• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Disgusting - Video of a horse shot in the head by a slaughter proponent in New Mexico

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Well put on every point, newhorsemommy. Right on.
    I tolerate all kinds of animal idiosyncrasies.
    I've found that I don't tolerate people idiosyncrasies as well. - Casey09

    Comment


    • Originally posted by up-at-5 View Post
      I beg to differ, let's save it for OT day!
      No need to save it, you just got caught in the wolf mystique, I assume?

      Growing up in Europe, we still had wolves and yes, they do attack people too.

      Six wolves killed and fatally injured about 20+ sheep one night, ate here and there on four of them, left the rest to finish dying.
      THAT is the way wolves operate.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
        And your assuming for the thousands of people who drop their unwanted pets off at shelters knowing full well that after sitting in a concrete floored kennel surrounded by stress and often sickness for days or weeks ..only to be Euthanized in whatever manner is cost effective , gas , injection is any different or better.

        The only differences I see are that one , horses are livestock. Some of us choose to treat them like pets and two , once dead the dogs/cats carcasses are ruined for use and that makes their death much sadder and wasteful.
        I am not assuming anything. Horses are ONLY livestock when they are unsound and not practical otherwise they are pets. This topic is about slaughter not abandoning animals at shelters.

        If the pro-slaughter people want horse slaughter why not slaughter dogs and cats as well ? Semantics , because dogs and cats are not livestock ? Bottom line horses are mostly pets, and telling yourselves that only "livestock" are slaughtered is delusional, people are sending their pets to slaughter because they legally can. I oppose that.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Sannois View Post
          Cats and dogs have nothing in common with live stock. No matter how much you love your horses, they are live stock.
          Cats and dogs may not be classified as livestock like horses are, but saying that cats and dogs have nothing in common with livestock is not accurate either.

          While you may not personally care what happens to an animal that is not yours, that is not a sentiment shared by everyone. You have the right to your own moral compass (unless it starts breaking laws!) and others have the right to their own moral compass (unless it starts breaking laws!).
          Annabelle Mayr, Arcadia Farm
          Home of Fitz, Austria & Erin
          Now over the Rainbow Bridge: Daeo, Max, Finn, Jake, Seamus & Pleasure

          Comment


          • Originally posted by newhorsemommy View Post
            Well, I posted this on my way out the door this morning and just got home. I have only skimmed some of the replies, but I did, in fact, post this to start a discussion. Isn't that why anyone posts here? Further, I rarely comment on the slaughter threads and I don't remember ever starting one.

            I don't have an issue with euthanasia by bullet. I don't have an issue if you want to raise horses, shoot them in your backyard, and eat them. Live it up.

            I have a problem with 1) the psychopath in the video shooting what appears to be a healthy horses for the SOLE purpose of sending some kind of a message or threat to people that don't happen to agree with him and 2) this never ceasing effort to re-open slaughterhouses in the US under the false pretense that it is for the benefit of the horses.

            The man in the video is affiliated with the slaughterhouse in NM up for consideration for re-opening. I really doubt the video was created to further some animal rights agenda. The man shooting the horse is clearly the man speaking. He is a sick, sick person. The video popped up on my FB this morning. I wish I had not seen it. I have not had a lot of time to look into it further, but plan to.

            There are too many horses. But if slaughter is done for profit, it will never be humane. There's not much humane about the way other meat is commercially raised or killed in this country. It's obviously being pursued for profit (i.e. someone is going to make a bunch of money) or they would not be expending so many resources lobbying various government officials and scurrying from state to state trying to find a community economically depressed enough to welcome their crappy jobs and crappy pay.

            So why don't they just put on their big boy and girl pants and state that they want to slaughter horses for profit? People that raise beef aren't carrying on about how they are helping the cows. Why are they hiding behind names like "United Horsemen" and claiming that the slaughter houses will have a rescue and adoption component? It's because MOST Americans don't view horses as food. It's as simple as that. So they can't just come right out and say that. So they couch it as an effort to find a humane end for "unwanted" horses to cover up what they are really doing.

            If the backers of these slaughter house efforts were really that concerned with the welfare of the horses, why not put their money and efforts elsewhere? Why not establish a non-profit that would fund low-cost or free euthanasia clinics across the country? Why not lobby to provide more funding to county animal shelters so they could accept surrendered horses and then euthanize after a short period? It's a big country. With the exception of the large hoarder cases and such, we are not talking about hundreds of horses per year in each county. Oh, that's right, because it's about MONEY, and neither of those options would make anyone any money.

            Finally, I will never agree with the idea that people should be rewarded for dumping their horses at an auction or slaughterhouse. Can you imagine what would happen if we paid people to dump their dogs and cats at the shelter?
            And while I understand that some people consider horses livestock, I am guessing the average American views them as pets.

            I do not consider myself to be a "radical animal rights activist." I'm a vegetarian, but my husband is not. I don't belong to PETA. I just think that slaughter is the lazy way out of the problem, on all levels, and Sue Wallis and her pals are planning to capitalize on that.

            PS: Some of the anti "radical animal rights activists" posters on here appear to be just as nuts as those the radicals they are constantly "warning" us about.
            My thoughts exactly.
            \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
              Jumping to conclusions like everyone else who has NEVER seen a slaughter plant in operation. The osters from the U.S. only have 2nd and 3rd hand stories.

              I would suggest you read the other threads. We did make a great difference..

              Not a horse dealer. Do breed and raise and show and have for most of my life.

              Dare I suggest you do some research and actually do something to solve the excess horse problem rather than draw conclusions based on your own lack of information.
              Excuse me? What are you doing to solve the excess horse problem? How dare you suggest I don't do my part? What do you breed? Out in western Canada eh, breeding, like there aren't thousands of horses already on the ground out in your area? And you're breeding? Must be darned special, those horses of yours!

              Send me a link via pm so I can see what you are breeding, maybe I know someone who wants to buy what you have for sale. To ride, though, not to eat.
              "Anti-intellect and marketing, pretty, pretty, who needs talent
              Crying eyes, we're so outnumbered, fight for the right to remain silent" Buck 65

              Comment


              • I watched the video, the unedited version, and I skimmed through most of the posts.

                There is NO reason to kill an animal to make such a point. To shoot a horse just to throw it in the face of AR activists is dumb at best, psychotic more likely. I don't care how bad the AR activists can be, shooting a horse just to say F you is unexcusable.

                I don't believe that this guy shot this horse to eat. He shot it make a stupid point. I live about three hours from this town. I live in the country, I work with and know ranchers, farmers, hunters. We have processed our own cattle in the backyard. I have no disconnect from the rural lifestyle. The people I know kill and butcher their own animals because it is a lifestyle, because they respect the animal. Even if this guy was butchering the horse for food, his stupid little display for the camera was simply sick.

                Was the horse in the video killed instantly? Looks like it. Should all horses that run through a slaughter plant be killed this quickly? Absolutely. The horse in the video thankfully did not feel a thing. But not with the hate shown by this guy. He may have patted the horse, but he didn't care a flip about that horse and weather it died humanely or not. He did it out of spite. Again, NO animal should be killed for this reason, ever! And anyone capable of killing an animal for this reason is sick.

                I wish they would open a horse slaughter plant in Roswell NM. A humane slaughter plant. It would save many horses in my state a trip to a very likely inhumane slaughter plant in Mexico. But if this is the kind of person that is opening the plant, then I don't think we have improved anything at all.

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  Then why don't they just say that?

                  And I would have been fine with an educational video on how to properly euthanize a horse with a bullet. It's not how I plan to do it, but I understand it's necessary in emergencies, cheaper, and some people prefer it.

                  ETA: Sorry, that was in response to Fairfax, I forgot to quote!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                    No need to save it, you just got caught in the wolf mystique, I assume?

                    Growing up in Europe, we still had wolves and yes, they do attack people too.

                    Six wolves killed and fatally injured about 20+ sheep one night, ate here and there on four of them, left the rest to finish dying.
                    THAT is the way wolves operate.
                    Oh yes, the mystique, the haunting call of the wild during the full moon, the cute pups, oh how I swoon to hear such a call out on my back fourty while I tend to the chores. Growing up here in Canada and NOT in Europe, we DO still have wolves, and one just attacked, omg, a HUMAN!!! The nerve!
                    "Anti-intellect and marketing, pretty, pretty, who needs talent
                    Crying eyes, we're so outnumbered, fight for the right to remain silent" Buck 65

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by ADM7040 View Post
                      Cats and dogs may not be classified as livestock like horses are, but saying that cats and dogs have nothing in common with livestock is not accurate either.

                      While you may not personally care what happens to an animal that is not yours, that is not a sentiment shared by everyone. You have the right to your own moral compass (unless it starts breaking laws!) and others have the right to their own moral compass (unless it starts breaking laws!).
                      I think most of the people that post about not wanting a horse "Slaughtered " are misguided and feed off pure emotion.
                      I love animals, I have done my level best to save tossed out dogs and cats, treated my own horses well and when their life was no longer quality they were humanely put down in my presence.
                      Dogs and cats are a whole nother can of worms.
                      I don't even know why I am having this conversation.
                      Those that are totally opposed to slaughter, seem to be opposed to even humane ending of a life.
                      In all these threads over the years I have never read one anti give a logical practical answer to what should be done.
                      And adopting them all is not the answer.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                        It still has nothing to do with the slaughter issue..where individuals cry about the alleged cruelty

                        Of course slaughter is for profit.
                        Fairfax, why don't you try discussing things like a grown up instead of your usual diversion tactics. Face it, you were wrong. You stated that the man did not slaughter the horse, he just euthanized it with a bullet. Your statement was blatantly wrong and I pointed that out to you. Your petulant reply above does nothing further to make you seem right, it just attempts to divert attention.
                        Annabelle Mayr, Arcadia Farm
                        Home of Fitz, Austria & Erin
                        Now over the Rainbow Bridge: Daeo, Max, Finn, Jake, Seamus & Pleasure

                        Comment

                        • Original Poster

                          Originally posted by Sannois View Post
                          I think most of the people that post about not wanting a horse "Slaughtered " are misguided and feed off pure emotion.
                          I love animals, I have done my level best to save tossed out dogs and cats, treated my own horses well and when their life was no longer quality they were humanely put down in my presence.
                          Dogs and cats are a whole nother can of worms.
                          I don't even know why I am having this conversation.
                          Those that are totally opposed to slaughter, seem to be opposed to even humane ending of a life.
                          In all these threads over the years I have never read one anti give a logical practical answer to what should be done.
                          And adopting them all is not the answer.
                          Well I just posted two possible solutions. Free or low cost euthanasia clinics and/or providing funding to county animal shelters to accept horses and provide euthanasia after a short holding period. It's not even hard to come up with other ideas. The lack of follow-through on alternatives strikes me as evidence of both the laziness I mentioned earlier and that the current efforts to re-open the slaughter houses are about money, and NOTHING else.

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
                            I am not assuming anything. Horses are ONLY livestock when they are unsound and not practical otherwise they are pets. This topic is about slaughter not abandoning animals at shelters.
                            No really it is you that is delusional if you believe that horses have to be unsound or not practical in order to be livestock. There are many many people that do not see them as pets. Same as there are steadfast people who will tell you all day long that certain dogs etc are not pets but working animals.

                            Its all personal opinion. You see a pet the next person sees livestock. Doesn't make either person wrong. If you don't want your "pet" to end up processed as livestock make provisions to provide for it as if it were in fact a pet.. keep it for its entire natural life provide finances to care for it should you perish Don't sell it because you can't ride it ..its a pet after all..don't attempt to turn a profit by purchasing one and doing some training and then selling it on ..after all a pet , don't buy one and sell it because you have graduated in skill and need something that performs at a higher level pet ..don't see much dog pin-hooking done. Keep your pet but don't stand in the way of anyone else who feels their personal property is not a pet but livestock and wishes to utilize them as such.
                            "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by newhorsemommy View Post
                              Well I just posted two possible solutions. Free or low cost euthanasia clinics and/or providing funding to county animal shelters to accept horses and provide euthanasia after a short holding period. It's not even hard to come up with other ideas. The lack of follow-through on alternatives strikes me as evidence of both the laziness I mentioned earlier and that the current efforts to re-open the slaughter houses are about money, and NOTHING else.
                              Sadly, for many, and many posters on here, it IS about the money. I agree with what you mentioned earlier, why not just say it's all about the money, and leave it at that! Ask any drug dealer why they sell...it's all about the money, they have no shame in admitting it. Except for Bluey, for her, it's all about the rights, I tell you, all about the RIGHTS!
                              "Anti-intellect and marketing, pretty, pretty, who needs talent
                              Crying eyes, we're so outnumbered, fight for the right to remain silent" Buck 65

                              Comment


                              • Agree newhorsemommy, many of the pro-slaughter posters marginalize those that do not agree with them. We are all PETA people and support dumping animals at the pound. I also find it troubling that "working animals" seem to be OK to slaughter according to a poster.

                                The vets in my area would never withhold euthanasia for payment. Opening slaughter for horses just allows an easy way to resolve any issue with a pet horse.

                                Comment


                                • I just found this~

                                  In spite of last minute attempts by animal rights extremists to slander an entire segment of animal agriculture by introducing Congressional action (S. 541 - a bill to prevent human health threats posed by the consumption of equines with others to follow...) that offers zero solution whatsoever to the dire circumstances facing the horse industry--the truth is that horse people are moving forward to provide a better future for horses and horse people.

                                  Radical groups, led by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and their supporters on Capitol Hill and inside the White House seek to destroy what vestige is left of the U.S. horse industry.
                                  Nonetheless, the Law is the Law, and right now the Law is behind the horse industry allowing us to move forward with positive, humane systems, that ensure the highest standards of verified food safety, preserving the value, and incentivizing the proper care of all horses in the United States.

                                  Several horse processing plants in the United States are set to begin operations very soon.
                                  These plants have accomplished most or all of their required modifications to their facilities and will be requesting final walk through inspections, approval to begin operations, and the assignment of inspectors.

                                  USDA has indicated that under current law they will be providing the necessary regulation and inspection.

                                  These plants, and others that will be follow, have modified not only their physical plants to accommodate the unique characteristics of the equine species, but their Hazard Analysis Critical Control Point (HACCP) plans and their Standard Operating Procedures to include extremely rigorous, thorough, and scientifically validated testing of every carcass that will ensure that no drug residue can ever enter the human food chain, and that every plant has installed humane handling systems and procedures that go above and beyond the U.S. Humane Methods of Slaughter law.

                                  There are eager markets awaiting the opening of these facilities both here in the United States and internationally. Cheval, which is the common term for meat from the equine species in the same way that beef is the term for meat from cattle, and pork is the term from hogs, is highly sought after by ethnic, gourmet, health and nutritionally interested, and value conscious consumers.


                                  Strong support nationwide for the horse industry is perhaps most evident right now in Oklahoma where a pair of pro-horse industry bills that will allow processing to begin in that state are sailing through the State Legislature.

                                  Just this past Wednesday more than 400 articulate supporters of the legislation led by the Oklahoma Farm Bureau and a host of other Ag organizations showed up for a rally at the Capitol, and not a single anti-slaughter activist!

                                  The week before a pathetic showing of anti-horse advocates at what was billed to be a "massive" rally against the bills achieved numbers barely above single digits, outnumbered by the media covering the event, illustrated the out of touch mentality of these extremist groups.

                                  Attached to this press release is a report originally produced by IEBA last Fall, the Promise of Cheval, and updated regularly as new science and information becomes available, as well as a Facts and FAQs document that answers common questions about the ethical and responsible production of cheval.

                                  Below are documents testifying to the position of the States and the Tribes in regards to this issue--powerful entities that stand solidly behind the broader horse industry in this struggle to ensure that horses and horse owners have humane options that provide value, and therefor ensures the welfare of horses in the U.S.
                                  And this is obviously not a anti.
                                  Do not know this woman, but from what it sounds like Slaughter in the US will be back and an industry.
                                  I know that I myself will never eat"Cheval"
                                  but IF it really is humanely done. If that will ever happen that a slaughter house is built that is specifically for horses and addresses all the issues of poor processes of the past.
                                  There seem to be a whole lot of newer videos of slaughter I had never seen before, Barring the russian one..
                                  the biggest problem in most of them is the isolation and immobilizing of the head. Where the whole problem lies.
                                  watching cattle ones they are accurate and quick, but the cattle are smaller and have their necks immobilized.
                                  Why that cannot be done with horses I do not quite get.
                                  Once they are dead they are dead.
                                  The part that occurs after the stunning, is unpleasant in all species. But the only one who cares are the people looking at it. It is the process up to that point that counts.
                                  To me if it truly was run as an industry here in the US for profit it is going to be better regulated and more efficient.

                                  Comment


                                  • Originally posted by newhorsemommy View Post
                                    Well I just posted two possible solutions. Free or low cost euthanasia clinics and/or providing funding to county animal shelters to accept horses and provide euthanasia after a short holding period. It's not even hard to come up with other ideas. The lack of follow-through on alternatives strikes me as evidence of both the laziness I mentioned earlier and that the current efforts to re-open the slaughter houses are about money, and NOTHING else.
                                    And the pro contingent will be around in a couple seconds to divert this thread into why they think these options aren't practical, and ask who s going to save all these unwanted horses.

                                    We don't even know, though, the extent to which alternatives to slaughter are needed, if at all. No one has ever made a compelling argument that anybody, ever, took their horse to an auction because they had no other option. Alagirl tried to with her poll and failed spectacularly. Breeders breed because they are profiting. The horses being bred are all wanted. Just wanted more, in some cases, by those who can profit from slaughtering them than by the next bidder.

                                    Prove that there even is a problem with unwanted horses. Saying they're unwanted because they get bought by creeps like this guy makes as much sense as saying there is an unwanted cattle problem because they get slaughtered.

                                    Horses will always fall victim to hoarders, just like any other animal. Criminal neglect has never been linked to too few going for slaughter, and I have yet to see a single allegation that horses were left over after the slaughter truck left, starving at the auction lot because there aren't enough slaughterhouses. One of those articles said 200,000 horses were exported last year, which was the first time I've seen the number that high although perhaps they weren't all for slaughter. It wasn't clear, but either way it's more than when we had slaughterhouses here.

                                    Like the op said, just admit that you can't stand seeing all those slaughterhouses over the border making money that you could be making here if only those damn animal rights nuts would mind their own business. Money. There is no other reason.
                                    \"Non-violence never solved anything.\" C. Montgomery Burns

                                    Comment


                                    • Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
                                      No really it is you that is delusional if you believe that horses have to be unsound or not practical in order to be livestock. There are many many people that do not see them as pets. Same as there are steadfast people who will tell you all day long that certain dogs etc are not pets but working animals.

                                      Its all personal opinion. You see a pet the next person sees livestock. Doesn't make either person wrong. If you don't want your "pet" to end up processed as livestock make provisions to provide for it as if it were in fact a pet.. keep it for its entire natural life provide finances to care for it should you perish Don't sell it because you can't ride it ..its a pet after all..don't attempt to turn a profit by purchasing one and doing some training and then selling it on ..after all a pet , don't buy one and sell it because you have graduated in skill and need something that performs at a higher level pet ..don't see much dog pin-hooking done. Keep your pet but don't stand in the way of anyone else who feels their personal property is not a pet but livestock and wishes to utilize them as such.
                                      You said what I was thinking so much nicer than I could have! People that think all horses should be pets scare the $hit out of me.
                                      Originally posted by The Saddle
                                      Perhaps I need my flocking adjusted.

                                      Comment


                                      • Your generalizing to suit your personal choices SV.

                                        It was you that claimed all horses are pets unless unsound or not practical That is a false statement. There are plenty of people who own horses / use them that do not participate in the ideal that they are pets but believe them to be classified as livestock.

                                        Work on your reading comprehension. The comment about was about working dogs , there are certainly people who own dogs ..and while most of us feel they are pets who will argue with you they are not pets to them , but a working animal.

                                        Bottom line you don't have to slaughter your horse ... but why are you so damn concerned with with what someone else chooses to do with their property ? Do you concern yourself over what each and every person chooses to do with their dogs /cats /cows / goats / chickens / etc ?
                                        "I would not beleive her if her tongue came notorized"

                                        Comment


                                        • Originally posted by Lynnwood View Post
                                          Your generalizing to suit your personal choices SV.

                                          It was you that claimed all horses are pets unless unsound or not practical That is a false statement. There are plenty of people who own horses / use them that do not participate in the ideal that they are pets but believe them to be classified as livestock.

                                          Work on your reading comprehension. The comment about was about working dogs , there are certainly people who own dogs ..and while most of us feel they are pets who will argue with you they are not pets to them , but a working animal.

                                          Bottom line you don't have to slaughter your horse ... but why are you so damn concerned with with what someone else chooses to do with their property ? Do you concern yourself over what each and every person chooses to do with their dogs /cats /cows / goats / chickens / etc ?
                                          Watch it, someone will accuse you now of caring about "the RIGHTS"!

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X