• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Ideas Needed For A Peaceful Protest

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    You go to the place where the decision makers are, and that might not be the horse show.

    You get all your friends to go with you.

    You make signs that can be read from a distance.

    And you just do it.
    I have a Fjord! Life With Oden

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by PeacefulProtestALTER View Post
      For the record, USDA inspectors are aware of the show and present. Although after seeing that process, my eyes were opened to just how much of a joke it truly is. They're looking for scars, chemical resins, and horses that flinch when their lower legs are touched. That's it.

      The stacked horses wearing action devices all pass the inspection with flying colors, even if they are so all over body sore they can barely move.
      The USDA vets are there to enforce the HPA. It has some very specific things that they can inspect for. If they find those things then the horse is ticketed and disqualified for that show. If they don't then the horse passes and it allowed to show, even if it's stacked, wearing chains, etc. It can even show if lame as long as the lameness is not caused by a prohibited practice.

      I've known several USDA vets. over the years and never, as in NEVER, have I seen the behavior from them that you ascribe to them. Where are you getting your information?

      If you want to bring to the sponsors of this event (i.e., the people putting up the front money to make it happen) the reality of the inherent cruelty of the Big Lick process then I'm all for it.

      I've known Mr. Keith Dane, the HSUS guru on this issue, for a very long time. He is good people. I'm a bit disappointed to see him in the company of HSUS but that's his call, not mine. Him I trust; his employers, not so much. But make the call and see what happens.

      Make your pitch to whoever you wish, but don't tell lies and don't repeat lies. That only damages your own credibility and makes you out to be a zealot who can be readily ignored.

      G.
      Mangalarga Marchador: Uma Raça, Uma Paixão

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #23
        Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
        The USDA vets are there to enforce the HPA. It has some very specific things that they can inspect for. If they find those things then the horse is ticketed and disqualified for that show. If they don't then the horse passes and it allowed to show, even if it's stacked, wearing chains, etc. It can even show if lame as long as the lameness is not caused by a prohibited practice.

        I've known several USDA vets. over the years and never, as in NEVER, have I seen the behavior from them that you ascribe to them. Where are you getting your information?

        If you want to bring to the sponsors of this event (i.e., the people putting up the front money to make it happen) the reality of the inherent cruelty of the Big Lick process then I'm all for it.

        I've known Mr. Keith Dane, the HSUS guru on this issue, for a very long time. He is good people. I'm a bit disappointed to see him in the company of HSUS but that's his call, not mine. Him I trust; his employers, not so much. But make the call and see what happens.

        Make your pitch to whoever you wish, but don't tell lies and don't repeat lies. That only damages your own credibility and makes you out to be a zealot who can be readily ignored.

        G.
        Whoa there, now back up. Telling lies and repeating lies? Where are on earth do you get off making that claim?

        I am getting my information from my own eyes, and YOU just corroborated my observations in the very same post where you accused me of lying. I highlighted your statement in bold that says the exact same thing I witnessed.

        As I stated, the USDA inspections are looking for exactly what I posted: excessive scarring, traces of chemicals (they swab for them), shoe violations, and horses painful to the touch. You can see it for yourself right here:

        http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j...64542518,d.dmQ

        The general public often thinks that these inspections put an end the atrocities of the Big Lick. They don't. In my opinion, they are a joke. The inspections are looking for cheating in the form of soring, and don't do squat to prevent the pain and wear and tear caused by physically altering a horse's conformation and natural movement.

        Comment


        • #24
          Be careful taking on local politics in a small town - I am not saying, that you shouldn't do it. But I am doing it right now, and I am being cited for every rule violation in the book they have.

          My latest violation was for having a Waste Management Bagster out in my yard, as we are renovating the house. We were cited for 'having a large amount of trash outside the house'. It had been there about 3 weeks, a month is an average time to fill one.

          The township came out and measured the gaps in our sidewalk, they couldn't get us for that, as we were within whatever ordinance they have. But as I go to the township meetings, and fight them on their corruption - they are out to get us. If I had known that, I don't think I would have started this war.

          Of course the soaring issue is worth standing up to, but just a heads up.

          Comment


          • #25
            Hi Peaceful! No experience with Big Lick issues here, but having spent a fair bit of time in small towns--and doing community organizing around public issues--I have to second the posters above who said don't go alone. Not just because it's potentially dangerous...it's also unlikely to be effective. One person, no matter how passionate and articulate, can be isolated instantly.
            You know the town and its "power structure". You need to find allies and build a coalition, if you will, that is harder to ignore. As said above, starting with horse people but perhaps also clergy, respected professionals, good-minded prominent businessmen/women. Town officials may be open to advocacy if they understand there's a risk of bad press (but I would make the approach to them through one of your "prominent citizens.")
            It can be frustrating because it takes longer, but that's how change in community attitudes usually happens.
            Good luck, you're doing the right thing!

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by AlexS View Post
              Be careful taking on local politics in a small town - I am not saying, that you shouldn't do it. But I am doing it right now, and I am being cited for every rule violation in the book they have.

              My latest violation was for having a Waste Management Bagster out in my yard, as we are renovating the house. We were cited for 'having a large amount of trash outside the house'. It had been there about 3 weeks, a month is an average time to fill one.

              The township came out and measured the gaps in our sidewalk, they couldn't get us for that, as we were within whatever ordinance they have. But as I go to the township meetings, and fight them on their corruption - they are out to get us. If I had known that, I don't think I would have started this war.

              Of course the soaring issue is worth standing up to, but just a heads up.
              This is why outside people come in. It can be inconvenient and just plain dangerous if you live there in some instances.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                This is why outside people come in. It can be inconvenient and just plain dangerous if you live there in some instances.
                I agree with you. Was just trying to give her a heads up of what can happen when you challenge the people in authority in a small town.

                My township even measured the distance that we shoveled out the snow around the fire hydrant this winter. Apparently there's an ordinance about that. We didn't get a citation, so we must have been ok.
                When they are out to get you, there's more ordinances than you could imagine.

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by AlexS View Post
                  I agree with you. Was just trying to give her a heads up of what can happen when you challenge the people in authority in a small town.

                  My township even measured the distance that we shoveled out the snow around the fire hydrant this winter. Apparently there's an ordinance about that. We didn't get a citation, so we must have been ok.
                  When they are out to get you, there's more ordinances than you could imagine.
                  This is also why outside people come in to expose abuse...like the abuse of the TWH. The lives of your animals and your property could be at stake if you are local and they know who you are. I've reported abuse and had to have a friend report it for me...it's not worth taking the chance.

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X