• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Would you get involved?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Would you get involved?

    This question is theoretical.

    Would you help in a possible lawsuit against a trainer in either of the below ways?

    1) If you had a horse trained by the same trainer and had serious issues with the horse/training, would you be willing to provide your experience as evidence?

    2) As a trainer, if you were asked by a lawyer to assess a horse's mental state/training for a legal proceeding, would you?
    Freeing worms from cans everywhere!

  • #2
    Can only answer to 1).
    If I had serious issues to the point I had severed my relationship with the trainer, yes I would provide my experience as evidence, with a time line giving the issues and any bills incurred, vet, excessive charges, whatever.

    If I had issues with a trainer and had removed my horses but not severed a relationship, ie continued to lesson there or show with said trainer, just made the effort to move the horses home to oversee their care, then I would only give evidence if the issues were precisely the same as what drove me to move the horses home.

    If I had issues but preferred to complain and live with it, then obviously I don't really have an issue and wouldn't give evidence.

    For 2) I'm not a trainer, and a horse's mental state is so subjective, think of the thread on horses behaving differently at different barns. Not able to give an opinion besides the above.
    Courageous Weenie Eventer Wannabe
    Incredible Invisible

    Comment


    • #3
      That would depend a lot on who was suing the trainer and why, what my relationship was to that person, and whether I felt there was sufficient moral or financial cause why that person should be sued and possibly even out of business.

      It would have to be a very serious matter affecting me personally to get involved in a snake pit like this.

      Comment

      • Original Poster

        #4
        Originally posted by Lady Eboshi View Post
        That would depend a lot on who was suing the trainer and why, what my relationship was to that person, and whether I felt there was sufficient moral or financial cause why that person should be sued and possibly even out of business.

        It would have to be a very serious matter affecting me personally to get involved in a snake pit like this.
        I would think the lawyer would want someone NOT involved to be able to be more objective. My other thought is, that the trainer would just be assessing the horse's current state, and not assessing the guilt or innocence of the trainer: that would be up to the court correct? Let's assume the trainer assessing does not know the name of the trainer who is being sued in order to remain objective.
        Freeing worms from cans everywhere!

        Comment


        • #5
          #1 - yes

          #2 - what they are asking for is an expert witness. I wouldn't do it without a) consulting my own attorney and if that was OK b) garnering a big fee.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by CHT View Post
            2) As a trainer, if you were asked by a lawyer to assess a horse's mental state/training for a legal proceeding, would you?
            I'm not a trainer, but this is something I do as a behaviorist. Generally the attorneys I've worked for want expert witnesses who are either PhD behaviorists or veterinarians to make these kind of assessments. I'm sure there are exceptions, but I haven't worked on a case where either side brought in a trainer for such an assessment. If they did, I would expert the trainer to be treated as an expert witness.
            Visit us at Bluebonnet Equine Humane Society - www.bluebonnetequine.org

            Want to get involved in rescue or start your own? Check out How to Start a Horse Rescue - www.howtostartarescue.com

            Comment


            • #7
              I am not a trainer and so can only answer No. 1, but if it were about safety or abusiveness, then yes. I would. If I believed that the trainer's actions were abusive and illegal or were likely to cause harm to people or animals in the future, then I'd feel a moral obligation to do so. But if it was like a he-said-she-said barn-drama type thing or a disagreement over non-abusive training methods, then I'd probably mind my own beeswax.
              Last edited by suzier444; Mar. 25, 2013, 05:31 PM. Reason: failure to form words into sentences

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by CHT View Post
                This question is theoretical.

                Would you help in a possible lawsuit against a trainer in either of the below ways?

                1) If you had a horse trained by the same trainer and had serious issues with the horse/training, would you be willing to provide your experience as evidence?

                2) As a trainer, if you were asked by a lawyer to assess a horse's mental state/training for a legal proceeding, would you?
                Only 1 could apply for me. It would definitely depend on situation if I would volunteer anything. I haven't been in a situation with a trainer causing an injury to a horse, so it's hard to say - injuries happen, and most of them are just because horses are a pain, not due to negligence or recklessness from a trainer. If I saw a trainer making a pattern of injuring horses and I had a first hand account, I thik I would volunteer to testify if it could possibly help the case, and would of course testify as required if subpoenaed.

                In a real situation, if someone I knew had a horse who had to be put down due to lack of timely care or water I would volunteer to testify against the former BO who gave far less than what I feel is the minimum for care at a supposedly full care facility.
                Originally posted by Silverbridge
                If you get anything on your Facebook feed about who is going to the Olympics in 2012 or guessing the outcome of Bush v Gore please start threads about those, too.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Overall, I'd probably not offer anything given how things backfire on me.

                  But, a big but, if I were apt to do so, if I heard numerous similar stories of a certain trainer who actually did the riding (not an underling), then depending on circumstances, may help out, but only from some sort of distance. I even get nervous sometimes on this board about some of my experiences, relating them in this sue-happy society.

                  As for the second part, I wouldn't as far as I can see. Horses can act just fine with me or my kids and being a real jerk with someone else or vice versa. Maybe the barn is scary or the firing range behind the house sets the horse off or whatever. I don't see how that can be done. Nothing stays the same when a horse is even moved from that side of the property to this side of the property. So, I'd beg off or fly under the radar in order not to be noticed and possibly asked.
                  GR24's Musing #19 - Save the tatas!!

                  Comment

                  • Original Poster

                    #10
                    Keep in mind for #2 the trainer is not being asked to comment on the actions/incident, just on the current state of the horse's training.

                    So not a:
                    - Do you think the trainer did his job?
                    But rather a:
                    - Is this horse currently exhibiting behaviour that would make you question getting on it and/or are its reactions what you would consider typical for a horse its age and with its experience.
                    Freeing worms from cans everywhere!

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by CHT View Post
                      Keep in mind for #2 the trainer is not being asked to comment on the actions/incident, just on the current state of the horse's training.

                      So not a:
                      - Do you think the trainer did his job?
                      But rather a:
                      - Is this horse currently exhibiting behaviour that would make you question getting on it and/or are its reactions what you would consider typical for a horse its age and with its experience.
                      Regardless, they are asking for a professional opinion. It's an assessment. If you don't have a professional way to make the assessment that will stand up in court AND you can't back it up with some sort of credentials, you may (will?) get taken to task if the whole mess goes to trial and the trainer's attorney has his/her way with you. That's why I suggested talking to YOUR attorney first - it's a reality check re: the rules of evidence and the in and outs of being an expert witness.

                      (I am not an attorney but have involved with just enough trials to be dangerous. Or to have a standing piece of advice which is: consult your attorney!!!)

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by CHT View Post
                        Keep in mind for #2 the trainer is not being asked to comment on the actions/incident, just on the current state of the horse's training.

                        So not a:
                        - Do you think the trainer did his job?
                        But rather a:
                        - Is this horse currently exhibiting behaviour that would make you question getting on it and/or are its reactions what you would consider typical for a horse its age and with its experience.
                        Of this, I'm pretty sure I could answer for a using western horse trained using traditional methods, plus add in a bit of hunt seat and lower level dressage. However, if the 'training system' (whatever that is) used is something like the Peps, then, nope, I wouldn't know because it would be like asking what Pluto's surface looks like. I couldn't tell you although I've had some of their training on a couple of my horses and thought it was terrible.

                        So, there's that line of thought too. All in all, I'd prolly just try to wiggle out of it and go about my way.
                        Last edited by goneriding24; Mar. 25, 2013, 10:48 PM. Reason: Clarifying.
                        GR24's Musing #19 - Save the tatas!!

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X