• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

If slaughter is banned, what happens to all the unwanted horses?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • If slaughter is banned, what happens to all the unwanted horses?

    What is going to happen with all the unwanted horses that currently end up in these slaughter houses if slaughter is banned in the US?
  • Original Poster

    #2
    What is going to happen with all the unwanted horses that currently end up in these slaughter houses if slaughter is banned in the US?

    Comment


    • #3
      Go look at the Sen Ensign on CSPAN2 thread on pg 4 of this forum. It pretty much answers that question.

      A brief explanation is that we have horse slaughter not because there is an excess of horses but because there is a demand for horse meat for human consumption overseas, and foreign companies that have slaughter houses here (and those that buy horses for slaughter, sell horses for slaughter and transport for slaughter) make a profit from it. Saying they are slaughtered to control the excess is like saying we slaughter pigs, cows and chickens because we have too many...we slaughter them because people want to eat them.
      In the late 80's we slaughtered over 300,000 horses. Now we slaughter about 60,000 per yr. THere hasn't been a huge increase in unwanted horses as a result. During 2 yrs in the 90's we decreased slaughter by about 60,000 (about the amount currently being slaughtered). There was no huge unwanted horse problem.
      The horses being slaughtered are not all old, crippled or dangerous horses. Check out CBER's website for examples of what is being slaughtered...
      CBER

      In fact over 80% of the horses slaughtered are healthy, usable horses. They are not unwanted, just unlucky enough to have been sold to killer buyers.

      Comment


      • #4
        Excellent question, and one that is given short shrift by the anti-slaughter faction. Many of the horses that end up at slaughter are there because their owners don't want/can't use them anymore - whether old, unsound, or whatever. Anyone can own a horse in this country, and not everyone is the conscientious caretaker that we all (presumably) are. These owners are not that concerned about their animals, and some of them, if the slaughter option is removed, will just neglect them to death. Literally. If they can't make any money off these animals, their thinking goes, they sure as heck will not SPEND any money on them. As we all know, the rescue organizations are stretched beyond their capacity now. Thousands of horses that were bound for slaughter will now be thrown into that system, where some number (fill in your own blank) will fall through the cracks, and die very slowly of neglect. There are problems with the transport of horses to slaughter, and also problems with slaughtering them (although that situation has improved drastically in recent years - read Temple Grandin's books), but if reality is faced, one realizes that death by starvation or thirst is a LOT slower and perhaps more agonizing than anything that might happen to a horse on its way to the slaughterhouse.

        Having said all that, and while I don my asbestos suit, let me also say that I have gone and am going to great lenghts to make sure my horses, whether current or former, do not end up in this situation.
        ~~Liz Williams, Snickersville Hounds~~

        "I'll thank the Lord the life I've led Was always near a Thoroughbred"
        -Paul Mellon

        Comment


        • #5
          I expect many will end up at the rendering plant instead.
          If you are allergic to a thing, it is best not to put that thing in your mouth, particularly if the thing is cats. - Lemony Snicket

          Comment


          • #6
            I agree totally with Hopefully. It is a reality that the anti slaughter folks DON'T want to realize. There IS no easy answer to this, and yes the responsible owners are also the ones makign sure that unwanted hroses aren't brought into the world, but it is those "others" who breed indiscriminantly, hoping to make a quick buck and therefore we have these hroses that no one wants.
            www.shawneeacres.net

            Comment


            • #7
              Even with slaughter as an available option, there is still way too much neglect out there. Therefore, the people who neglect their animals aren't necessarily the same people sending them to slaughter. Though I agree there is a business aspect to it, you can't compare horses to cows, pigs, and chickens that are SPECIFICALLY BRED to be slaughtered. I don't know of any circumstance where a horse was brought into this world solely for its meat. That ia a financially losing proposition!

              I really don't know what may happen to those horses that otherwise would have been slaughtered, but I do believe that euthenasia or even a bullet to the head (as gruesome as that may be) has to be better than a multi-day foodless, waterless trip on a double decker trailer and a crushed skull.

              Now I really do worry about the horses that may get smuggled into Canca or Mexico to be sluaghtered.

              Comment


              • #8
                Until it happens no one knows for sure but I don't think its going to be a positive for the overall horse markwet. Anytime you take away part of a market for a product it doesn't help bring prices up for that product overall. I don't see rescues taking in even more horses they seem to be full up at least around here. I don't see people like myself buying any again if theres no chance to recover costs to take in the next ones. I'm guessing some will just stand around till they die. Some will be left unwanted, some will be hauled to sales and let go for what ever they bring.
                Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                Comment


                • #9
                  well, you did say earlier that you thught there would be no real increase in abuse? i don't want to put words in your mouth, honstly i don't remember exactly what you said.

                  some stand around and die now, don't they?that's not gonna change.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Hopefully...The people selling to slaughter are not the people abusing/neglecting horses. We have had horse slaughter available for years and yet we have people starving/abusing horses. By your reasoning we shouldn't have that now.
                    In fact when horse slaughter was outlawed in CA in 98, abuse/neglect rates DROPPED. And in Illinois, for the year that Cavel was shut down due to fire, horse abuse/neglect cases dropped.
                    Horse abuse/neglect is illegal in every state. People selling horses to slaughter, supporting or working in the slaughter industry are not a bunch of law breakers. You are not suddenly going to turn a bunch of people into animal abusers/lawbreakers by taking away slaughter. You will still have the same people that are now neglecting horses, doing it after slaughter is banned.
                    Less than 1% of horses sold to slaughter are owner turn in's/drop offs. Most of the other horses sold to slaughter are done so by sending them to an auction that doesn't exactly advertise the fact that killer buyers are present. Right now, a horse that brings a low bid with no reserve has been given a death sentence that the owner selling the horse may not be aware of. Without slaughter, that horse now has a chance. If you own an undesireable horse with no redeeming qualities (pedigree, training, performance, conformation, health, etc) except that they are big, you won't get much money for it after the slaughter option is gone. Which is as it should be. If you want more money for a horse, put some training into it, get it healthy etc. If a horse is too permanently crippled to live pain free, you should humanely euthanize it. You will save future board/upkeep costs. It costs the same to feed a healthy horse as a crippled one.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Oh I don't think abuse or neglect will increase those type people will do so regardless of what a horse is worth. I do think a number of neglected and abused horses will not get out of their situation though because of slaughter being banned.
                      Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Saying they are slaughtered to control the excess is like saying we slaughter pigs, cows and chickens because we have too many... </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                        I don't believe this is accurate at all. Pigs, cows and chickens are raised to be slaughtered. For the most part, and I realize there might be exceptions, horses are NOT raised to be slaughtered.

                        There are folks I know who would never send their horse to auction, and folks who do. I have things in common (everything from "world view" all the way to horse feeding/training methods) with folks in both camps. There is no black and white. If someone brings their horse to an auction and there are no kill buyers there, what will happen? Someone else will get the horse for a ridiculously low price, or it won't sell at all. Some of the people who buy horses for ridiculously low prices are good people looking for a deal -- some shouldn't own horses. Some people whose horses don't sell (at auction or anywhere else) will continue to give them exemplary care till they do sell; others will neglect them or abandon them or give them away. By eliminating slaughter as an option, we have removed one outlet in the economic equation, and this will cause swelling in another area. I doubt it will be a good one.
                        Shall I tell you what I find beautiful about you? You are at your very best when things are worst.
                        Starman

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Jetsmom I agree with almost everything in your post except that abused horses will now have no chance or very little chance to be bought by people like me. Most of those end up in good homes a few go to a sale. Now if theres no chance to recover costs they stay in the abused home. And the numbers of cases in CA. and Ill. are spun by both sides to show what they want.
                          Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            The way I see it is when you are alive, you have a chance of a "good" life, even if things are bad at stages in your life.

                            When you are walking down the plank to your death, your chances are slim to none.

                            It should mean I can work harder now to stop neglect as I won't need to work on the slaughter issue any longer.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Rodeio:
                              What is going to happen with all the unwanted horses that currently end up in these slaughter houses if slaughter is banned in the US? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                              I imagine that many of them will still die, they just won't end up on a plate in France or Belgium.
                              They'll become Alpo or they'll get a bullet in the head and be buried in a field.
                              --------------------------------------
                              Creo que el mundo es bello,
                              que la poesÃ*a es como el pan, de todos.
                              .

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                All I know, is I'm not buying or selling any more horses for a VERY LONG TIME, so I'm not going to worry about the horse market anymore, or what is going to happen to my horses I have now. If I sell again, it will be because of divorce (which I don't see happening), or disability (of myself). I don't care if the horse breaks it's leg, as long as it can walk around, they're here to stay (unless Cujo kills another one of my animals!, but I know he would not be going to slaughter for a VERY LONG time)

                                Maybe one of these days I can realize my dream to have a rescue for old horses, so I could take on some then! Plan: 8 years, moving WAY out, alot of acreage, and ALOT of old "unwanted" and "unusable" horses just moping about, munching on hay, enjoying their last days in comfort, not having to do anything, and having nothing but th best and kindness before they go.

                                Can I just get a wee tad off topic here?

                                Here is something I came across today that is a small micro-victory, in our department. Please take a look at the new AQHA unwanted horse article, revised and certainly more politcally correct than the one with the flies buzzing around the face:

                                http://www.aqha.com/association/who/unwantedhorse.pdf

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Huh? What "unwanted" horses are you talking about? Do you mean horses that are for sale at auctions? hmmm..I thought they were called sale horses!

                                  Surely you dont think that because a horse is offered for sale by one owner that it should be labled "unwanted"? I have sold hundreds of horses in my life at all price levels, and not one of them was "unwanted" they were just simply for sale.

                                  Does this mean that classified ads will now read "Unwanted Horses" instead of "Horses for Sale"?
                                  www.horse-protection.org

                                  No Horses to Slaughter Clique

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    County- I don't understand why you say that you wouldn't have a chance to buy/recoup your money..

                                    For example...I think you agree that not having slaughter removes the basis for the bottom of the market. (currently, weight).
                                    Now the bottom of the market will be determined by the desirability of the horse based on pedigree, performance, training, conformation, health, manners, availability. So a well bred, but skinny abused horse without much training, will still bring a small amount. If you buy that horse for very little, get him healthy and put some training into him, you should get a profit. Your horse should bring more money than a fat unbroke draft.
                                    Prices are relative. If you can buy for less, because you aren't bidding against slaughter buyers, then, even though the prices of horses have dropped a little, you will still realize an over all profit if you have improved the desirability your purchase.
                                    I don't think you are buying a skinny abused horse, fattening them up with no training with the intention of running them back through the sale to be sold for slaughter at a higher price because they weigh more. At least that is what I gathered from your previous posts.

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by onthebit12000:
                                      Huh? What "unwanted" horses are you talking about? Do you mean horses that are for sale at auctions? hmmm..I thought they were called sale horses!

                                      Surely you dont think that because a horse is offered for sale by one owner that it should be labled "unwanted"? I have sold hundreds of horses in my life at all price levels, and not one of them was "unwanted" they were just simply for sale.

                                      Does this mean that classified ads will now read "Unwanted Horses" instead of "Horses for Sale"? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                      I think you're being delibrately obtuse.
                                      The OP never said that all Auction/For Sale horses are unwanted.
                                      --------------------------------------
                                      Creo que el mundo es bello,
                                      que la poesÃ*a es como el pan, de todos.
                                      .

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Actually most the neglected horses I've bought aren't even halter broke much less trained for anything. And alot aren't reg. although could be if a person wanted to spend more then I could possably get for the horse. To me a neglected horse is just that training and breeding never enter into the picture if I buy them or not. I just hate to see neglected animals period sometimes its cattle I buy
                                        Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X