• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

SPINOFF: Should a 'live home' offer at a profit require a 'for kill' owner to sell?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #81
    Originally posted by Guilherme View Post
    Sadly, yes.

    G.
    Only for some classes of people...others have never had it.

    Comment


    • #82
      John Holland Horses for Habitat...remember Angela when you and your buddies were cheering that ALL slaughter was closed ... gone..kaphoot?

      John Holland went on his website almost demanding DONATTIONS as all of these horses caught in the transport pipeline were going to need new homes

      He wanted 1 MILLION DOLLARS so he could provide immediate refuge for the TEN THOUSAND HORSES HE KNEW were in transport. He wanted the money now.

      He continued to run that on his website and blog for almost 10 days and gosh..the money sure was rolling in because he continued to deny the slaughter was back open.

      But..he got caught.

      Just an "honest mistake" he claimed. No fraud intended

      A worthy source for the Rara crowd.
      The Elephant in the room

      Comment


      • #83
        Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
        John Holland Horses for Habitat...remember Angela when you and your buddies were cheering that ALL slaughter was closed ... gone..kaphoot?

        John Holland went on his website almost demanding DONATTIONS as all of these horses caught in the transport pipeline were going to need new homes

        He wanted 1 MILLION DOLLARS so he could provide immediate refuge for the TEN THOUSAND HORSES HE KNEW were in transport. He wanted the money now.

        He continued to run that on his website and blog for almost 10 days and gosh..the money sure was rolling in because he continued to deny the slaughter was back open.

        But..he got caught.

        Just an "honest mistake" he claimed. No fraud intended

        A worthy source for the Rara crowd.
        You have so much to say but none of it is ever about the content of the conversation, the facts of the matter.
        Why is that?
        Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

        http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

        Comment


        • #84
          Originally posted by Lori B View Post
          ...

          But operating a slaughterhouse is a business that essentially turns an individual (Pookey, the horse) into a commodity (horse meat, $X a pound). It makes no damned difference to the SH operator which horse they put in a can. It can make a great deal of difference to the past owner of Pookey who was lied to about his intended destination. Not to mention Pookey himself. So I say, tell the slaughterhouse operator that they are obligated as a condition of their license to sell any horse that an individual shows up to buy w/ cash and a trailer. No questions asked, no bull$hit about what they were told to do.
          ...
          What I am proposing is ONLY FOR SLAUGHTERHOUSES ONLY FOR SLAUGHTERHOUSES as a provision of their licensure.

          This accomplishes 2 things: no more Backstreet Bully stories, or SH loses its license, and people who deem a horse to dangerous to be owned by someone else are obligated to see the deed done themselves.
          Well, to start with, the 'live' home would have to offer more that the horse is worth 'by the pound' to make it worth the SH's time.

          The way (any) assembly line process works means that any deviation from the 'line process' means lost productivity, extra personnel costs, and that increased down time leads to missed deadlines. The "live home" would have to be willing to compensate the SH for all down time, staff time and the cost of the horse (and possibly holding fees). Time is money and most people aren't willing to pay that that time is worth.

          The next issue is how would that live home find 'their' horse (honestly, I don't know how slaughter facilities are run). I strongly doubt that they have a bar code scanner that will tell them that Hip 479 is actually Doc Pine Zip, former beloved horse of Mrs. Noseypants.
          How is the owner supposed to find that horse? Tell the slaughter staff to scour the facility for a sorrel gelding with a sock (remember, time=money)? Is a property and business owner supposed to allow unknown persons to wander about the facility willy-nilly, with or without an escort (more personnel costs)?

          I understand that you are emotional about this, but your proposal makes no logical sense whatsoever.

          The only tried and true way to keep Pookie from slaughter (or starvation, or rollkur, or parelli or whathaveyou) is to never sell.

          Comment


          • #85
            Originally posted by amm2cd View Post
            Well, to start with, the 'live' home would have to offer more that the horse is worth 'by the pound' to make it worth the SH's time.

            The way (any) assembly line process works means that any deviation from the 'line process' means lost productivity, extra personnel costs, and that increased down time leads to missed deadlines. The "live home" would have to be willing to compensate the SH for all down time, staff time and the cost of the horse (and possibly holding fees). Time is money and most people aren't willing to pay that that time is worth.

            The next issue is how would that live home find 'their' horse (honestly, I don't know how slaughter facilities are run). I strongly doubt that they have a bar code scanner that will tell them that Hip 479 is actually Doc Pine Zip, former beloved horse of Mrs. Noseypants.
            How is the owner supposed to find that horse? Tell the slaughter staff to scour the facility for a sorrel gelding with a sock (remember, time=money)? Is a property and business owner supposed to allow unknown persons to wander about the facility willy-nilly, with or without an escort (more personnel costs)?
            Let's change this up a bit to... the slaughter plant is alerted that Pookie [is that what we're calling hypothetical horsie?] is, verifiably, LOADED to the gills with drugs.
            The drugs ALL the consumer groups do not want in the meat they import.
            The bad drugs.
            All of them.
            And large doses of each of them.

            Regardless of why they need to find the horse, they should be able to trace Pookie and locate Pookie... don't you think?

            Re: what I bolded.. ever seen a hip tag? I'm guessing not.
            Last edited by Angela Freda; Apr. 4, 2013, 07:18 PM. Reason: grammer
            Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

            http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

            Comment


            • #86
              Originally posted by amm2cd View Post

              The next issue is how would that live home find 'their' horse (honestly, I don't know how slaughter facilities are run). I strongly doubt that they have a bar code scanner that will tell them that Hip 479 is actually Doc Pine Zip, former beloved horse of Mrs. Noseypants.
              How is the owner supposed to find that horse? Tell the slaughter staff to scour the facility for a sorrel gelding with a sock (remember, time=money)? Is a property and business owner supposed to allow unknown persons to wander about the facility willy-nilly, with or without an escort (more personnel costs)?
              If a horse needs to be found, it can be:

              The case of Canuki and Cactus Cafe is nearing its conclusion, at least for the horses. The two Thoroughbreds became famous in May when their surprising return from the Richelieu slaughterhouse in Canada led the horsemeat company to stop accepting Thoroughbreds and raised questions about the effectiveness of racetrack anti-slaughter policies.

              http://www.drf.com/news/banned-train...aughter-policy
              Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
              http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
              http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

              Comment


              • #87
                Originally posted by Angela Freda View Post
                Let's change this up a bit to... the slaughter plant is alerted that Pookie [is that what we're calling hypothetical horsie?] is, verifiably, LOADED to the gills with drugs.
                The drugs ALL the consumer groups do not want in the meat they import.
                The bad drugs.
                All of them.
                And large doses of each of them.

                Regardless of why they need to find the horse, they should be able to trace Pookie and locate Pookie... don't you think?

                Re: what I bolded.. ever seen a hip tag? I'm guessing not.
                I imagine it would be cheaper and easier to test all outgoing meat processed on XX day, however an potential FDA violation is a very different story than finding a particular horse for a hypothetical and potentially expensive law where a former owner can reclaim said horse on a whim.
                It's a very basic cost analysis; shutting down production to prevent a potential crisis vs inspecting every piece of inventory on the whim on a potentially uninvolved party.

                Oh, and as for 'Pookie'... I believe Lori B started that nickname. We could call it 'Product', for all that it would matter.

                As for the bar code comment. Please read the second half of that sentence. The only way to that a "factory installed" sticker would help Pookie/Product (see what I did there? Just for you.) is if it referenced every bill of sale/breeder/registry info so that the potentially interested party could be reunited with the right plain bay gelding (or however you want to imagine Pookie/Product). If the hip tag only references the information on the coggins that accompanied the horse... well, it may or may not be worth the paper it's written on.

                So, to bounce this back to the OP, I'll say again, that no, the SH is under, and should be under, no obligation to sell.
                JMO, obviously.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #88
                  More on Viande Richelieu declining to accept (USA origin) Thoroughbreds apparently to avoid disruption of plant business to find horses in the future.

                  http://www.drf.com/news/canadian-sla...-thoroughbreds

                  I do wonder how they were able to export 'for meat only' horses from Canada: I'm going to assume they were not precisely that since they seem to have gone past the 72 hour processing rule?

                  People interested in recovering horses really ought to dig for the details on this one. It only takes one to set a precedent.

                  Comment


                  • #89
                    I find the assertion that showing up with $$ and a trailer and a hip number (I want that horse there.) is catastrophically disruptive to slaughterhouses to be laughable and not plausible. Are you saying that slaughterhouses have exactly no downtime, not even a crappy paddock that horses about to be processed are kept in before they are killed and cut to bits? It's just one giant well-oiled machine without 10 seconds of slack? Really?

                    It is my understanding that in the most egregious of these cases, the person seeking to acquire a slaughterbound horse knew exactly which hip number they wanted. There was no question of identity, there was just inexcusably shitty behaviour on the part of the SH staff.

                    I am not suggesting that staff have to sort through the horses to find anything but a hip number. As usual on this thread, people argue with my proposal by either inventing circumstances that are not part of what I suggest, or by saying some version of "it's mine, and you can't make me". The volume and incoherence of the arguments against that I am hearing makes me believe that it's a pretty good idea.

                    And IF this proposal is such a catastrophe for slaughterhouses, then I guess they had better be sure that they don't acquire horses through lying and misrepresentation.

                    Just not seeing any problems here.

                    Any day that I make veins stand up on Fairfax's forehead is a day that I consider a success.
                    I tolerate all kinds of animal idiosyncrasies.
                    I've found that I don't tolerate people idiosyncrasies as well. - Casey09

                    Comment


                    • #90
                      Lori,

                      Perhaps you should turn up your hearing aid! Behaviour as you suggest would currently have you arrested in Canada and possibly charged with terrorism.
                      Your attitude that you know better than anyone else is laughable. Once again, it sounds like Wayne has managed to send one of his hired posters to the board to stir it up!

                      Comment


                      • #91
                        I don't agree with LoriB that it would be as simple as it sounds to pull a particular horse from a slaughter plant, but terrorism? Really?

                        7arabians, LoriB has been posting on COTH for almost 10 years...paid poster? I think not. However, I do wonder what financial interest you have in the slaughter industry. Either that or you're channeling Kelsey LeFever.

                        Comrade Laura

                        Comment


                        • #92
                          Laura,
                          You are well aware of Wayne's rara sisterhood's tactics. They are called 'sleepers' and only post when directed by Wayne. Lori's clearly acting at the behest of the man!

                          Comment


                          • #93
                            Now LoriB is a sleeper? Been watching The Americans on TV a little too often?

                            So what's your financial interest in slaughter, 7arabians?

                            Comment


                            • #94
                              I don't think it would be terrible to inconvenience a slaughterhouse and that is terrorism? Wow.

                              The fact that this crowd once again is stuck resorting to calling people who disagree with them and don't accept their assertions that they work for Wayne Pacelle tells you all you need to know about actual arguments that they have available to them: none.

                              Ranting is done on my own time and on my own dime. Sorry to prove you wrong again.
                              I tolerate all kinds of animal idiosyncrasies.
                              I've found that I don't tolerate people idiosyncrasies as well. - Casey09

                              Comment


                              • #95
                                Lori
                                Which slaughter plant have you gone to for a full inspection?

                                When, Where and who was the operating company?
                                The Elephant in the room

                                Comment


                                • #96
                                  I don't care if this isn't 'workable', according to whomever. And anyone who let's themself be suckered into caring what slaughter houses want is being duped.

                                  Y'all do not get it. I am ok w/ a rule like this making life difficult for slaughterhouses. I am not trying to make their lives run smoothly so that they get home at 5 on the dot to wash the blood off their hands.

                                  This rules intention is to put the burden on slaughterhouses to not source horses which have been fraudulently acquired or which have willing and present alternative buyers. Don't try to tell me that there are never any such horses in slaughterhouses, because we hear quite plausible reports of such on this board quite regularly.

                                  People like Fairfax and his cohort make it sound like slaughterhouses are doing us all a favor by operating, and that any request that they comply with any kind of openness about drugs, or where the horses come from will shatter the precious role they play in upholding .. god only knows what. But in fact, slaughterhouses require all kinds of things from the communities in which they are located. They stink to high heaven, they are huge users of clean water (which is getting scarcer and scarcer), their waste is processed through wastewater treatment facilities which are built with their communities property taxes, they are served by police and firefighters which are funded by taxes, they are inspected by FDA inspectors (or your local equivalent in Canada, etc.) which are also funded by ... your taxes! (are you starting to see a theme here?)

                                  Expecting such facilities to accept and abide by regulations is, when you think of it this way, simple reciprocity. You operate in our community, benefit from our tax base, then you play by our rules. Letting propertarians tell us that regulations are an unconscionable abridgement of their sacred freedom is baloney.

                                  The right is obsessed with 'you don't get something for nothing.' Well, I say, that's right. Businesses shouldn't expect to benefit from all the tax-funded amenities that underly their ability to operate without accepting some reasonable level of regulation. And I still believe that people seeking specific horses will be quite rare. They will be even more rare if SHs stop buying from notorious brokers who lie to acquire horses. Such brokers are routinely discussed on this board, so don't tell me there is no such thing.

                                  Slaughter opponents: don't let your desire to appear reasonable to this crowd cow you into accepting their terms of debate and their shrieking assertions of grievance and woe. Be skeptical, and don't give ground to bullies.

                                  The fact that I am drawing such of stream of angst from them is all the proof you need that they know they are losing.
                                  I tolerate all kinds of animal idiosyncrasies.
                                  I've found that I don't tolerate people idiosyncrasies as well. - Casey09

                                  Comment


                                  • #97
                                    Bute is not the only problem. How about Furazone? That's my go to with DMSO for a sweat. Furall too...when you could still buy it.

                                    Comment


                                    • #98
                                      Lori

                                      The Fort MacLeod slaughter plant is well accepted in Fort MacLeod. It provides employment. It has been a long time employer (decades)

                                      They are located about 5 miles out of the town. There is a lot of land for grazing for many of the horses (640 acre land groups) plus they grow their own feed plus purchase grains from the local economy.


                                      Slaughter plants do not solicit stolen horses or fraudently acquired horses knowingly.

                                      They are as careful as they can be however they are not going to run DNA checks on horses that were purchased for slaughter. You might not be aware but many years ago there was a form one could attach to the AQHA papers saying Person X wanted to be notified if horse was going to slaughter so they could save it.

                                      They spent THOUSANDS of dollars and probably the same in hours and phone calls to these people who had died, lost interest, didn't care OR wanted the horse returned to the U.S. for FREE.,

                                      People did sue to try and block slaughter by claiming they had been promised first buy back rights for THAT horse etc.

                                      It just did not work.

                                      They pay taxes. They are not heavy users of water any more than "a truck stock with 20 bays for the large Road King groups). Those sludge oil and chemicals right back into the water.

                                      The taxes are charged to the company including the shipping companies for transportation of the horses to the plant and also the frozen meat boxes to export. ALL companies receive benefits such as police protection and fire department. Why would they need to be excluded. Their employees pay school taxes and so does the business based on their property value and since they do not farm the land, they are also charged a yearly tax on it..something farmers and ranchers do not have to pay



                                      Social services pays for young girls to have a safe delivery for their child out of wedlock. Taxes pay for that even if I disagree with it. Taxes pay for seniors to have a better living by offering them subsidized housing. Individuals with disabilities are given subsidization out of my taxes.

                                      The roads I travel are paid for by taxes and are driven on by members of church faiths I do not agree with however I do not believe they should be excluded from using them just because I don't care for their religion.

                                      Strange. You think you are winning? My gosh...how wrong you are
                                      The Elephant in the room

                                      Comment

                                      Working...
                                      X