• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse
1 of 2 < >

Event Announcements now available FREE to all registered users

We just reconfigured the Event Announcements forum to be available as a free service for all registered forum users. See the thread stuck at the top of that forum for more information.
2 of 2 < >

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

UC-Davis Unwanted Horses UPDATE Post #67

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • UC-Davis Unwanted Horses UPDATE Post #67

    I don't know if this has been posted previously, but I thought I would share it and see what folks though of this idea:
    http://veterinarynews.dvm360.com/dvm...tegoryId=44923

    Equine welfare: UC-Davis plan calls for network of community shelters for horses

    Proposal calls for assessment stations, rehabilitation, adoption and euthanasia standards

    Jan 1, 2009
    By: James M. Lewis
    DVM NEWSMAGAZINE

    A triage flow chart: A faculty group at the University of California-Davis came up with this diagram showing how unwanted horses could be handled much like dogs and cats are in animal shelters. They would be divided first according to whether they are adoptable.

    DAVIS, CALIF. — A faculty organization at the University of California-Davis has come up with a proposal for dealing with unwanted horses and intends to create a template that communities anywhere in the country could follow.

    Essentially, the plan is to create shelters that would deal with unwanted horses in much the same way that most animal shelters deal with unwanted cats and dogs.

    The International Animal Welfare Training Institute (IAWTI), organized last spring, is part of the UC-Davis School of Veterinary Medicine and is directed by Dr. John Madigan, a professor and clinician at the Veterinary Medical Teaching Hospital. Its members include more than 20 faculty members who have projects and research aimed at improving animal welfare across all species, and it has international links in the areas of global emergency and disaster response.

    "A significant portion of society views horses differently than livestock," Madigan says. "This suggests to us that something similar to a normal community animal-shelter program for small animals is needed for horses."

    The IAWTI has started a pilot program with foundations in northern California that have started similar programs, and it expects to use those sites to create a template any community could follow.

    "Horse-rehoming facilities or horse-assessment stations need to be licensed, certified, inspected and have in effect the components needed for housing, assessment, adoption, maintenance, veterinary care, licensing with county animal services, temperament assessment for adoption, humane euthanasia, an operating budget and so on," Madigan explains.

    "We are working now to create that infrastructure template to share with other counties in California and other states."

    The system the group envisions calls for an "unwanted horse assessment station" that first would triage any unwanted horses brought in, determining whether they are adoptable or non-adoptable.

    If adoptable, they would be placed in one of four groups: rehabilitation required, immediately usable, needing permanent housing and retirement, or used for outreach education in equine care.

    If un-adoptable, the animals would be designated either for humane euthanasia with carcass salvaged for zoo feeding, nutritional use for animals or rendering; or for humane euthanasia, with the carcass disposed by tissue digester, composting or cremation.

    "Some current (horse) rescue facilities are over their heads with regard to costs and caring for animals long-term," Madigan says.

    "We believe this approach will provide a means for people to take their healthy animals — which they can't keep — to a place where they may be adopted out (sold) as a person would obtain a dog or a cat from a shelter.

    "Adoption, housing and humane euthanasia are needed for the magnitude of this problem and for the benefit of the horse, in our opinion."

    The IAWTI is inviting several agencies this month to a meeting at UC-Davis to explore the implementation and funding of such a program. So far, representatives from UC-Davis, Animal Services, California Dept. of Food and Agriculture, the California Veterinary Medical Association, American Association of Equine Practitioners, Grace Foundation, California Horse Racing Board and the Humane Society of the United States are expected to attend.

    Anyone wishing to support the effort can send donations to the IAWTI at UC-Davis, Madigan says.
    Last edited by Whoanellie; Feb. 22, 2009, 12:00 PM.
    Be kind to the animals for they are the True Innocents!
    True Innocents Equine Rescue: www.tierrescue.org
    Join us on Facebook!

  • #2
    Who pays?
    ... _. ._ .._. .._

    Comment


    • #3
      Thasts my question also they seem to have left out a very important part.
      Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Equibrit View Post
        Who pays?
        Who CARES??

        It's a great idea.
        "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

        Comment


        • #5
          If its the taxpayers who pay I care, I know a whole lot of otherones that would also.
          Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

          Comment


          • #6
            Also if its the taxpayers which ones? City, county, state, federal?
            Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

            Comment


            • #7
              "Who CARES??

              It's a great idea."



              Funding - or the lack of it makes the final decision. I would think you would be familiar with that concept !
              ... _. ._ .._. .._

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by county View Post
                If its the taxpayers who pay I care, I know a whole lot of otherones that would also.
                But see, County, we live in this wondrous thing called a participatory democracy.

                That means that sometimes, for the common weal, we end up paying taxes for things we don't necessarily support or agree with.

                For example: I don't have kids. I don't LIKE kids. I will remain happily child-free for the rest of my life.

                If we follow your thinking, WHY should I be paying to subsidize YOUR child's education? Isn't that YOUR responsibility? You made a very expensive lifestyle choice - having kids - which I elected not to make.

                But if the tax exists, then as a U.S. citizen, I have two choices. I either pay it, understanding as I do that paying for everybody else's sprogs to get at least SOME form of education is a lot better for the common weal than ending up with generations of unlettered slobs... Or I try to put up a "conscientious objection" sort of defense when I'm dragged into tax court b/c I happen to resent the living f*ck out of paying school taxes. And I end up going to jail for tax evasion.

                In the U.S.A., you pay to play. Or you leave, or you go to jail.

                Quite honestly, any tax enacted for horse shelters would end up taking SIGNIFICANTLY less out of me than I privately donate to 501(c)(3)s every month. *Shrug* So I really DON'T care who pays. I just think it needs to be done.
                "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                Comment


                • #9
                  I thought we were talking about killing horses not about kids. In my world theres nothing close to the same about the two things. I understand you don't care who pays. Others do.
                  Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    County, even if we reopened slaughter houses, there would not be enough market for the number of unwanted horses there are now. This is going to be needed regardless of the slaughter issue.

                    I agree, it's fabulous. Getting someone to pay for it will be the issue.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Ambrey I agree but don't see what this has to do with slaughter houses? If someone wants to kill their horse thats their business I just see no reason to have the tax payer foot the bill. Less then 2% of people in this country own a horse the only one that should be responsable for the cost of killing one is the owner.
                      Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Because those people ARE sending their horses to slaughter. This is for the horses that are left over anyway.

                        It might be that some would choose subsidized euthanasia over sending their horses to auction, is that what is bothering you?

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by War Admiral View Post

                          That means that sometimes, for the common weal, we end up paying taxes for things we don't necessarily support or agree with....If we follow your thinking, WHY should I be paying to subsidize YOUR child's education? Isn't that YOUR responsibility?
                          You don't - in Georgia it is property OWNERS who foot the bill


                          Somehow I don't think the MAJORITY see this as vital to the "common weal". The children we are paying to educate will be funding you in your drooling dotage, if they aren't already!
                          Last edited by Equibrit; Jan. 10, 2009, 03:09 PM.
                          ... _. ._ .._. .._

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            What someone does with their horse doesn't matter to me as long as its legal. I don't feel the taxpayer should foot the bill if someone decides they want to kill it though.
                            Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by county View Post
                              What someone does with their horse doesn't matter to me as long as its legal. I don't feel the taxpayer should foot the bill if someone decides they want to kill it though.
                              We foot the bill for dogs and cats.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                I don't agree with that either.
                                Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by county View Post
                                  I don't agree with that either.
                                  Then I refer you to War Admiral's post, sometimes you have to pay for things you don't agree with because other people think it's important

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    And sometimes you don't. I understand you agree with it, I think your having a problem understanding there are others that don't. My guess is that the majority of tax payers aren't going to want to pay for someone to kill their horse. Just a wild guess and knowing the people here.
                                    Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      It all depends. I'm guessing you'll be right, not because it's not a valid plan, but because there will not be enough money raised by the "for" to actually get the point across.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        As the ownership of horses is viewed by the masses as an elite type of activity, I doubt very much that they would care to pay for cleaning up the dross created by those selfish enough to dump their problems. The only reason cat/dog rescue is funded is because it is the MAJORITY doing the dumping etc.
                                        ... _. ._ .._. .._

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X