• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

ClipClopNYC '14 is officially on hold

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • ClipClopNYC '14 is officially on hold

    ClipClopNYC '14 is officially on hold.

    What would have been the NYC carriage industry's third annual event in March 2014 is now in jeopardy of not happening as scheduled, as we must instead put all of our efforts into fighting for our very right to exist.

    Background: Deep-pocketed businessmen with an agenda have bought and paid for the NYC mayoral and city council candidates, so that they will do their bidding and outlaw the horse drawn carriages at Central Park, a 150 year old tradition.

    These efforts were bolstered financially by the ASPCA, HSUS, and PETA. Small groups of radical animal rights activists have consistently stirred this pot at a local level.

    What this means is that our wonderful ClipClopNYC --- an event attended by over 500 people from a dozen states over the last two years, an event formally recognized by Mayor Bloomberg and City Council Speaker Christine Quinn, an event which has raised over $13,000 total for Blue Star Equiculture and the wonderful work that organization does for working horses --- will now, from necessity, be put on indefinite hold.

    So, the efforts of those who wish to see us gone not only will put 200+ working horses out of their good homes and jobs, and into the at-risk population, but now have hindered our efforts to help folks like BSE who help other horses.

    But we are not defeated - not by a long shot.

    We are working ceaselessly on our defense - and we will be victorious.

    ClipClopNYC is simply postponed, not canceled -- we will be back to educate and delight all who are interested in us, and do our best to give back to the horses who have given us so much.

    Stay tuned.

    Thank you,

    Eva Hughes
    VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC
    carriageassocnyc@aol.com
    Most people don't need a $35,000 horse. They need a $1,000 horse and $34,000 in lessons.

    "I don't have to be fair… . I'm an American With a Strong, Fact-Free Opinion." (stolen off Facebook)

  • #2
    I don't understand. Were you denied a permit to hold the event or is your profession now banned?
    Brothers and sisters, I bid you beware
    Of giving your heart to a dog to tear.
    -Rudyard Kipling

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by JSwan View Post
      I don't understand. Were you denied a permit to hold the event or is your profession now banned?
      I think the mayortorial race is still pending...but with so much money converging on the heads of the few, I can see the need to redefine priorities for the moment.
      Won't keep me from saving my money to hopefully make it up there.

      It's just a perfect sh*t storm....all the self gratifying citiots accumulated in one convenient location.

      (hopefully they will perform true to form though and not give a rip about their campaign promises...)

      Comment


      • #4
        I'm "believe" that all mayoral candidates left have openly expressed that they will ban the carriages once they are in office.
        "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
          I'm "believe" that all mayoral candidates left have openly expressed that they will ban the carriages once they are in office.
          That's what it looks like, at least that's what DeBlasio said during his campaign. Time to turn on the charm to convince him otherwise, while trying to get as many reporters to hear the carriage owners side of the story.

          You know, big business trying to run small business out of town for profit. It could be a winner.

          Comment


          • #6
            Don't you think they've tried that already LauraKY?
            \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

            Comment


            • #7
              Look, your candidate that you bought and paid for, Quinn, lost. Sour grapes. You should have allowed inspections of the carriage horses by independent parties. Double shifting horses under different names is not nice and can and does kill horses.

              As Jon Stewart said, how are you going to top a progressive democratic guy, with the name De Blasio (sp), who has such cool kids who are articulate and photogenic, as well as an African-American wife who used to be a lesbian? You cannot beat that combination.

              Now maybe he'll also require pet shops to have sprinkler systems. Quinn never supported that bill in NYC. Which would save the lives of animals in pet shops when fires occur.

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                Look, your candidate that you bought and paid for, Quinn, lost. Sour grapes. You should have allowed inspections of the carriage horses by independent parties. Double shifting horses under different names is not nice and can and does kill horses.

                As Jon Stewart said, how are you going to top a progressive democratic guy, with the name De Blasio (sp), who has such cool kids who are articulate and photogenic, as well as an African-American wife who used to be a lesbian? You cannot beat that combination.

                Now maybe he'll also require pet shops to have sprinkler systems. Quinn never supported that bill in NYC. Which would save the lives of animals in pet shops when fires occur.
                The NYC carriage horses are subject to inspection of not one but 4 agencies, one being the ASPCA who wants to shut them down.
                The regulations they have to adhere to are the strictest I can think of in ANY part of the horse industry!
                And I doubt the working man has enough money to buy a politician....

                Comment


                • #9
                  Personally, I don't think DeBlasio has been "bought." I suspect he's trying to appeal to what the majority of his constituents think they want.

                  It's the carriage folks problem to convince him otherwise.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                    Personally, I don't think DeBlasio has been "bought." I suspect he's trying to appeal to what the majority of his constituents think they want.

                    It's the carriage folks problem to convince him otherwise.
                    Historic amounts of money being dumped into the mayor's race. Pick any article in NYT, NY post, etc etc for reference. Guess NYC is heading back to the good old days.... having the finest government that money can buy.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by AlterNetReality View Post
                      Historic amounts of money being dumped into the mayor's race. Pick any article in NYT, NY post, etc etc for reference. Guess NYC is heading back to the good old days.... having the finest government that money can buy.
                      Talk to the Supreme Court. That's the way it is thanks to Citizens United.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                        Talk to the Supreme Court. That's the way it is thanks to Citizens United.
                        Yup.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          PS - Will wait on hold for when CC-14's a victory party.

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            #14
                            Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                            Look, your candidate that you bought and paid for, Quinn, lost. Sour grapes. You should have allowed inspections of the carriage horses by independent parties. Double shifting horses under different names is not nice and can and does kill horses.
                            No one "bought and paid" for Quinn. That is a ludicrous statement.

                            The stables have always been open for inspection and are, in fact regularly inspected. And aside from the hack line inspections by the ASPCA, the horses are on display on one of the busiest streets in the world and yet, not one citation for abuse, mistreatment or cruelty.

                            The horses are not double shifted under different names.

                            Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                            Now maybe he'll also require pet shops to have sprinkler systems. Quinn never supported that bill in NYC. Which would save the lives of animals in pet shops when fires occur.
                            Ironic, since the stables have sprinkler systems. Does your barn?
                            Most people don't need a $35,000 horse. They need a $1,000 horse and $34,000 in lessons.

                            "I don't have to be fair… . I'm an American With a Strong, Fact-Free Opinion." (stolen off Facebook)

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #15
                              Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                              Personally, I don't think DeBlasio has been "bought." I suspect he's trying to appeal to what the majority of his constituents think they want.

                              It's the carriage folks problem to convince him otherwise.
                              Of course he's been bought: http://www.crainsnewyork.com/article...GS04/130809963
                              Most people don't need a $35,000 horse. They need a $1,000 horse and $34,000 in lessons.

                              "I don't have to be fair… . I'm an American With a Strong, Fact-Free Opinion." (stolen off Facebook)

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Could the nonbelievers answer one question:

                                ***do you think it's good for horse owners at large for an entire industry to be banned by law***

                                ***when the "abuse" being cited is prevalent in the horse world, at large?
                                \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                  Personally, I don't think DeBlasio has been "bought." I suspect he's trying to appeal to what the majority of his constituents think they want.

                                  It's the carriage folks problem to convince him otherwise.
                                  I used to think lobbying worked that way. It doesn't. Simply put, there are political consequences from backing out on a promise you made to a major donor. Unless the horse world speaks out, because the average New Yorker doesn't care, there will be NO political consequences for voting to ban horse carriages.

                                  You don't persuade a politician with your pretty smile or superior rationale when his career will suffer if he sides with you, and not one bad thing will happen to him if he doesnt.
                                  \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by TheBarnRules View Post

                                    The horses are not double shifted under different names.
                                    I kind of missed that allegation...kind of hard to pull off when each horse has to have a number engraved into the hoof for permanent ID purposes....

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                                      Could the nonbelievers answer one question:

                                      ***do you think it's good for horse owners at large for an entire industry to be banned by law***

                                      ***when the "abuse" being cited is prevalent in the horse world, at large?
                                      The alleged abuse is a fabrication, so yes, it is not right to pass any kinds of laws on fabrications.

                                      As has already explained time and again, those are some of the most visible horses in use anywhere, inspected for years now by those trying to do their industry harm, animal rights extremist intent on ending ALL animal uses.
                                      There is NO ABUSE there.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        Originally posted by TheBarnRules View Post
                                        The Irony that Nyslic is backing 'New York is not for sale'

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X