• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Always Consign w/a Tack Shop - UPDATE PG 4

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #41
    Originally posted by RubyTuesday View Post
    Like I've said before, I have had many, many more positive Ebay transactions and very few gripes. That said, I am very glad you are kicking up a fuss. Sellers need to kick up a fuss before this kind of behavior gets out of hand. Ebay needs to start seeing that this can make their shares take a hit.
    I never had any bad experiences selling on ebay, but I've heard about way too many scares like the op's so I don't shop or sell there. And I don't miss it so all is well. I've sold a couple of saddles through tack shop consignments. Had good luck even though it took several months to sell one of them, I go that route again.
    Hillary Rodham Clinton - the peoples choice for president.

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by Bluey View Post
      I tried a used saddle that Rick's Heritage Saddlery had, in NJ, I think.
      Saddle didn't fit, sent it back, got my money back right away.(
      They're a good place to buy.

      To sell? Not so much. They had a saddle for close to a year and never listed on their site, despite my periodic reminders. I sold it elsewhere.
      Born under a rock and owned by beasts!

      Comment


      • #43
        There was someone on the eventing forum who had a similar experience. Ebay found in her favor. You might be able to find the thread with a search.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by IFG View Post
          There was someone on the eventing forum who had a similar experience. Ebay found in her favor. You might be able to find the thread with a search.
          I think we're thinking of the same thread (County saddle). eBay did NOT "find in her favor." eBay found in the buyer's favor and allowed the buyer to return the saddle for a refund. But the seller complained and eBay credited her the amount of the saddle so she ended up with the saddle and the refund. Which is why I suggested the OP cause a stink w/eBay. But eBay did NOT find against the buyer.
          ~Veronica
          "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
          http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
            I think we're thinking of the same thread (County saddle). eBay did NOT "find in her favor." eBay found in the buyer's favor and allowed the buyer to return the saddle for a refund. But the seller complained and eBay credited her the amount of the saddle so she ended up with the saddle and the refund. Which is why I suggested the OP cause a stink w/eBay. But eBay did NOT find against the buyer.
            Right VXF, that is the one. You have a better memory than I.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by IFG View Post
              Right VXF, that is the one. You have a better memory than I.
              I remember because I thought maybe, maybe just ONCE eBay might find for the seller but nope again...
              ~Veronica
              "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
              http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

              Comment

              • Original Poster

                #47
                Do y'all remember the COTH users name? I'm searching for it. I'm definitely not letting this drop. I've requested that the buyer send me a photo of the alleged damage and do it us to get no reply. Probably b/c there is no damage to photograph. Anyway I'm searching the eventing forum but if anyone remembers other details please share. I have a bad feeling this business of trying saddles at the sellers expense is maybe a habit for this girl.

                Oh - some advice please - I have the name of the "trainer" and her business phone number at her studio in Upstare NY - should I call her and request a photo of the damage? The buyer has written that the trainer said the saddle was completely unsafe. Probably not a good idea but I sort of want to just call this all out into the real world as opposed to cyber world.

                Comment


                • #48
                  I think this was the eventing thread: http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...highlight=ebay
                  Caitlin
                  *OMGiH I Loff my Mare* and *My Saddlebred Can Do Anything Your Horse Can Do*
                  http://community.webshots.com/user/redmare01

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by RedMare01 View Post
                    I think this was the eventing thread: http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...highlight=ebay
                    That's it!
                    ~Veronica
                    "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                    http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Originally posted by RedMare01 View Post
                      I think this was the eventing thread: http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...highlight=ebay
                      OK the way that thread ended was that ebay satisfied both the OP and the buyer. So ebay did not stiff the seller/OP, if I read the OP's posts correctly.

                      So if ebay doesn't allow sellers to rate buyers, how come we buyers have ratings? Sellers rate us as we rate them on each purchase.

                      I've bought 5 saddles off of ebay over the years. One from the UK, one from Germany, one from FL and one from California, all high end saddles. The fifth saddle was a moderately priced german saddle that I bought from a seller here in GA. I've bought high end bridles from France and from NY state and from Maryland & CA as well as other tack from all over the USA and the UK. All the buyers correctly & honestly described tack, and those who weren't horse people responded to my questions about the tack, when I explained what I was asking to them. All showed any defects and all were honest seller.

                      I bought one saddle consigned to a tack store in SC. I think the fee to the seller was something like 45% of the sales price. I also bought 2 saddles out of the Georgia Agricultural Market Bulletin, but I drove up to Madison to look at them before buying. And I bought one high end saddle from the ads in Coth Mag. The seller lived in Jax, and I worked down to the border, so we met and exchanged saddle for money on 95. I bet that looked like a dope deal with thousands of dollars in cash being handed over for a big brown item.

                      As long as people check the buyer's rating and feedback, as we buyers should check the seller's rating and feedback, and ask questions about tack, things should work out. There will always be scammers everywhere. Both paypal and ebay have been great on the few things, non-horse items, that I did not receive from the sellers.

                      Comment

                      • Original Poster

                        #51
                        cloudyandcallie -

                        I have been a seller/buyer on eBay since forever. I've even purchased saddles from German eBay and NEVER had a bad situation. I have 100s of (+) feedback - not one negative. If this buyer had chosen to communicate with me beforehand, she wouldn't have bought this saddle b/c I wouldn't have sent it on trial. If she had communicated with me after the saddle didn't fit her very wide paint horse instead of lying and filing a case, I probably would have been just fine with refunding her purchase price less the shipping and eBay fee.

                        I was honest to a fault with this saddle sale. Everyone involved knows it; buyer refuses to present any evidence of her claim. Honesty apparently isn't worth much these days. Looks like eBay will lose an honest seller...not that I did much on there...but I was one of the honest ones.

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                          OK the way that thread ended was that ebay satisfied both the OP and the buyer. So ebay did not stiff the seller/OP, if I read the OP's posts correctly.
                          The OP in that older thread made out ok. But eBay made her allow the saddle to be returned and made her refund the buyer. Then AFTER that happened she raised a stink (rightfully so) and eBay also gave her the value of the saddle. So she ended up ok in the end, but in terms of the dispute process-- eBay found for the buyer and forced her to accept the return. eBay did not "side" with her or find in her favor. eBay decided they made some sort of clerical error and as a result they credited her the value of the saddle. Very different from finding for the seller rather than the buyer-- and I don't know how good the odds are that eBay will do the same for the OP of this thread.

                          Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                          So if ebay doesn't allow sellers to rate buyers, how come we buyers have ratings? Sellers rate us as we rate them on each purchase.
                          A seller can give a buyer feedback... it can be positive, positive, or positive. A seller can't give anything but positive feedback. No matter how bad a buyer is, the choices a seller has are to give positive feedback or none at all.

                          A buyer can give a seller positive, neutral, or negative feedback. Or none.

                          Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                          I've bought 5 saddles off of ebay over the years. One from the UK, one from Germany, one from FL and one from California, all high end saddles. The fifth saddle was a moderately priced german saddle that I bought from a seller here in GA. I've bought high end bridles from France and from NY state and from Maryland & CA as well as other tack from all over the USA and the UK. All the buyers correctly & honestly described tack, and those who weren't horse people responded to my questions about the tack, when I explained what I was asking to them. All showed any defects and all were honest seller.

                          I bought one saddle consigned to a tack store in SC. I think the fee to the seller was something like 45% of the sales price. I also bought 2 saddles out of the Georgia Agricultural Market Bulletin, but I drove up to Madison to look at them before buying. And I bought one high end saddle from the ads in Coth Mag. The seller lived in Jax, and I worked down to the border, so we met and exchanged saddle for money on 95. I bet that looked like a dope deal with thousands of dollars in cash being handed over for a big brown item.
                          I had had lots of positive experiences over the years too. Things have changed. A lot. For the worse. And recently.

                          Originally posted by cloudyandcallie View Post
                          As long as people check the buyer's rating and feedback, as we buyers should check the seller's rating and feedback, and ask questions about tack, things should work out. There will always be scammers everywhere. Both paypal and ebay have been great on the few things, non-horse items, that I did not receive from the sellers.
                          This doesn't work because, as mentioned above, a buyer can be a totalwing nut and sellers CANNOT give that buyer negative feedback. So the next seller has NO IDEA how bad that buyer is... your whole "feedback polices abuse" argument would work if eBay didn't prohibit negative feedback for buyers. But it does. So a buyer can scam away on every transaction and the next seller will have no way of knowing...
                          ~Veronica
                          "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                          http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            The lengths dishonest people will go to on eBay is astounding. I bought a blue iPhone 5 Otterbox from a commercial seller. As soon as I paid, I mean the VERY SECOND, the seller withdrew the listing. When the package arrived, it was an Otterbox alright-- a green one that fit an iPhone 4. I couldn't leave the seller negative feedback because you can't leave feedback on a removed listing. Very very sneaky/clever and now that I watch that seller-- it's what s/he ALWAYS does to avoid getting negged for sending out defective/incorrect merchandise.
                            ~Veronica
                            "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                            http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #54
                              vxf111 - This is exactly why I wish I could out this woman in Upstate New York. I wish people would know how she - a small business owner - operates. I have a feeling this ain't her first rodeo either.

                              Let me just say as much as I LOVE fish & rice, if I were in Poughkeepsie [sic], I wouldn't be dining at her establishment not matter how great the food... It IS about the principle...I try not to do any sort of business with dishonest, sneaky people. The end.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                The lengths dishonest people will go to on eBay is astounding. I bought a blue iPhone 5 Otterbox from a commercial seller. As soon as I paid, I mean the VERY SECOND, the seller withdrew the listing. When the package arrived, it was an Otterbox alright-- a green one that fit an iPhone 4. I couldn't leave the seller negative feedback because you can't leave feedback on a removed listing. Very very sneaky/clever and now that I watch that seller-- it's what s/he ALWAYS does to avoid getting negged for sending out defective/incorrect merchandise.
                                Go on EBay's chat help and report this so they can track her.
                                America dialed 911. Donald Trump answered the phone.

                                Stop pumping money into colleges and start getting ready to earn money in the projected tradesman shortage of 2024. Make Trades Great Again!

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Originally posted by RubyTuesday View Post
                                  Go on EBay's chat help and report this so they can track her.
                                  I did report the seller, but s/he's a BIGTIME power seller, so my guess is that nothing will happen. The only better person to be on eBay than a BUYER is a huge volume powerseller. Apparently you can be totally disreputable and get away with it. There's the rules for everybody and then the rules for the special everybodys

                                  Seriously... I'm basically done with eBay.
                                  ~Veronica
                                  "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                                  http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                    I did report the seller, but s/he's a BIGTIME power seller, so my guess is that nothing will happen. The only better person to be on eBay than a BUYER is a huge volume powerseller. Apparently you can be totally disreputable and get away with it. There's the rules for everybody and then the rules for the special everybodys

                                    Seriously... I'm basically done with eBay.
                                    Care to tell who they are by username? I am betting there is someone on here who can get results..."special everybodys" don't seem to hold up well against the wrath here once it gets moving.
                                    America dialed 911. Donald Trump answered the phone.

                                    Stop pumping money into colleges and start getting ready to earn money in the projected tradesman shortage of 2024. Make Trades Great Again!

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Originally posted by vxf111 View Post
                                      The OP in that older thread made out ok. But eBay made her allow the saddle to be returned and made her refund the buyer. Then AFTER that happened she raised a stink (rightfully so) and eBay also gave her the value of the saddle. So she ended up ok in the end, but in terms of the dispute process-- eBay found for the buyer and forced her to accept the return. eBay did not "side" with her or find in her favor. eBay decided they made some sort of clerical error and as a result they credited her the value of the saddle. Very different from finding for the seller rather than the buyer-- and I don't know how good the odds are that eBay will do the same for the OP of this thread.
                                      As I recall, it wasn't a clerical error. It was that the OP received the saddle back with serious damage - holes cut in the panels by the buyer's saddle fitter when they apparently tried to "make it work" before trying to return it. OP made a stink about it being damaged and now less valuable then when it was sent to buyer, which is why OP was eventually credited the purchase price AND got to keep the saddle (which she then donated, and used the $ to buy a new one, IIRC).

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by Heinz 57 View Post
                                        As I recall, it wasn't a clerical error. It was that the OP received the saddle back with serious damage - holes cut in the panels by the buyer's saddle fitter when they apparently tried to "make it work" before trying to return it. OP made a stink about it being damaged and now less valuable then when it was sent to buyer, which is why OP was eventually credited the purchase price AND got to keep the saddle (which she then donated, and used the $ to buy a new one, IIRC).
                                        There was some clerical error element to it... like eBay decided the dispute without allowing her to fully respond or something of that nature. There was some process related snafu admitted to by eBay. It wasn't as straightforward as eBay acknowledging, ultimately, that the seller was right and the buyer was wrong.
                                        ~Veronica
                                        "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                                        http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Originally posted by RubyTuesday View Post
                                          Care to tell who they are by username? I am betting there is someone on here who can get results..."special everybodys" don't seem to hold up well against the wrath here once it gets moving.
                                          Happy to... the "honest horseman" 4H leader that apparently has no qualms about screwing over someone raising money to pay for their horse's surgery is username "thelillyzoo1995." Doesn't look like eBay has banned her account for unpaid items strikes... she's still an active user...

                                          http://feedback.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAP...ab=AllFeedback

                                          Only looky look... back in the days when sellers COULD leave negative feedback, she was bidding on items, winning, and not paying....

                                          http://toolhaus.org/cgi-bin/negs?Use...rn=Received+by

                                          http://toolhaus.org/cgi-bin/negs?Use...rn=Received+by

                                          So she's been doing this bid, win, no pay, no communication deal since 2002 on TWO DIFFERENT USERNAMES and eBay's done nothing to terminate her account. Nice.

                                          The powerseller who knows how to take listings down before sending out incorrect merchandise is "axsecure51z1." Doesn't look like eBay has done a thing to him... he's still got plenty of electronics etc. listed...

                                          http://www.ebay.com/sch/axsecure51z1..._sop=12&_rdc=1
                                          ~Veronica
                                          "The Son Dee Times" "Sustained" "Somerset" "Franklin Square"
                                          http://photobucket.com/albums/y192/vxf111/

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X