• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Divorce and horses

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Windsor1 View Post
    The breadwinner's primary contribution to the home is financial, the homemaker/at-home parent's (regardless of that person's sex) primary contribution is labor. Both are critical to the home and neither owes the other anything as long as that "agreement" is entered into with the full knowledge and consent of both parties.
    That's right. And when they split up, the breadwinner does not get to pick up his (or her) toys and leave with all the 'bread'.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by sketcher View Post
      That's right. And when they split up, the breadwinner does not get to pick up his (or her) toys and leave with all the 'bread'.
      Of course not. If you think I was somehow suggesting that either party was somehow entitled to clean out the other financially or materially, you're reading into my words something that isn't there.
      Your future is created by what you do today, not tomorrow.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Windsor1 View Post
        I
        The breadwinner's primary contribution to the home is financial, the homemaker/at-home parent's (regardless of that person's sex) primary contribution is labor. Both are critical to the home and neither owes the other anything as long as that "agreement" is entered into with the full knowledge and consent of both parties.
        Except that when they split up,the one that worked outside the home has advanced in his or her career, earned a pension and remains employable. The one who stayed at home to manage the household and raise the children has not advanced in a paying career or is so far behind their peers they would find themselves at an entry level position again, assuming they are even still employable. This is why, in a traditional marriage where one party either gave up a career or did not pursue one, spousal support is ordered. The spouse that worked outside the home was able to do so because there was someone in the home managing the domestic end of things and raising the kids. Someone who has done that has been economically disadvantaged by the marriage and the point of spousal support is to restore them to the position they would be in but for the marriage. Depending on the circumstances, what the parties intentions were and whether that person can again become employable and how long that would take,the spousal support may be limited in duration or go on for a long time. At least that is the law where I live. Consider the position of someone who has been out of the work force for maybe 20 years while raising a family and is now suddenly without income. But for the agreement that the homemaker stay home and raise the family they could have had an established career in that time.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Windsor1 View Post
          I really dislike this line of thinking (and -- gasp! -- I'm a woman, albeit not a homemaker or a mother). Women do get compensated in the form of room and board, car(s), etc. that are provided to them but for which they do not pay in money.

          I should be declared legally insane for posting this here, but if you're going to make the "women should get paid for running the home and raising the kids" argument, then the counter argument is that the man who holds the paying, outside-the-home job is owed a substantial sum because he's the one footing all the bills.

          The breadwinner's primary contribution to the home is financial, the homemaker/at-home parent's (regardless of that person's sex) primary contribution is labor. Both are critical to the home and neither owes the other anything as long as that "agreement" is entered into with the full knowledge and consent of both parties.
          I agree in a way. I divorced a high earner, I left with my books, clothes, pets and vehicles (plural as I had a motorcycle). I didn't go after the house, or his income etc. As that was moral to me, he had paid for that. I don't hate my ex, and about every 4-6 months ish we call each other, I am friends with his wife, and he is with my hubby.

          As he earned enough I worked at none profits and did work I wanted to do as I didn't need to chase the money, and we had no kids.

          However, I did 3 out of 4 years of a law degree, and then he moved me from the UK to the US. It's not really possible to transfer like that, as the law is so different. So I went out to work rather than back to school when I moved to the US. He absolutely changed my career path, not that I regret that, as I am just fine now. I willingly chose to change my life for him, so that's on me. Just it's a confusing issue with not a clear cut answer.
          A Mom who stays home and sacrifices her career could go to work, and day care, but she is choosing not to. But then what's best for the kids....


          I have a cousin in law who divorced, is back living with her parents, she's about 40. She bought a custom motorcycle and a boob job with the money she got from her divorce. She has two kids, and this is how she spent the money.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Mozart View Post
            Except that when they split up,the one that worked outside the home has advanced in his or her career, earned a pension and remains employable. The one who stayed at home to manage the household and raise the children has not advanced in a paying career or is so far behind their peers they would find themselves at an entry level position again, assuming they are even still employable. This is why, in a traditional marriage where one party either gave up a career or did not pursue one, spousal support is ordered. The spouse that worked outside the home was able to do so because there was someone in the home managing the domestic end of things and raising the kids. Someone who has done that has been economically disadvantaged by the marriage and the point of spousal support is to restore them to the position they would be in but for the marriage. Depending on the circumstances, what the parties intentions were and whether that person can again become employable and how long that would take,the spousal support may be limited in duration or go on for a long time. At least that is the law where I live. Consider the position of someone who has been out of the work force for maybe 20 years while raising a family and is now suddenly without income. But for the agreement that the homemaker stay home and raise the family they could have had an established career in that time.
            Spousal support for the reasons you cite is reasonable. What I was taking issue with was the idea that the stay-at-home spouse is not already compensated for labor performed in the home when the working outside-the-home spouse is paying all the bills. When such is the case, the home the stay-at-home spouse lives in IS his or her compensation, as is the car he or she drives, the food he or she eats, and the electricity he or she enjoys, etc. Those forms of compensation are different from actual money, but they are forms of compensation nonetheless, just as if a barn manager is provided an apartment by a farm owner as part of the BM's compensation.

            When I said neither party owes the other anything as long as that arrangement was entered into by consent of both parties, I meant that neither party owes the other either for bills paid or for housekeeping or child-raising that occurred during the marriage. For the purposes of my argument, the question of spousal support for lack of career advancement is a separate issue, and one that, as I said, have no quarrel with.
            Your future is created by what you do today, not tomorrow.

            Comment

            • Original Poster

              When we married 10 years ago, I was in the mide of my masters program. I owned my own house,y own car and I was
              Doing great. I met him while he was in law school. Have up my degree moved across the state and had 3 kids. All while he was furthering his career.
              I had a separate bank account for horse expense. Buying selling board farrier ect.
              The separate account was only to keep the financials of the horses less confusing.
              He is now trying to use that against me. He is trying to say that I had a side job with horses. Wtf.

              Comment


              • Can't say it enough...let all this "stuff" he's saying just go in one ear and out the other. Not that you are blindsided but don't dwell on it. My Ex became a stellar creative genius while we were divorcing, crediting me with all sorts of things I had never done. It would have been comical if it hadn't been so hurtful at the time.

                Love on your kids and hold your head high. Don't get sucked into his nonsens blather. If your attorney is worth his/her salt, the facts will come out...you'll be alright.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Finzean View Post
                  Can't say it enough...let all this "stuff" he's saying just go in one ear and out the other. Not that you are blindsided but don't dwell on it. My Ex became a stellar creative genius while we were divorcing, crediting me with all sorts of things I had never done. It would have been comical if it hadn't been so hurtful at the time.

                  Love on your kids and hold your head high. Don't get sucked into his nonsens blather. If your attorney is worth his/her salt, the facts will come out...you'll be alright.
                  ^This.
                  America dialed 911. Donald Trump answered the phone.

                  Stop pumping money into colleges and start getting ready to earn money in the projected tradesman shortage of 2024. Make Trades Great Again!

                  Comment


                  • Tell him you sold them for 1.00. Have a trusted horse friend provide a bill of sale. Move them for awhile.

                    Comment


                    • Horses are only worth what someone is willing to pay. Right? ;-). And yes he is trying to leverage....what a bleep!!! Good luck

                      Comment


                      • Jobs imply income. It wouldn't be hard to disprove that with bank statements !
                        ... _. ._ .._. .._

                        Comment


                        • OH my ex tried that...but..

                          I reminded him of the bmx bikes that he bought, the expensive fishing poles, the tools, the paid off truck etc. He backed right off when I listed my assets ( horse and trailer) and his assets ( 4 bmx bikes - 1000 each, fishing poles - 2000, truck etc). I told him my horse might be worth 3500 right now. He backed off completely. Like 360 degree turn.
                          OTTB - Hurricane Denton - Kane - the big dog!
                          Tuggy - RIP 9/12/2016 - Wait for me at the bridge
                          Foster LolaMaria AKA LolaBean (Boxer)

                          Comment

                          • Original Poster

                            Husband wants to have horses appraised ....

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by bellaalexander View Post
                              Husband wants to have horses appraised ....
                              This is probably best for both of you.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by bellaalexander View Post
                                Husband wants to have horses appraised ....
                                Just don't go with the one HE wants...I have the feeling he is going to try to control that issue now too.
                                America dialed 911. Donald Trump answered the phone.

                                Stop pumping money into colleges and start getting ready to earn money in the projected tradesman shortage of 2024. Make Trades Great Again!

                                Comment


                                • I hope your horses are as smart as the horses of a trainer I know. When the appraiser showed up, 2 of her 5 horses came out limping... AND they were the best of her horses.... lol
                                  the next day they were totally fine again....

                                  Comment


                                  • Do you get to have the law firm appraised????

                                    Originally posted by bellaalexander View Post
                                    Husband wants to have horses appraised ....
                                    The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                                    H. Cate

                                    Comment


                                    • Make sure that you have all of his toys appraised also. The boat, the vehicles, the golf clubs, the guns, everything that he has paid a lot of money for during the marriage. Turnabout is fair play.

                                      When you are home taking care of children and raising a family, you are contributing to the marriage just as much as the spouse who is out making money in a profession.

                                      Get the shark attorney who likes to win.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                                        Make sure that you have all of his toys appraised also. The boat, the vehicles, the golf clubs, the guns, everything that he has paid a lot of money for during the marriage. Turnabout is fair play.

                                        When you are home taking care of children and raising a family, you are contributing to the marriage just as much as the spouse who is out making money in a profession.

                                        Get the shark attorney who likes to win.
                                        Sadly, I have had several couples, which are so caught up in winning, that they lose sight of what they are fighting about. One couple fought so much the wife spent almost $200,000 in attorney's fees and once it was over both parties declared bankruptcy. Please try to maintain some perspective.

                                        My husband and I (both attorneys) always joke that when one of us leaves the other gets the house, kids, pets and horses :winkgrin

                                        Comment


                                        • I just wanted to add that if he still has his mistress(es) then you're not only fighting your husband, you're fighting her too. The husband probably just wants out of the marriage, the mistress wants to destroy you.

                                          I watched this happen with my sister, 20 year marriage where he cheated for 15 years with different women. The last one (whom he married) did everything she could to ruin my sister financially and socially, and and managed to do some damage. She even convinced the husband to give her the children's 80k college fund, my nephews now attend community and local state colleges, instead of the private universities they were accepted to, all the money is gone. California laws are brutal, my sister, a housewife for 15 years, can not touch her ex's retirement, alimony is short-term and the courts don't care about infidelity. She'll work for the rest of her life and never catch up.

                                          The only thing that saved her from complete ruin was that she acted fast. Don't hesitate, if your lawyer says do something, do it. Make phone calls immediately. Get the papers you need now. Don't give him and his mistress a chance to act first. And don't let them bankrupt you, they tried to do that to my sister.

                                          BTW, my husband and I have traveled to the Philippines several times, where husband stealing is an art. These mistresses have friends giving advice and help.
                                          In memory of Apache, who loved to play. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MjZAqeg7HyE

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X