• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

HB427: Equine Licenses-NH horse owners please read

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • HB427: Equine Licenses-NH horse owners please read

    Forgive me if this has already been posted, it is being discussed on other boards.

    http://www.nhliberty.org/bills/view?...B427&year=2009


    Equine Licenses

    435:42 Procuring License. Every owner or keeper of an equine as defined by RSA 436:93 4 months old or over shall annually, cause it to be registered, numbered, described, and licensed for one year in the office of the clerk of the city or town in which the equine is kept. The license shall be furnished by the clerk at the expense of the city or town. Regardless of when the license is obtained, the license shall be effective from May 1 of each year to April 30 of the subsequent year.

    435:43 Vaccination Required. Before a license is issued under the provisions of this subdivision, the owner or keeper of an equine shall furnish to the clerk verification from a licensed veterinarian that the equine has been vaccinated against rabies

    435:44 Part of Year. An owner of an equine may at any time have it licensed until the ensuing May 1 and a person becoming the owner or keeper of an equine not duly licensed after May 1 shall cause it to be registered, and licensed as provided in RSA 435:42.

    435:45 Transfer. A license duly recorded shall be valid in any part of the state, and may be transferred with the equine licensed.


    II. With the owner’s consent, a veterinarian may report the euthanizing or death during treatment of a licensed equine to the town or city clerk in order to have the record reflect that the equine was euthanized or died. A veterinarian providing such a report may also provide the town or city clerk with the mailing and street addresses of the owner of the equine. Written reports, if any, shall be destroyed after receipt by the town or city clerk, and any resulting record reflecting the equine’s death shall not specify the manner or cause of death.

    Missouri Fox Trotters-To ride one is to own one

    Standardbreds, so much more then a harness racing horse.

  • #2
    what got that started? just to raise funds?
    Nothing says "I love you" like a tractor. (Clydejumper)

    The reports states, “Elizabeth reported that she accidently put down this pony, ........, at the show.”

    Comment


    • #3
      Step 2 - taxing horse ownership

      Please note for those of you who do your own shots... proof of vaccinations given by licensed vet.

      Comment


      • #4
        Let the restrictions of freedoms expand and continue. "Change" ? "Hope"? Yeah sounds about right to me. Send out the brown shirts to make sure you have paid your equine tax! "Yes we can!!"
        The thing about smart people, is they look like crazy people, to dumb people.

        Comment


        • #5
          If I lived in NH I would be on the phone to my representative, who better be ready to get an ear full.

          Comment


          • #6
            This is one of the reasons horse owners need to realize that changing the classification of horses from livestock to companion animals is not a Good Thing.

            Agriculture statutes provide much more protection for horse owners.
            "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

            ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Ghazzu View Post
              This is one of the reasons horse owners need to realize that changing the classification of horses from livestock to companion animals is not a Good Thing.

              Agriculture statutes provide much more protection for horse owners.
              $5 goes to Vet fund. What is that?

              $10 goes to fund AC.

              $10 goes to the state.

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #8
                For contacts here is a link to the thread on Equinesite with a lot of contact info...

                http://discus.equinesite.net/discus/...tml?1232750631
                Missouri Fox Trotters-To ride one is to own one

                Standardbreds, so much more then a harness racing horse.

                Comment


                • #9
                  I cross posted this to Equinesite....

                  Guys.......I want to post this here as a vet's opinion. It was posted to the MANE group -

                  "Truthfully, I doubt anything anyone does is going to make a difference. There do seem to be a number of opinions about why this bill is being introduced -- allow me to say that this is not a "get rich quick" scheme from the State Vet's Office. Nor is it likely to raise a great deal of money for any town, in fact most will probably lose money on the paperwork end of it all. Rather, this comes from direct pressure from the USDA, as part of the "national animal identification" program that is being introduced in almost every state this year. Horses are being treated as companion animals and pets, rather than as livestock (something for which everyone is probably going to be very grateful, since it will allow for easier sale, travel and general horse-y get-togethers). That means horses are now big dogs when it comes to animal tracking and licensing.
                  I would caution MANE about the likely alternatives should this bill fail -- i.e., mandatory livestock protocols for identification (e.g., microchip, tattoo, ear tag) in line with USDA standards. Perhaps more importantly, there could be health certificate type requirements imposed for your horse leaving your property (as there currently are with ruminants) -- not just for crossing the border, but for going to the local indoor, trail ride or to ride down the rail trail. While we don't tend to think about it, the truth is that police forces will have the right to impound your horse if it's off your property without a valid (ie 30 day) health certificate. Not to mention the issue of Coggins tests, VS, FMD, EEE, WNV and any other diseases the USDA may feel the need to quarantine for in our area. Personally, the idea of an annual license doesn't look so bad to me anymore....
                  Secondly, the addition of a Rabies requirement isn't actually a change in the law at all, it just moves it from one gov' agency to another. Equines have ALWAYS been required to have annual vaccines for Rabies, this just gives that legislation some bite. And since equines are now a major source of human exposure (second only to cats in NH), one can understand why the DOH wants some bite in the law.
                  I would be more than happy to discuss the push for animal identification with anyone, and would love to be informed of any MANE meeting which might act as a forum.
                  Christine
                  PS Deb, please feel free to post this out, if it might answer some of the MANE'rs questions.


                  Dr. Christine E. Schlupf DVM"

                  For me, I'd much rather have to "license" my horse yearly than to pay for a health certificate every month. Maybe it doesn't affect those of you with backyard horses who do not leave the property. But I take both of my horses off the property ALL THE TIME. Having valid health certs on each of them ALL THE TIME would GREATLY cut in to my enjoyment of them.

                  Go ahead, boo hooo me....but NAIS is coming. And I'd rather my horses be considered pets than livestock.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    We have a similar law in VA for dogs. Evidently some people were so pissed off about the law that they no longer vaccinate against rabies.

                    We get a very threatening letter from the county saying that Animal Control will seize the dog if we don't pay the license within 10 days.

                    It's BS about it not being revenue driven. It sure as he** is revenue driven. Every year they try and raise the cap on license fees so they can be higher.

                    Evidently rich white people want laws so that only rich white people can own animals.

                    Has nothing to do with NAIS and everything to do with taxing animal ownership.
                    Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                    Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                    -Rudyard Kipling

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Local governments can regulate the hell out of pets/companion animals.

                      *Way* more than they can regulate livestock.

                      Be afraid. Be very afraid.
                      "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                      ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        This is the beginning....along with taxes on non-diet soda, socialism, banning moments of silence in schools, decrees from on high such as 'I can do it because I won.'

                        Ah yes, be afraid indeed.

                        And DON'T LET THESE THINGS HAPPEN!!! Fight for individual rights, for your freedom to choose, for your right to resist taxation without representation.
                        Form follows function, or does function follow form?

                        www.clearvisionequine.com

                        http://clearvisionequine.blogspot.com

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          I must say, I'm a little surprised that this is taking place in NH, the home of "Live Free or Die".

                          Guess the state has been overrun by the yuppie element.
                          "It's like a Russian nesting doll of train wrecks."--CaitlinandTheBay

                          ...just settin' on the Group W bench.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Yes, this is stupid and unnecessary. However, PLEASE do not blame President Obama for this bill. THAT is just as stupid. Obviously, this bill has been being planned for quite some time. They don't happen overnight.
                            \"I refuse to engage in a battle of wits with someone who is unarmed.\"--Pogo

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by boosma47 View Post

                              This is the beginning....along with taxes on non-diet soda, socialism, banning moments of silence in schools, decrees from on high such as 'I can do it because I won.'
                              Fire and brimstone coming down from the skies! Rivers and seas boiling!
                              Forty years of darkness! Earthquakes, volcanoes...
                              The dead rising from the grave!
                              Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Originally posted by joharavhf View Post
                                And since equines are now a major source of human exposure (second only to cats in NH), one can understand why the DOH wants some bite in the law.
                                According to theHorse.com, there were only 10 cases of equine rabies in the country in 2004. Where is this person getting this information that "equines are a major source of human exposure." What a load of crap. What human has ever gotten rabies from a horse? This is another scare tactic.

                                Plus, this woman is actually trying to angle that this is a way to circumvent NAIS for horses??? If this was truly what they were doing, they would have instead passed a law that said "horses are not livestock" and leave it at that. There would have not been any need for a fee structure and a rabies vaccine requirement. And personally, I think they are using this as a preliminary step towards NAIS. Once you have people "licensing," your horses are already in a database and you are halfway to NAIS.

                                NAIS isn't just going to require health certificates to go down the street, NAIS is going to require that you tell the government when and where your horse went.

                                Edited to Add: Does this "Christine E. Schlupf" even have horses? From what I can find, she is a cat vet and her bio only says that she has cats and children. It appears to me that she is unqualified to be forming any type of opinion on this.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  No I am not here to make fun of Booosma ...she is right...you WILL wake up one day and realize that you have lost all your freedoms and then the govt will tell you what you can and cant have. (now it is you cant have a cigarette here or there (I dont like smoking nor do i smoke), you cant eat McDonald's French fries because they have trans fats, you cant drink soda because of the sugars, you MUST wear a seat belt, we are banning trans fats in major cities restaurants, blah blah blah...) Big brother DEFINITELY knows what is best for us...(no sarcasm icon sadly) So here is where I bring up boiling the frog....AND the monthly health cert is simply a way to force you to buy into the ownership tax ... this is disgusting. and I am not blaming BO I am blaming his politics and his "vision" for the country. He is exacerbating the ease of control of the people....Be afraid. Be very afraid.
                                  The thing about smart people, is they look like crazy people, to dumb people.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    You're welcome to comment on your thoughts on this particular development, and what it could mean for the industry, but keep the general, not horse-related political commentary off of the board.

                                    Thanks!
                                    Mod 1

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      My comment was apolitical. It was just an observation.

                                      Taxing horse ownership is revenue driven. Has nothing to do with animal welfare, NAIS, REAL ID, horse slaughter, or any other political hot potato.

                                      It's about $$. There are people that would LOVE for horses to be reclassified as companion animals. Opens up a whole new world of regulation, licensing, personal and real property taxation, impacts zoning, all kinds of things.

                                      Classified as livestock, horses, owners and the horse industry are represented by the larger world of agriculture; a very influential lobby. Horse owners are heard within that lobby. Maybe not as well as some would like - but still - we're heard.

                                      We buy the same hay, use the same vaccines, suffer the consequences of the decline in large animal vets. Grain prices affect us, as does state and national policy related to agriculture. Land use affects us just like farmers. Zoning. Conservation. Farm labor.

                                      The horse has the same requirements as other species of livestock. They need large amounts of land - making real estate taxes an issue for horse owners. They need similar housing, have similar manure disposal requirements, similar everything.

                                      Singling horse owners out makes us a very attractive target. We cannot cry poverty when our real estate and other taxes are raised - because the horse is expensive to keep. We're "rich" and so fair game for politicians.

                                      The vet quoted doesn't have very good information. Look what is happening to companion animals across the US. Taxes, fees, licenses, heavy regulation, special laws, special insurance (or no insurance), bans on breeds - legislators are VERY involved in companion animal regulation and taxation.

                                      Lose the protection of the agricultural lobby and we're sitting ducks for any politician or special interest group that wants to make an example of us, tax us, regulate us, or ban us. We're too small a percentage of the population to be an effective lobby for our own interests. Animal rights groups have goals that are different than ours.

                                      We'll be on our own - a target on our back pocket where we keep our wallets.
                                      Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                                      Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                                      -Rudyard Kipling

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Excellent post, J Swan! Am always amazed that horseowners are considered "rich."
                                        Somewhere I read recently that 1/3 of the horses are owned by folks with under $50,000 income. I remember boarding at barn in Chicago about 20 years that was all adults and with one exception, all women, most of home were single supporting themselves and their horses on their own. My horse took a very large chunk of my take home pay but for me, he was as necessary to my life as breathing and eating.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X