• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

One eyed Harry from Lisa Ballard/Fox Point Farm (DE) lesson program slaughtered :(

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by county View Post
    And I agree it gets old when they do it, but they must enjoy hearing me because they bring the subject up over and over.
    No. We don't enjoy it. You just seem to really get under the skin of those who don't shut off their heads or hearts to the pathway of each horse that they have responsibility for.

    I listen to JSwan. She never gets me under the skin. She is logical, and is fair, and can accept slaughter as a reality. But you have this way of drilling it in to the first layer of the heart that really ticks true horse lovers off.
    Member of the Standardbreds with Saddles Clique!
    LouLove - OTTB - 1992-2008...miss you my pretty red girl...
    Wilde! NEW - OTTSTB - 2004 Gelding...my heart's new journey...

    Comment


    • Lou: I love your tagline "It's 2009. Do you know where your old horse is?"

      Kinda says it all. ....and yes, I know where each and every old horse of mine is.

      Comment


      • Helping Hearts Equine Rescue in NJ rescued a large pony from a local lesson program that had been dumped at the local auction. She's about 25, and has a hitch in stifle. She would have been on the truck to slaughter but the auction owner contacted the rescue. Anyone know a solid APP mare fitting this description that was recently giving lessons in central NJ?

        Comment


        • I'm a true horse lover and it doesn't tick me off at all I'm betting theres other true horse lovers as well that aren't. Sounds like a generalization me.
          Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

          Comment


          • I think you must also look from different perspectives. I strongly support animal research. I know the benefits. In all my years of research, at numerous universities (as student, faculty, visiting) I have yet to meet a researcher who in any way abused their animals; all did what they could to minimize pain and suffering - which, I do appreciate, does not mean it has never happened. It is a major reason why I use the model system I do, which is not mammalian (heck, it's not vertebrate). But personally, I cannot bring myself to work even with rodents.

            I have one horse. Unless the $$ start flying in, I can't ever see myself owning more than two at a time, if that. Ted has a home with me forever. Period. If anything happens to me, I have money put aside for his care (which would piss the hell out of my niece if she knew Ted was getting the money and not her!). If he lives to be 30, and 10 of those years are as a pasture pet, that is a responsibility I have chosen to shoulder.

            But then, I do not breed horses, I do not make my living selling horses, I am not someone rising through the ranks of my discipline.

            All I ask, if that if there must be slaughter, that it happens humanely, with minimal pain and suffering, and it happens quickly and with minimal fear. And I feel this way for all animals, not just horses.
            www.specialhorses.org
            a 501(c)3 organization helping 501(c)3 equine rescues

            Comment


            • I'm going to call DDA this morning- will update and let you know. I was just as surprised to hear about it.

              Originally posted by suniday View Post
              DiablosHalo - I was under the impression that it is against the law in DE to bury a horse on your property. I am in Sussex County, so I wonder if Kent and New Castle Counties are different?

              I would also like to know about the new rendering fee/State assistance. When I had to use the renderer about 3 years ago it was $250 plus around $150 for the vet. I have a 25 y.o. guy whose time will come sooner rather than later.

              Thanks!
              Last edited by DiablosHalo; Mar. 16, 2009, 08:19 AM.

              Comment


              • DiablosHalo - Thanks!

                Looking forward to seeing what you find out.

                Comment


                • ..... I just talked to DDA. Apparently, a letter was sent out to all the state vets last year and it IS now illegal to bury any large animal- cow, horse, buffalo, etc. citing water quality concerns. The regulatory agency on this issue is DNREC with guidelines sent to DDA.

                  The state started the rendering cost share to help the cattle owners dispose of their large animals. I'm still waiting for a response from a different person at DDA about the rendering cost share situation.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by county View Post
                    No actually slaughter is what feeds millions of people and the people involved in it are very very responsible types. I 've known 1000's of them all my life they pay their bills, raise food, go to church, raise families, do every thing any other responsible type person does.
                    As did many millions of Germans when Hitler was in power. Responsible acts do not cancel out immoral ones. It's immoral to participate in something that causes misery to other living creatures and disengenous to assign to it a benefit. After all, who's going to starve if the supply of horse meat from the US was cut off?


                    And it's "they're" not "their". (Did you notice you're spitting?)

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by BabyGreen View Post
                      As did many millions of Germans when Hitler was in power. Responsible acts do not cancel out immoral ones. It's immoral to participate in something that causes misery to other living creatures and disengenous to assign to it a benefit. After all, who's going to starve if the supply of horse meat from the US was cut off?


                      And it's "they're" not "their". (Did you notice you're spitting?)
                      Surely I'm not reading this right. Surely you are not comparing the Holocaust to horse slaughter?

                      And it is "disingenuous", not "disengenous".

                      I never go near slaughter threads because of their extremely volatile nature, but here goes:

                      Oh, never mind. People will hear what they want to hear. My opinion won't change anyone's mind.

                      Carry on with your arguments.
                      "My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world." ~ Jack Layton

                      Comment


                      • BabyGreen did you notice your the one whos spitting??? ROTFLMAO I love those who give English lessons but need them themselves shows just what a joke they really are.
                        Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                        Comment


                        • BTW no ones going to starve if the supply of horse meat from the U.S. is cut off. Same as the supply of beef, pork, and poultry. Not sure what your point is?
                          Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by BabyGreen View Post
                            As did many millions of Germans when Hitler was in power. Responsible acts do not cancel out immoral ones. It's immoral to participate in something that causes misery to other living creatures and disengenous to assign to it a benefit. After all, who's going to starve if the supply of horse meat from the US was cut off?
                            Yay! Godwin's law finally invoked!

                            Comment


                            • I wondered how long it would take to compare Hitler to eating meat usually someone does it long before this.
                              Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Coreene View Post
                                If people really want to cut down the # of horses that go to European dinner plates, the only way it will happen will be a PR campaign in Europe that informs THEM about the type of medication and chemicals that are in horsemeat that comes from the US and Canada. THAT is where the efforts need to be ramped up.
                                OR that could completely backfire and end up with us having a lot more restrictions on what we can and cannot give our horses.
                                Visit us at Bluebonnet Equine Humane Society - www.bluebonnetequine.org

                                Want to get involved in rescue or start your own? Check out How to Start a Horse Rescue - www.howtostartarescue.com

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by BabyGreen View Post
                                  And it's "they're" not "their". (Did you notice you're spitting?)

                                  Actually, it's not. They're is the contraction of "they are". So really, you do say "pay their bills" not "pay they are bills".
                                  Holly
                                  www.ironhorsefrm.com
                                  Oldenburg foals and young prospects
                                  LIKE us on Facebook!

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by county View Post
                                    SevenDogs what is getting old IMO is people that slam anyone thats pro slaughter at every turn to me its Ad naseum. I get it their anti slaughter and for every name they call someone and every time they slam anyone that does something other then the way they do it I'll keep responding as I do. People get it? No actually I don't see anything that indicates they do at all.

                                    Actually, the context of the use above would call for "they're". I think country just got excited and forgot his grammar.

                                    I'm not arguing against eating meat. What I object to on moral grounds is supporting/encouraging/permitting the acts of those who bring misery to living creatures, whether horse or human. And I personally believe that applies to all slaughterhouses and transport thereto.

                                    Comment


                                    • No I didn't forget anything its just not important to me. As long as the person reading gets the meaning thats all I care about. If they don't get it ask and I'll explain.

                                      I also object on moral grounds those who bring misery to any animal IMO all species deserve humane treatment
                                      Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                                      Comment


                                      • I love my horse the way I love my dogs and cats. On some levels even more. I would not ever take a horse that I could not give a forever home. Period. In fact, I love the fact that they can have such a lengthy lifespan. That means that I have more years to love them! That is for better or for worse too. My animals all have provisions made for their care so that if anything happens to me they will live out their lives the way I want them to.

                                        I am curious of something...how many who oppose horse slaughter eat meats, eggs and dairy from commercial sources? You know, grocery store meats. And I don't mean to sound judgmental, I judge no one...I just really am curious.

                                        *eta* I agree with cloudyandcallie...It's a shame this dear old soul didn't have as many people pulling for him before he needed it most
                                        I Loff My Quarter Horse & I love Fenway Bartholomule cliques

                                        Just somebody with a positive outlook on life...go ahead...hate me for that.

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by DressageGeek "Ribbon Ho" View Post
                                          I think you must also look from different perspectives. I strongly support animal research. I know the benefits. In all my years of research, at numerous universities (as student, faculty, visiting) I have yet to meet a researcher who in any way abused their animals; all did what they could to minimize pain and suffering - which, I do appreciate, does not mean it has never happened. It is a major reason why I use the model system I do, which is not mammalian (heck, it's not vertebrate). But personally, I cannot bring myself to work even with rodents.

                                          I have one horse. Unless the $$ start flying in, I can't ever see myself owning more than two at a time, if that. Ted has a home with me forever. Period. If anything happens to me, I have money put aside for his care (which would piss the hell out of my niece if she knew Ted was getting the money and not her!). If he lives to be 30, and 10 of those years are as a pasture pet, that is a responsibility I have chosen to shoulder.

                                          But then, I do not breed horses, I do not make my living selling horses, I am not someone rising through the ranks of my discipline.

                                          All I ask, if that if there must be slaughter, that it happens humanely, with minimal pain and suffering, and it happens quickly and with minimal fear. And I feel this way for all animals, not just horses.
                                          Here Here!

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X