• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Off Course

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Well said, Mistyblue. This indeed is a major concern of people who own horse farms, train, board, or compete.

    There are many politicians, zoning folks and developers that would just love for horses to be reclassified - and we're helping them by not thinking of the big picture.

    There is a thread just now on taxing horses in CT, and the current Bill in committee in the House emphasizes the horse as an animal used "primarily for pleasure, recreation and sport" - not as livestock or working animals - which indeed many of them are.

    Pets are being subjected to taxing and higher licensing fees throughout the country - this is going on right now. We don't want horses to be considered a "luxury item" of personal property, nor do we want them to be classifed as "pets" - which would eliminate the land use/ag status of horse farms, boarding stables, show facilities - and have many unintended consequences.

    This is not a pro/anti slaughter issue - this is common sense, plain and simple. You can ban horse slaughter and still keep the horse classified as livestock - but that Bill isn't helping matters......
    Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
    Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
    -Rudyard Kipling

    Comment


    • Jetsmom - it doesn't have to. But if you've ever owned your own business - you should know that the IRS insists you make a profit or cut your losses or be considered a hobby. I think we all agree that the big jump in slaughter numbers a few years back was because the IRS clamped down on horse businesses....

      Regardless - the IRS code doesn't have much to do with what MB said - it's true that in many localities people in power are looking at horse farms and seeing dollar signs. A developer would love for horse farms to lose their land use valuation. That is not the purview of the IRS - but of the locality.

      Setting precendents like the language in that Bill does nothing to further the assertion that horses are livestock. It's a gradual erosion - and at the local level - such taxes are already occuring and more are proposed.



      Originally posted by jetsmom
      MB- could you show me where in the tax code it states that horses must be slaughtered to be considered livestock, and where an ag business must have livestock in order to reap any tax benefits. The reason I ask is that if you read pg 4 of the link provided, they are pretty convincing that the above is not true.
      Since we don't consider horses food animals, and they are still livestock, it should make no difference to ban slaughtering them. THe sale of horse meat in this country is illegal as it is. Yet they are considered livestock.
      Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
      Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
      -Rudyard Kipling

      Comment


      • I'm afraid this is all too true..

        Originally posted by MistyBlue
        Not to throw another stick on the fire...however...another thing not being considered very well (possibly not at all) in the stopping of equine slaughter is:
        If we stop equine slaughter we are in effect saying equines aren't livestock.
        If equines aren't livestock...the governement of each and every state can and most definitely WILL tax the living snot out of each and every private horse owner and equine business.
        Boarding barns, training barns, etc will no longer be farmland or ag businesses. They'll need to be reclassified as Business Property and thus taxed as such. Do you know the difference between business/commercail property taxes of large acreage and ag taxes? It's enough for private owner to sell their animals and boarding barns to either close down or double,triple and in some states even quadruple their board rates to cover their massively inflated taxes. Dumping tons more horses into a system where truly now only the elite can afford them.
        My property taxes alone, on 4.5 acres of CT land will go from $5200 annually to $9600. Not to mention the actual tax on my once livestock and now luxury/hobby item. CT is already fighting tooth and nail to stop property taxes on equines...the state is trying to liken them to boats and the like. We're fighting the tax not just because it's wrong...but because you can not tax livestock.
        Do we really want to stop equines from being livestock? If so, then they can't be slaughtered at livestock plants...and most of us on here cannot own them either. And forget trying to afford board anymore if you board yours out.
        And a real possibility! Everyone want a law against something, well If we are not very careful we will legislate ourselves right out of our freedom that we take for granted. Everyone want to "Make a law" well that can really backfire on us all, horsepeople, americans in general. Its a really slipperyslope. one that we need to be very careful about.
        Some people may not think that something like banning slaughter could cause any reprocussions, I think it would be a poiticians dream, Look at what CT is trying to do. Be careful what one wishes for. I think that is a very real point that Mistyblue brought up.

        Comment


        • Those of you who live places where your horses qualify as "livestock" and your property is taxed as 'ag exempt' are lucky. It isn't like that everywhere.

          In many counties in Texas (not all, but many), if you own horse property, you do not qualify as ag. exempt unless you are breeding & selling horses. Owning horses isn't enough. Showing isn't enough. In some places running a training business isn't enough.

          Horses themselves aren't taxed, but the property sure is. ( I know, I'm not ag. exempt here!).

          Horses are not treated the same as livestock - no matter what the USDA (either in their NAIS-promoting guise or in their slaughterhouse-protecting guise) say. They are treated like livestock when it is convinient for the government, and they're treated like non-livestock when it is convinient.
          Visit us at Bluebonnet Equine Humane Society - www.bluebonnetequine.org

          Want to get involved in rescue or start your own? Check out How to Start a Horse Rescue - www.howtostartarescue.com

          Comment


          • MB- could you show me where in the tax code it states that horses must be slaughtered to be considered livestock, and where an ag business must have livestock in order to reap any tax benefits.
            Okay, finally not getting the "refresh" page again when I try to post.
            Jetsmom...a horse doesn't require being slaughtered to be thought of as livestock. However, it's definitely a huge step in the direction of reclassifying them. And it won't be to pet status because pets aren't taxed. Pets also don't require acreage, useable acreage that can make a lot more money as something else.
            A boarding barn or training barn needs to have livestock on it if it is an ag zoned. Otherwise it must have some form of agriculture...food plants, cattle, pigs, chickens, etc. It's not equines that are required but some form of ag business to retain it's ag status. Not many boarding barns or training barns are going to start an egg or dairy business or grow corn on their acreage to keep their ag/farm status.

            if you own horse property, you do not qualify as ag. exempt unless you are breeding & selling horses. Owning horses isn't enough. Showing isn't enough. In some places running a training business isn't enough.
            Cowgirljean, same here in CT. If you're ag zoned in order to be considered ag for tax purposes as an equine business, you must be breeding or selling equines. Which is why so many boarding barns and training centers also bring in horses themselves to re-sell...I can't name a single decent training or show facility in my area that doesn't also list equines for sale or breed a couple annually to maintain their ag status.
            Also, where are we getting our horses if not from the breeding or sales places? Even auction and backyard horses were bred somewhere at some point. The issue isn't so black and white...there's a whole lot of gray in there that few are taking notice of...and even fewer are projecting what impact changes made now will have in the future. It doesn't always seem like something as horrible as current slaughter conditions are being stopped will impact almost every equine owner, big or small, in this country. But it can, very easily. Kind of like the butterfly effect. One ripple can cause a tidal wave. Following legislation (on most things, not just farming and ag and livestock issues) shows how this happens...many to most smaller issue changes that are changed aren't done so with just the public's opinion in mind...they're done to start setting new precedents that will ultimately make more income at a later date or be a bigger benefit somehow.
            Right now the gov is indeed treating equines in whichever capacity benefits them the most at any certain time. Some of us are trying to change that and come up with a definite classification for equines across the board. By saying, "Oh, I'm not a big breeder or sales barn" or "My place isn't zoned ag anyways" can very easily change your actual enjoyment of equines at a later date even if you aren't directly impacted at the time of changes made. The ripples those changes cause (that we won't even see) will keep spreading and growing until most of us are hit with a tidal wave we never saw coming, yet one we ourselves helped put into motion.
            You jump in the saddle,
            Hold onto the bridle!
            Jump in the line!
            ...Belefonte

            Comment


            • Originally posted by jetsmom
              MB- could you show me where in the tax code it states that horses must be slaughtered to be considered livestock, and where an ag business must have livestock in order to reap any tax benefits. The reason I ask is that if you read pg 4 of the link provided, they are pretty convincing that the above is not true.
              Hi jetsmom - I just read the link you provided for The Fourth Wall's white pages prepared for the Thoroughbred Retirement Foundation and I agree, it does refute the responses you received about banning slaughter causing tax consequences for horse owners. Unfortunately, the information cannot be cross-posted, but here is the link again, for anyone who has questions about this point: http://www.trfinc.org/news/TRF_WhitePaper.pdf
              "There's something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man" ~ Sir Winston Churchill

              Comment


              • I don't think anyone asserted that - I think people who work on legislative issues at the state level have seen a gradual erosion of horses as agricultural which thinking has indeed resulted in taxation, loss of land use status, etc.

                The language in the Bill emphasizing the horse as an animal used primarily for pleasure drives home that point at the national level and lends it credence. This recital should be omitted from the Bill.
                Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                -Rudyard Kipling

                Comment

                Working...
                X