• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

Please! Nobody "LAYS" on the neck of the horse!

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Original Poster

    Congratulations, Filly85, you are now officially a member of the grammar police! You will be glad to know that not only can I dish it out, I can take it! I make absolutely no claim to being perfect-- as a matter of fact, one of the reasons I have even a minimal awareness of grammar and/or spelling, is that my mother used to correct the spelling in my letters home from camp! I do not possess the spelling gene. I do, however, possess a dictionary and I am not afraid to use it!

    Personally, I am amazed that this thread has had such "legs." Amazed and delighted-- I am happy to know that many people are still concerned about language and clear expression. Who knows, now that we have a genuinely literate and articulate President of the United States, maybe good grammar will even become trendy!

    Thanks to the "grammar squad" (Better than grammar nazis? How about grammar gurus? Spelling czars? Language lunatics?) for keeping this going and keeping it lighthearted and enjoyable!

    (Uh-oh---a few too many exclamation points in that post...)
    www.baymarefarm.net

    Comment


    • I personally like "grammar gurus!" I get frustrated by so many silly little mistakes, but in the real world, I truly couldn't care less whether my friends are up on the latest MLA standards. On message boards, etc. I find them mildly aggravating and kind of amusing; it's when I see anything being passed off as a legitimate piece of writing that I get truly annoyed. It's simply laziness, for the most part.


      ...I am, however, an English major, and I realize that I am now and forever will be in the minority! Though, I do think that if people realized how many funny words they'd get to use for the purpose of talking about literature, more folks would get into it: Epizeuxis! Zeugma! Synecdoche! My papers truly are a joy to write.

      Comment


      • I read through the entire nine pages of this thread, and I must say, the posters who have shared their peeves have never once spoken lowly of people who may make these errors (and we all make them, at least occasionally), while those opposed to the thread have gone as far as to say that the "grammar gurus" may be poor horsepeople.

        I don't believe this thread was meant to patronize anyone with less than stellar spelling or grammar, and it is unfortunate if someone takes it that way. However, it does not change the fact that there is a correct and incorrect way to conjugate a sentence and spell a word. Just because the person falsely asking for a canter is genuinely nice and well educated does not make their error any less wrong.

        I feel like society has started to settle for mediocrity in the subjects detailed in this thread. Proper grammar? Who cares? Knowing the difference between they're and there? That's why spell check was created.

        I think a larger emphasis SHOULD be placed on speaking properly and having a solid grasp on spelling and grammar. The fact of the matter is that first impressions count, with everything in life. Whether it be when you first ride into a hunter ring, or when you're being interviewed for a job. You might have an excellent mover with to-die-for bascule, and you might have a PhD from Harvard... but if your horse is covered in dried mud and your braids are falling out, and you greet your interviewer with, "I seen your assistant as I was getting coffee this morning!" you're going to have to make up for the poor image you just created for yourself. So why cause the unnecessary hurdle?

        No one here is demanding perfection, nor is anyone claiming to be perfect themselves. But, as with anything in life, is it really wrong to expect at least minimal effort? The English language may not be your passion, but no matter where you go, "I seen" is not a proper phrase, "aint" isn't a real word, and a double negative creates a positive. Just because the trained schoolie will canter when you swing your outside leg back and thud, doesn't mean it's the proper canter cue. And just because someone may know what you are trying to say when you utter, "You don't do nothing," doesn't make it correct.

        We don't let errors slide so easily in other aspects of life, so why are they so readily accepted and defended with the spoken (and written) language?

        Bottom line: This thread was just meant to be a place for us sticklers to joke and groan about legitimate errors in our beloved language, and is for no way intended to condescend. So if you're reading this, and you feel put down, please don't. We value you here, typos or not... and if you learned from it, great. We'd love a world where we can all hold hands and sing, "The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain!"

        Comment


        • The apostrophe talk reminded me: quotation marks are used to indicate that one is quoting someone (or purporting to quote someone), to note that a word is being used ironically or unconventionally, to indicate certain types of titles, or in a few other less common ways. The one thing for which they are never, ever used (correctly) is for emphasis. To emphasize something, you can use italics, boldface, underline (though technically the underline should have gone the way of the dodo, except in handwritten items, when word processors became so commonplace) or, in an online setting (or elsewhere where neither italics nor underline are options), all caps.

          For the record, no matter how annoyed I am, I only correct someone's grammar (unasked) if it is germane to the discussion. A person who purports to be a lawyer yet consistently cannot get simple legal terms correct, for example, is fair game. Someone who is trying to make a point of how smart or educated they are (or is nastily correcting someone else's grammar ) is probably going to hear about their own inability to speak/write. Other times, even when I'm cringing inside, I don't actually say (or type) anything. I may, however, skip reading messages from people whose grammar or spelling is so bad as to make said reading difficult. And I nearly always skip messages written in "text speak." <shudder>
          Proud member of the EDRF

          Comment


          • Most new browsers have spell check built right in!

            Just sayin'

            Comment


            • Originally posted by baymare View Post
              Congratulations, Filly85, you are now officially a member of the grammar police! You will be glad to know that not only can I dish it out, I can take it! I make absolutely no claim to being perfect-- as a matter of fact, one of the reasons I have even a minimal awareness of grammar and/or spelling, is that my mother used to correct the spelling in my letters home from camp! I do not possess the spelling gene. I do, however, possess a dictionary and I am not afraid to use it!

              Personally, I am amazed that this thread has had such "legs." Amazed and delighted-- I am happy to know that many people are still concerned about language and clear expression. Who knows, now that we have a genuinely literate and articulate President of the United States, maybe good grammar will even become trendy!

              Thanks to the "grammar squad" (Better than grammar nazis? How about grammar gurus? Spelling czars? Language lunatics?) for keeping this going and keeping it lighthearted and enjoyable!

              (Uh-oh---a few too many exclamation points in that post...)
              I don't want to be in that group. Don't associate me with that type of person. I would NEVER bring this up as a topic. It's ridiculous. I find it even more ridiculous that no one else that is in this so called "grammar police" group caught it before I did since most posting on this thread find incorrect spelling and grammar on a message SOOOO atrocious. These sorts of things are for rigid people that need to get a life.

              I do not have an internet browser with spell check. I am concerned about language and expression only when it matters like in college. It has no practical purpose for me on a message board other than to get a point across. As long as people understand what I am saying, well that's good enough for me even if my grammar isn't perfect.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Filly85' View Post
                I don't want to be in that group. Don't associate me with that type of person. I would NEVER bring this up as a topic. It's ridiculous. I find it even more ridiculous that no one else that is in this so called "grammar police" group caught it before I did since most posting on this thread find incorrect spelling and grammar on a message SOOOO atrocious. These sorts of things are for rigid people that need to get a life.

                I do not have an internet browser with spell check. I am concerned about language and expression only when it matters like in college. It has no practical purpose for me on a message board other than to get a point across. As long as people understand what I am saying, well that's good enough for me even if my grammar isn't perfect.
                Then why did you post on this thread, let alone READ it...??? Just sayin'...

                over the moon, you got it right on!!!
                Seb
                Aca-Believe it!!

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Sebastian View Post
                  Then why did you post on this thread, let alone READ it...??? Just sayin'...

                  over the moon, you got it right on!!!
                  Seb
                  I read it because it was so ridiculous. People tend to be drawn into things that make them angry.

                  I saw this as an attempt to degrade those who do not possess the abilities to formulate proper sentences or spell words properly. Some people simply are not as fortunate as others!!! It isn't always laziness. It may be laziness with some, but it is an incapability with others.

                  And even if this wasn't meant that way, it indirectly did so. I am an educator and a scientist who simply does not like to hurt peoples' feelings or put people down unless they are making fun of or hurting those who can't stand up for themselves. I have worked with people with learning disabilities, and they truly can't help it.

                  Also, because perfection is demanded out of me in so many other aspects of my life, I would like to think that the same standard and perfection should not be required out of me when typing on a message board. It is supposed to be my let down time from the extreme stresses in my life.

                  Correcting peoples' mistakes on a message board makes me angry, especially when those who are correcting can't seem to get it right half of the time either. It's just one big ignorant mess...an ignorance of peoples' circumstances and cognitive abilities.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Filly85' View Post
                    These sorts of things are for rigid people that need to get a life.
                    It's WHO. We are rigid people WHO need to get a life.

                    (C'mon, that was funny! )
                    Your future is created by what you do today, not tomorrow.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Windsor1 View Post
                      It's WHO. We are rigid people WHO need to get a life.

                      (C'mon, that was funny! )

                      Verdad? No. Es pesado. No comprendes. Pesado? Es pesado que estoy escrito en espanol? Si, pienso asi! Porque, no compredes como cuando estas corregido mi gramatica. Sientes bruto ahora? Me hizo siento bruta.

                      Viene, es chistoso!

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Filly85' View Post
                        I do not have an internet browser with spell check. I am concerned about language and expression only when it matters like in college. It has no practical purpose for me on a message board other than to get a point across. As long as people understand what I am saying, well that's good enough for me even if my grammar isn't perfect.
                        Funny, because I've yet to find a place where being able to communicate in writing DOESN'T matter.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by over the moon View Post
                          I read through the entire nine pages of this thread, and I must say, the posters who have shared their peeves have never once spoken lowly of people who may make these errors (and we all make them, at least occasionally), while those opposed to the thread have gone as far as to say that the "grammar gurus" may be poor horsepeople.

                          I don't believe this thread was meant to patronize anyone with less than stellar spelling or grammar, and it is unfortunate if someone takes it that way. However, it does not change the fact that there is a correct and incorrect way to conjugate a sentence and spell a word. Just because the person falsely asking for a canter is genuinely nice and well educated does not make their error any less wrong.

                          I feel like society has started to settle for mediocrity in the subjects detailed in this thread. Proper grammar? Who cares? Knowing the difference between they're and there? That's why spell check was created.

                          I think a larger emphasis SHOULD be placed on speaking properly and having a solid grasp on spelling and grammar. The fact of the matter is that first impressions count, with everything in life. Whether it be when you first ride into a hunter ring, or when you're being interviewed for a job. You might have an excellent mover with to-die-for bascule, and you might have a PhD from Harvard... but if your horse is covered in dried mud and your braids are falling out, and you greet your interviewer with, "I seen your assistant as I was getting coffee this morning!" you're going to have to make up for the poor image you just created for yourself. So why cause the unnecessary hurdle?

                          No one here is demanding perfection, nor is anyone claiming to be perfect themselves. But, as with anything in life, is it really wrong to expect at least minimal effort? The English language may not be your passion, but no matter where you go, "I seen" is not a proper phrase, "aint" isn't a real word, and a double negative creates a positive. Just because the trained schoolie will canter when you swing your outside leg back and thud, doesn't mean it's the proper canter cue. And just because someone may know what you are trying to say when you utter, "You don't do nothing," doesn't make it correct.

                          We don't let errors slide so easily in other aspects of life, so why are they so readily accepted and defended with the spoken (and written) language?

                          Bottom line: This thread was just meant to be a place for us sticklers to joke and groan about legitimate errors in our beloved language, and is for no way intended to condescend. So if you're reading this, and you feel put down, please don't. We value you here, typos or not... and if you learned from it, great. We'd love a world where we can all hold hands and sing, "The rain in Spain stays mainly in the plain!"

                          Exactly!

                          The only snarkiness I've seen on this thread came from posters like Filly85' and Foxtrot every other post has a light, joking feel.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Filly85' View Post
                            Verdad? No. Es pesado. No comprendes. Pesado? Es pesado que estoy escrito en espanol? Si, pienso asi! Porque, no compredes como cuando estas corregido mi gramatica. Sientes bruto ahora? Me hizo siento bruta.

                            Viene, es chistoso!
                            You know, I poked some fun at myself and the rest of us grammar bullies when I said WE are rigid people who need to get a life.

                            For what it's worth, I tend to agree with you regarding threads of this kind, but I don't think it would kill you to lighten up a little.
                            Your future is created by what you do today, not tomorrow.

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Filly85' View Post
                              I read it because it was so ridiculous. People tend to be drawn into things that make them angry.

                              I saw this as an attempt to degrade those who do not possess the abilities to formulate proper sentences or spell words properly. Some people simply are not as fortunate as others!!! It isn't always laziness. It may be laziness with some, but it is an incapability with others.

                              And even if this wasn't meant that way, it indirectly did so. I am an educator and a scientist who simply does not like to hurt peoples' feelings or put people down unless they are making fun of or hurting those who can't stand up for themselves. I have worked with people with learning disabilities, and they truly can't help it.

                              Also, because perfection is demanded out of me in so many other aspects of my life, I would like to think that the same standard and perfection should not be required out of me when typing on a message board. It is supposed to be my let down time from the extreme stresses in my life.

                              Correcting peoples' mistakes on a message board makes me angry, especially when those who are correcting can't seem to get it right half of the time either. It's just one big ignorant mess...an ignorance of peoples' circumstances and cognitive abilities.
                              I'm sorry you have a tendency to be drawn into "things that make you angry" -- personally I try to avoid them. And, I find this type of over-reaction sad. Obviously your feelings get "hurt" VERY easily. Hence, my suggestion to stay away from these types of things.

                              I was raised by educators and scientists, and make my living with language (of the written variety). I was encouraged to "get it right" and certainly don't find a correction to be as offensive as you do... Honestly, I can't spell worth a hoot, but that doesn't stop me from TRYING to get it right.

                              And to keep this HR, I maybe I DO equate the ability to communicate with humans directly with one's ability to communicate with horses. If I'm sloppy with my aids (i.e. the "words" we use to communicate with our horses), I will NOT get the desired response. SO, maybe there IS something to the theory that "bad writers" are bad horsemen...

                              Seb
                              Aca-Believe it!!

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Windsor1 View Post
                                You know, I poked some fun at myself and the rest of us grammar bullies when I said WE are rigid people who need to get a life.

                                For what it's worth, I tend to agree with you regarding threads of this kind, but I don't think it would kill you to lighten up a little.
                                For waht it's worth, I said

                                Really. No. It is annoying. "I know that you do not understand this". Is it annoying that I am writing in spanish? I think so! You do not understand just like I do not understand why you are correcting my grammar. Do you feel stupid now because you can't understand me. Well, you made me feel really stupid when you corrected me because I can't get it right. Come on, it's funny isn't it?

                                I didn't say it in so many words, but that is the gist of it.

                                You know, I always get the I need to lighten up stance when I am right about a given topic and whether it is going to hurt people's feeling or not. It hurt my feelings. Sorry, but I can't help the way I feel about it.

                                It's like the bully picking on the little kid. A third person tries to help the little kid, and the bully says to the third person that they just need to lighten up and that they really aren't hurting the little kid.

                                The snarkiness was shown in the original post by picking on the person who wrote the original topic about laying on the horse's neck. My response is to that, and you missed the whole point of my posting on this subject if you didn't see that. This whole thread is about picking on the various people who have misused words on this board. I just find it degrading, especially because I know some, like me, are trying their best.

                                I'm done with this thread. Think whatever you like about me. If you think that I need to lighten up, well, that's your problem. It isn't mine.

                                And just for the record, I have never gotten anything other than an A on a paper and I go to one of the best colleges in the world. I also have taken two English courses and a literature course in college. All were As. I also have gotten 3 As in my Spanish courses in college so far. When I was young, I won the Young Author's Award, and my books usually went on to the state competitions. I also won school spelling Bs when I was younger.

                                So despite what you may think and even though Sebastian suggested that I am a bad horseman because I have bad grammar, in actuality, I don't have bad grammar at all. But, I am taking up for those that do.

                                The only people that I want correcting me are those that I know actually know what they are talking about. Like my college professors and my riding instructors. I don't know any of you in real life, so I don't feel comfortable by being corrected by a complete stranger who may not know what they are talking about.

                                However, I do think some people are very knowledgeable on this board about horses. However, those people aren't going around correcting me in a condescending way. They are making suggestions, and they are helping me learn a lot more about horses.

                                Comment


                                • Originally posted by baymare View Post
                                  Irregardless of how many hours you have lounged your horse before riding, if you lay on it's neck and loose your stirrups, you will fall on the ground like alot of sh*t even if you have great confirmation.

                                  That had me laughing for 15 minutes! I have two more:

                                  Fewer v. less. (Fewer relates to things that can be counted)
                                  Nauseous vs. Nauseated (Nauseous things make you nauseated). I always chuckle when someone says "I am nauseous". I wonder why they have such low self esteem.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by workl8 View Post

                                    Fewer v. less. (Fewer relates to things that can be counted)
                                    Nauseous vs. Nauseated (Nauseous things make you nauseated). I always chuckle when someone says "I am nauseous". I wonder why they have such low self esteem.
                                    And this is why when you have word pet peeves, you need to get over them quickly- because words are defined by their usage. You are no longer correct in this particular instance. The meaning of the word has changed.

                                    http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/nauseous

                                    nau⋅seous   [naw-shuhs, -zee-uhs] Show IPA Pronunciation
                                    –adjective
                                    1. affected with nausea; nauseated: to feel nauseous.
                                    2. causing nausea; sickening; nauseating.
                                    3. disgusting; loathsome: a nauseous display of greed.

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by Filly85' View Post
                                      The snarkiness was shown in the original post by picking on the person who wrote the original topic about laying on the horse's neck. My response is to that, and you missed the whole point of my posting on this subject if you didn't see that. This whole thread is about picking on the various people who have misused words on this board. I just find it degrading, especially because I know some, like me, are trying their best.
                                      Yeah, I get that, hence my comment about tending to agree with you about threads of this kind. I thought you miiiiiight make an exception to my post, which unlike many others here was an obvious attempt at humor--correcting your objection to being corrected while also taking a jab at people who do the correcting, which was me at the time?

                                      What the hell, I thought it was pretty funny!
                                      Your future is created by what you do today, not tomorrow.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by Windsor1 View Post

                                        What the hell, I thought it was pretty funny!
                                        FWIW, I thought it was hilarious.

                                        I find it so interesting that the most negative posts tend to come from those that are screaming that everyone else is being negative...

                                        Seb
                                        Aca-Believe it!!

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by Windsor1 View Post
                                          Yeah, I get that, hence my comment about tending to agree with you about threads of this kind. I thought you miiiiiight make an exception to my post, which unlike many others here was an obvious attempt at humor--correcting your objection to being corrected while also taking a jab at people who do the correcting, which was me at the time?

                                          What the hell, I thought it was pretty funny!
                                          Sorry, I had know idea what you were trying to do and read the tone wrong. I haven't gone through all of posts in this thread. I thought that you were just trying to be annoying.

                                          I said I was done with the thread, but I'm still posting

                                          However, I think you can see the condescending attitudes that I was talking about from some of these posts.

                                          I could have been a little nicer as well, but heck. You have to play hardball with bullies. It's the only way to get through to them, if they're not already set in their ways that is...

                                          Of course, I'm the snarky one and am ignoring the big picture

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X