• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

hypothetical Q- want your opinion

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Original Poster

    #61
    Originally posted by RaeHughes View Post
    OP, my apologies for my late response. I have been out and about enjoying the start to my weekend .

    PLEASE note that the analysis of these sort of situations are my bread and butter. You asked a hypothetical question - I made the assumption (my bad) that you actually wanted an answer and not a "oh dear, bad employee! FIRE THEM!". Yes, I do have a different perspective than you - because I have been trained to look under the gloss of the poor communication here (and, phew!, it is poor!) to see what can be learnt.

    The barn employee was in contact wth the horse - she needed to pass it. It is merely fortunate that the horse involved is a well behaved soul - that saint of a horse should be thanked for giving the people a chance to learn. We all know how quick one (or both) of those back feet can come flying out ... and often for the silliest of reasons .

    There was a lot of poor communication here - the barn worker could have asked the boarder to move their horse; the barn owner doesnt want to deal with the issue so is turning a blind eye to a potentially dangerous situation; the boarder for being a little "holier than thou" and playing the innocence card.

    My day-to-day job involves breaking down work processes into the nuts and bolts. The bit I dont like (but do regularly ) is when I have to break down what happened in an incident - and, yes, I have been involved in investigating serious harm incidents. The cause can often be tied back - through asking questions, studying processes, visiting sites etc - to something as simple as a hazard not being clearly identified and "dealt with".

    What you described in your original post was a "close call" - to be frank, these are the best. But to do any growth, you need to separate the employee part from the boarder part of the employee. That person is entitled to a safe work environment. The boarders are entitled to a safe boarding environment.

    Instead of ranting at me for not understanding your question: Have you just asked some simple questions? Did the employee need to go through that aisle to complete the task she was working on or had it become a convenience (as they can so easily do)? Did the employee have communication issues with the other boarder (whether correctly or not)? Should the barn require that certain tasks are completed by a certain time (say 9am) and that boarders should not come to the barn before say 9.30 - in other words, the barn worker was being a little lazy and hadnt got their chores completed?

    Please take a step back - everyone - and look at it from your legal position. I have checked and US Federal Law requires that all employees are entitled to a safe working environment.

    I will not check this thread again as, to be frank, I see that most posters agree that the boarder was the innocent one here. I dont - I think she was oblivious to what was going on around her. Yes, the employee has a lot to learn in communication skills (does she what!) and she could have handled this a lot better, as could the BO, but to call for the employee to be fired is simply not on.

    Yes, I enjoy riding, walking the dogs etc - including getting out of bed in the morning. Just since I have been in my present role, I do look at situations in a different light. I sure always wear my riding helmet now .
    Uh seriously? i was ranting at you? i asked you a question b/c i wanted you to clarify. No one ever said the employee was not entitled to a safe environment, and no one said she was in danger.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Nezzy View Post
      no one said she was in danger.
      I...know? That reply just made me laugh. Passing by a horse that's cross-tied is a dangerous "close call" now? I assume a normal boarded horse (not a saint, a normal horse here) is used to people passing by it; only one of the 6 barns I've been in has tacking-up bays, it was normally always done in the aisles where the cross-ties are (or in the stall, as preferred by boarder).

      A person needing to pass behind the horse's butt might ask the owner to move the butt to the side, but people (workers, boarders, everyone) walk up and down the aisles without any issue. Never have I seen a horse just kick out at a person passing it by in an aisle; I would not be comfortable boarding in a barn that had a horse like that, unless the owner was forbidden from using cross-ties and would always loudly warn everyone to clear the aisle if they had to lead the horse down it. I'd assume such a horse would simply be asked to leave the barn.
      Proud Member Of The Lady Mafia

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by tidy wabbit View Post
        Only solution is for BO to dismiss employee.
        Originally posted by sketcher View Post
        Wow. You live in a harsh world.
        The real problem is that employee is still angry days later after the incident, still angry after the boarder apologizes ... (is willing to communicate that anger but not communicate to prevent the incident in the first place)
        employee may very well end up injured when a horse acts uncharacteristically in response to her tension/anger - so I'll agree with RaeHughes: employee is indeed unsafe
        BUT it's due to her own reactivity.

        If the boarder, I'd try to sort this out face to face, if there is no resolution, I'd arrange for my horse to be independent of this employee's care or move elsewhere ...

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by alto View Post
          If the boarder, I'd try to sort this out face to face, if there is no resolution, I'd arrange for my horse to be independent of this employee's care or move elsewhere ...
          Face to face with the barn manager, not an employee. In any business, you go to the manager rather then face off with an angry, possibly unstable employee you have absolutely no authority over and has already sent an e mail telling you how to behave. I always respect my grooms/muckers but if they contacted me personally and complained about me behind my back??? I'd be in the managers office and considering being out the gate with a trailer. Once dissent between boarders and the help, another boarder or paid, in a barn gets started? People start taking sides. It never ends well.
          Never.

          The fact it appears this employee is also a work off client makes this extra messy. Maybe you don't need to move the horse but, when crap like this goes on to where you are uncomfortable and lose enjoyment of your barn time? Maybe moving is a possibility, IME some let this stuff fester forever and never ever let it go...maybe moving needs to be considered. By one party or the other.
          When opportunity knocks it's wearing overalls and looks like work.

          The horse world. Two people. Three opinions.

          Comment


          • #65
            I'm not saying the employees need to tip toe around the clients, but I am saying that the whole email exchange was just handled wrong. Employee shouldn't have b*tched out the boarder to another boarder even if she had her own boarder hat on, and boarder shouldn't have emailed employee even if it was an apology. One email leads to another and the mess just gets deeper. Drama in action.
            If working boarder had a problem she should have taken it up with the BO, her boss, or better yet asked politely if boarder could shift down to another, open, set of crossties. (If that was the problem)
            I suppose it's possible that boarder didn't HEAR a request that was made and working boarder got a little irked by that, but she still doesn't own the barn and doesn't get to speak for the owner, that's the manager's job. (and that is why I asked if she had somehow become the de facto manager).
            Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
            Incredible Invisible

            Comment


            • #66
              As someone who is in the same position as this thread's "employee" (I work off board by cleaning stalls), I'm inclined to cut employee even LESS slack.

              Here's why: As someone who is obviously familiar with horses AND familiar with the horses she boards with in what sounds like a relatively small barn, she should know what horses will be OK with sweeping/wheelbarrow, etc., and she should have a good enough/friendly enough relationship with the boarders to be able to say:

              "Hey can I sweep around your horse?" Or, "Mind if you move Beauty over so I can get the wheelbarrow past?" OR whatever.

              When I clean with boarders present (sometimes happens due to scheduling), I often am chatting/friendly while I clean. If we aren't talking and they are in the way of sweeping or whatever, I just wait until they're done. If I'm ready to go and that's the last thing, I'll ask them to move the horse. No biggie.

              I also know the horses and know what ones will tolerate a wheelbarrow going by in our (admittedly very wide) aisle. (There is no other place to tie in our barn other than the aisle.)

              If I EVER contacted a boarder directly and snarked at them, particularly about an event that took place while I am acting as "employee" (even if I AM ALSO a boarder), I know my BO wouldn't be impressed. Actually, the reverse is true.... as a 'boarder' I won't be snarky to my fellow boarders because I'm ALSO an employee. I've felt like it sometimes, and often get my BO involved more than probably necessary, but rather that than the alternative.

              Comment


              • #67
                I was at barns that didn't allow boarders to arrive until 8:30 AM. The barn workers knew they had till that time to clean and do all they needed. Seemed to work out as long as the workers started on time and the boarders weren't wanting to ride at o-dark-thirty.
                "Sic Gorgiamus Allos Subjectatos Nunc"

                Comment


                • #68
                  Alto is right. When someone is angry for days over some minor incident, then there's something wrong with the angry person.

                  As a boarder who often voluntarily helped out (without pay or board reduction) at barns, I know that there are a lot of people with serious personality disorders working (and yes, boarding) at barns. It's one thing for a boarder to be totally inconsiderable of the staff, I've seen that, but it's another thing for staff to deeply resent boarders. Boarders pay for services. Staff won't have jobs without boarders.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by tidy wabbit View Post
                    Alto is right. When someone is angry for days over some minor incident, then there's something wrong with the angry person.
                    Yeah. And, the relationship between the two people doesn't really matter...staff/boarder, whatever. The real issue is that someone got angry because someone else was in their way and they decided to suffer silently rather than politely ask for accomodation. The someone else didn't successfully use their super powers to read their mind and mood and behave accordingly to pacify them. So, the offended person fumes silently, holds a grudge and engages in passive aggressive behavior and STILL doesn't let their manufactured "hurt" go, even after someone else has apologized (which I NEVER do when confronted with passive aggressive behavior, that just encourages it).

                    It's not a boarder/staff issue, it's a maturity issue, a communication skill issue and possibly even a mental health issue. This kind of thing happens everywhere, every day, nowhere near boarding barns...it happens in families, in workplaces, between neighbors.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      RaeHughes, yes, employees must be guaranteed a safe working environment, but that responsibility relies majorly on management shoulders, not boarders'. Therefore, if situations like this arise and employee feels her safety is threatened, he/she should bring it up to the management, not the client. The only responsibility the boarder has is to makes sure he/she does not "intentionally" and "wantonly" endanger the employee. Since the boarder put the horse at a designated area and went about her normal tacking up business, the boarder had not intentionally put the employee in any danger.

                      On the other hand, if employee refuses to change his/her way of working, like cleaning another stall, using another route, watering now and mucking out later, etc, and insists on pushing wheel barrel through a narrow aisle next to a horse without asking to be given a wider space from the boarder, it is the employee who intentionally and wantonly endanger the boarder and her horse, not the other way around.

                      Regardless, what this employee did was extremely unprofessional and spoke poorly of the management of the barn. I will not tolerate this kind of behavior from my employees.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X