• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Stalkers, Jail Time for selling your horse and more ....yes, about Carriage Horses

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    from the 'manhole video' tag, my bolding

    "Most of the people who like this page know instinctively that carriage horses in City traffic is wrong and abusive; that this trade is inherently inhumane. They need no convincing and want to see it end. "

    Since the 'trade' is inhumane, the owners must be 'abusers'. Abusive owners may legally have their horses seized from them without compensation or the right to sell or give away their horses as they choose, or to keep them, for that matter.
    Then there is the criminal abuse charge to be adjudicated and fines or time served.

    This goes FAR beyond merely pulling the licenses to operate the business; which could be passed off as a municipal decision, and countered via legal recourse/public pressure on the mayor, etc.

    Taking control of the drivers' property is a whole 'nother proposition and needs stomping out as the 'spark that could set the entire woods afire' that it is.

    Comment


    • #42
      Are there Amish communities in NY that use horses as transport? Would it be possible to get them on board - after all, if horses pulling carriages is deemed "inhumane", and those carriage-pulling horses may not be sold into any type of working home, that would impact those communities too once it spreads out of NYC.
      Proud Member Of The Lady Mafia

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by D_BaldStockings View Post
        from the 'manhole video' tag, my bolding

        "Most of the people who like this page know instinctively that carriage horses in City traffic is wrong and abusive; that this trade is inherently inhumane. They need no convincing and want to see it end. "

        Since the 'trade' is inhumane, the owners must be 'abusers'. Abusive owners may legally have their horses seized from them without compensation or the right to sell or give away their horses as they choose, or to keep them, for that matter.
        Then there is the criminal abuse charge to be adjudicated and fines or time served.

        This goes FAR beyond merely pulling the licenses to operate the business; which could be passed off as a municipal decision, and countered via legal recourse/public pressure on the mayor, etc.

        Taking control of the drivers' property is a whole 'nother proposition and needs stomping out as the 'spark that could set the entire woods afire' that it is.
        Except there hasn't ever been actual abuse documented, so no animal cruelty charges. The worst you could say is differing opinions about how the horses should best be cared for. Because that doesn't happen in any other corner of the horse world...
        \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

        Comment


        • #44
          The carriage people have bullied and carried on like mean girls in high school. They have, in my google research, posted that the Foret woman is "Lizzie Fecal." lot of poor class by the carriage people. I'm not on FB, so I don't know what they've done there
          http://horsebackmagazine.com/hb/archives/14758


          http://www.banhdc.org/archives/ch-fact-peta.html


          http://www.banhdc.org/ch-why.shtml

          All show up without being on FB. And if you google the names, the FB pages come up and aren't restricted to FB members. You can open them and look at them.

          Or you could have just looked at her replies under her name on here:
          Again - the gross inaccuracies - and stupidity because your comments show up on google alerts.

          You people must be so bored, you have nothing else to do but this. Pathetic and desperate.

          if you had any integrity, you would use your real name.
          you're kidding me - Right. That horse was panting because he was hot.
          Atlanta= hot. Is there something wrong with you to be in such a state of denial that you do not acknowledge that?

          Must all of you always defend horse abuse.

          Don't you people care about horses at all - or are they just a meal ticket. Never mind - I know the answer.

          love your red neck language BTW - very classy
          (horses are obligate nose breathers and the horses in Death Valley don't pant)

          Did you read my article "Horse of a Different Color" - where I say the NYC carriage horses are "entertainment horses?" In case you did not, I will include it in my newsletter this weekend. I am sure you can't wait to find it on line. It is time to take it out for an airing again. Thanks for reminding me that this is such an important issue. NYC carriage horses are not WORK HORSES. period.

          So, yes - I straightened them out on our FB page and explained it better - so please do not fool the people on this page to suit your own needs. They all agreed with me. Reread it. And BTW, many are horse people and know the head from the tail. They even know what a (gasp) chestnut is.

          The carriage horses in NYC do not WORK for 9 hours straight. They stand around most of the time doing nothing. This is documented
          Again - hiding behind your screen name. No one said the horses are exhausted. I said they stand around doing nothing for many of those 9 hours. Reading comprehension please. Many are so bored they fall asleep or paw the pavement our of frustration.

          You can lie all you want and try to impress the people on this page with your "cleverness."

          Being kept in heavy equipment for 9 hours just waiting around for a customer is not my idea of work.
          Elizabeth Forel - Presentation in part on Misconceptions of the public



          MISCONCEPTION: INDUSTRY: OUR HORSES GO ON VACATION FOR 3-4 MONTHS A YEAR
          Even if this is true – it is only for some of the horses – it still means that these same horses are working with no break for 8-9 months a year with no daily turnout, which is more important. In other words the horses are kept prisoners for 8-9 months a year with no turnout, no opportunity to express their equine nature. And most do not get any break at all.



          We are against horses being worked between the shafts of their carriages for 9 hours a day as horse slaves, with bits and blinders and tack - not even being able to scratch an itch. We advocate for the right of animals to live free according to their own terms – as indicated on Friends of Animals home page.


          AN INDUSTRY OUT OF CONTROL

          Horses suffer while carriage drivers defy the law and work their horses as temperature remains in the 90s By: Elizabeth Forel


          So do tell us who is lying and who is name calling?My name is easily found via google, as is the attorney firm I have.
          You jump in the saddle,
          Hold onto the bridle!
          Jump in the line!
          ...Belefonte

          Comment


          • #45
            BTW, the NY Daily News printed my letter to the editor today, which was in response to one of the typical anti-carriage letters they print every so often. They actually printed it without cutting even one word; this is the first time in 30 years of writing letters that has happened LOL

            Anyway, of course,someone got right onto the comments section with lies and attacks...par for the course, but it never ceases to amaze me, as every single thing I said I can back up with ironclad proof:

            http://www.nydailynews.com/opinion/-article-1.1462982
            VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

            https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
              Except there hasn't ever been actual abuse documented, so no animal cruelty charges. The worst you could say is differing opinions about how the horses should best be cared for. Because that doesn't happen in any other corner of the horse world...
              My post was in response to supposed add-ons to the 'stopping the carriage business in NYC' perceived stance of the mayor by the vocal anti- crowd.

              Has this been written and proposed?
              Or is it only a fiction of exaggeration.

              IF the reason for business stoppage is 'abuse' and there is no agreement as to what abuse is, who will the expert be who decides?
              -There is already a licensed vet willing to give 'expert' opinion to the detriment of the carriage drivers.

              I do not understand why the carriage drivers cannot move against the activists on grounds of obstruction of business and disturbing the peace.
              Rights of free speech do not include trespass, screaming or overly loud, vile slander at the tops of their lungs.
              There is plenty of video evidence that could be brought to bear.

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by D_BaldStockings View Post
                I do not understand why the carriage drivers cannot move against the activists on grounds of obstruction of business and disturbing the peace.
                Rights of free speech do not include trespass, screaming or overly loud, vile slander at the tops of their lungs.
                There is plenty of video evidence that could be brought to bear.
                We have been told by the NYPD, city councilmembers, and a high-powered law firm that we can do precisely zero about the weekly demonstrators. There is no trespass involved; they do not obstruct the entire sidewalk; they do not march; their numbers do not rise to the level where they need a permit; they use no amplifiers for sound.

                On the odd occasion when we have called the cops on a stray, lone lunatic screaming at us, yelling at our passengers etc, the response is pretty much a shrug - or worse, a "hey-you-kids-stop-fighting-or-I'll-summons-both-of-you" situation.

                Worse again is the desk cop who told one of our guys, who called the precinct directly repeatedly over a number of weeks on Sundays to complain about the harassment, "Hey, call here again and we will come and arrest YOU."

                Ever since OWS it has gotten even worse; the cops won't say 'boo' to anybody, for fear of being filmed, having false charges brought against them etc.
                VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                Comment


                • #48
                  Okay, I have a few questions for the resident experts. Now, if the city/mayor arbitrarily decides to shut down an entire business on a whim with no concrete proof of wrongdoing, aren't the (carriage drivers) entitled to some compensation? Or can the city/mayor actually just arbitrarily do this just because? Doesn't this open up the city/mayor to a potentially huge lawsuit?

                  About the horses. Since it is NOT against the law to either send your horse to an auction or sell him to slaughter (also distasteful but legal), just how can an outside group arbitrarily keep you from doing this? Now, if the outside group were to compensate the owners for the ownership of the horses, that might be different. The figure of 200 +/- horses comes up somewhere. Now, if each horse is worth, say $2000 (probably a low figure), we are talking about something in the neighborhood of $400,000 that has to be raised to "retire" these horses. Is the city or the other groups going to be willing to raise this amount of money strictly on the say-so of a small group of protesters?

                  If there is a law limiting what happens to the horse in New York State, what happens when the horse crosses the state line--wouldn't this be harder to enforce? Wouldn't this be akin to somebody who sells/gives away a horse with a return clause--which pretty much is not worth the paper it's printed on.

                  I'm assuming that since the carriage people are far from stupid that they already know the legal in's and out's. I would think that all of this seizing of property would be far easier said than done. I would imagine that a very smart lawyer plus the ACLU (taking away a group's livelihood) could have a field day with this whole problem, or at least halt it in its tracks indefinitely.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Here's the exact text of De Blasio's position on the carriage horses, taken directly from his mayoral campaign website.

                    Replace Carriage Horses with Vintage Tourist-Friendly Vehicles in Parks

                    Bill de Blasio will end the inhumane treatment of carriage horses and supports an immediate ban on abuse of carriage horses. We can provide a humane retirement of all New York City carriage horses to sanctuaries, and replace them with electric, vintage-replica tourist-friendly vehicles that provide jobs for current drivers.

                    This is just one of many issues his website addresses, and it's almost at the bottom of the pile. Is there more info from his office on exactly how he would like to accomplish this, and a timeline? If the electric cars are not happening, would that cause a change or delay in his plans?
                    It's 2017. Do you know where your old horse is?

                    www.streamhorsetv.com -- website with horse show livestream listings and links.

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by betonbill View Post
                      Okay, I have a few questions for the resident experts. Now, if the city/mayor arbitrarily decides to shut down an entire business on a whim with no concrete proof of wrongdoing, aren't the (carriage drivers) entitled to some compensation? Or can the city/mayor actually just arbitrarily do this just because? Doesn't this open up the city/mayor to a potentially huge lawsuit?

                      About the horses. Since it is NOT against the law to either send your horse to an auction or sell him to slaughter (also distasteful but legal), just how can an outside group arbitrarily keep you from doing this? Now, if the outside group were to compensate the owners for the ownership of the horses, that might be different. The figure of 200 +/- horses comes up somewhere. Now, if each horse is worth, say $2000 (probably a low figure), we are talking about something in the neighborhood of $400,000 that has to be raised to "retire" these horses. Is the city or the other groups going to be willing to raise this amount of money strictly on the say-so of a small group of protesters?

                      If there is a law limiting what happens to the horse in New York State, what happens when the horse crosses the state line--wouldn't this be harder to enforce? Wouldn't this be akin to somebody who sells/gives away a horse with a return clause--which pretty much is not worth the paper it's printed on.

                      I'm assuming that since the carriage people are far from stupid that they already know the legal in's and out's. I would think that all of this seizing of property would be far easier said than done. I would imagine that a very smart lawyer plus the ACLU (taking away a group's livelihood) could have a field day with this whole problem, or at least halt it in its tracks indefinitely.
                      Great post, Bill.

                      We have the same exact questions --- and no answers. It's a wait and see right now.
                      VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                      https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by Amwrider View Post
                        The original quote came from Forel's own newsletter.I know that there has been a manhole or two that has blown from the steam pressure, but it is a seriously rare occurrence and I think lightning would stick a horse in NYC before a manhole would blow up under him.
                        This particular issue sounds beyond stupid to me. Why not just move the horse forward five feet? Seriously? Simply remove this issue as a point of argument.

                        I think carriages in New York seem charming. I do. But from some of the things I have read on this forum from the pro carriage side, I am starting to question that. Why are you fighting over something this dumb? Why would you not go out of your way to make such a simple change to improve public relations and improve your public image? It's a smaaaaaall thing to just inch the horse forward. Just a few feet. Really. And if you don't, and if that rare instance occurs and the horse is hit with an exploding manhole cover, then what? Was it worth it to not just... move... the horse... forward... a little... bit.
                        "Random capitAlization really Makes my day." -- AndNirina

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by PeteyPie View Post
                          This particular issue sounds beyond stupid to me. Why not just move the horse forward five feet? Seriously? Simply remove this issue as a point of argument.

                          I think carriages in New York seem charming. I do. But from some of the things I have read on this forum from the pro carriage side, I am starting to question that. Why are you fighting over something this dumb? Why would you not go out of your way to make such a simple change to improve public relations and improve your public image? It's a smaaaaaall thing to just inch the horse forward. Just a few feet. Really. And if you don't, and if that rare instance occurs and the horse is hit with an exploding manhole cover, then what? Was it worth it to not just... move... the horse... forward... a little... bit.
                          Then it'll be something else.

                          A horse licked the water off the cover of a trash can and the howling about it went on for days.
                          \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #53
                            Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                            Then it'll be something else.

                            A horse licked the water off the cover of a trash can and the howling about it went on for days.
                            I missed that one, LOL. I see them complaining about horses that spill grain out of their buckets and eat it off the pavement, I see them claiming "harness rub" when it is simply winter coat shedding out, poor horsie is lame because he cocks a hind leg at rest, horsie is injured because he has cuts on the bottom of his hoof....

                            OH! And if you give a horse a whole apple and he has a bit in his mouth and slobbers it all over the sidewalk, they take photos and claim it to be vomit from the horse.
                            Every man has a right to his opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.
                            Bernard M. Baruch

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Don't forget the "tumors". (chestnuts) Yes folks, the horses are forced to work with "tumors" on their legs.

                              The stupid just goes on and on... with an ignorant bilious public lapping it up.
                              Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
                              Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
                              -Rudyard Kipling

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                There are college texts and veterinary manuals on line that one could use as expert reference witness to add to whatever blogs/ FB, etc. the carriage industry has for public viewing and information.
                                Point by point refuting every assertion of the anti-s.

                                'Opinions' from within the industry will not be considered valid (you lie! etc.) which is why you simply link to the 3rd party material -and there is a ton of it.

                                Their 'Emporer' is naked and yes, you can let others see it via 3rd party disinterested material.

                                If they are acting fools, it never hurts for you to let others, titled experts words, point that out and vindicate you.

                                Doesn't hurt to offer to the Mayor that of course he/she had to come to the decision printed given the information the office had been receiving and you know they will be glad to increase the accurate information available to them on the issue...

                                Don't say they are wrong, only that the information is inadequate. And you appreciate them considering the 3rd party facts in weighing their position and updating their stance.

                                Promises based on false and incomplete information are often voided and overturned, and rightly so.

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  That's why Forel and company don't allow any dissenting opinions, also known as the truth, to appear on their pages. They can't have actual facts get in the way of their opinions. That's why she's not posting on COTH. With a few exceptions, no one who knows anything about horses is going to believe her BS. Of course, those of you who haven't been banned from her No Walk in the Park site on FB can try posting and see what kind of reaction you get. It's got to be a good post -- you only get one chance and you're deleted and banned.

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Originally posted by lolalola View Post
                                    With a few exceptions, no one who knows anything about horses is going to believe her BS.
                                    That is the part that confuses me. I do not get why people who seem to actually have a clue about horses fall for her spewing.

                                    It would make far more sense to me if the anti group had good logical reasons for their stance instead of making up falsehoods and spewing them and deleting anything that rebuts them.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Originally posted by betonbill View Post
                                      Okay, I have a few questions for the resident experts. Now, if the city/mayor arbitrarily decides to shut down an entire business on a whim with no concrete proof of wrongdoing, aren't the (carriage drivers) entitled to some compensation? Or can the city/mayor actually just arbitrarily do this just because? Doesn't this open up the city/mayor to a potentially huge lawsuit?

                                      About the horses. Since it is NOT against the law to either send your horse to an auction or sell him to slaughter (also distasteful but legal), just how can an outside group arbitrarily keep you from doing this? Now, if the outside group were to compensate the owners for the ownership of the horses, that might be different. The figure of 200 +/- horses comes up somewhere. Now, if each horse is worth, say $2000 (probably a low figure), we are talking about something in the neighborhood of $400,000 that has to be raised to "retire" these horses. Is the city or the other groups going to be willing to raise this amount of money strictly on the say-so of a small group of protesters?

                                      If there is a law limiting what happens to the horse in New York State, what happens when the horse crosses the state line--wouldn't this be harder to enforce? Wouldn't this be akin to somebody who sells/gives away a horse with a return clause--which pretty much is not worth the paper it's printed on.

                                      I'm assuming that since the carriage people are far from stupid that they already know the legal in's and out's. I would think that all of this seizing of property would be far easier said than done. I would imagine that a very smart lawyer plus the ACLU (taking away a group's livelihood) could have a field day with this whole problem, or at least halt it in its tracks indefinitely.
                                      What I bolded is basically what I was saying.

                                      IF [and that is a big if] this law is enacted, and thanks for the civics class lesson about what a law is, how would it be any more enforce-able than all the 'contracts' and other policies and laws that presently exist that we horse owners know are next to useless and never enforced?

                                      Law Enforcement is way too busy to be following former Carriage horses around to see where they end up and then look into how they got there and how many hands they passed through before getting there.
                                      Last edited by Angela Freda; Sep. 24, 2013, 08:59 AM. Reason: spelling
                                      Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                      http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                      Comment

                                      • Original Poster

                                        #59
                                        And I still suspect that for a good amount of them "sanctuary" will be a syringe of pink liquid and a hole in the ground... the anti groups will hang on to a few that go to actual sanctuaries so they can continue to solicit fundraising for their care.
                                        Every man has a right to his opinion, but no man has a right to be wrong in his facts.
                                        Bernard M. Baruch

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                          Except that it's not steam. They are exploding. There's a big difference.

                                          I get that you don't think it's a big deal, but I sure wouldn't park my car over one.

                                          http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/20...-manhole/?_r=0

                                          http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2013/05/...r-in-brooklyn/
                                          Yes, it's true. One exploded at the end of my block a couple of winters ago. Luckily it was a quiet night, but had any people or animals been nearby, it wouldn't have been pretty: http://gothamist.com/2011/01/03/vide...ing_everyw.php

                                          This is why you sometimes see the covers removed with big orange and white pipes releasing the steam from the top of them. It is not a rare occurrence, particularly in the winter.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X