• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

TBs, SB and others may ship to slaughter

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    If you don't like what she wrote, no one is forcing you to read it.
    The board has an ignore feature as well and it goes both ways.

    If this isn't a save the horses from slaughter thread what is it?

    There are thousands of horses for sale. Not every horse is going to get bought and some will end up going to slaughter.

    This thread is a sale thread in my opinion. Others on here are not allowed to advertise to sell horses. The only difference is was the tacking on the phrase, the horses may go to slaughter and the list of "brokered" horses is on a rescue's site. The rescue makes it perfectly clear they are not in possession of the horses and they are not theirs.

    Why should these horses be singled out any more then the other thousands of horses up for sale?

    You may not like what I have to say, but it is a fact, that someone is trying to play on the emotions of some, to buy these specific horses.
    The ultimate goal of farming is not the growing of crops, but the cultivation and perfection of human beings.

    Comment


    • #42
      It's not that they are being singled out. COTHers are an incredibly wonderful and generous group, and many do what they can to save. If you'll scan the threads, you will see that this is just one of many such threads.

      If you choose not to help, or can't, that is fine, and absolutely your choice. AC4H is still 501(c)3, and this type of thread is no different from CANTER threads (or similar) alerting us to track closings. BUt there are many of us who want to know, and want to help. Most of us cannot take a horse in. Many of us, with this economy, can't afford to donate. But some of us can, and if enough can do just a little (my dribble theory) it can add up to a whole lot.

      True, we cannot save them all, But for the ones we can, that makes all the difference. These horses are at risk of certain death - and a not very humane death.

      I hope that this thread has come to the attention of someone who may be able to offer a home to even one of those at-risk horses. And I will never ever fault anyone for trying to do so.
      www.specialhorses.org
      a 501(c)3 organization helping 501(c)3 equine rescues

      Comment


      • #43
        Bluey, you are my hero.

        Comment


        • #44
          Outside of the cloistered walls of COTH, newspapers across the country are running front page articles discussing the fact that economic conditions have put horses in private homes at risk. People simply cannot afford to keep them, with costs skyrocketing, and incomes faltering. The number of horses here on the giveaway board give some strong indication of just how challenging these times are.

          This is something that has been near and dear to the heart of so many here on COTH- and now, the world at large is being made aware of it. To say that somehow anything here concerning the welfare, at any level, of a horse, should be limited, or censored, is a patently absurd. The fact that a Broker is trying to make a living on a horse who has lost one of these homes isn't the fault of the Broker- but it sure as hell isn't the fault of the horse, and it makes them no less at risk for sliding down the scale into truly desperate straights. Does a horse need to be starving in a field, or standing in a feedlot to be at risk? If you believe that, your rose colored glasses are working, just fine.

          This may not be your welfare concern- you may be worried about riding in the cold weather, or keeping shoes on in the mud, or waterproofing your blankets, or some other concern- but it IS a welfare concern, and as such, I hope that we never turn a blind eye to these issues on COTH.
          When someone shows you who they are, BELIEVE them- Maya Angelou
          www.americansaddlebredsporthorse.net
          http://www.asbsporthorse.blogspot.com/

          Comment


          • #45
            So, wait, the pro-slaughter people don't care if horses go to slaughter (and think this is a preferable option for any horse) and OBJECT when people try to PREVENT horses from going to slaughter and label anyone who dares to contribute to such an effort an "animal rights activist?"

            Really?

            I choose to contribute to some rescue efforts. I, personally, do not support AC4H, but I would not condemn or belittle anyone who chooses to help keep these horses from going to slaughter.

            I realize that we cannot save them all. I also realize that some slaughter experiences for horses are worse than others, but if I can spare one horse that fate then why wouldn't I? And how does it affect the pro-slaughter trolls' world if someone tries?

            I dearly hope that COTH decides to open a well regulated Horse Welfare board. So many of the horses who go to slaughter and suffer abuse and neglect are the "refuse" of the industries supported and encouraged by this very board. However, if they do, I would hope that some people would have the decency (fat chance, I know) to leave people to their good fight to make a difference in the lives of a few horses.
            When life gives you lemons. . .say &%^# you lemons! And throw those lemons back in life's face so that it will be afraid of you and won't try that crap again!

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Bluey View Post
              Very nice that some feel like aquiring their next horse thru a "rescue" effort, but in reality, we are just playing musical chairs with horses when buying one talked about in the rescue threads here, when maybe we would have been better buying a more appropiate horse locally.
              Bluey, you're my COTH person of the day for saying this.
              Head Geek at The Saddle Geek Blog http://www.thesaddlegeek.com/

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by LessonLearned View Post
                So, wait, the pro-slaughter people don't care if horses go to slaughter (and think this is a preferable option for any horse) and OBJECT when people try to PREVENT horses from going to slaughter and label anyone who dares to contribute to such an effort an "animal rights activist?"

                Really?

                I choose to contribute to some rescue efforts. I, personally, do not support AC4H, but I would not condemn or belittle anyone who chooses to help keep these horses from going to slaughter.

                I realize that we cannot save them all. I also realize that some slaughter experiences for horses are worse than others, but if I can spare one horse that fate then why wouldn't I? And how does it affect the pro-slaughter trolls' world if someone tries?

                I dearly hope that COTH decides to open a well regulated Horse Welfare board. So many of the horses who go to slaughter and suffer abuse and neglect are the "refuse" of the industries supported and encouraged by this very board. However, if they do, I would hope that some people would have the decency (fat chance, I know) to leave people to their good fight to make a difference in the lives of a few horses.
                I think that some miss the forest for looking at each individual tree.
                There is much more than meets the eye in these discussions.
                These are very serious concerns, way past slaughter, that in reality is just one more way to dispose of some unwanted horses.

                Other than the one horse that may be helped, of giving any one horse another chance at being of use, the real issues here are about what we want our use of horses to be and who is to decide.

                We have gone from "saving the horses from slaughter" to "saving the horses from racing", to "save the horses" from eventing, rodeo, whatever you want to name, to what else will the next target be?

                Try looking at that big picture and why some may object to the subtle and not so subtle propaganda behind many so called "rescues".

                Comment


                • #48
                  I think that it is very easy to extrapolate out to the ends of something, and smell PETA behind each and every effort to help a horse.

                  Even in the era of Monica Lewinsky, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

                  Look at each horse, on a case by case basis. If the horse is in an "at risk" situation, as you define it yourself, or as it is defined generally, you can step up and help.

                  If not, you can sit back, and say that you are not going to enable any of those dogooders who might be members of those factions on the fringe- my God, they could be part of the conspiracy to take away our rights to....whatever. In the mean time, horse like those originally brought to our attention by this thread are STILL on the bubble.

                  Why people feel the need to stop others from trying to help where they can is beyond me. It seems that they feel possessed of some great wisdom that escapes those who are out there pulling horses out of at risk situations, or that, because they are not actually doing this themselves, they are somehow in need of stopping others.

                  All I give a damn about, in all of this is the horses. Do no let anyone make you lose sight of them- ever.
                  When someone shows you who they are, BELIEVE them- Maya Angelou
                  www.americansaddlebredsporthorse.net
                  http://www.asbsporthorse.blogspot.com/

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Nice post Bluey and very true.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by ASB Stars View Post
                      I think that it is very easy to extrapolate out to the ends of something, and smell PETA behind each and every effort to help a horse.

                      Even in the era of Monica Lewinsky, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar.

                      Look at each horse, on a case by case basis. If the horse is in an "at risk" situation, as you define it yourself, or as it is defined generally, you can step up and help.

                      If not, you can sit back, and say that you are not going to enable any of those dogooders who might be members of those factions on the fringe- my God, they could be part of the conspiracy to take away our rights to....whatever. In the mean time, horse like those originally brought to our attention by this thread are STILL on the bubble.

                      Why people feel the need to stop others from trying to help where they can is beyond me. It seems that they feel possessed of some great wisdom that escapes those who are out there pulling horses out of at risk situations, or that, because they are not actually doing this themselves, they are somehow in need of stopping others.

                      All I give a damn about, in all of this is the horses. Do no let anyone make you lose sight of them- ever.
                      Are you not maybe assuming a little too much there?
                      Why would you think that people that may want to point out some truths are not also, have been always, helping horses in need?

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by Bluey View Post

                        I am afraid that the day is coming where we will see people "rescuing" horses from stables, because keeping a horse in a stall will be deemed abusive, or horses turned loose at shows, because they are being abused when asked to jump, etc.
                        That day is already here and it is the prime reason why I adopted my critters from Sunkissed clear across the East coast rather than in my own backyard.

                        I love and support rescues...it is all we adopt here for many, many reasons. But at times I really get tired of the "send me your money, I just "rescued" another $800 dollar horse from the auction. There were three other buyers there...including a woman who really wanted a life long companion horse...GOSH! I couldn't let that happen! So I out bid her! Now we REALLY need more donations and she will be listed at $3,000 after she completes $1,000 worth of training."

                        Not saying that is the case here...no way...but I am very, very tired of the way "bad" rescues make it hard for the "good" rescues. And I have had my fill just today...sorry, needed to vent a little

                        I hope these horses have happy endings
                        I Loff My Quarter Horse & I love Fenway Bartholomule cliques

                        Just somebody with a positive outlook on life...go ahead...hate me for that.

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by Bluey;3748123Very nice that some feel like aquiring their next horse thru a "rescue" effort, but in reality, [B
                          we are just playing musical chairs with horses[/B] when buying one talked about in the rescue threads here, when maybe we would have been better buying a more appropiate horse locally.
                          You can say that about anyone purchasing a horse. How about the people adopting CANTER horses? Surely one can find local TBs or other horses locally. I don't remember seeing any comments from you or anyone else crabbing about people adopting them from across the nation. Who are you or anyone to say a person would be better off buying a local horse as opposed to going through a rescue 1/2 across the country.

                          Weren't you on a previous thread willing to "rescue" a horse in CO? Surely you could find more than enough horses locally. Why is it OK for you and not anyone else?

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Please.

                            I am speaking about this group of horses, specifically.

                            Whatever is being done- by you or anyone else- for others certainly deserves a thread of its own to celebrate those efforts. If you prefer to keep those efforts to yourself, that is sure OK, too.

                            Perhaps I missed what you were doing for these horses, other than questioning the rationale?
                            When someone shows you who they are, BELIEVE them- Maya Angelou
                            www.americansaddlebredsporthorse.net
                            http://www.asbsporthorse.blogspot.com/

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Originally posted by Sail Away View Post
                              You can say that about anyone purchasing a horse. How about the people adopting CANTER horses? Surely one can find local TBs or other horses locally. I don't remember seeing any comments from you or anyone else crabbing about people adopting them from across the nation. Who are you or anyone to say a person would be better off buying a local horse as opposed to going through a rescue 1/2 across the country.

                              Weren't you on a previous thread willing to "rescue" a horse in CO? Surely you could find more than enough horses locally. Why is it OK for you and not anyone else?
                              Many see what I see but choose not to comment most of the time.
                              I would not have posted here at all, until the personal attacks started by some, that had their say without restrain for too long.

                              As for the one horse I was interested in, not that far away, I was asked not to comment on it, so I won't, to protect the guilty.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by LessonLearned View Post
                                So, wait, the pro-slaughter people don't care if horses go to slaughter (and think this is a preferable option for any horse) and OBJECT when people try to PREVENT horses from going to slaughter and label anyone who dares to contribute to such an effort an "animal rights activist?"
                                One can't help but notice the irony.
                                Proud Anti-Slaughter Handwringer http://www.tbfriends.com/

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by DressageGeek "Ribbon Ho" View Post
                                  IAC4H is still 501(c)3, and this type of thread is no different from CANTER threads (or similar) alerting us to track closings.
                                  So do the broker horses 'bailed' by AC4H go out with a rescue contract protecting them?
                                  Are there reference checks, site checks afterwards, etc?
                                  Is any portion of the 'bail' for a broker horse deductible?
                                  If not, how is their charitable status applicable?
                                  Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                  http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    COTH, like any other forum, reflects the times we live in currently. As a horse board, it reflects what is happening in the horse community at large. When the Olympics were happening, there were multiple threads regarding the Olympics. When the FEI games come to Kentucky in 2010, the pages will be filled with topics on that.

                                    Right now, we are in economic times that suck for many, including horse owners. Hence, more rescue threads. On trot.org, we do have a rescue forum specifically, and have had one for a few years, however, the number of threads that have started and the amount of traffic on those threads has increased over the last three months dramatically. So, I wouldn't say that COTH is becoming rescue central, it is just doing it's job as it always does, which is to reflect the current state of the horse industry. And, right now, like it or not, there are more horses at risk of not having homes.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                                      So do the broker horses 'bailed' by AC4H go out with a rescue contract protecting them?
                                      Are there reference checks, site checks afterwards, etc?
                                      Is any portion of the 'bail' for a broker horse deductible?
                                      If not, how is their charitable status applicable?
                                      If the funds to "bail out" these horses were donated directly to AC4H, then yes, the horses must have adoption contracts on each of them, because, in reality, they are the property of the rescue. Appropriate reference checks and such are done by AC4H. I am an approved foster/adopter for them and they did these checks on me.

                                      If a horse is purchased by an individual directly from a Broker, no such contract exists.
                                      When someone shows you who they are, BELIEVE them- Maya Angelou
                                      www.americansaddlebredsporthorse.net
                                      http://www.asbsporthorse.blogspot.com/

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        I don't get it.

                                        Dear pro-slaughter folks,

                                        Isn't it bad manners to divert a thread for your own purposes? This was a thread to spread awareness about a specific group of horses that were likely destined for slaughter. Getting the news out meant that people could get involved in helping them if they felt so inclined. This wasn't a discussion thread. I understand that the beauty of COTH is that everyone has different opinions but it seems that alot of threads have gone way off track - so much so that it is difficult to follow the original thread. Start your own thread if you want to go off-subject.

                                        No offense meant for anyone who jumped in to defend the original thread.....

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          If you really believe this then you should report it to the moderator. I don't happen to agree and you surely have the right to your opinion. However this is what the mods do, they decide if something is inappropriate.

                                          I do use my ignore option when I get tired of reading the same old tired things from the same people. Obviously you are not on my ignore list. I've been on this forum for a few years and have learned my way around, made plenty of mistakes and learned to tone down a bit. But going after someone does bring out the underdog defense mode in me.

                                          IMHO, you should allow the mods to do their job and if they agree with you they will address it to the op. If you believe this to be a real case of selling horses then the right thing to do is to make a formal complaint to the mods and let them decide.




                                          Originally posted by 7HL View Post
                                          The board has an ignore feature as well and it goes both ways.

                                          If this isn't a save the horses from slaughter thread what is it?

                                          There are thousands of horses for sale. Not every horse is going to get bought and some will end up going to slaughter.

                                          This thread is a sale thread in my opinion. Others on here are not allowed to advertise to sell horses. The only difference is was the tacking on the phrase, the horses may go to slaughter and the list of "brokered" horses is on a rescue's site. The rescue makes it perfectly clear they are not in possession of the horses and they are not theirs.

                                          Why should these horses be singled out any more then the other thousands of horses up for sale?

                                          You may not like what I have to say, but it is a fact, that someone is trying to play on the emotions of some, to buy these specific horses.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X