• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Thoroughbreds Going To Auction

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #21
    I just saw this in my facebook feed...

    http://www.paulickreport.com/feature...ay-many-hands/

    Comment


    • #22
      Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
      I just saw this in my facebook feed...

      http://www.paulickreport.com/feature...ay-many-hands/
      What an appropriate time for that to come out.

      Let's remember that in spite of all of the bad press that the TB industry is one of the very few breed associations that are being proactive about this problem. Add in the recent interest in the all TB shows and the TB as an all around athlete, things are looking up..

      Comment


      • #23
        Originally posted by 7arabians View Post
        Yes, they have tried to self-police the TBs to avoid the SH. But in reality, recent investigations have found that many of the retired TBs which were sent to wonderful retirement homes where they could run in lush pastures, actually went to holding farms where they were starved to death!
        So, choose the future wisely. To a 'retirement' home where they may linger for months before dying, or the SH where one, painless impact from the bolt gun ends its suffering!
        Neither is a very nice alternative!

        where did you get the idea the 'one, painless impact from the bolt gun ends its suffering'...??

        how about saying within XX hours 'their suffering is over'...that may be days in a holding pen, 1-2 or more auctions, a trailer trip crammed with other horses or 2 or 3 trips, regardless of sex for XX hours, run thru a chute then hopefully killed instantly rather than being just stunned and alive while being eviserated.. I think that is more reality.

        Comment


        • #24
          Uphill,
          It doesn't sound like you've ever been to a SH. Your post sounds like a direct copy from a Wayne Pacelle speech. One instance of each of your points may have occurred over the past 100 years, but hsus and the rara's condense them all together to make it sound bizarrely cruel. Please educate yourself. Take a look at the Canadian operation!
          If so many people keep drinking that hsus koolaid, discussion is pointless. That is exactly what Wayne wants. 'One generation and out' is all he cares about.

          Comment


          • #25
            Originally posted by FineAlready View Post
            Ah, my mistake. I don't think a rule that only prevents direct sale to slaughter really prevents much at all, unfortunately.
            But it does prevent owners/trainers being held responsible for something someone five owners later does. If it were the case that they were responsible no matter how long it had been, the smart thing would be shoot it the minute its last race was over because that's the only way to guarantee it never, ever changes hands again. You can't hold someone responsible for another person's actions just because they own property you once owned.
            Author Page
            Like Omens In the Night on Facebook
            Steampunk Sweethearts

            Comment


            • #26
              Originally posted by Judysmom View Post
              No.

              Again, check into the rule at which ever specific track its is you are concerned about, but the rules are intended to prevent the owner/trainer from SELLING DIRECTLY TO SLAUGHTER.

              If Joe Schmo buys the horse, and then sells it to slaughter, no problem. If the owner/ trainer sells DIRECTLY to the kill buyer, THEN the owner/trainer can get banned from the track. This is not a lifetime prohibition from selling to slaughter for the horse.
              This exactly.

              It also has nothing to do with selling at auction. There are some well known TB auctions that sell horses that are done their racing career as breeding prospects. (Fasig-Tipton is one). These horses usually have a reserve put on them and have value as breeding animals.

              So the 'rule' is not selling at auction per se, but selling to slaughter. If a racing owner takes the horse to a low-end auction with no reserve and they end up going to slaughter, then the track holds the racing owner responsible for that. Of course that's if they get caught.

              Comment


              • #27
                Originally posted by FineAlready View Post
                Not really. I think most track policies basically say that IF a horse that ended its career at their track EVER later ends up at slaughter, the owner/trainer of that horse will be permanently banned from racing future horses at that track.
                Tracks have timeframes attached to such rules. The idea is to prevent on track trainers from selling horses from the backstretches to the kill buyers. If a trainer sold or gave away a horse 10 years ago and it turned up in an aution or killpen, it's hard to hold that trainer responsible.

                Once you own a horse, legally you can do whatever you want with him. Sadly many people have taken horses for free off the tracks with promises of
                green pastures, plenty of downtime to ease old ailments or happy trail rides only to send them (still in racing plates) to shady auctions.
                F O.B
                Resident racing historian ~~~ Re-riders Clique
                Founder of the Mighty Thoroughbred Clique

                Comment


                • #28
                  Originally posted by 7arabians View Post
                  Uphill,
                  It doesn't sound like you've ever been to a SH. Your post sounds like a direct copy from a Wayne Pacelle speech. One instance of each of your points may have occurred over the past 100 years, but hsus and the rara's condense them all together to make it sound bizarrely cruel. Please educate yourself. Take a look at the Canadian operation!
                  If so many people keep drinking that hsus koolaid, discussion is pointless. That is exactly what Wayne wants. 'One generation and out' is all he cares about.
                  Sometimes even Wayne is right. Even Temple Grandin has admitted that the horse slaughter houses should be monitored by outsiders constantly. And if you don't believe there are plenty of grisly videos and testimony on the net showing it. Now do ALL of the horses suffer like this? No, some live close by, some are sold directly to the plant, some are lucky enough to get through the whole pipeline relatively unscathed and SOMETIMES the guy with the bolt or the gun actually kills them outright right away, however unusual it is. Note a bolt gun is not SUPPOSED to kill them simply render them unconscious but sadly horses normally wake up within about 30 seconds and are often very much aware when they are hung up. It is also extremely painful for them vs. ruminants which usually are rendered unconscious and stay that way. I was disturbed to read that more of the Canadian plants were going to the bolt gun versus a real gun. I HOPE that is not true although one of them was caught shooting horses with the door to the kill box open and horses behind him. Doesn't take a genius to figure out how badly wrong that could go.
                  Every mighty oak was once a nut that stood its ground.

                  Proud Closet Canterer! Member Riders with Fibromyalgia clique.

                  Comment


                  • #29
                    Remember the story of Cactus Cafe and Canuki?

                    The case of Canuki and Cactus Cafe is nearing its conclusion, at least for the horses. The two Thoroughbreds became famous in May when their surprising return from the Richelieu slaughterhouse in Canada led the horsemeat company to stop accepting Thoroughbreds and raised questions about the effectiveness of racetrack anti-slaughter policies.

                    http://www.drf.com/news/banned-train...aughter-policy
                    Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                    http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                    Comment


                    • #30
                      I know of one track that had to relax it's policy on taking horses directly to slaughter because of all the dead horses in the river bottom with their upper lips cut off. It was creating a public health hazard. The policy is still there, but not enforced at all.
                      Originally posted by The Saddle
                      Perhaps I need my flocking adjusted.

                      Comment


                      • #31
                        Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
                        I just saw this in my facebook feed...

                        http://www.paulickreport.com/feature...ay-many-hands/
                        Thanks for sharing this, Comrade Laura. I love this quote:

                        “It is our responsibility as owners, tracks, breeders, trainers, jockeys, bloodstock agents, and anyone who has a stake in the game to take responsibility for the aftercare of these great animals who are the keystone of our sport,” Wolf said at the time.
                        Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                        http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                        http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                        Comment


                        • #32
                          Originally posted by summerhorse View Post
                          Sometimes even Wayne is right. Even Temple Grandin has admitted that the horse slaughter houses should be monitored by outsiders constantly. And if you don't believe there are plenty of grisly videos and testimony on the net showing it. Now do ALL of the horses suffer like this? No, some live close by, some are sold directly to the plant, some are lucky enough to get through the whole pipeline relatively unscathed and SOMETIMES the guy with the bolt or the gun actually kills them outright right away, however unusual it is. Note a bolt gun is not SUPPOSED to kill them simply render them unconscious but sadly horses normally wake up within about 30 seconds and are often very much aware when they are hung up. It is also extremely painful for them vs. ruminants which usually are rendered unconscious and stay that way. I was disturbed to read that more of the Canadian plants were going to the bolt gun versus a real gun. I HOPE that is not true although one of them was caught shooting horses with the door to the kill box open and horses behind him. Doesn't take a genius to figure out how badly wrong that could go.
                          You are just saying what animal rights activists have been stating..the bolt allows them to awaken and be gutted alive. DOES NOT HAPPEN. In four years monitoring I saw fewer than 25 cases where an emergency procedure had to be followed. There is the immediate impact of the second spear bolt definitely destroys the brain. All that is required is for the heart to keep pumping the blood out. The twitching projected as horse is still alive is just the horse twitching.

                          The industry has grown, changed, has a different mindset and work mantra. In Canada the industry is very well monitored by volunteers (I was one).

                          I guess if the lie is told enough times it circles the globe 10 times before the truth wakes up.
                          The Elephant in the room

                          Comment


                          • #33
                            Originally posted by caffeinated View Post
                            I don't know of any tracks that would have a forever prohibition on horses going to slaughter/auctions. Most that do have rules just prohibit the trainer/owner from selling directly to slaughter. The tracks that we deal with do investigate if horses end up at New Holland or other area "high kill" type auctions, as to how the horse got there. The frustrating thing is if the race owner can say they sold or gave the horse to someone in good faith, they can't really be held accountable (even when there's good indication they knew exactly what they were doing). If horses from one trainer show up repeatedly on 'broker listings' or similar, they can get in trouble. Either way the track rules about this are hard - they are not easy to enforce as there are often third parties involved (and sometimes fourth and fifth parties, even in the space of a week), and also because they encourage people who want to get rid of horses fast to just sort of "disappear" them - sending them with dealers with strict instructions not to try and sell the horse (at auction or otherwise) so they don't get caught (instead going direct to kill). Some tracks will consider a sale to certain dealers they know of the same as sending a horse directly to auction or slaughter, but there's always more people willing to pick up horses for a cheap buck so it's hard to keep up with (and some trainers really are misled or duped, been involved in a few of those situations)



                            CANTER only screens purchasers if the horse has been donated to us and is part of our retraining programs.
                            Exactly this.
                            "When a horse greets you with a nicker & regards you with a large & liquid eye, the question of where you want to be & what you want to do has been answered." CANTER New England

                            Comment


                            • #34
                              Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                              You are just saying what animal rights activists have been stating..the bolt allows them to awaken and be gutted alive. DOES NOT HAPPEN. In four years monitoring I saw fewer than 25 cases where an emergency procedure had to be followed. There is the immediate impact of the second spear bolt definitely destroys the brain. All that is required is for the heart to keep pumping the blood out. The twitching projected as horse is still alive is just the horse twitching.

                              The industry has grown, changed, has a different mindset and work mantra. In Canada the industry is very well monitored by volunteers (I was one).

                              I guess if the lie is told enough times it circles the globe 10 times before the truth wakes up.

                              Sorry but this is the truth and it is a published study (or more than one now) and you can google it and read it all for yourself. Bolt guns are designed for Cows and sheep and works well on them. It is not designed for horses and does not work very well on them. This is the TRUTH.

                              They better not be gutted alive though, they are supposed to be bled out first.
                              Every mighty oak was once a nut that stood its ground.

                              Proud Closet Canterer! Member Riders with Fibromyalgia clique.

                              Comment


                              • #35
                                As for volunteer monitoring that is probably as usefull as our fire inspectorl monitoring was at my previous job when the inspector would call and say I'm coming out on THIS DATE. About THIS TIME. Yeah do you thnk he EVER found anything wrong? The films taken with hidden cameras tell the tale and the industry as a whole has been found lacking.
                                Every mighty oak was once a nut that stood its ground.

                                Proud Closet Canterer! Member Riders with Fibromyalgia clique.

                                Comment


                                • #36
                                  The industry may have been lacking in security and pre-employment checks, but that is about all. Who would have anticipated that a person would come begging for a job, then set about committing severe abuses while filming one another! That is so abnormal to most folks, but it is exactly the modus operandi of the AR groups.

                                  Comment


                                  • #37
                                    The policies at the tracks are only as good as the people behind them.
                                    At many of the tracks the burden of proving the trainer/owner knew that the horses was headed to a bad place is such that there's no punishment and it ends up being nothing more than lip service.

                                    Do the tracks and TB industry do more then the AQHA and other organizations? Sure, but there's a lot of room for improvement and as always the money talks.
                                    Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

                                    http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

                                    Comment


                                    • #38
                                      Originally posted by rustbreeches View Post
                                      I know of one track that had to relax it's policy on taking horses directly to slaughter because of all the dead horses in the river bottom with their upper lips cut off. It was creating a public health hazard. The policy is still there, but not enforced at all.
                                      Ye gods. I think I just threw up in my mouth a little. If this is the kind of scumbags you pro-slaughter people want to jump into bed with, have at it, but leave the rest of us OUT of it please.
                                      "The standard you walk by is the standard you accept."--Lt. Gen. David Morrison, Austalian Army Chief

                                      Comment


                                      • #39
                                        Originally posted by summerhorse View Post
                                        Sorry but this is the truth and it is a published study (or more than one now) and you can google it and read it all for yourself. Bolt guns are designed for Cows and sheep and works well on them. It is not designed for horses and does not work very well on them. This is the TRUTH.

                                        They better not be gutted alive though, they are supposed to be bled out first.
                                        Please tell us which slaughter plant you have been to in the past seven years?
                                        Monitoring goes on EVERY DAY there is a kill floor operation AND the horses are filmed from the intial time into the chute to the final hoist to move the carcas from the killing floor to the area for cutting.
                                        The Elephant in the room

                                        Comment


                                        • #40
                                          If you just hate slaughter and all aspects you will, like some on the boards, try and restrict all aspects of ownership and equine movement. It is not just slaughter they hate..it is the FACT that they can not MAKE others do as they say.

                                          Nothing in the world is 100 percent however this is what THEY demand

                                          The anti group commenting the most have NEVER been to Canada nor to any slaughter plant by their own admissions on other threads. (here on COTH)

                                          I accept slaughter "as an option" and I have worked hard to make sure horses getting dead are treated in a kind manner. I do not try and ban anyone nor stop them from what it is they are doing.

                                          Slaughter is NOT against the law however those who are anti try every trick in the book U Davis etc to make their WISHES into law.
                                          The Elephant in the room

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X