• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Disgusting - Video of a horse shot in the head by a slaughter proponent in New Mexico

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Good grief. Shooting a horse in the head to kill it is about as humane as it gets. I prefer it to injection, myself.

    When riding in remote areas we always make sure someone has a gun just in case. If a horse suffers a catastrophic injury we sure don't want it to suffer.

    When I whipped in foxhunting back east and carried a pistol loaded with rat shot, I always had bullets in my vest pocket for the same reason. Yes, I will shoot my own horse to spare it suffering. If I don't have a gun, I'll slit its throat with a knife.

    I perceive that many of you think that is just 'awful,' so you'd be standing there wringing your hands and sobbing and allowing your horse to suffer until 'someone else' takes care of the problem.

    Just like many of you supported the slaughter ban to force horses to travel further to their deaths. If it isn't in your back yard, you don't care what happens to them.

    Shame on you.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Sannois View Post
      In spite of last minute attempts by animal rights extremists to slander an entire segment of animal agriculture by introducing Congressional action (S. 541 - a bill to prevent human health threats posed by the consumption of equines with others to follow...) that offers zero solution whatsoever to the dire circumstances facing the horse industry--the truth is that horse people are moving forward to provide a better future for horses and horse people.

      Radical groups, led by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and their supporters on Capitol Hill and inside the White House seek to destroy what vestige is left of the U.S. horse industry.
      Nonetheless, the Law is the Law, and right now the Law is behind the horse industry allowing us to move forward with positive, humane systems, that ensure the highest standards of verified food safety, preserving the value, and incentivizing the proper care of all horses in the United States.

      Several horse processing plants in the United States are set to begin operations very soon.
      These plants have accomplished most or all of their required modifications to their facilities and will be requesting final walk through inspections, approval to begin operations, and the assignment of inspectors.

      USDA has indicated that under current law they will be providing the necessary regulation and inspection.

      These plants, and others that will be follow, have modified not only their physical plants to accommodate the unique characteristics of the equine species, but their Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) plans and their Standard Operating Procedures to include extremely rigorous, thorough, and scientifically validated testing of every carcass that will ensure that no drug residue can ever enter the human food chain, and that every plant has installed humane handling systems and procedures that go above and beyond the U.S. Humane Methods of Slaughter law.

      There are eager markets awaiting the opening of these facilities both here in the United States and internationally. Cheval, which is the common term for meat from the equine species in the same way that beef is the term for meat from cattle, and pork is the term from hogs, is highly sought after by ethnic, gourmet, health and nutritionally interested, and value conscious consumers.


      Strong support nationwide for the horse industry is perhaps most evident right now in Oklahoma where a pair of pro-horse industry bills that will allow processing to begin in that state are sailing through the State Legislature.

      Just this past Wednesday more than 400 articulate supporters of the legislation led by the Oklahoma Farm Bureau and a host of other Ag organizations showed up for a rally at the Capitol, and not a single anti-slaughter activist!

      The week before a pathetic showing of anti-horse advocates at what was billed to be a "massive" rally against the bills achieved numbers barely above single digits, outnumbered by the media covering the event, illustrated the out of touch mentality of these extremist groups.

      Attached to this press release is a report originally produced by IEBA last Fall, the Promise of Cheval, and updated regularly as new science and information becomes available, as well as a Facts and FAQs document that answers common questions about the ethical and responsible production of cheval.

      Below are documents testifying to the position of the States and the Tribes in regards to this issue--powerful entities that stand solidly behind the broader horse industry in this struggle to ensure that horses and horse owners have humane options that provide value, and therefor ensures the welfare of horses in the U.S.
      And this is obviously not a anti.
      Do not know this woman, but from what it sounds like Slaughter in the US will be back and an industry.
      I know that I myself will never eat"Cheval"
      but IF it really is humanely done. If that will ever happen that a slaughter house is built that is specifically for horses and addresses all the issues of poor processes of the past.
      There seem to be a whole lot of newer videos of slaughter I had never seen before, Barring the russian one..
      the biggest problem in most of them is the isolation and immobilizing of the head. Where the whole problem lies.
      watching cattle ones they are accurate and quick, but the cattle are smaller and have their necks immobilized.
      Why that cannot be done with horses I do not quite get.
      Once they are dead they are dead.
      The part that occurs after the stunning, is unpleasant in all species. But the only one who cares are the people looking at it. It is the process up to that point that counts.
      To me if it truly was run as an industry here in the US for profit it is going to be better regulated and more efficient.
      I find the rhetorical choices in that press release fascinating. According to the sourced material's argument, those who disagree with their perspective on horse slaughter are "anti-horse", "extremists", "slander(ous)", "radical", "pathetic", etc. For an organization that sets itself up as a spokes-entity for "the horse businesses and families of the World by protecting their economic, legislative, regulatory, judicial, environmental, custom and cultural interests" (see source), they certainly do an excellent job employing inflammatory and divisive language.

      Since those that run the "International Equine Business Association" also own and run Chevideco, a company that deals in live horses for slaughter as well as the rendered meat of said animals, their benevolence and credibility is -- frankly -- suspect.
      Piaffe Girl -- Dressage. Fashionably.
      http://piaffegirl.wordpress.com/
      https://www.facebook.com/PiaffeGirl

      Comment


      • You could not have missed the whole point of this thread any more brilliantly if you had honestly tried Beverley.
        \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

        Comment


        • Originally posted by DancingFoalFarms View Post
          I find the rhetorical choices in that press release fascinating. According to the sourced material's argument, those who disagree with their perspective on horse slaughter are "anti-horse", "extremists", "slander(ous)", "radical", "pathetic", etc. For an organization that sets itself up as a spokes-entity for "the horse businesses and families of the World by protecting their economic, legislative, regulatory, judicial, environmental, custom and cultural interests" (see source), they certainly do an excellent job employing inflammatory and divisive language.

          Since those that run the "International Equine Business Association" also own and run Chevideco, a company that deals in live horses for slaughter as well as the rendered meat of said animals, their benevolence and credibility is -- frankly -- suspect.
          Guess they are learning from the masters of flourish of speech, the illustrious animal rights groups, so clear to see in their decades of propaganda.

          Comment

          • Original Poster

            Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
            You could not have missed the whole point of this thread any more brilliantly if you had honestly tried Beverley.
            No kidding.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Beverley View Post
              Good grief. Shooting a horse in the head to kill it is about as humane as it gets. I prefer it to injection, myself.

              When riding in remote areas we always make sure someone has a gun just in case. If a horse suffers a catastrophic injury we sure don't want it to suffer.

              When I whipped in foxhunting back east and carried a pistol loaded with rat shot, I always had bullets in my vest pocket for the same reason. Yes, I will shoot my own horse to spare it suffering. If I don't have a gun, I'll slit its throat with a knife.

              I perceive that many of you think that is just 'awful,' so you'd be standing there wringing your hands and sobbing and allowing your horse to suffer until 'someone else' takes care of the problem.

              Just like many of you supported the slaughter ban to force horses to travel further to their deaths. If it isn't in your back yard, you don't care what happens to them.

              Shame on you.
              Wow, I'm just relieved that you were not around the handfull of times I hunted my guy. Slit their throat ? Wow, I'll take euthanasia over having you around any day.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                Guess they are learning from the masters of flourish of speech, the illustrious animal rights groups, so clear to see in their decades of propaganda.
                Not really. It appears they're pulling an old trick: resorting to personal attacks (ad hominem fallacy).
                Piaffe Girl -- Dressage. Fashionably.
                http://piaffegirl.wordpress.com/
                https://www.facebook.com/PiaffeGirl

                Comment


                • Mandy, attempting to belittle a poster with whom you disagree won't win you any debating points. Suggest you try civil discussion as a preferable option.

                  So- Stolen Virtue- you'd just let a catastrophically injured horse suffer needlessly while you wait hours for what you consider to be politically correct euthanasia? Or, in a wilderness area, 20 miles into the mountains from where your trailer is parked, you'd just do what- leave the horse there in shock to take days to die?

                  I'm glad I'm not your horse!

                  Comment


                  • I was just pointing out the obvious. Touchy?
                    \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Beverley View Post

                      So- Stolen Virtue- you'd just let a catastrophically injured horse suffer needlessly while you wait hours for what you consider to be politically correct euthanasia? Or, in a wilderness area, 20 miles into the mountains from where your trailer is parked, you'd just do what- leave the horse there in shock to take days to die?

                      I'm glad I'm not your horse!
                      Days.....to die. No really there are vets everywhere these days. I would never have someone wanting to slit my horse's throat around. "Politically correct euthanasia" yes, I would take that over sliting my horses throat. Good lord, who would ever hunt with you ? And your gun, save it, all the hunt people I now call a vet. "Politically correct" more like sane.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Beverley View Post
                        Mandy, attempting to belittle a poster with whom you disagree won't win you any debating points. Suggest you try civil discussion as a preferable option.

                        So- Stolen Virtue- you'd just let a catastrophically injured horse suffer needlessly while you wait hours for what you consider to be politically correct euthanasia? Or, in a wilderness area, 20 miles into the mountains from where your trailer is parked, you'd just do what- leave the horse there in shock to take days to die?

                        I'm glad I'm not your horse!
                        I worked for a vet who who had to Euthanize his wifes horse by severing its internal iliac artery with a pocket knife. Because they were hours from passable roads and the horse stepped into a crevice/crag and shattered its hind leg.

                        Like Beverly said SV glad I'm not one of your animals although I imagine the first time you have to live through one of those situations you'll change your tune. Its easy to pass judgments from the safety of your office chair.

                        Not really sure who you hunt with but almost every group I know someone carries a gun for emergent situations. Or did you think that gun was just there to ward off the boogie man.
                        "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          Originally posted by Beverley View Post
                          Mandy, attempting to belittle a poster with whom you disagree won't win you any debating points. Suggest you try civil discussion as a preferable option.

                          So- Stolen Virtue- you'd just let a catastrophically injured horse suffer needlessly while you wait hours for what you consider to be politically correct euthanasia? Or, in a wilderness area, 20 miles into the mountains from where your trailer is parked, you'd just do what- leave the horse there in shock to take days to die?

                          I'm glad I'm not your horse!
                          The horse in the video was not injured. It was not an emergency situation. I don't think anyone has an issue with euthanasia by gunshot if done properly. Have you read any of this thread? Wow.

                          Comment


                          • That's not very nice, newhorsemommy.
                            \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                            Comment


                            • I don't think it is so much that the horse was shot, but the circumstances under which it was shot. This guy shot the horse to make a statement. NO animal should be killed, humanely or not for the sole purpose of throwing it in the face of someone.

                              Beverly, I agree that correct shooting is the most humane way to kill a horse, and the horse in the video appeared to not know what hit him. But do you really approve of this guy and his motives for killing this horse? It wasn't to demonstrate that a horse can be killed humanely. It was a sick way to try and make a point.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
                                I worked for a vet who who had to Euthanize his wifes horse by severing its internal iliac artery with a pocket knife. Because they were hours from passable roads and the horse stepped into a crevice/crag and shattered its hind leg.

                                Like Beverly said SV glad I'm not one of your animals although I imagine the first time you have to live through one of those situations you'll change your tune. Its easy to pass judgments from the safety of your office chair.

                                Not really sure who you hunt with but almost every group I know someone carries a gun for emergent situations. Or did you think that gun was just there to ward off the boogie man.
                                Lynnwood, you have always had a bad attitude towards anyone who would dare disagree with you. We all understand you and your rude attitude.

                                Who I hunt with is also none of your business and no, riders in the local hunt do not carry guns nor does anyone offer to slit the throat of any lame horse, but hey I guess you must feel that those services could help you with your carriage horses.

                                Comment

                                • Original Poster

                                  Originally posted by MandyVA View Post
                                  That's not very nice, newhorsemommy.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
                                    Lynnwood, you have always had a bad attitude towards anyone who would dare disagree with you. We all understand you and your rude attitude.

                                    Who I hunt with is also none of your business and no, riders in the local hunt do not carry guns nor does anyone offer to slit the throat of any lame horse, but hey I guess you must feel that those services could help you with your carriage horses.
                                    SV does your village make you juggle and wear a funny hat ?

                                    Who said lame horse ? I think what was discussed was catastrophic injury/suffering not lame. Do you go around euthanizing lame horses ?

                                    PSS good dig on carriages horses ...didn't see that coming Now dance a funny jig or back to the stockades with you !
                                    "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                    Comment


                                    • I cant believe people who spend time on Coth, own and or work with horse's attempt to justify a healthy sound young looking horse being shot for no reason other then some ah trying to make a point.

                                      Comment


                                      • Originally posted by casper324 View Post
                                        I cant believe people who spend time on Coth, own and or work with horse's attempt to justify a healthy sound young looking horse being shot for no reason other then some ah trying to make a point.
                                        I don't agree with the guy using the horses processing to make a political statement I also think hes fairly off the rails.

                                        However you are theorizing from a 2min video that the horse was any of the adjectives you used. The horse was a chestnut in decent condition who looked unstressed until humanely shot. That's all I could gather from the video as far as descriptors about the horse. I believe he intended to consume said horse ...and just made an ass out of himself doing the harvesting on film in some F/U statement.
                                        "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                        Comment


                                        • Or head cheese??? Blech

                                          Originally posted by fordtraktor View Post
                                          We have never saved the blood but it is certainly true some people do. The thought of blood pudding turns my stomach.
                                          The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
                                          H. Cate

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X