• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Valley Meats openng is imminent!!!

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Wow one of the most non constructive threads yet.
    Wait, they are all non constructive. Just bashing both sides.
    They are going to Slaughter horses people, one way or another, unless you are the richest person and you can afford to 1. Buy them all and feed them,or 2. Build your own state of the art Horse slaughter facility, where they are slaughtered humanely. NOTHING is going to be changed by this constant bickering and bantering and rehashing over and over and over and over again.
    In case you have not noticed... IT IS SPRING! Get out and enjoy it.
    Back to mowing~

    Comment


    • #62
      http://www.abqjournal.com/main/2013/...hter-plan.html

      Ex-inspector has concerns about horse slaughter plan

      Tue, May 21, 2013




      LAS CRUCES –

      Former U.S. Department of Agriculture inspector and horse race veterinarian Lester Friedlander, who has seen thousands of cows butchered over the years, has major reservations about plans to begin slaughtering horses in a Roswell plant....


      Friedlander, a Pennsylvania resident, traveled to Roswell on Monday to lend his voice to those opposed to Valley Meat Co. owner Rick De Los Santos’ efforts to get the USDA inspections necessary to start up the nation’s first horse slaughterhouse in six years.


      He held a news conference in front of the plant, outlining his reasons for opposing it.


      Among his concerns is whether the horses can be humanely killed in the manner described by De Los Santos. De Los Santos took a Journal reporter on a tour of the plant recently and described the process, which involved shooting a retractable 8-inch-long bolt into the animal’s skull to destroy its brain.
      The horse would then be hung up, stabbed and drained of blood.


      Friedlander also said that because horses are skittish and have longer necks, it is more difficult for slaughterhouse workers to effectively stun the animals with a bolt gun used on cattle.


      Before the last horse slaughtering operations ended in the United States in 2007, there were many examples of horses having to be shot up to seven or eight times, he said.


      Although Friedlander was not an inspector at any horse slaughter plants, he said he bases his statements on his background as a horse veterinarian and on research and studies on the effectiveness of using bolt guns on horses.


      Congress halted funding for mandatory inspections in 2007, effectively closing all horse slaughter operations. The funding was restored for the current fiscal year, opening the door for De Los Santos’ plans.


      Friedlander also said he doubts the claim by De Los Santos that a USDA inspector would be near the factory’s stun box to check whether a horse is unconscious before being stabbed.


      “USDA doesn’t have the luxury or the funding to put an inspector right there at the stunning block,” Friedlander said. “There’s just no inspector there.”


      Improper stunning could leave a horse conscious as it is stabbed and bled out.
      A Valley Meat Co. representative disputed Friedlander, saying the USDA had notified the company that an inspector would be located at that spot.


      “If you have to do it more than once, you cause intense pain, and that’s a violation of the horse slaughter act,” said Friedlander, adding that the humane slaughter law was rarely enforced in the past.


      Valley Meat attorney A. Blair Dunn said that Friedlander is uninformed about Valley Meat’s specific plans and that the company is taking steps to address the concerns of its many opponents, who include Gov. Susana Martinez and most of the state’s congressional delegation. Plans to open the plant have sparked opposition from around the country.


      “Friedlander is making a big deal out of what he knows and applying it to what he hasn’t seen,” Dunn said. “He doesn’t know the inside of this plant. That’s what it really comes down to.”


      Friedlander said three USDA inspectors are typically stationed at a slaughter plant to inspect the head and tongue, the intestines, and finally the carcass of an animal. A USDA veterinarian typically moves about a plant working with inspectors.


      Dunn said USDA officials informed De Los Santos that a federal inspector would be by the stun box. Dunn also argued that the Roswell factory is so compact that a USDA veterinarian would be aware of how effectively, or ineffectively, employees used the bolt gun.


      De Los Santos plans to slaughter about 100 horses a day over a 10-hour period, making it a relatively small operation compared with big beef slaughterhouses.


      Dunn added that De Los Santos has not ruled out an alternative method of putting a horse down – a gun to the head – before the animal is bled out.


      “If that (the bolt gun) is not working, they have the capability to switch to the other. It’s whatever has the best results,” Dunn said.


      As of July 1, the European Union will require a lifetime medical history for horse meat imports, in an effort to keep out substances banned from the food supply. Painkillers commonly given to race horses are banned.


      Friedlander contended that paperwork certifying horses are free of banned substances could be easily faked.


      Dunn said that is the responsibility of companies that would supply Valley Meat with animals for slaughter and, he noted, some countries where horse meat is eaten do not apply European Union standards.


      Dunn said the plant passed the USDA’s inspections, and the grant of inspections could occur any time, pending a Department of Justice review of threatened litigation.


      Animal welfare organizations that include Humane Society of the United States intend to sue to stop the plant, saying its byproducts would threaten water sources.


      Dunn also said Valley Meat is negotiating with several outfits that would supply horses for slaughter.
      ************************
      \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

      Comment


      • #63
        ^^^ That is just the HSUS showing it's hand again.

        Comment


        • #64
          Lester is well known for his HSUS support and in particular Wayne Pacelle.

          He has no validity
          The Elephant in the room

          Comment


          • #65
            Maybe addressing the issue is too much of a stretch for the pro-slaughter crowd. So much easier to blame HSUS than to actually take the argument on.
            "He has no validity" but his argument does......Yours, not so much.

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
              Maybe addressing the issue is too much of a stretch for the pro-slaughter crowd. So much easier to blame HSUS than to actually take the argument on.
              "He has no validity" but his argument does......Yours, not so much.
              He prefers horses to go over the border to Mexico to be slaughtered, I guess.

              Comment


              • #67
                The issue has been addressed over and over.

                False pictures of a "tour" of the facility..never happened.

                Therefore stating they had truly done a poor job and everything was just the same as it was before is again..a story

                As for Lester..he makes his point..he has also been the guest speaker many many times at HSUS fund raisers and I expect he is also one of their influential lobby individuals

                Lester uses the advanced philosphy of " So when did you stop beating your wife"

                He knows it can be done but he believes in forever homes...I wonder if he is still a vegan...??????

                His analogy of a horse had to be shot 7 or 8 times and that it happened with regularity was not substantiated.

                He already knows the chutes have been changed for the industry.

                But he prefers to recycle the same old same old he has since 2008.

                By the way..when cornered and asked what his solution was..he did not have one that did not involved wood nymph's , bamby.... thumper. AND all breeders should quit producing.

                He has NEVER explained why the average is is 6 and over and that is from both HSUS and USDA

                Re-read the post...it lacks substance and is just the rehasing of an old view.

                As stated. He has NOT been in the new plant.
                The Elephant in the room

                Comment


                • #68
                  P.S. HSUS unveiled its GIVE US MONEY SO WE CAN SAVE THE ANIMALS IN OKLAHOMA program...like Katrina..nary a cent will stay there...

                  Thankfully, TV and radio have been supporting the LOCAL humane societies and rescue groups..and telling listeners to give the money ONLY locally...

                  I would have thought that with Lois from IRS having her butt in a sling Wayne would go quiet..not so...

                  Will be interesting to see if IRS has any "plans" for future slaughter plants..

                  As for HSUS caring about the water...why do they now advocate euthanization with burial?

                  Talk about double speak
                  The Elephant in the room

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Oh goody more slaughter threads.
                    While I am not as you know opposed to slaughter, I am opposed to the fact that stunning horses with the cattle bolt with their heads unrestrained is an issue,
                    And no matter what I have read, I go back to The canada slaughter house video that Temple Grandin viewed, Many misses and rehits.
                    They snake their heads and duck, and it causes misses, most cattle just stand there. And are easier to restrain.
                    So I still think that is an ineffective inefficient way to slaughter horses.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Why does this thread title need three exclamation marks?

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        I believe it relates to the size of the ego of the OP.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          If they could find a better way to do it - I wouldn't have an issue with it either.


                          Originally posted by Sannois View Post
                          Oh goody more slaughter threads.
                          While I am not as you know opposed to slaughter, I am opposed to the fact that stunning horses with the cattle bolt with their heads unrestrained is an issue,
                          And no matter what I have read, I go back to The canada slaughter house video that Temple Grandin viewed, Many misses and rehits.
                          They snake their heads and duck, and it causes misses, most cattle just stand there. And are easier to restrain.
                          So I still think that is an ineffective inefficient way to slaughter horses.
                          The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                          H. Cate

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            At best I think slaughter is a necessary evil. Therefore, even if this was the best plant in the whole wide world with all the horses with honest & perfect paperwork, and the most humane killing process possible, I would still be sort of sad that it had to exist.

                            I find the enthusiasm of the OP to be morbid, really.

                            Just for the record, I'm predicting that a year or so from now, if the plant opens, that it will be no better than past operations.

                            Comment

                            • Original Poster

                              #74
                              It's amazing how so many proud members of the sisterhood as well as those still closeted, can post and re-post the same worn-out comments!!! How you draw any inference from the use of 3 apostrophes is comical!!!
                              Wise up sisters, hsus is about to face a true reckoning now that their shill at the IRS is headed for jail. No more protecting the puppetmaster Wayne.
                              And it is so very sad that so many lend any credence to that vet who stood like a sissy in front of the plant to preach to his like-minded reporters! What a joke.
                              Also have been having a laugh reading about the judgemental SPORTHORSE QUEEN on other forums! Very interesting indeed!!!

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                "Friedlander also said that because horses are skittish and have longer necks, it is more difficult for slaughterhouse workers to effectively stun the animals with a bolt gun used on cattle.


                                Before the last horse slaughtering operations ended in the United States in 2007, there were many examples of horses having to be shot up to seven or eight times, he said.

                                Although Friedlander was not an inspector at any horse slaughter plants, he said he bases his statements on his background as a horse veterinarian and on research and studies on the effectiveness of using bolt guns on horses."

                                I found this interesting. No first hand knowledge or observation?
                                And the links to the research and studies?
                                I just think if he is using other people's statistics it would be polite to let us know.

                                "Because I say so" isn't quite enough to make it fact, or scientific proof.

                                -And everything he says may be true.
                                Or not.


                                Sometimes when you call a second vet for another opinion, the diagnosis and treatment change, don't they?

                                Comment


                                • #76
                                  Originally posted by 7arabians View Post
                                  It's amazing how so many proud members of the sisterhood as well as those still closeted, can post and re-post the same worn-out comments!!! How you draw any inference from the use of 3 apostrophes is comical!!!
                                  Wise up sisters, hsus is about to face a true reckoning now that their shill at the IRS is headed for jail. No more protecting the puppetmaster Wayne.
                                  And it is so very sad that so many lend any credence to that vet who stood like a sissy in front of the plant to preach to his like-minded reporters! What a joke.
                                  Also have been having a laugh reading about the judgemental SPORTHORSE QUEEN on other forums! Very interesting indeed!!!
                                  I think there is a supplement for low testosterone, you might want to look into it. Glad the "sisterhood" makes you insecure about your own posts.

                                  Comment

                                  • Original Poster

                                    #77
                                    Oh boy, SV is back to thinking I'm a man again.
                                    Bluey, Fairfax and D.Baldstockings have just logically and surgically sliced and diced Friedlander and his textbook hsus pablum. Funny how silent those who dance to Wayne's tune have become. They now see that hsus has only survived as a non-profit because he had one of his sycophants in charge of the non-profit section of the IRS.
                                    We have warned that Wayne and many of the other radical, AR groups are methodically moving step by step toward their ability to tell everyone how they will treat their animals. That is for one, generation. Wayne wants no more animal ownership after the current generation is gone. One of his 'small steps' was to place his group's member in the IRS to run cover for him.

                                    Comment


                                    • #78
                                      The black helicopters are coming...beware! Obamacare is going to make everyone implant a chip so they can track you in March 2013, the government can direct tornadoes, and let's not forget the chip that is in every HDTV so the government can listen to your every word....

                                      Comment


                                      • #79
                                        How 'bout SH's for asshats?

                                        Comment


                                        • #80
                                          Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                                          The black helicopters are coming...beware! Obamacare is going to make everyone implant a chip so they can track you in March 2013, the government can direct tornadoes, and let's not forget the chip that is in every HDTV so the government can listen to your every word....
                                          You can't seriously be that ignorant of what is happening in this country,
                                          Oh wait you are one of the uninformed. Just by what you are writing proves you know nothing but the nonsense.
                                          Wake up and you might see truth, not the Goofy crap you just wrote.
                                          Since it is not off topic day I will not elaborate.
                                          And if you think The IRS being in charge of Healthcare is a good thing, well I hope to be around when you realize what your life will be like.
                                          I actually feel very sorry for the uninformed.

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X