• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

ClipClopNYC '14 is officially on hold

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    It absolutely slays me that groups such as peta etc. harass working horses and the owners when these animals are obviously well cared for. With all the news on abused horses, they could find many, many other horses to save. But wait, that's right, they don't want to really save anything, they simply want to destroy. Butt heads.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
      I suppose they might get away with banning the carriages, but I don't see how they can get away with confiscating horses. There's your angle.
      And they can take that out of the bill. As it is, that issue isn't swaying anyone because the language is too ambiguous.
      \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by Lady Eboshi View Post
        Whatever their personal feelings (or political panderings!) may lead them to say, there still has to be a LAW on the books enabling them to shut you down--and the burden of proof of a problem normally has to be extremely high when you're talking about denying people's right to make a living running a legitimate business. In short, statutes cannot be generated specifically to rule on a case in progress.

        Have your lawyer research on what basis, if any, they could shut you down. I'm betting they haven't any except for B.S. and publicity . . .
        Statutes can and do get made just to single out one case. The Walmart bill almost became law this week in DC, and was written so narrowly as to literally only apply to Walmart, forcing one company to pay higher wages.

        The carriages operate under a statutorily created license. The city can decide it no longer wants to grant those licenses. There is no right to charge money for carriage rides that the city would be violating.
        \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

        Comment


        • #44
          I do think that the issue lies not with the candidates (I don't think any of them feel particularly strongly about carriage horses), but rather with their constituents. Many people here have never heard of NYCLASS, but if you ask them if they think the carriage horses should still be on the streets, they'll pause and go, "Hm, yeah, isn't that sort of cruel?"

          It's those lukewarm moderate folks who need to come take the stable tours and meet carriage operators. You all will NEVER change groups like NYCLASS or the hardcore activists and it's a waste of time, energy, and money trying.

          Having said that, I couldn't stomach a vote for Christine Quinn. There are unfortunately more looming issues facing the city than the carriage industry, so with that in mind de Blasio won my vote.

          Comment


          • #45
            The NYC carriage horses live their lives under a microscope, and with a spotlight shining on them. Now, unfortunately, both the Democrat and Republican mayoral candidates are anti-carriage. The Democrat, especially, has promised to ban the carriages pretty much as soon as he gets in office. The anti-carriage groups have assured the gullible non-horsey NYC residents that the horses will be comfortably retired to "sanctuaries" where they will be cared for the rest of their lives. Anyone got enough land for about 200 drafties? C'mon, now, speak up! This is a very unfortunate situation for the carriage owners and operators. People who are voting have very little knowledge of horses and horse care. They don't realize that it's almost impossible to find sanctuary care for all those horses. And for most voters, there are other reasons that they favor one candidate or the other. Overall, the carriage issue makes very little difference to a large number of voters, but it will destroy the lives of the people in the industry. It's the perfect political storm for the carriage people and I'm very worried for them.
            It's 2018. Do you know where your old horse is?

            www.streamhorsetv.com -- website with horse show livestream listings and links.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Tha Ridge View Post
              I do think that the issue lies not with the candidates (I don't think any of them feel particularly strongly about carriage horses), but rather with their constituents. Many people here have never heard of NYCLASS, but if you ask them if they think the carriage horses should still be on the streets, they'll pause and go, "Hm, yeah, isn't that sort of cruel?"

              It's those lukewarm moderate folks who need to come take the stable tours and meet carriage operators. You all will NEVER change groups like NYCLASS or the hardcore activists and it's a waste of time, energy, and money trying.

              Having said that, I couldn't stomach a vote for Christine Quinn. There are unfortunately more looming issues facing the city than the carriage industry, so with that in mind de Blasio won my vote.
              Agree with the above, and to add candidates say alot of things and agree with alotta' things that they have absolutely 0 investment in, and zero intention of ever acting on... it's called campaigning... Seems to me the thing one should not do is in Sept. say because the Mayor who takes office in January MIGHT ban us, the event in March is on hold ....

              Seems to me the thing to do is have an event EVERY WEEKEND until January, with open doors and lots of media so that IF the Mayor does try to ban them, there are too many people who have been to the stables, and who've met the horses and drivers and seen with their own eyes and heard with their own ears the oversight that they are under... that when/if the mayor gets around to banning carriage horses after s/he's dealt with all those other issues that are far more high profile and effect more people and are on everyone's 'what the mayor needs to do' list... the uproar can be heard all the way up here in far, far upstate.

              Putting the March event on hold in Sept. because of what might/might not happen in January [or after] seems a little like throwing in the towel way, way too early.
              Why would you do that?
              Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

              http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                Agree with the above, and to add candidates say alot of things and agree with alotta' things that they have absolutely 0 investment in, and zero intention of ever acting on... it's called campaigning... Seems to me the thing one should not do is in Sept. say because the Mayor who takes office in January MIGHT ban us, the event in March is on hold ....

                Seems to me the thing to do is have an event EVERY WEEKEND until January, with open doors and lots of media so that IF the Mayor does try to ban them, there are too many people who have been to the stables, and who've met the horses and drivers and seen with their own eyes and heard with their own ears the oversight that they are under... that when/if the mayor gets around to banning carriage horses after s/he's dealt with all those other issues that are far more high profile and effect more people and are on everyone's 'what the mayor needs to do' list... the uproar can be heard all the way up here in far, far upstate.

                Putting the March event on hold in Sept. because of what might/might not happen in January [or after] seems a little like throwing in the towel way, way too early.
                Why would you do that?
                You will not get the average New Yorker to care. It's up to US. Horse owners know there is no abuse in this industry. But we all are looking the other way while one avenue of horse use gets maligned. Why aren't horse owners coming out of the woodwork to say these antis are nuts? Why does NYCLASS's Facebook page have 35,000 likes and Carriage Horse Facts has 2,000? What message does the lack of interest from the actual knowledge-holders say to our elected officials?

                Sitting back and arm-chair quarterbacking how Eva should be running her advocacy effort isn't going to shut up these rara's.

                When another celebrity signs on with PETA to appear on an anti carriage horse campaign, and doesn't get her Facebook page crashed by irate horse lovers...WE have all failed Eva, the other families, and someday, probably ourselves.
                \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by michaleenflynn View Post
                  Yes - actually, they are hoof hot-brands, and the numbers must correspond with the numbers on a brass plate affixed to the halter (halters are worn 24/7)
                  I apologize for throwing 'engraved' out there. I knew better.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    They don't care about people from outside of New York. They care about their voters. It's the same thing as the pony rides at the Staten Island Zoo. You need petitions from VOTERS.

                    Who cares what Laura in Kentucky wants in NY? I can't vote for any of them. ***(I would have voted for DeBlasio too, it's about time NY gets a progressive mayor.)

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                      Agree with the above, and to add candidates say alot of things and agree with alotta' things that they have absolutely 0 investment in, and zero intention of ever acting on... it's called campaigning... Seems to me the thing one should not do is in Sept. say because the Mayor who takes office in January MIGHT ban us, the event in March is on hold ....

                      Seems to me the thing to do is have an event EVERY WEEKEND until January, with open doors and lots of media so that IF the Mayor does try to ban them, there are too many people who have been to the stables, and who've met the horses and drivers and seen with their own eyes and heard with their own ears the oversight that they are under... that when/if the mayor gets around to banning carriage horses after s/he's dealt with all those other issues that are far more high profile and effect more people and are on everyone's 'what the mayor needs to do' list... the uproar can be heard all the way up here in far, far upstate.

                      Putting the March event on hold in Sept. because of what might/might not happen in January [or after] seems a little like throwing in the towel way, way too early.
                      Why would you do that?
                      I agree.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                        Agree with the above, and to add candidates say alot of things and agree with alotta' things that they have absolutely 0 investment in, and zero intention of ever acting on... it's called campaigning... Seems to me the thing one should not do is in Sept. say because the Mayor who takes office in January MIGHT ban us, the event in March is on hold ....

                        Seems to me the thing to do is have an event EVERY WEEKEND until January, with open doors and lots of media so that IF the Mayor does try to ban them, there are too many people who have been to the stables, and who've met the horses and drivers and seen with their own eyes and heard with their own ears the oversight that they are under... that when/if the mayor gets around to banning carriage horses after s/he's dealt with all those other issues that are far more high profile and effect more people and are on everyone's 'what the mayor needs to do' list... the uproar can be heard all the way up here in far, far upstate.

                        Putting the March event on hold in Sept. because of what might/might not happen in January [or after] seems a little like throwing in the towel way, way too early.
                        Why would you do that?

                        I guess you can then go ahead and plan it for Clip Clop...Eva said she and the other two people are currently BUSY trying to save the industry without Clip Clop would be pointless.
                        It ain't throwing the towel in, it's doing he most with what you got, time in this case.

                        Come January, and the horses are still there, there is still time to plan the event.

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                          Putting the March event on hold in Sept. because of what might/might not happen in January [or after] seems a little like throwing in the towel way, way too early.
                          Why would you do that?
                          "Throwing in the towel"?

                          Shirley, you jest.

                          May you live so long to find another warrior like me - I don't, as they say, know the meaning of "throwing in the towel."

                          I do appreciate your input though, thanx. Trust that there is a method to my madness.
                          VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                          https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            The horses will still be there in January. And in March. And in May. And in August.

                            Anyone who thinks that ANYONE happens quickly in NYC is crazy and obviously hasn't lived here. There is plenty of time to convince de Blasio that he has better things to spend his time on. He certainly knows it.

                            I 100 percent agree with Angela's points.

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              where the hell are the people with money and horses?
                              the bloomberg girl? Christie Brinkley?
                              and all of the hamptons and dutchess county polo and show people who live and vote in the city.
                              we need to light a fire under THEIR asses! cuz it's all about money as usual.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                They don't care about people from outside of New York. They care about their voters. It's the same thing as the pony rides at the Staten Island Zoo. You need petitions from VOTERS.

                                Who cares what Laura in Kentucky wants in NY? I can't vote for any of them. ***(I would have voted for DeBlasio too, it's about time NY gets a progressive mayor.)
                                I'm not saying we should all be making phone calls to city council. They do not care about anyone who isn't their constituent.

                                But when the paid NYCLASS lobbyists talk to the media and legislators, they are saying nobody even tries to defend this industry except those actually profiting from it.

                                And they're right.

                                Hence why it's a no-brainer for any politician to support bills to ban this industry.

                                We do need an outcry from the collective horse world saying simply that these horses are not abused. Otherwise NYCLASS has made themselves the de facto experts on horse care as far as media and electeds are concerned.
                                \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                                  Y.WE have all failed Eva, the other families, and someday, probably ourselves.
                                  This in spades. I am shocked at the number of ostriches there are on a horse forum.
                                  "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Originally posted by Tha Ridge View Post
                                    I do think that the issue lies not with the candidates (I don't think any of them feel particularly strongly about carriage horses), but rather with their constituents. Many people here have never heard of NYCLASS, but if you ask them if they think the carriage horses should still be on the streets, they'll pause and go, "Hm, yeah, isn't that sort of cruel?"

                                    It's those lukewarm moderate folks who need to come take the stable tours and meet carriage operators. You all will NEVER change groups like NYCLASS or the hardcore activists and it's a waste of time, energy, and money trying.
                                    Thanx for the input, Ridge. Did you make it to either of the ClipClops? I know you were planning on the first one, but if you came, I missed meeting you.

                                    As for NYers, not only do we get tons of them in the carriage, especially at Christmastime and other holidays, but most people I meet outside of Manhattan are very supportive; "Oh, you have a carriage! How fun!" or "Oh, we went when I was a little girl, I have to go again!", or "Wow, how interesting!" etc etc. are the usual responses I get when pressed to answer what I "do."

                                    As for people outside NY - who are all those thousands of people who climb into our carriage day after day, year after year?

                                    The constituents who you refer to, who do not support us, either have RARA leanings to begin with, are gullible and not research-prone, or are pet owners who think horses are like dogs and cats. All of these people have swallowed the propaganda that has been made available to them by the huge amount of money pumped into this campaign.

                                    You are politically savvy - you really should see this video, where hired gun Scott Levenson of The Advance Group actually admits that they bought this outcome: http://vimeo.com/73913372#

                                    ....and really, of course, you are entitled to vote for anyone you please; but who you voted for not being germane to this thread, was it necessary to tell me that you voted for the person who is causing such upheaval in my life?
                                    VP Horse & Carriage Association of NYC

                                    https://www.facebook.com/pages/The-F...ref=ts&fref=ts

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                                      I'm not saying we should all be making phone calls to city council. They do not care about anyone who isn't their constituent.

                                      But when the paid NYCLASS lobbyists talk to the media and legislators, they are saying nobody even tries to defend this industry except those actually profiting from it.

                                      And they're right.

                                      Hence why it's a no-brainer for any politician to support bills to ban this industry.

                                      We do need an outcry from the collective horse world saying simply that these horses are not abused. Otherwise NYCLASS has made themselves the de facto experts on horse care as far as media and electeds are concerned.
                                      When Mane and Tale jumped the shark and supported NYCLASS under erroneous circumstances this board and others and the horse community in general made a tremendous effort and it resulted in an eye opening change of heart for them.

                                      Where is that support now ...

                                      Least you not forget that NYCLASS is partnered openly and actively with PETA. A win for them is an open door just as said above that they know what is best for horses more so then horse owners and professionals.
                                      "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        you guys need to get on the ellen show somehow.
                                        maybe we can flood the ellen show with letters and she could do a holiday segment on carriage rides with Portia.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                                          I'm not saying we should all be making phone calls to city council. They do not care about anyone who isn't their constituent.

                                          But when the paid NYCLASS lobbyists talk to the media and legislators, they are saying nobody even tries to defend this industry except those actually profiting from it.

                                          And they're right.

                                          Hence why it's a no-brainer for any politician to support bills to ban this industry.

                                          We do need an outcry from the collective horse world saying simply that these horses are not abused. Otherwise NYCLASS has made themselves the de facto experts on horse care as far as media and electeds are concerned.
                                          And based on the hostility expressed on this forum of anyone who would question the Carriage Horse Industry, that is one steep hill to climb. Sometimes I think some of the posters claiming to be pro-carriage, might be working for the other side based on the rudeness and hostility in their posts.....

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X