• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

More troubles in Canada horse slaughter plant land

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
    So you have the pro slaughter side, telling us for years that the people involved in the slaughter industry, care about horse welfare, and most are honest, law abiding people just trying to make a living, and that those that sell to slaughter, are decent people that may be breeders that need to sell to keep their business tax status or accountants happy, or individuals that care about their horses and don't find slaughter cruel. The horses they are getting rid of are young and healthy, not starved.

    We also know the killer buyers are not buying neglected, 3 legged, blind, old or emaciated horses. So those horses that are already endangered/or are in danger of starving are not currently being "saved" from further neglect by being bought for slaughter.

    But now we are being told that "oh no...the people that sell to slaughter are willing to starve, neglect or abandon the horses and are willing to break laws, and are going to do so since they can't sell to slaughter"

    Which is it?
    No, not at all, that is what YOU are saying.

    Remember, there is more involved in this that JUST those people you so malign there and try to use your opinion of them as an excuse to ban slaughter.

    There are many unwanted horses and if the animal rights extremist driven ban slaughter goes thru, those horses now sold for slaughter will be ADDED to those unwanted ones, not necessarily starved and abandoned, but playing musical chairs with who then is going to be the unwanted ones when there are so many more out there.

    Of course, that is what animal rights extremists want, to keep disturbing and dismantling any and all we do with horses, any one way they can, ban slaughter just one more way to do so.

    Comment


    • And...

      I think we are conflating "used up" horses as unwanted vs. "formerly wanted by the KB but potentially will no longer be".

      If slaughter is somehow made illegal completely, both sets of horses will make up "the unwanted".

      Comment


      • I think it's the overall volume that the contract buyers make their money on. Is it Charlie Curtis in Colorado that has a strong of buyers fanning out all over to bring horses to his feedlot? From there they ship to wherever he can get the best price. If you buy truckloads of horses dirt cheap, gather them up and ship them regularly, you are going to make a pretty good living even after expenses.
        Sounds so. I doubt they are making many stops here from the east coast, as I don't even know of any cattle feedlots near here, so that may be a regional difference. One slightly more profitable than the other, but both profitable.

        The percentages (17% for TB and the rest QH types is also interesting. We don't see that at our auctions here...so is that regional? Or is that an overall number (if that makes any sense)?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post
          Sounds so. I doubt they are making many stops here from the east coast, as I don't even know of any cattle feedlots near here, so that may be a regional difference. One slightly more profitable than the other, but both profitable.

          The percentages (17% for TB and the rest QH types is also interesting. We don't see that at our auctions here...so is that regional? Or is that an overall number (if that makes any sense)?
          No way, cattle feedlots have been losing money for at least the past three years, many have closed, this last week losses were at $200+ a head.

          The horse breeds, without registration papers on hand, are a pure guess, of course.

          Comment


          • No way, cattle feedlots have been losing money for at least the past three years, many have closed, this last week losses were at $200+ a head.
            Sorry Bluey - I was actually talking about horse feedlots and "straight to slaughter" dealers.

            I just mentioned cattle because I've never seen a horse feedlot much less a cattle feedlot here in the east.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by betonbill View Post
              I think it's the overall volume that the contract buyers make their money on. Is it Charlie Curtis in Colorado that has a strong of buyers fanning out all over to bring horses to his feedlot? From there they ship to wherever he can get the best price. If you buy truckloads of horses dirt cheap, gather them up and ship them regularly, you are going to make a pretty good living even after expenses.

              Remember, it's the guys with the contracts that are are making the money in the business.

              I believe that you can call and find out what their walk-in price is, but remember that the contract guys get more per head.

              As far as percentages, I believe that TBs make up about 17% of the total number of horses slaughtered. QHs and QH types make up the majority.
              Charlie Carter.
              Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

              http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

              Comment


              • Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post
                Sounds so. I doubt they are making many stops here from the east coast, as I don't even know of any cattle feedlots near here, so that may be a regional difference. One slightly more profitable than the other, but both profitable.

                The percentages (17% for TB and the rest QH types is also interesting. We don't see that at our auctions here...so is that regional? Or is that an overall number (if that makes any sense)?
                Kaufmanzoning has documents that detail what each load consisted of [breed] per the shipper documents.
                There are shipping documents for Brian Moore available online that details each load for the entire year of 2010, again each horse put down as ___ breed by the shipper.

                Those are two sources of the best available information on the breakdown of breeds slaughtered off the top of my head.
                Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                Comment


                • Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post
                  Sorry Bluey - I was actually talking about horse feedlots and "straight to slaughter" dealers.

                  I just mentioned cattle because I've never seen a horse feedlot much less a cattle feedlot here in the east.
                  Sorry, losses last week were "only" -$133:

                  http://www.cattlenetwork.com/e-newsl...210874671.html

                  There are no such figures for horse feedlots.

                  Comment


                  • Just to clarify, I said that QH and QH types made up the majority, but definitely not the rest of the 83%, which can include other types of horses.

                    BTW, aren't there some feed lot type places in Kentucky where horses are kept for a while? Doesn't Nickerson have a holding area somewhere close to NH? From Joe at TB Friends, it seems like a lot of the dealers out his way hold horses for a while until they get up a big enough load to go to Texas.
                    Last edited by betonbill; Jun. 11, 2013, 09:38 PM. Reason: adding on

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                      Kaufmanzoning has documents that detail what each load consisted of [breed] per the shipper documents.
                      There are shipping documents for Brian Moore available online that details each load for the entire year of 2010, again each horse put down as ___ breed by the shipper.

                      Those are two sources of the best available information on the breakdown of breeds slaughtered off the top of my head.
                      Right, but it is a guess, no one really knows and as we know, what breed any one horse may be just standing there is not something you can take to the bank.

                      You ought to see what breeds our animal shelter lady puts dogs under.
                      Those list of horse breeds you have there are about as laughable.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                        So Mature, and so indicative of a willingness to debate an issue...not.
                        "I don't like what you're saying, so shut up/leave".

                        And you were complaining earlier of people acting like 7th graders?????? Pot meet kettle.
                        No that was me yesterday!

                        Comment


                        • BTW, aren't there some feed lot type places in Kentucky where horses are kept for a while? Doesn't Nickerson have a holding area somewhere close to NH?
                          I've only ever been to his plant that deals with downed cows (long story)...so I've never heard of it, but that doesn't mean anything.

                          Comment


                          • Would people be so against the idea of horsemeat they made life miserable for anyone trying to sell it??

                            Originally posted by betonbill View Post
                            I know that they used to sell horsemeat domestically, but in 40 years FDA and USDA standards have evolved.

                            The big plants didn't have any problem because all of their meat went overseas.

                            Would anyone, big plant, little plant, even be allowed to open a retail market for horsemeat these days? Would this require a whole set of new drug standards be formulated in order to do so?
                            The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                            H. Cate

                            Comment


                            • if you want to change an existing behavior pattern, you have limit yourself to recognizing the behavior and who is doing it.
                              And why they do the behavior.
                              And what ideal behavior would be as an alternate.
                              Then, if there is a way that changing that behavior could possibly be valuable to the mindset of the ones whose behavior you wish to change in some way. Not valuable to you, to THEM.

                              If there are 20 behaviors, one solution will never address all the behaviors; I assume this is why the BAN solution comes up.


                              ++
                              The classic example was how Texas reduced littering on their highways (catching and prosecuting litterbugs would have been a hopeless undertaking both financially and man-powerwise, and might even have increased the littering as people 'rose to the challenge' of confronting authority...)
                              The profile of the typical litterer was a young adult, pickup driving, beer drinking and TV watching male, who would rebel against restraint and authority (fines and tickets would not deter), was not motivated by pleas for the environment, pollution or beautifying the landscape.

                              What did motivate him was pride in being a Texan, specifically a vigorous male Texan.

                              How did they motivate him?
                              A series of commercials starring iconic male Texan role models: Dallas Cowboys defensive players, Rock Stars from Texas bands, Boxers born in Texas, and other clearly physically macho male Texans, Each spot expressing disgust with slobs and picking up litter, making not-so-subtle threats about what they'd do to the litterbug if they met him (crushing beer can with their handwhile saying they'd have to show him personally!) With the final line of "Don't mess with Texas...!"

                              It became UN-Texan for young men to litter. Their own idols were making that clear to them.
                              If they had pride in their State, their masculinity, then littering was contrary to their self image.

                              Litterers weren't 'real' Texans.
                              And 'real' Texans didn't let their friends litter, either.

                              Littering dropped significantly, then really fell off. This saved hundreds of thousands of dollars in state funds that would have been earmarked for a follow-up enforcement blitz that now wasn't needed.

                              Comment


                              • Are the KB's buying the weanlings???

                                Originally posted by Sannois View Post
                                But How Angela, They don't buy them now. I have a friend who goes to a local auction and the bigger ones here in Michigan,
                                She comes home and says half the really nice ones end of going for 80.00 or less and the rest the Killers pick up. She said QH weanlings were going for 40 dollars last summer. No lie.
                                The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                                H. Cate

                                Comment


                                • if you want to change an existing behavior pattern, you have limit yourself to recognizing the behavior and who is doing it.
                                  And why they do the behavior.
                                  And what ideal behavior would be as an alternate.
                                  Then, if there is a way that changing that behavior could possibly be valuable to the mindset of the ones whose behavior you wish to change in some way. Not valuable to you, to THEM.
                                  Yes, however, with your littering example there was no financial incentive for them to keep littering.

                                  That does add an extra dimension.

                                  Comment


                                  • Jets mom is not saying there is a (new) home for every horse. She's saying every horse has a home. It's what the owners choose to do that makes a difference. Make slaughter unprofitable and I think the market will adjust in time to reflect the loss of that venue. Hold the cruel and neglectful responsible legally for their actions, they won't be in the pool of horse breeders and sellers. Hold euthanasia clinics or some other venue that assists people who need help with costs. Cheaper than trying to rescue all those horses for whom " the truck is coming"

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                      Didn't you know? NSA, CIA and Homeland Security have Fairfax in the loop with all the surveillance...video, voice, digital.
                                      Keep laughing and making jokes!
                                      He is a Canadian, not worried, You.. Even if you voted for this bunch.
                                      LOL!

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by JGHIRETIRE View Post
                                        Are the KB's buying the weanlings???
                                        I think at that particular auction, it was a year ago, many of them were no sales.
                                        Because it was an estate.

                                        Comment


                                        • There's a couple KB's that go up and down the west coast. Juarez, Mexico is a straight shot but what about up north?? Not sure there's a SH in BC.

                                          Originally posted by OneGrayPony View Post
                                          I suppose it could be "reimbursed".

                                          I'm still though, concerned about d_bald's questions. I'm looking for numbers on how many horses per truck, but can't seem to find any other than the accidents, which have ~40 horses per truck.

                                          So that's 40 x $500 = $20,000 per truck.

                                          Fuel costs...um...okay, I've found fuel costs plus maintenance costs to be 1.40 per mile (standard tractor trailer...can't imagine it's much different than that).

                                          What's the average distance to a plant from an auction? I'd imagine that they go from specific auctions to specific plants (based on proximity) no?
                                          The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                                          H. Cate

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X