• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

NGB Dispute -- NJ Court Rules in Against USET (Again) BRREAKING NEWS - USET WITHDRAWS CHALLENGE (pg 2)

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SGray -- Aside from racing, they don't cover much equestrian news. When the National was in NYC, they ran articles but I'm not sure about this year. I'll keep an eye out -- and try to run a search on their website. Last year (or maybe the year before, they did something on the winter circuit for the Style section. There may be a thread here on it. It was pretty negative -- and I can't remember who did that either.

    Comment


    • Liverpool, Thanks again for your play-by-play. I just read all 11 pages tonight.

      It seems, (please those of you who are smarter in these matters than I am, correct me if I'm wrong ) but it seems as if there may be a light at the end of a dark winding tunnel that is not the on coming headlights of a Mack truck. Not that it's solved, but a resolution appears to be in sight.

      - Therese

      - Therese

      "I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be." - Douglas Adams

      Comment


      • Therese, you are very welcome. Glad to help.

        I would like to add that while I know the meeting is poorly promoted, I will second the thoughts that Portia has posted about attending even if you are "just" a regular member.

        This was my third year of attendance and the difference is simply amazing - you can sit in on almost ANY committee and most welcome comments and questions, too. It is so much easier to understand the issues when you hear the presentations on challenges like the NGB dispute!

        For what it is worth I do think there is light at the end of this particular tunnel. The USET has few other options open to them if they want to be part of the NGB going forward. And the USOC folks have quite a lot on their own governance plate at the moment; I cannot imagine that they want to belabor this particular issue and will insist it gets solved sooner rather than later.

        The offer on the table makes a lot of sense to me. The division of accounts allows anyone who wishes to designate support to only ONE of the groups to do so without concern that the funds will be applied in a way that doesn't suit them, while retaining the strength of the organization as a whole that will benefit all horse sports.

        And who could argue against David O'Conner in the leadership role? The guy is simply amazing. Thoughtful, talented, committed... and with unquestioned integrity. He is really an inspired choice.
        \"It\'s a funny thing about life: If you refuse to accept anything but the best, you very often get it.\" ---W. Somerset Maugham

        Comment


        • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Therese:
          on coming headlights of a Mack truck.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

          Actually, Mack is owned by Volvo, so you're looking at Volvo headlights.

          Comment


          • So, whadja all think of the latest news? They're (USET,USAE) joining up (as USOC instructed) and AB and AL will not be on board?
            Cool, huh?

            Comment


            • Where did you hear Armand Leone would also step down? Is there a story out there somewhere about the USET reaction?
              www.bfkequestrian.com

              Comment


              • If he has to step aside, which personally I think is a huge loss to the sport of equestrian.............I vote for Alan Balch to be head of the USOC (yet another thankless task)........Perhaps he could clean up that mess since he has done such a terrific job of bringing governance out in the open for us

                Comment


                • I mean Alan Balch not Armand Leone!

                  Comment


                  • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Ezzie:
                    If he has to step aside, which personally I think is a huge loss to the sport of equestrian.............I vote for Alan Balch to be head of the USOC (yet another thankless task)........Perhaps he could clean up that mess since he has done such a terrific job of bringing governance out in the open for us<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                    "clean up that mess" - it's like cleaning the Augean stables - many years of accumulated manure

                    or like the labors of Sisyphus
                    Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

                    The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

                    Comment

                    • Original Poster

                      And this time they'd have to pay him! He deserves a job that will pay him "a few hundred thousand dollars" in bonuses after dealing with the equestrian mess for free!

                      That's something people haven't much commented on, is that the board passed amendments to the USA Eq Constitution so that finally they can hire a professional CEO who will be paid for all the work he/she does. You should have seen Jim Wofford and Ned Bonney's happy reaction when that one (which they've been fighting for for 20 years) finally passed!
                      "I don't want to sound like a broken record here, but why is it that a woman will forgive homicidal behavior in a horse, yet be highly critical of a man for leaving the toilet seat up?" Dave Barry

                      Comment


                      • Portia - glad to hear they resolved that, although I was hoping they wouldn't leave it as reporting to the president, but instead would leave the position as reporting to the Chairman of the Board.

                        CEOs reporting to Presidents tweaked at my finely honed sense of Corporate Order (such as it is these days). But CEOs reporting to COBs, who by definition are elected by Shareholders, and therefore represent the Will of the Shareholders (really, I can keep a straight face when I say that ), seems to be much more the thing.

                        But it is all semantics, when you come down to it, and all is good with the concept, to be sure!
                        Your crazy is showing. You might want to tuck that back in.

                        Comment


                        • the congressional hearings about USOC?Will these hearings really shed light on what we all have been witness to??I.E. questionable decisions conflict of interest in picking Olympic teams ,etc etc ?? What do you think will happen to horse sports due to these hearings?
                          Brilyntrip

                          Comment


                          • I think that without these hearings USOC and USET would stay locked in their tight embrace, i.e., USET will be USOC's golden child NO MATTER what they do, no matter what a NJ judge says, no matter what. The people are so much alike in how they operate, how they dissemble, how they twist things - they're soulmates, face it.

                            PERHAPS if the glare of investigation on USOC continues, USOC will be forced to do the right thing in equestrian, but I firmly believe (sad to say) that they must be forced by shining a light on their doings because otherwise there is no way in **** USOC will do the right thing. Tell me, looking at all this stuff coming out about USOC, do you think for a SECOND they would welcome Alan Balch and USAEq, as they proceed in open-ness, to be part of their clique? They run like cockroaches when the light is switched on. Opening up USAEq doings to everyone is good news for us and for the horses and for the sport but it is NOT good news for USOC, so why on earth would they choose that option?

                            Comment


                            • <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by Portia:

                              That's something people haven't much commented on, is that the board passed amendments to the USA Eq Constitution so that _finally_ they can hire a professional CEO who will be _paid_ for all the work he/she does. You should have seen Jim Wofford and Ned Bonney's happy reaction when that one (which they've been fighting for for 20 years) finally passed! <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                              I liked the part where AB apologized to Jimmy for opposing him on this, and said he'd been wrong and Jimmy was right.
                              If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

                              Comment


                              • coldritzy where did you hear this?

                                <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR>So, whadja all think of the latest news? They're (USET,USAE) joining up (as USOC instructed) and AB and AL will not be on board?
                                Cool, huh? Smile<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                The last I heard that was the offer on the table from USAE and that the USET had until February 1 to answer. I have seen no references to any answer that has been received.It has always been the offer of a merger that came from USAE and it has always been the USET that has refused to even discuss it.
                                http://www.usAHSA.org and http://www.noreinstatement.org

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X