• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Spains Economy Affecting Horses

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Spains Economy Affecting Horses

    http://news.yahoo.com/legendary-hors...070920044.html

    And yet, they still bred their mares last year. I hope they find homes for all of them.
    Lori T
    www.calypsofarmeventers.blogspot.com
    www.facebook.com/LoriTankelPhotography
    www.facebook.com/LTEquine for product updates on the lines I rep

  • #2
    There was a blurb started by 7arabians about it - they are also now breeding for slaughter.
    I'll see if I can't find the link.
    The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
    H. Cate

    Comment


    • #3
      http://www.chronofhorse.com/forum/sh...cosm-of-the-US
      The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
      H. Cate

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by Lori T View Post
        http://news.yahoo.com/legendary-hors...070920044.html

        And yet, they still bred their mares last year. I hope they find homes for all of them.
        "Many breeders have gone out of business and those that remain are breeding fewer horses, said Leopoldo Fernandez, president of the Spain-based Union of Breeders of Spanish Horses association."

        I hope some of the North American fans and breeders that are not as hard hit by the economic downturn are aware and trying to assist.

        I hardly think the Pura Raza breeders are breeding 'for slaughter'.

        Comment


        • #5
          I would hope not.
          The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
          H. Cate

          Comment


          • #6
            Like other breeders around the world many have downsized. Yeguda Miliar reduced breeding to just replacement.

            Here is an example of HSUS interferring and how it went bad

            It used to be that during the bull fight the horse would be gored and very few would survive this barbaric practice.

            Enter HSUS and other rara groups.

            They put protective pads around the blind folded horse.

            Before..6000 were killed per year (a horrific number)

            Now..about 3800-4000 are killed BUT the problem is..they do not get killed the first time...they must fight, terrified time after time after time

            We told the HSUS this was wrong and this is exactly what would happen and we would support them to remove the horses but "negotiating" a padded senerio was not going to be the answer.

            Removing the horse IS a major step within this culture. It could have been done but HSUS moved on after their last major financial drive during the late 80's and one attempt in the very early 90's.
            The Elephant in the room

            Comment


            • #7
              I know it's Wikipedia but Wikipedia says that picadors' horses started wearing padding in 1928...HSUS wasn't founded until almost thirty years later. How did they have any say in whether the horses wore padding or not?

              Then there's this from 1957....which doesn't seem to have anything to say about RARAs advocating padding for horses but the bullfighting industry itself wanting it.

              Spanish bullfights are as delicately put together as Swiss watches, and when one thing gets out of adjustment, everything else does too. Recently the Spanish government ordered the padding on the picadors' horses cut from 80 kilograms to 15—and everything about the bullfight was affected, from the gate receipts to the number of ears awarded by the judges.

              The picador's job is to mount an old and expendable nag and ride out with a steel-pointed spear which he jabs several times into the bull's neck muscle. The bull, with his power to gore and toss thus reduced, is then taken over and worked by the matador.

              On a well-padded horse the picador is safe and can jab away until the bull is thoroughly workable. But on one with little padding, or none, the picador is likely to find himself on his own two feet, with a gored and dying horse on one side and a charging bull on the other. Faced with this possibility he can't work nearly as well and is able to do far less toward weakening the bull for the kill. Some matadors dislike this; they prefer to have the picador deliver up to them half-debilitated bulls rather than furiously aroused ones. Others meet the new challenge with a courage which forces the ecstatic judges to award more than the usual number of ears and tails.

              After a few days of using the thinner padding in Madrid, bullfight managers wailed last week that the rule would ruin their business: the sight of eviscerated horses would drive the tourists away forever. Besides, even old plugs cost money and the 10-day festival of San Isidro had seen 12 of them gored, killed and dragged away. The weight limit on padding was raised in mid-festival to 25 kilograms, and cynics predicted that it would eventually climb back to 60.

              In view of the fact that the government had ordered padding put on the picadors' horses in the first place (in 1928) why had it backtracked now? Well, the feeling has been growing in Spain the last few years that, what with purging and starving animals to make them weak, shaving horns to make them hypersensitive and dulling them to make them harmless, the bullfight was being rigged just a little too strongly against the bull.
              The Trials and Jubilations of a Twenty-Something Re-rider
              Happy owner of Kieran the mostly-white-very-large-not-pony.

              Comment


              • #8
                That is so sad - and here I am, actively looking for an Iberian, but they are all so expensive...
                "When life gives you scurvy, make lemonade."

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by analise View Post
                  I know it's Wikipedia but Wikipedia says that picadors' horses started wearing padding in 1928...HSUS wasn't founded until almost thirty years later. How did they have any say in whether the horses wore padding or not?

                  Then there's this from 1957....which doesn't seem to have anything to say about RARAs advocating padding for horses but the bullfighting industry itself wanting it.
                  The Hemmingway Papers...Bullfighting is not a sport, it is a tragedy deals with the number (6000) horses per year. Although they COULD use padding they did not and definitely NOT at Seville. We were there early 70's and went to the ring and NONE of the horses were padded. The horse was always dragged out of the ring before the bull as a sign of respect for the bull...

                  HSUS was approached by the Countess Belecazar ( a world renowned Arabian Horse breeder).

                  Her organization asked them to put their International weight with her group to remove all horses from the ring. Instead...they just implemented the old law of giving them padding.



                  http://www.horsetalk.co.nz/features/bullfighting.shtml

                  But bulls are not the only creatures to suffer in bullrings. The tormented bull does not understand that it is the man on the horse's back that is causing his pain, only that he is in agony. He therefore sees the horse as his enemy as much as the man.
                  It's not unusual for horses used in bullfights to be so badly gored by the bulls that they have to be killed, but only after they have been dragged from the ring and the view of the spectators

                  HSUS has always muttered something about culture etc..meaning they are afraid to attack a Mediterranian culture but they have no problems attacking North American and European cultures for much less.

                  Read and view the pictures in the link and know that HSUS will fight slaughter with little no suffering while keeping quiet over a gruesome painful and long death.
                  The Elephant in the room

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                    The Hemmingway Papers...Bullfighting is not a sport, it is a tragedy deals with the number (6000) horses per year. Although they COULD use padding they did not and definitely NOT at Seville. We were there early 70's and went to the ring and NONE of the horses were padded. The horse was always dragged out of the ring before the bull as a sign of respect for the bull...

                    HSUS was approached by the Countess Belecazar ( a world renowned Arabian Horse breeder).

                    Her organization asked them to put their International weight with her group to remove all horses from the ring. Instead...they just implemented the old law of giving them padding.



                    http://www.horsetalk.co.nz/features/bullfighting.shtml

                    But bulls are not the only creatures to suffer in bullrings. The tormented bull does not understand that it is the man on the horse's back that is causing his pain, only that he is in agony. He therefore sees the horse as his enemy as much as the man.
                    It's not unusual for horses used in bullfights to be so badly gored by the bulls that they have to be killed, but only after they have been dragged from the ring and the view of the spectators

                    HSUS has always muttered something about culture etc..meaning they are afraid to attack a Mediterranian culture but they have no problems attacking North American and European cultures for much less.

                    Read and view the pictures in the link and know that HSUS will fight slaughter with little no suffering while keeping quiet over a gruesome painful and long death.
                    So you are for banning fighting bulls on horseback. I guess that makes you an RARA, since you want to ban something.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                      So you are for banning fighting bulls on horseback. I guess that makes you an RARA, since you want to ban something.
                      And you know what the next step will be if the ban is allowed to happen!
                      Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                      http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                      http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Well I'll be danged

                        I guess you must be right

                        I am a rara who supports slaughter because at its worst, the horse might suffer for 60 seconds.

                        You, both of you, are rara's who support horses gored to death..sometimes lying in the ring in agony for 15 minutes or so..or you want the same horse used over and over and over until she dies of a heart attack.

                        I guess I am a DIFFERENT type of rara than you.

                        I am against cruelty where both of you support it.

                        Thank you for showing all of us who you are and where you stand.

                        JetsMom quote: So you are for banning fighting bulls on horseback. I guess that makes you an RARA, since you want to ban something.

                        Jenms enlightening agreement: And you know what the next step will be if the ban is allowed to happen

                        Thanks for sharing your true nature.
                        The Elephant in the room

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                          Well I'll be danged

                          I guess you must be right

                          I am a rara who supports slaughter because at its worst, the horse might suffer for 60 seconds.

                          You, both of you, are rara's who support horses gored to death..sometimes lying in the ring in agony for 15 minutes or so..or you want the same horse used over and over and over until she dies of a heart attack.

                          I guess I am a DIFFERENT type of rara than you.

                          I am against cruelty where both of you support it.

                          Thank you for showing all of us who you are and where you stand.

                          JetsMom quote: So you are for banning fighting bulls on horseback. I guess that makes you an RARA, since you want to ban something.

                          Jenms enlightening agreement: And you know what the next step will be if the ban is allowed to happen

                          Thanks for sharing your true nature.
                          Actually I would support banning bullfighting, whether on horseback or on foot. I don't like to see animals tortured and killed for entertainment. Unfortunately the pro slaughter posters all seem to feel that banning things like that, whether it is bullfighting from horseback, horse tripping, dogfighting etc, is wrong, and makes one an RARA.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by jetsmom View Post
                            Actually I would support banning bullfighting, whether on horseback or on foot. I don't like to see animals tortured and killed for entertainment. Unfortunately the pro slaughter posters all seem to feel that banning things like that, whether it is bullfighting from horseback, horse tripping, dogfighting etc, is wrong, and makes one an RARA.
                            Not to mention a slippery slope.
                            I mean, ban bull fights and what's next? No pony rides at the fair?
                            Every use of animals will be in jeopardy!

                            ETA of course I am for banning bull fights. While I understand it's part of the tradition in some nations, I am a firm believe in the mantra 'when we know better, we do better' and we know better than to torture animals like that.
                            Or most of us do anyway.
                            Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                            http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Angela..check with your bosses at HSUS. Don't they still have Michael Vick of dog fighting "fame" speaking on their behalf. Wayne was positively glowing with endearments as he stated Michael would be a wonderful dog owner.

                              Remember how he took that pitbull bitch and had them break her front legs and toss her into the pit to be torn apart because she was a chicken?

                              I know I know..he is your idol and that is why you don't mention him

                              Difference ladies...Pro equine slaughter are not for abuse. Slaughter is NOT abusive and yes, things do go wrong...but the numbers of double bolts or problems were usually one in ten thousand where bull fights, cock fights, dog fights are 100 torture to the end...DEATH...and the bodies are tossed into a pit.

                              HSUS Wayne and woman (wife) do not bother to attack spain...they vacation there with the owner of the tee shirt manufacture in the Phillipines (the shirts are made for HSUS). The sun is lovely in Ibiza
                              The Elephant in the room

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                Here's a photo gallery of some of the gorgeous horses supposedly headed for slaughter thanks to the economy:

                                http://photos.denverpost.com/2013/04...isis-photos/#1

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Yes, Angelina Fredarina's boss and puppetmaster, Wayne has given Mikey a brand new pitbull! Wayne never meant to remove Mikey's entertainment or his ability to show his children how to make a few bucks.
                                  It is both shocking and sad to see that Analise, Angela and their sisters support the killing of horses in bullfights. True raras.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    The mark of zealots, fanatics for their causes, they will defend even the indefensible at any cost, here the HSUS and the Vick connection.

                                    Honestly, after what that man did, why would any decent human think it is good PR to put him on display for your cause?
                                    Only another a twisted mind could think that makes any sense:

                                    http://www.nathanwinograd.com/?p=6510

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Where did I ever say I supported the killing of horses in bullfights. All I did was say it looked like the padding of horses in bullfights was made law in Spain decades before there was an HSUS and linked to some resources stating it.
                                      The Trials and Jubilations of a Twenty-Something Re-rider
                                      Happy owner of Kieran the mostly-white-very-large-not-pony.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I have a hard time wrapping my bead around people wanting to pay big bucks to import these horses when there are so many in the US that need homes and groceries. The transport, import, and quarantine fees for one horse is in the thousands of dollars, yet sometimes only a few dollars and a little work will save a horse in your own county.
                                        ~ Shannon Hayden ~

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X