• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

JSwan was right. The HSUS sux.

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • JSwan was right. The HSUS sux.

    And it think I threw up a little in my mouth. They rescued animals just long enough to get the headlines and then left the animals to die. Including two very old horses.

  • #2
    Uh, um, link or something??

    Comment

    • Original Poster

      #3
      my blog

      Comment


      • #4
        so it's a bit more complicated than that .. http://www.news-journalonline.com/Ne...FLAG123008.htm
        Nevertheless, she persisted.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #5
          Originally posted by RainyDayRide View Post
          so it's a bit more complicated than that .. http://www.news-journalonline.com/Ne...FLAG123008.htm
          That's the article I posted. There have been many since Nov. . but it went form Oh no its awful to lets help! to eh, it was no big, deal we're out of hear. Mainly because the HSUS had promised to fund the whole operation. One weeks pay and they left. They left the local HS deeply in debt.

          It is more complicated, but that was the reason the local HS acted. But that is he last article in the chain until tomorrow.

          Now they person with custody has the animals but will be banned from being around animals. They can't leave, she can't stay. Nobody else wants that life.

          Comment


          • #6
            HSUS is good at making headlines. They come in, make headlines, get donations, and then leave. Someone else gets to clean up the mess.

            If you want to read horror stories about HSUS, you can search the archives and see if anything is still there from Katrina. There was a neat lady who was helping with the horses down there and showed up pictures of what HSUS was "doing". Throwing brand new crates in dumpsters and refusing to give them to rescuers, tons of donated dog food going to waste..... but they were always ready for a photo op or interview.

            It's shameful. Ask any dog rescuer who worked on Katrina, or any local folks who worked on the Michael Vick case here. You'll really be sickened.

            They have a great website and are fabulous fund raisers, and their marketing is top rate. Actually doing what they say they're doing? Not so much.

            Keep your money local, donate to people like Lori and other well run ethical rescues. Support good and reasonable legislation. HSUS used to be a great organization but now they're just another Enron.
            Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
            Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
            -Rudyard Kipling

            Comment


            • #7
              Isn't the group "United Animal Kingdom" or something like that the one that comes in during natural disasters and helps? And in Katrina, my local vet went down with his van and helped out with the dogs. And my horse importer went over from Florida with his trailer and people and supplies to help with the horses. So Katrina was not just an HSUS endeavor, lots of people helped out.

              But as for the pigs, if people would send contributions to the feed store for feed, that would surely help out. That feed store is listed on the newspaper articled that is linked supra.

              Comment


              • #8
                Well Im afraid last yr I lost all faith in the Humane Society and the aspca and well as the state police.

                IN short, I received a hysterical call from one of my daughters. she had just been up to see her dad (my ex) to hear that her dads dogs, one of which was hers, had been killed by the neighbor with a pitchfork, yes a pitchfork. He admittedly forked them until they were finally relieved by death. Now I figured since this was such a horrible act that someone would respond. I called the Humane S which said call the police. I called them and they called back and took a report. ASked me if I realized what a lawless, take matters into your own hand type of area that was. I said that I was quite aware of what went on up on htat mountain and I didn't care, that a dog had a right to not be treated as such. They went up there (four of them) and spoke to all involved. The dogs had done nothing wrong. There is a long time feud going on between many neighbors up there. HE did this out of hate for my ex and no other reason. Ex would not press charges as he said it would make the whole situation worse. That was that, the end. The state did not press charges. This nut has since killed another neighbors hogs and who knows what else. HE brags about killing the dogs to anyone who will listen.
                A dog in another area had just been on the news as some teen had sodomized it and broke its spine, that dog must have mattered more as the teen was charged and jailed, the dog had to be pts. Why did these two dogs not matter? I still think about those two dogs all the time, it bothers me to no end. It should not matter what the circumstances are or who is involved, the dogs lifes should have mattered, something should have been done. All I got out of the Humane Society was that it wasn't an issue that they could handle and passed it off to another. Not impressed with them at all. And it makes me very angry that that area has always been left alone by the police, and ppl up there can more or less do as they want, including doing something that horrific to an animal. They lost my support. The picture I get of those two dogs going through that is something that will never leave my mind.
                Last edited by WaningMoon; Jan. 7, 2009, 09:57 AM. Reason: added word call in second sentence

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #9
                  Originally posted by JSwan View Post
                  HSUS is good at making headlines. They come in, make headlines, get donations, and then leave. Someone else gets to clean up the mess.

                  If you want to read horror stories about HSUS, you can search the archives and see if anything is still there from Katrina. There was a neat lady who was helping with the horses down there and showed up pictures of what HSUS was "doing". Throwing brand new crates in dumpsters and refusing to give them to rescuers, tons of donated dog food going to waste..... but they were always ready for a photo op or interview.

                  It's shameful. Ask any dog rescuer who worked on Katrina, or any local folks who worked on the Michael Vick case here. You'll really be sickened.

                  They have a great website and are fabulous fund raisers, and their marketing is top rate. Actually doing what they say they're doing? Not so much.

                  Keep your money local, donate to people like Lori and other well run ethical rescues. Support good and reasonable legislation. HSUS used to be a great organization but now they're just another Enron.
                  Yep. That's exactly what they did. And bankrupted the local HS in the process after they lied to them and promised to pay all expenses. Grab the headline, move on and make sure the animals are dead. I give up. I do donate to Lori, but people like Lori can't do it alone and they have to compete with the HSUS for the same $$$$$.

                  I have defended them in the past, but this was just wrong. The local HS didn't even see a bad problem and the HSUS orchestrated the whole thing as a way to get a headline. They put the local HS up to it, promised unlimited funding, lied about having to file "charges" in order to get funds and vanished.

                  HS of US cause its all about them. Its not about saving any animals. Shame

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                    Isn't the group "United Animal Kingdom" or something like that the one that comes in during natural disasters and helps? And in Katrina, my local vet went down with his van and helped out with the dogs. And my horse importer went over from Florida with his trailer and people and supplies to help with the horses. So Katrina was not just an HSUS endeavor, lots of people helped out.

                    But as for the pigs, if people would send contributions to the feed store for feed, that would surely help out. That feed store is listed on the newspaper articled that is linked supra.
                    How will it help out? The states attorney asked for the owner to not be allowed near animals. If she loses in court she can't fed them anyway. Nobody else wants to. Its a full time job for 3 people.

                    The horses are 27 and 25. I guess they can leave the farm, but who in FL wants some old Appys? That's one of the states that has too many free horses as it is.

                    I remember picking that mare up as a 6 mo old in MD in the early 80's. The man was selling about 20 babies for $50 a piece. She was not halter broke and damn near killed the poor Vet helping us try and load her. The man selling said they had to be gone that day or he was killing them all. We had to get her out of there and she was a wild child!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Um, everyone needs to realize that HSUS is not the same as your local Humane Society, which is also different in many areas from Animal Control.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Ambrey View Post
                        Um, everyone needs to realize that HSUS is not the same as your local Humane Society, which is also different in many areas from Animal Control.

                        THANK YOU!

                        Whether you have a problem with one or the other, don't drag the other down. The HSUS has nothing to do with local humane societies. They do not regulate them. Similarly, your local humane society doesn't answer to or necessarily agree with everything The HSUS says/does. PLEASE bother to do research before you post such harsh accusations.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by WaningMoon View Post
                          HE did this out of hate for my ex and no other reason. Ex would not press charges as he said it would make the whole situation worse. That was that, the end. The state did not press charges.
                          So what was the humane society or spca supposed to do about it, exactly? Your ex didn't want to press charges so the state didn't. How is that the humane society's fault?
                          "smile a lot can let us ride happy,it is good thing"

                          My CANTER blog.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            And Ambrey made another excellent point - a lot of people want to point fingers at their local humane socities, rescue groups, or even the ASPCA and HSUS but the reality is none of these orgs have the right to take action such as seizing animals. That is up to the ACO or other local law enforcement. A member of the FHS going in and taking a horse (even if the horse is in need) w/o the assistance of local law is the same as if Joe Schmo or any of us were to go in there and take the horse. It's opening themselves to a tremendous law suit.

                            A lot of time these orgs get flack for "not taking action" when really, their hands are tied. Legally, they can't do anything sometimes, unless ACO or the sheriff is willing to authorize it. I am not saying this is the case here, I'm just asking that people educate themselves before jumping the gun and blaming left and right.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Yep. In our area, the Humane Society is a contribution-funded organization that helps homeless animals and animals in need. It has no legal authority or jurisdiction to do ANYTHING about abused animals.

                              And it also is unattached to the HSUS.

                              Comment

                              • Original Poster

                                #16
                                Originally posted by horsecrazy View Post
                                THANK YOU!

                                Whether you have a problem with one or the other, don't drag the other down. The HSUS has nothing to do with local humane societies. They do not regulate them. Similarly, your local humane society doesn't answer to or necessarily agree with everything The HSUS says/does. PLEASE bother to do research before you post such harsh accusations.
                                In this case the HSUS WAS the problem. They lied to the local HS too and almost bankrupted them when they ran. I am not confusing the 2. They came in, got their headline, and left a mess for the locals to deal with.

                                Stories like this are to warn local HS and rescues about the HSUS too. The whole point was that with feed prices so high the best thing to do was take the help of the HSUS to pay for all the care of the sanctuary animals. The HSUS said they could not release funds unless someone was charged with something, but that the charges would be meaningless. It was "just a formality and paperwork".

                                Then they made things sound 1000 times worse then they were, grabbed the headline and left the local HS looking like jerks if they gave the animals back. The local HS had guts and gave them back anyway.

                                But the charges were not dropped so now its impossible to care for the animals at all. All thanks to the HSUS. The big fat liars.

                                The local HS will be hurt by this too. Half the people who read those headlines are mad they gave the animals back and will no longer donate $$$.

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by equinelaw View Post
                                  In this case the HSUS WAS the problem. They lied to the local HS too and almost bankrupted them when they ran. I am not confusing the 2. They came in, got their headline, and left a mess for the locals to deal with.

                                  Stories like this are to warn local HS and rescues about the HSUS too. The whole point was that with feed prices so high the best thing to do was take the help of the HSUS to pay for all the care of the sanctuary animals. The HSUS said they could not release funds unless someone was charged with something, but that the charges would be meaningless. It was "just a formality and paperwork".

                                  Then they made things sound 1000 times worse then they were, grabbed the headline and left the local HS looking like jerks if they gave the animals back. The local HS had guts and gave them back anyway.

                                  But the charges were not dropped so now its impossible to care for the animals at all. All thanks to the HSUS. The big fat liars.

                                  The local HS will be hurt by this too. Half the people who read those headlines are mad they gave the animals back and will no longer donate $$$.

                                  Well then enlighten me, since I don't see much of an explanation in the article. What exactly did HSUS promise to do? Did they say they were going to donate money, or did everyone assume that if the pigs were seized that they would?

                                  From what I've seen, HSUS focuses their time and money on larger issues (animal welfare - for instance they had a big push to pass Prop 2 for farm animals in CA), and not so much specific instances of animal cruelty and neglect, like this case. If they jumped in and gave $ everytime there was a specific animal neglect or cruelty case, pretty sure they would run out of money fast. Not saying this is "right" or "wrong," just saying what I have seen and that's pretty consistent with what's going on here (why it doesn't surprise me that The HSUS isn't financially stepping in with this particular case).

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    I did a little party for them, worked with them in DC and became very disappointed in them and now totally disrespect this organization and Wayne Pacelle and the HSUS legislative branch. They are just not worth anything in my opinion. They have the name, they should stand aside and let this political and partisan organization be taken over by someone decent and honorable.

                                    Comment

                                    • Original Poster

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by Susan P View Post
                                      I did a little party for them, worked with them in DC and became very disappointed in them and now totally disrespect this organization and Wayne Pacelle and the HSUS legislative branch. They are just not worth anything in my opinion. They have the name, they should stand aside and let this political and partisan organization be taken over by someone decent and honorable.
                                      Well said.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by horsecrazy View Post
                                        If they jumped in and gave $ everytime there was a specific animal neglect or cruelty case, pretty sure they would run out of money fast.
                                        seeing as I believe when I looked them up recently, my recollection (which could be faulty) is that HSUS had something like $225 million in assets and some huge hunk of that ($80+ million sticks in my mind) sitting in investments that was never touched for operating expenses or any other purpose other than collecting interest, it would take a good long time and save a lot of animals before they went bankrupt and IMVHO it would actually positively effect/help more animals than their political and litigation agenda does. What kills me about HSUS is it seems 99.9% of people think they support local animal shelters and actual animal rescue and give money to them based on that misconception- drives me batty. At least PETA is open about its agenda and purpose.
                                        Last edited by bambam; Jan. 7, 2009, 10:52 PM.
                                        There is something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man.(Churchill)

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X