• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Carolyn Vaughn: 20 to 30 dead horses

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Carolyn Vaughn: 20 to 30 dead horses

    WEWOKA, Okla


    http://www.usatoday.com/story/news/n...orses/2059141/

    http://www.koco.com/news/oklahomanews
    The virtual "woodshed" seems the only remedy for willful fools .

  • #2
    Crap. Not another one.

    Comment


    • #3
      Is this person related to Donja Vaughn?

      ETA: Just did a search. Donja's mom is Sharon.
      Derby Lyn Farms Website

      Derby Lyn Farms on Facebook!

      Comment


      • #4
        Local TV stations are reporting that Carolyn Vaughn, the accused, was an animal and trash hoarder who had previously been convicted of animal cruelty when she ran a puppy mill. In OK animal cruelty can be charged as a felony with fines + up to 5yrs. in prison. According to news reports she was to pay a $10,000 vet bill on the puppy mill. I'm questioning how she came to have 100 horses on her place and wondering why she wasn't at least on probation for the previous charges. That way a home visit might have picked this up earlier. As of today, 63 horses have been taken to Blaze's Tribute Equine Rescue; some look absolutely horrible, some are just plain horrible. It's going to be a long term major project to get so many horses back to health, provided from this point everything goes in the right direction.
        "I never met a man I didn't like who liked horses." Will Rogers

        Comment


        • #5
          Animal hoarding is a sickness and we need to identify these people before the situations become this dire. Authorities are notoriously reluctant and slow to respond to these situations and prevent people from owning animals again.

          I do have to say though, with several auction houses in OK that sell to slaughter, this confirms the hypothesis that people who starve/neglect/hoard do so whether or not slaughter is an option. If we are to truly address prevention of these kinds of situations, we need to better understand and identify those prone to this kind of treatment to animals.
          "There's something about the outside of a horse that is good for the inside of a man" ~ Sir Winston Churchill

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by JumpingPaints View Post
            I do have to say though, with several auction houses in OK that sell to slaughter, this confirms the hypothesis that people who starve/neglect/hoard do so whether or not slaughter is an option. If we are to truly address prevention of these kinds of situations, we need to better understand and identify those prone to this kind of treatment to animals.
            I totally agree.

            What I don't understand is how people get away with it, especially those who have already been convicted of animal cruelty? It just doesn't make sense.
            Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
            http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
            http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by JumpingPaints View Post
              Animal hoarding is a sickness and we need to identify these people before the situations become this dire. Authorities are notoriously reluctant and slow to respond to these situations and prevent people from owning animals again.

              I do have to say though, with several auction houses in OK that sell to slaughter, this confirms the hypothesis that people who starve/neglect/hoard do so whether or not slaughter is an option. If we are to truly address prevention of these kinds of situations, we need to better understand and identify those prone to this kind of treatment to animals.
              I, on the other hand, think that the mentality of hoarders is pushed to the edge and beyond by all the anti slaughter talk and rescuing from slaughter and such.

              That lady considered herself a "rescue" and was getting donations to buy and feed horses and overextended badly.

              Sure, there is pathology involved there, she is a mentally sick person, but just as the shooters that kill people, they are incited by others and so are these people like this lady.

              Not that it matters on the ban slaughter debate, really, that is incidental, but it is worth noting when these cases come up that in these, the increase we have seen in those is in part because of the anti slaughter drives.

              Those cases have always been common with small animals.
              With large animals, especially horses, those were very rare before that and are more common now.
              We used to buy, retrain and resell all kinds of horses, some the traders would call and find someone to sell their promising horses, rather than send them to slaugther.
              That was how the horse world worked, now that has become "saving from slaughter".
              See that one thread about the trader selling on his web site as "rescuing" before he sends them to slaughter, see the many rescues that mostly buy and sell horses from sale barns they insist were going to slaughter, if that may be so or not.

              I am not sure that new way to market those horses is helping them any more than the old way of just selling and buying and retraining and reselling as a useful horse.
              I think that maybe that "rescue" mentality has some to do with these sad situations.

              Comment


              • #8
                I'm not sure where to add this in, but, it seems to me, 'these' people either breed for too many or buy/rescue too many, then they get overextended, but can't let go. It seems, from the last several big explosions, people get in this position but tend to think things are going to turn around...just around the corner. It gets worse and worse, spiraling down.
                GR24's Musing #19 - Save the tatas!!

                Comment


                • #9
                  Bluey: "Not that it matters on the ban slaughter debate, really, that is incidental, but it is worth noting when these cases come up that in these, the increase we have seen in those is in part because of the anti slaughter drives."

                  Do you HEAR what Bluey is saying? She is saying this is the fault of the anti-slaughter people. That if the anti-slaughter people would just shut up and let the horses get slaughtered, there would be no hoarding.

                  Now that is what I call spin.

                  No Bluey, this is a mentality issue caused by too much breeding and irresponsible ownership. The point is that slaughter is not the answer for it. Slaughter houses are not going to make idiots any less stupid.

                  Those poor horses need help, but we need to stop more from being bred. Horse slaughter is only going to start a whole new business and reason to breed. Money, money, money. All those slaughter houses that are failing because of the drought and fewer cattle, need to stop licking their lips over horses.
                  Rest in peace Claudius, we will miss you.

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by ToTheNines View Post
                    Do you HEAR what Bluey is saying? She is saying this is the fault of the anti-slaughter people. That if the anti-slaughter people would just shut up and let the horses get slaughtered, there would be no hoarding.

                    Now that is what I call spin.

                    No Bluey, this is a mentality issue caused by too much breeding and irresponsible ownership. The point is that slaughter is not the answer for it. Slaughter houses are not going to make idiots any less stupid.

                    All those slaughter houses that are failing because of the drought and fewer cattle, need to stop licking their lips over horses.
                    I know, there is much more to these people and said so, if you read what I posted without anti slaughter bias.
                    I was suggesting, that is a thought that has been crossing my mind, that all the anti slaughter, "lets rescue from slaughter" mentality is what has at times, in some cases, maybe here too, helped fuel some those disturbed individuals actions.

                    I know, slaughter is not going to make people stupid, it is also not going to make them breed more, that is also proven wrong.

                    Just one more opinion, responding to the, as you say, "spin" of the post I quoted.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Does this really have to turn into a slaughter debate?

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Bluey, she was a trash hoarder too. Last I heard there was no ban on the slaughter of trash.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by trubandloki View Post
                          Does this really have to turn into a slaughter debate?
                          Well, it may if that is where some want to take this.
                          Don't blame me for bringing slaughter up.
                          I was responding to that thought someone presented in this discussion.

                          There was some similar case here a few months ago, but didn't involve that many horses.
                          Those people are sick and need to be on probation and supervision if not taken out of circulation.

                          Not that I know, don't have the numbers to show so, but I think the police already has so much else they consider very important, like keeping people safe, that they are getting to animal abuse cases when they can, more than right away.
                          Maybe that is why they can get this far and be repeaters, as this lady here.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                            I was suggesting, that is a thought that has been crossing my mind, that all the anti slaughter, "lets rescue from slaughter" mentality is what has at times, in some cases, maybe here too, helped fuel some those disturbed individuals actions.
                            Yes. Nailed it.
                            GR24's Musing #19 - Save the tatas!!

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              You know, Bluey, that's just total crap. This happens because people don't report it, they don't want to get involved, they make excuses. When the case comes up for trial, they ignore it. We don't argue for laws for more punishment and oversight of animal abusers. Since the abuse laws are state based, there's no way to track someone who pulls up stakes and moves from state to state.

                              But ultimately, at least for the hoarders? They do it because we let them.

                              Comment


                              • #16
                                ya..sooo...she does it again-this time with horses instead of dogs. And they REDUCE her bond..letting her back out on the street. Again.
                                Seems NO ONE learned a lesson the first time..
                                the NOT!! Spoiled!! Arabian Protectavest poster pony lives on in my heart

                                Comment


                                • #17
                                  Originally posted by macmtn View Post
                                  ya..sooo...she does it again-this time with horses instead of dogs. And they REDUCE her bond..letting her back out on the street. Again.
                                  Seems NO ONE learned a lesson the first time..
                                  That's exactly my point. We (the collective we) let her get away with it. At the very least, she needs psychological help.

                                  Comment


                                  • #18
                                    Originally posted by ToTheNines View Post
                                    Bluey: "Not that it matters on the ban slaughter debate, really, that is incidental, but it is worth noting when these cases come up that in these, the increase we have seen in those is in part because of the anti slaughter drives."

                                    Do you HEAR what Bluey is saying? She is saying this is the fault of the anti-slaughter people. That if the anti-slaughter people would just shut up and let the horses get slaughtered, there would be no hoarding.

                                    Now that is what I call spin.

                                    No Bluey, this is a mentality issue caused by too much breeding and irresponsible ownership. The point is that slaughter is not the answer for it. Slaughter houses are not going to make idiots any less stupid.

                                    Those poor horses need help, but we need to stop more from being bred. Horse slaughter is only going to start a whole new business and reason to breed. Money, money, money. All those slaughter houses that are failing because of the drought and fewer cattle, need to stop licking their lips over horses.
                                    Not to mention that slaughter is a very active industry and if this woman had wanted to she could have called a dealer to come take them away to a plant very easily... which she didn't. Just like other neglect cases we've seen in the last few years: Trupia, Parkinson, 3 Strikes Ranch,...

                                    This kind of neglect is not a slaughter/lack of slaughter issues in the least, except when it's convenient for people w/an agenda to make it one.
                                    Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                    http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                    Comment


                                    • #19
                                      Originally posted by JumpingPaints View Post

                                      I do have to say though, with several auction houses in OK that sell to slaughter, this confirms the hypothesis that people who starve/neglect/hoard do so whether or not slaughter is an option. If we are to truly address prevention of these kinds of situations, we need to better understand and identify those prone to this kind of treatment to animals.
                                      Is the hypothesis that hoarders would sell their horses? I don't think so. I think people understand that hoarders hang onto stuff even if it means the stuff is infested with rats, rusting, rotting, starving, dying etc.

                                      I think the hypothesis is that if people who are unable to care for their horses are unable to sell their horses- or if the price of horses goes below the price of a week of feed... that you will see more cases of neglect.

                                      Comment


                                      • #20
                                        I have seen that "rescue" mentality in hoarders long ago in the dog world, it had not hit horses then yet, where hoarders would take dogs from streets and animal control so they would not be killed and get too many and before they knew it, some were dying, starving because hoarders don't believe anyone else can care for their animals as much as they do and can't see they are not handling it and need help.

                                        Comment

                                        Working...
                                        X