• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

And another one falls through the cracks! :(

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Original Poster

    #41
    Fairfax, you know it all don't you?
    Stronach does help the horses they breed which is a lot more than many do...
    For a few years, I have been convinced and so have many of my friends, that Bluey and that other pro slaughterd guy who died, were paid by the pro slaughter to keep on harping their message.
    Now Fairfax is one of them as well.

    I have put you on ignore anyway since you use up too much of Coth band... oh and Alagirl too... I understand you are pro slaughter, fine. Accept that I am anti.. I don't have to keep reading your arguments which are really old!

    Comment


    • #42
      Originally posted by LauraKY View Post
      Hey Jenm, now you have a group too! That's you, me and Angela. Anyone else want to join the commie, socialist, vegan (did I leave anything out) RARAs?

      Comrade readers of the communist, vegan Toronto Star (the most widely read paper in Canada, by the way) unite!

      Comrade Laura
      Me too, me too. Except that I'm a carnivore. Can I still join?????

      Comment


      • #43
        Originally posted by FalseImpression View Post
        Fairfax, you know it all don't you?
        Stronach does help the horses they breed which is a lot more than many do...
        For a few years, I have been convinced and so have many of my friends, that Bluey and that other pro slaughterd guy who died, were paid by the pro slaughter to keep on harping their message.
        Now Fairfax is one of them as well.

        I have put you on ignore anyway since you use up too much of Coth band... oh and Alagirl too... I understand you are pro slaughter, fine. Accept that I am anti.. I don't have to keep reading your arguments which are really old!
        Curious, I think there are some here that work for animal rights groups and part of their job is cruise web sites to push their disruptive propaganda.

        And no, I don't work or am paid by anyone.

        I may say, I have known slaughter and it's purpose in two continents and several countries and know it is not the evil certain posters want to make of it.
        Slaughter is a process by which we use SOME horses once more, as the natural, renewable resource horses have always been thru that process and still are in most of the world that uses horses, nothing more or less.

        I think many here don't know at all what slaughter really is and go by myths and propaganda only.

        I will say, with what I know of what slaughter is, it doesn't make sense at all to ban it, any more than banning rescues, because some and more all the time seem to be abusing/mismanaging horses.

        Comment


        • #44
          Originally posted by Bluey View Post
          I heard the HSUS, being the richest animal rights extremist non-profit in the world, has over 50 attorneys employed and they pay good and have excellent benefits, courtesy of all those donations from the public, that thinks is giving to save the little sad kitten in their envelopes.
          You may have a bright future there.
          Thanks

          Comment


          • #45
            Originally posted by Discobold View Post
            Thanks
            I may warn you, I have known people that worked for them long ago and didn't stay there long.
            The things that went on were not what they wanted to be part of.
            They didn't specify what it was, just that it was not what they wanted in their professional lives.
            Don't know how things are today, or may be by the time you may be eligible for a position there.

            Comment


            • #46
              Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
              Present an alternative that does not cost the tax payer, and you will have the ears of the government.
              You are kidding, right?
              ************************
              \"Horses lend us the wings we lack\"

              Comment


              • #47
                Originally posted by betonbill View Post
                Me too, me too. Except that I'm a carnivore. Can I still join?????
                Welcome to the group, Comrade betonbill!

                Originally posted by Discobold View Post
                Me! Me! My dream is one day - not so far in the future - to use my legal and writing skills to further the agenda of commie do-gooder animal-loving vegans.
                Comrade Discobold, you a welcome addition to the group!
                Last edited by jenm; Mar. 30, 2013, 09:52 PM. Reason: added quote
                Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                Comment


                • #48
                  Originally posted by jenm View Post
                  Welcome to my group, Comrade Ginger!
                  Thank you, Comrade JenM! This is taking cliques to the next level...
                  Trying a life outside of FEI tents and hotel rooms.

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                    Lori

                    I have stated as many times as possible Slaughter is only ONE piece of the puzzle. I have read the posts looking for alternatives for 100,000 horses for one year. There have been some good suggestions i.e. support some rescues but when I check them out...it is always same old same old with new MONEY sponsors i.e. Purina...but they are not even giving money..if you purchase goods from the online store...a little percentage goes to the rescue. Better than nothing but nothing new.

                    I have worked trying to get the registration groups to forge a union for advertising in non horse publications extolling horse ownership and health benefits...rather than poaching members from a diminishing group.

                    They are luke warm as they feel their "competition" will get ahead of them.

                    Breeders have reduced each year by 50% according to the records published by registration bodies.

                    Euthanization clinics have been suggested. Did you read the thread about the dead Bald Eagles from a lady who euthanized horses and did not bury them. Both she and her vet can be charged and found guilty of criminal charges and fined $50,000 PER eagle..

                    The U.S. article also stated rendering the euthanized horse was not a good idea due to residue found in the meat and other animals might die..be eaten..and kill more...

                    Incineration appears to be the governments only positive but gosh..it is expensive if one can even find one and then pay for hauling.

                    I, like many others will gladly support a VIABLE alternative. Turning them out on Government owned land doesn't work. Chemical castration or even neutering stops more babies but does not cure the problem

                    According to the USDA the average age is 6 and over..and the new breed of choice is the prolific warmblood producers. (or so I am told)...making them equal to the QH numbers.

                    As I support slaughter I have worked (volunteered) to make it as safe and stress free as possible. My own time and my own money every week for four years (I no longer do it)..

                    Present an alternative that does not cost the tax payer, and you will have the ears of the government.

                    Present an alternative that does not bankrupt the breeder with forever taxes and you will have the ears of the breeders

                    I am sure interested in valid suggestions?
                    Why in the DEVIL do you keep harpin' on this? You're like the flippin' Angel of Death or something. You just have to keep these threads going endlessly while you hurl the RARA epithet at anyone who disagrees, and keep dragging everyone who can stand it through the process from auction to rendering.

                    All I know is, anybody who can look a 2-year-old or an old granddad schoolie in the eyes and put 'em on one of those trucks has got a big, yawning BLACK HOLE where their compassion ought to be.

                    And arguing endlessly in favor of it makes one imagine a few set-screws that need a turn or two, frankly.

                    Our vet just put on a new Dr. who has an interest in equine geriatrics. As does the whole firm, whose Senior Wellness program is quite successful. Wave 'o the future, though I suppose it doesn't win you as many cowgirl-badass points, eh?

                    I'd like to log on here ONCE and not see a possumbelly-wreck thread!

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      Lady,
                      Sorry you are finding the truth so upsetting! Obviously, you are a proud member of the rara sisterhood. One reason nobody can say what amount of bute is permissible in humans because there is no proof that any human has ever developed any measurable amount of bute or its derivatives. In fact, it would require to a human to eat 500-600 horse meat burgers/day for years, just to reach a level where testing could detect it!
                      So, as Easter arrives, let us embrace Spring and open our minds to the truth!
                      And by the way, a special shout-out to Carol 'hfs' for helping the Oklahoma horse slaughter bill to pass.

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        This story is so sad. I agree that the most disturbing part is that someone tried to buy the horse, but was turned down. What kind of awful person and/or businessperson turns down the opportunity to make a profit?

                        I don't care if I would have to eat 600 horsemeat burgers/day (that is a ridicuous number which makes you look nuts, but whatever I'll go with it), I don't want anything I'm eating to have been given drugs or other substances that can cause significant problems in humans. I happily eat beef because cows are bred and raised with the intention of human consumption. Although I take issue with some of the farming and slaughter practices, I can tailor my shopping to reflect my preferences. I don't support that which I find inhumane.

                        If you want to raise and breed horses for human consumption, which includes submitting to the same regulations we expect of cattle farmers, and then slaughter them humanely, have at it.

                        Until then, I will continue to be anti-slaughter and anti-crazy.

                        Comrade Big Red

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Originally posted by big_red_ottb View Post
                          This story is so sad. I agree that the most disturbing part is that someone tried to buy the horse, but was turned down. What kind of awful person and/or businessperson turns down the opportunity to make a profit?

                          I don't care if I would have to eat 600 horsemeat burgers/day (that is a ridicuous number which makes you look nuts, but whatever I'll go with it), I don't want anything I'm eating to have been given drugs or other substances that can cause significant problems in humans. I happily eat beef because cows are bred and raised with the intention of human consumption. Although I take issue with some of the farming and slaughter practices, I can tailor my shopping to reflect my preferences. I don't support that which I find inhumane.

                          If you want to raise and breed horses for human consumption, which includes submitting to the same regulations we expect of cattle farmers, and then slaughter them humanely, have at it.

                          Until then, I will continue to be anti-slaughter and anti-crazy.

                          Comrade Big Red
                          Comrade Big Red, I salute you!

                          Originally posted by GingerJumper View Post
                          Thank you, Comrade JenM! This is taking cliques to the next level...
                          Proud owner of a Slaughter-Bound TB from a feedlot, and her surprise baby...!
                          http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e350/Jen4USC/fave.jpg
                          http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e3...SC/running.jpg

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            Originally posted by 7arabians View Post
                            Lady,
                            Sorry you are finding the truth so upsetting! Obviously, you are a proud member of the rara sisterhood. One reason nobody can say what amount of bute is permissible in humans because there is no proof that any human has ever developed any measurable amount of bute or its derivatives. In fact, it would require to a human to eat 500-600 horse meat burgers/day for years, just to reach a level where testing could detect it!
                            So, as Easter arrives, let us embrace Spring and open our minds to the truth!
                            And by the way, a special shout-out to Carol 'hfs' for helping the Oklahoma horse slaughter bill to pass.
                            Sweetie, you need to open your mind to education and comprehension, then maybe truth will be able to come to you.

                            Your lack of knowledge is glaringly obvious every time you post this type of BS. A "fact" is not made because some politician is quoted saying nonsense off the cuff. As for the issue on bute, there is plenty enough evidence that it became policy for the FDA, USDA, EU, CFIA, etc, etc.

                            Your RARA cries went a quite a bit "off course" in the other thread when you foolishly branded Jswan of being a RARA. Grow up, and learn what a RARA really is. Here is a hint, despite your apparent adoration of Fairfax, he is not quite sure what a RARA is, either.
                            Annabelle Mayr, Arcadia Farm
                            Home of Fitz, Austria & Erin
                            Now over the Rainbow Bridge: Daeo, Max, Finn, Jake, Seamus & Pleasure

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Originally posted by big_red_ottb View Post
                              This story is so sad. I agree that the most disturbing part is that someone tried to buy the horse, but was turned down. What kind of awful person and/or businessperson turns down the opportunity to make a profit?

                              I don't care if I would have to eat 600 horsemeat burgers/day (that is a ridicuous number which makes you look nuts, but whatever I'll go with it), I don't want anything I'm eating to have been given drugs or other substances that can cause significant problems in humans. I happily eat beef because cows are bred and raised with the intention of human consumption. Although I take issue with some of the farming and slaughter practices, I can tailor my shopping to reflect my preferences. I don't support that which I find inhumane.

                              If you want to raise and breed horses for human consumption, which includes submitting to the same regulations we expect of cattle farmers, and then slaughter them humanely, have at it.

                              Until then, I will continue to be anti-slaughter and anti-crazy.

                              Comrade Big Red
                              I, too, salute you, Comrade Big Red! Well said.
                              Trying a life outside of FEI tents and hotel rooms.

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                So, dear comrades, what exactly is a RARA? I think I should know since I just signed up to be one. I think my "aha" moment came when I just got plain old tired of apologizing for being a vegetarian, non-smoker, animal lover, tree hugger who drives a hybrid

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  Theoretically, I do believe it is possible to improve the welfare of horses destined for slaughter. There are currently rules and regulations regarding the handling, transport and actual slaughter. I do believe that these are not adhered to often enough and that offenders are rarely prosecuted, but theoretically, it could be enforced to improve the welfare.

                                  I do have an issue with slaughtering for human consumption an animal that has not been raised for food. We currently do have rules and regulations regarding how more "typical" animals are raised and what can be fed or administered to these animals. This is done to ensure the integrity of the human food chain. I believe it is entirely wrong to have lesser standards for horses intended for human consumption. Current testing standards are entirely too lax. According to USDA published standards, every horse must be visually inspected to ensure that it is ambulatory and does not outwardly appear diseased. After that visual inspection, only 1 in 300 horses (or minimum of 1 per week) is all that is required to actually be tested for drug residues, etc. That is no where near a statistically relevant sampling of a population that has mostly individual histories of feed/medications, by that I mean that they were not raised by the same source farm/ranch.

                                  The current EID documents are inadequate as well. First of all, if answered truthfully to the spirit of the document, it still only requires 6 months of history and there are plenty of commonly administered substances which are, by regulation, never to administered to animals intended for human consumption. In actual practice, the document is pretty meaningless as illustrated by the fate of Backstreet Bully and many, many others.

                                  I do not understand how the pro-slaughter faction can continue to push that breaking these regulations is a non-issue. If regulations regarding possible contamination of the human food chain are blown off, how in the world can the industry expect the general population to believe their other promises to improve compliance on past infractions.

                                  If we are to believe in the inevitablity of Bluey's constant repetition of the slippery slope argument, then that would mean that if we allow the rules to be less stringent for horses, then the next thing that is going to happen is that the ag industry is going to want to lower the standards for other animals for human consumption as well. Hmmm, that is not something I want happening in my country and to our food supply.

                                  Fairfax constantly alludes to new testing that will allow them to test every horse while it is still alive. I have asked for him to tell us more about this, but he has ignored every one of my requests so I have to question if this is really being developed. A test such as this would be important and would show that the industry is truly trying to improve.
                                  Annabelle Mayr, Arcadia Farm
                                  Home of Fitz, Austria & Erin
                                  Now over the Rainbow Bridge: Daeo, Max, Finn, Jake, Seamus & Pleasure

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Originally posted by 7arabians View Post
                                    Lady,
                                    Sorry you are finding the truth so upsetting! Obviously, you are a proud member of the rara sisterhood. One reason nobody can say what amount of bute is permissible in humans because there is no proof that any human has ever developed any measurable amount of bute or its derivatives. In fact, it would require to a human to eat 500-600 horse meat burgers/day for years, just to reach a level where testing could detect it!
                                    So, as Easter arrives, let us embrace Spring and open our minds to the truth!
                                    And by the way, a special shout-out to Carol 'hfs' for helping the Oklahoma horse slaughter bill to pass.
                                    You are one sick puppy.

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      Originally posted by ADM7040 View Post
                                      Theoretically, I do believe it is possible to improve the welfare of horses destined for slaughter. There are currently rules and regulations regarding the handling, transport and actual slaughter. I do believe that these are not adhered to often enough and that offenders are rarely prosecuted, but theoretically, it could be enforced to improve the welfare.

                                      I do have an issue with slaughtering for human consumption an animal that has not been raised for food. We currently do have rules and regulations regarding how more "typical" animals are raised and what can be fed or administered to these animals. This is done to ensure the integrity of the human food chain. I believe it is entirely wrong to have lesser standards for horses intended for human consumption. Current testing standards are entirely too lax. According to USDA published standards, every horse must be visually inspected to ensure that it is ambulatory and does not outwardly appear diseased. After that visual inspection, only 1 in 300 horses (or minimum of 1 per week) is all that is required to actually be tested for drug residues, etc. That is no where near a statistically relevant sampling of a population that has mostly individual histories of feed/medications, by that I mean that they were not raised by the same source farm/ranch.

                                      The current EID documents are inadequate as well. First of all, if answered truthfully to the spirit of the document, it still only requires 6 months of history and there are plenty of commonly administered substances which are, by regulation, never to administered to animals intended for human consumption. In actual practice, the document is pretty meaningless as illustrated by the fate of Backstreet Bully and many, many others.

                                      I do not understand how the pro-slaughter faction can continue to push that breaking these regulations is a non-issue. If regulations regarding possible contamination of the human food chain are blown off, how in the world can the industry expect the general population to believe their other promises to improve compliance on past infractions.

                                      If we are to believe in the inevitablity of Bluey's constant repetition of the slippery slope argument, then that would mean that if we allow the rules to be less stringent for horses, then the next thing that is going to happen is that the ag industry is going to want to lower the standards for other animals for human consumption as well. Hmmm, that is not something I want happening in my country and to our food supply.

                                      Fairfax constantly alludes to new testing that will allow them to test every horse while it is still alive. I have asked for him to tell us more about this, but he has ignored every one of my requests so I have to question if this is really being developed. A test such as this would be important and would show that the industry is truly trying to improve.
                                      Summed up in a nutshell.

                                      Comrade betonbill

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Originally posted by Discobold View Post
                                        So, dear comrades, what exactly is a RARA? I think I should know since I just signed up to be one. I think my "aha" moment came when I just got plain old tired of apologizing for being a vegetarian, non-smoker, animal lover, tree hugger who drives a hybrid
                                        Radical Animal Rights Activist, I believe. Welcome, Comrade Discobold!
                                        Trying a life outside of FEI tents and hotel rooms.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          Good morning Comrades. Power to the horses!

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X