - there are simply not enough homes and no place for them to go. With a dog or cat - you can take them to the shelter - there will be NO option for a horse owner. None. Threats of punishment (that won't be enforced) - won't do the horses any favors at all.

      Oh well - like I said - it would be political suicide for a politician to vote against this Bill. To them - it's just another day at the office. In the real world - that vote translates into some real problems that we are not equipped to deal with.

      Cammie - just FYI - horses are not used for pet food in the US. In Europe, horses are slaughtered and eaten all the time. It is accepted as a standard practice and the costs for horsemeat are similar to any other meat.


      Originally posted by equinelaundry View Post
      Silly J Swan, no, they won't. But owners will have to take responsibility for their actions or lack thereof. Euthanasia costs, based on the "supply & demand" should come down. Everyone, from breeders, vets, owners, sellers will have to make concscience decisions or pay the consequences.
      Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
      Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
      -Rudyard Kipling

      Comment


      • #23
        Are they slaughtered the same way in Europe as they are here? Or, do they have and use practices that are "correct" for killing a horse...and dont have to shoot a bolt through its head 5 times?

        I am all for it being banned in the Us, but, if its not...there needs to be some rules and such made, just like there are in the cow, chickens, etc, slaughter business.

        Yes, people need to be held accountable for what they do, but lets face it, thats NOT going to happen everywhere. People need to take responsablity for their animals, but thats not going to happen everywhere.
        Never Ride Faster Than Your Guardian Angel Can Fly
        Way Back Texas~04/20/90-09/17/08
        Green Alligator "Captain"

        Comment


        • #24
          I am happy about the slaughter bill being passed in the house and I am not in denial that there are/will be problems. But I've never been one to sweep my problems under the rug(or send my don't wants to slaughter). So as a nation of horse owners we will have to face our problems.
          How do we get started with better solutions for those excess horses?

          - how do we get clinics/vet schools to offer more inexpensive euthanasia?
          - can these schools use the bodies for teaching?
          - can we get government to help fund euthanasia/cremation/disposal?
          - will breeders that mass produce lower quality horses reduce their output because it is not as easy to dump their unwanted young horses?
          - can we provide better/more animal control enforcement?
          - can we get goverment to help fund santuaries/rescues(we're going to need a lot more of them)?

          We need to start focusing our efforts on solutions. How do we get started?
          There is a starting place for everything.

          I just saw about 4 mares and foals on a well know west coast rescue feedlot. Moron...that dropped them off should be......

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by J Swan View Post
            Really? Making something illegal makes people responsible? So why is there so much child abuse and neglect?
            It doesn't make people more responsible, but it sure makes it easier to help those abused/neglected kids. Can you imagine if it was legal? "Sorry kid. I know you're hungry and dirty and your mom just beat the cr*p out of you, but there's no law against it. Now, quit your crying and run along and play like a good kid."
            DON'T MAKE ME COME DOWN THERE!!! - God

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by J Swan View Post
              And where did you come up with euthanasia costs coming down? It can cost up to 2K to euthanize and dispose of a horse carcass where I live. It ain't the shot that is expensive.
              Where do you live that it costs $2,000?

              I respectfully disagree with you on this, JSwan.

              Here having the vet to come out to my farm and do it, then have removal professionally done cost me a little under $300. The nearest rendering plant is actually in another state, so that price would be less if I wasn't so far from it. Not making that number up...it's what it actually cost me a few months ago to put down my poor old QH mare.

              If you own a backhoe and a gun, the costs could be a few bucks worth of diesel fuel it'll take to dig that hole.

              If you don't know how to use a gun, this same livestock service can do it for you at your location or theirs... then you don't have a vet fee. And you can still decide between burial or removal.

              I don't buy the excuse that it's too "expensive" to put a horse down humanely; this just as much a part of horse ownership as purchase price and hay. What if your horse founders/colics badly tomorrow & won't recover? Is it OK to sell him to the feedlot... maybe he'll be alive long enough to sell him for meat? If he dies before he can be dumped at a feedlot, is it ok not to bury/remove the carcass because the owner finds it too "expensive"? When does the lack of owner responsibility end?
              Veterinarians for Equine Welfare

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by county View Post
                I think so many people get hung up on the hauling costs they forget Can and Mex border the U.S. its a whole lot closer to haul a horse from here in Mn. to Can then to Tx. Same goes for places like Az. going to Mex.

                And as I've said before you want to haul a load of livestock into Can. come on up I know of at least a dozen places to go across thats not monitored.


                So if slaughter is banned, you said that you would stop rescueing horses because you couldn't be guarenteed of getting some money back. Why don't you keep rescueing and just cross over to Canada and sell them to slaughter there, since it is so easy?

                Comment


                • #28
                  Sorry but it ain't the shot that's expensive - you got that right JSWAN..

                  That was the LEAST of my expense in putting down my injured horse - the backhoe operator robbed me of almost 800.00 plus the burial license and a lost day's pay -

                  altogether - almost 1,000 for putting down my horse. I did it because it needed to be done, but not everyone has that kind of money just sitting around waiting for a horse to be put down.

                  Sorry but around here, the best a horse can hope for is an owner like me - the worst - left to "live or die" in the back field and a bag of lime if he don't make it.

                  That's the truth of the situation!

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #29
                    At the risk of starting a fist fight - I would be more inclined to support responsible and humane laws for the transport and slaughter of animals. What the carcass is eventually used for is immaterial. In my view, an outright ban is pretty irresponsible.
                    ... _. ._ .._. .._

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      Why don't I cross the border and sell them? because it will be against the law. And I'm accesory to a crime? Which one?
                      Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        That's the problem, MayS. Folks can only relate to what the situation is in THEIR part of the world.

                        I recently spent 200$ having a PYGMY GOAT euthanized - and I buried her on my own farm. I live in Virginia - Fauquier County. Just because it might cost you less where you live- does not mean that is the case all over the country.

                        I am not using costs of euthanasia to justify sending a horse to slaughter - but I do ask that people THINK about what other people might be dealing with - what struggles or difficult decisions they may have to make - where those people might live, how much access they have to certain services, what business challenges they face, etc.

                        The laws and regulations regarding slaughter are pretty much the same for every species of animal slaughtered in the US. The abuses and violations of those laws and regs occur to EACH species - not just horses.

                        While everyone has their knickers in a twist and their hankies out over the horses - they are ignoring the big picture - that we really need to focus on overall improvment in livestock handling and slaughter practices.

                        I feel the slaughter ban argument detracts from the larger issue.

                        And yes, in many parts of this state the total cost of end of life can be EXTREMELY expensive. Not everyone has a backhoe, not every jurisdiction allows burial of carcasses, not every euthanasia is conveniently scheduled to avoid emergency fees, hospital trips, etc.



                        Originally posted by MayS View Post
                        Where do you live that it costs $2,000?

                        I respectfully disagree with you on this, JSwan.

                        Here having the vet to come out to my farm and do it, then have removal professionally done cost me a little under $300. The nearest rendering plant is actually in another state, so that price would be less if I wasn't so far from it. Not making that number up...it's what it actually cost me a few months ago to put down my poor old QH mare.

                        If you own a backhoe and a gun, the costs could be a few bucks worth of diesel fuel it'll take to dig that hole.

                        If you don't know how to use a gun, this same livestock service can do it for you at your location or theirs... then you don't have a vet fee. And you can still decide between burial or removal.

                        I don't buy the excuse that it's too "expensive" to put a horse down humanely; this just as much a part of horse ownership as purchase price and hay. What if your horse founders/colics badly tomorrow & won't recover? Is it OK to sell him to the feedlot... maybe he'll be alive long enough to sell him for meat? If he dies before he can be dumped at a feedlot, is it ok not to bury/remove the carcass because the owner finds it too "expensive"? When does the lack of owner responsibility end?
                        Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                        Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                        -Rudyard Kipling

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by J Swan View Post
                          Really? Making something illegal makes people responsible? So why is there so much child abuse and neglect?

                          And where did you come up with euthanasia costs coming down? It can cost up to 2K to euthanize and dispose of a horse carcass where I live. It ain't the shot that is expensive.

                          No - people won't pay the consequences. Horses will. People pay fines, get embarrassed or vilified, or get convicted and spend some time in jail with all the comforts of home.

                          Horses pay the consequences.

                          I don't have a problem with slaughter ending in ths US - I have a problem with the fact that there is no safety net for these animals - rescues cannot absorb them all - there are simply not enough homes and no place for them to go. With a dog or cat - you can take them to the shelter - there will be NO option for a horse owner. None. Threats of punishment (that won't be enforced) - won't do the horses any favors at all.

                          Oh well - like I said - it would be political suicide for a politician to vote against this Bill. To them - it's just another day at the office. In the real world - that vote translates into some real problems that we are not equipped to deal with.

                          Cammie - just FYI - horses are not used for pet food in the US. In Europe, horses are slaughtered and eaten all the time. It is accepted as a standard practice and the costs for horsemeat are similar to any other meat.
                          Obviously 100+ don't care about political suicide. And yes, we are equipped with the forces to deal with the real problems. It is a joint effort, just as ending child abuse is, poverty, health insurance and any other number of issues.

                          If a threat of punishment is not taken seriously then those cases will have to be dealt with on an individual basis. Again, it comes down to laws and those who are willing to go the distance. Don't think your community/state animal cruelty laws are good enough? Help to change them. Are they good but not enforced? Demand that they are. Horse suffering and the tax payers have to pay the cost of housing? Demand that the prosecutor collects all fines. Honestly, if lawmakers would enforce the law the consequences of breaking them would soon make it too risky to break them.

                          The safety net is YOU. It is also me. It's also the community. This is a man-made problem and must be dealt with just like any other unpleasantness.

                          It's silly to think that euthanasia price wouldn't come down since everything is based on supply & demand. I'm sorry you had to pay $200 to euthanize your goat this summer but you chose to have the goat and the responsibility that comes with it. You knew the goat was in distress and you did have the option of a quicker death by your hand so the goat wouldn't suffer for, if I remember correctly, 2+ hours. Now you have to decide what end will come for your other goats when the time comes. If you can't afford it, rehome.
                          "Concern for animals is a matter of taking the side of the weak against the strong, something the best people have always done." Harriet Beecher Stowe 1811-1896

                          Ponies are cool!

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Originally posted by county View Post
                            Why don't I cross the border and sell them? because it will be against the law.


                            Exactly!!!!!!

                            Most people who currently sell to slaughter are law abiding citizens. If it becomes illegal to slaughter or transport for slaughter (out of the country), most people WILL NOT do that. THey are not suddenly going to be willing to become criminals. Yet, the pro-slaughter side wants everyone to believe that all 90,000 horses will be taken out of the country or left to starve.

                            There may be a few people who will transport out of the country illegally, but I'd rather risk a couple of hundred/ or thousand horses being killed out of the country, than GUARANTEE that 90,000 will be slaughtered. If the goal of a 90% successful first time hit ratio applies, that means that 9000 horses will not be insensible after the first hit...AND THAT IS IF THEY MEET THAT 90% GOAL. I doubt even 9000 horses would be illegally crossed into CA/MX, but if they did, and say they only have a 80% clean kill ratio , then that is only 1800 horses that have to be hit twice. I think most horses would rather risk a few being transported illegally, than guarenteeing certain death for 90,000.

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              And what about that horse meat?

                              On a related note, I always wonder why it is that this horse meat is desirable? The meat from our horses is not at all like beef or chicken or other livestock that is raised for the sole purpose of human consumption. Horses that live as pets and companions in the U.S. that sadly end up in slaughterhouses have been fed any number of supplements, given any number of vaccines, de-wormers, have been fed any number of different feeds with any number of additives... A horse's intake is not regulated like that of commercially raised livestock. I don't understand why anyone would want to eat it in the first place? Is it even safe or healthy?

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                The pro slaughter side wants people to beleive all 90,000 horses will starve or be hauled out of country? Where did you see that at I think your making things up as you go.
                                Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  What do we give horses that cattle don't get? I know both species here get the same supplements, wormers, and medicines.
                                  Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    As I have already said - it ain't the shot that is expensive, my dear. If my vet cuts me a break on the shot - there are always other costs.

                                    And the goats were rescues. Like many people - we do the best we can with what we have. Yes - next time I'll just use a firearm - though I did not have a problem with paying the 200$ for euthanasia - Koza's death was used to illustrate that costs of euthanasia can be expensive in many parts of the country.

                                    At the risk of repeating myself - it ain't the shot that's costly.

                                    I for one would like to know the economic model used to predict that costs will come down. Did Brookings perform a study?



                                    Originally posted by equinelaundry View Post
                                    Obviously 100+ don't care about political suicide. other unpleasantness.

                                    It's silly to think that euthanasia price wouldn't come down since everything is based on supply & demand. I'm sorry you had to pay $200 to euthanize your goat this summer but you chose to have the goat and the responsibility that comes with it. You knew the goat was in distress and you did have the option of a quicker death by your hand so the goat wouldn't suffer for, if I remember correctly, 2+ hours. Now you have to decide what end will come for your other goats when the time comes. If you can't afford it, rehome.
                                    Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                                    Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                                    -Rudyard Kipling

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      I guess this would be a bad time to let you know how much pus is legally allowed to be in milk.



                                      Originally posted by duecavalle View Post
                                      On a related note, I always wonder why it is that this horse meat is desirable? The meat from our horses is not at all like beef or chicken or other livestock that is raised for the sole purpose of human consumption. Horses that live as pets and companions in the U.S. that sadly end up in slaughterhouses have been fed any number of supplements, given any number of vaccines, de-wormers, have been fed any number of different feeds with any number of additives... A horse's intake is not regulated like that of commercially raised livestock. I don't understand why anyone would want to eat it in the first place? Is it even safe or healthy?
                                      Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                                      Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                                      -Rudyard Kipling

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by J Swan View Post
                                        I guess this would be a bad time to let you know how much pus is legally allowed to be in milk.
                                        Go ahead and tell me, I hate milk.

                                        And fwiw, I'm anti-anti-slaughter.

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          Originally posted by Two Simple
                                          Yes.

                                          If there were enough good homes for these animals, they wouldn't BE at slaughter houses. So banning slaughter will do NOTHING except ensure the pain, suffering, neglect, and abuse be drug out for years. Or, as you said, thousands of miles.


                                          County- Regarding where pro- slaughter people have stated that the horses will be taken out of the country or starved...see above post as just ONE example. There are many others just like it throughout these threads.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X