• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Disgusting - Video of a horse shot in the head by a slaughter proponent in New Mexico

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
    Wow, delusional much. There is no "little group" just people who disagree with horse slaughter and we are the majority.
    I am rather confident that you are not the majority.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by stolen virtue View Post
      And you as a breeder stand to gain from horse slaughter, so what you think also, "means nothing".
      How do I gain, as a breeder? I know how I could if I was forced to use it..I know it is there...many people are not as fortunate as I have been.

      She stated since she did not own a horse..her opinion ment nothing. I was in agreement..her opinion means nothing. She has no solution but sarcasm
      The Elephant in the room

      Comment


      • OK this is a question I have for Sannois what the hell does whether I live in Saginaw CO have to do with my opinion?

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
          How do I gain, as a breeder? I know how I could if I was forced to use it..I know it is there...many people are not as fortunate as I have been.

          She stated since she did not own a horse..her opinion ment nothing. I was in agreement..her opinion means nothing. She has no solution but sarcasm
          As a breeder you will always benefit from a lower horse population in the nation. Simliar to the housing market: more homes on the market favor the buyer, less homes on the market favor the seller. I'm pretty sure you understand the horse market as a breeder.

          My point, and I know that you are frusterated, is that those of us anti-slaughter people are not all animal rights extremists. For many of us, we see it as an easy alternative to euthanizing our horses, which are to me my pets. That opinion does not make me or others animal rights extremists.

          Comment


          • I get it really I do. From what I am hearing there is already a lax attitude about drugs in whatever we are eating.
            What was it Jswan said that now 80% of our animals are processed in only 4 places. That's potentially a long ride doesn't matter the species.
            We have lost alot of the local processing ability, which I think is really sad.
            If kept locally, I think we would have a better chance of keeping an eye on things. Making things more transparent instead of less would make things easier as well.
            I think most of us know the difference between a good death and a bad one.
            Yes I realize there are a lot of nutjobs out there that are going to complain no matter what.

            The concern over horse processing is that the companies were foreign owned and seemed to have no interest in complying with regulations. From transport to slaughter it seems that many violations occurred and were never, at the time, fixed or fines paid. What makes it all different now??
            So far I have seen nothing to convince me that it would all be better this time.
            It's not the RARAs it's the government. Most of them couldn't find their *ick with tweezers and a magnifying glass and they will pass legislation without really knowing what the consequences are. This time possibly to appease a woman whose grandparents own an auction house. Is that a reason to pass a bill??

            Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
            I do NOT think it is good for the horse...that is why I became involved with rescue for the ASB and became critical of the rescues under the umbrella of HSUS and also HSUS. They are after the money...looking aftrer horses is a necessary evil..they do not care how many people and horses they destroy in their rampage.

            I have stated all along that slaugher is ONLY ONE PIECE of the Puzzle

            Bluey is actually more in tune with reality..it is not just meat..IF the horse must be slaughtered then why not USE all of the products including its meat...rather than just dump it in a landfill.

            We have continued to say..make the changes...get the facilities as stress free as possible and some have been it working..and working well. NOTHING is 100% and that is the demand of the Rara's. They demand impossible knowing that they can not meet that bar themselves..

            A lot can be done with transportation and violators should be removed from ANY livestock transportation. That would cut very very deep into the industry and violators. Fine the shipping company. Not the auction nor the slaughter plant.
            Fire employees who are abusive. Tape and review all of the tapes. Train your employees. i think many things are going to operate to the better in the states as the owners KNOW they are under the microscope. I don't object to that.

            Volunteer to be an oversee'er. No...it isn't pleasant..but it does make a difference.

            As for a majority..NOPE..many don't like it..but they do not see an alternative and some pretty great people have tried to find a solution to no avail.

            No ban needs to be put in place. Regulations and follow thru do..
            The problem with political jokes is that they get elected.
            H. Cate

            Comment


            • There are many that think banning slaughter is a harebrained idea, but don't care for the name calling the antis do, so don't post.

              It does take guts to stand against the ban slaughter animal rights extremist drive.
              You are immediately assumed to be some kind of ogre and told so in many ways.

              My thoughts? Any one that is generally dismissive of humans up front I have trouble believing them when they are declaring themselves very humane toward's animals.
              Their motives become suspect when they are mean to people with any one excuse, like when disagreeing.

              What is that phrase, that kindness starts at home?
              My premise, good people are good all around.
              Basically good, honest people don't wish ill on others as easily as antis seem to do regularly.

              Remember, animal rights is about bans and eliminating uses of animals by humans.
              Animal welfare is doing all we do with animals, including using some thru slaughter, the best way we can manage, with what we know.

              When some want to ban this now, that later, they are following animal rights extremists agendas, if they want to admit it to themselves or are fanatics knowing very well what they are after.

              Animal welfare would be working to make all we do, including slaughter, the best we can make it.

              Those are different in important ways that we ought to be careful to remember will eventually mean if we get to keep our animals and yes, that means our horses also, or if we lose our rights to have them.

              Comment


              • Really Bluey, the anti-slaughter people are the name callers ? I think I have been called many names by the pro-slaughter posters and the pro-carriage posters, names that I have been asked by the mods not to repeat.

                Please, pointing fingers is quite silly at this point.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Fairfax View Post
                  You aren't qualified. I accept that

                  Too much proof with rescue, involvement AGAINST HSUS and its affiliates and volunteering Wednesdays at the Fort.

                  What you think, since you admit you aren't qualified..means nothing..
                  Well since we do not know who you are, or what you claim to be involved with, other than throwing your weight around on the internet, right back at you!

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Bluey View Post
                    There are many that think banning slaughter is a harebrained idea, but don't care for the name calling the antis do, so don't post.

                    It does take guts to stand against the ban slaughter animal rights extremist drive.
                    You are immediately assumed to be some kind of ogre and told so in many ways.

                    My thoughts? Any one that is generally dismissive of humans up front I have trouble believing them when they are declaring themselves very humane toward's animals.
                    Their motives become suspect when they are mean to people with any one excuse, like when disagreeing.

                    What is that phrase, that kindness starts at home?
                    My premise, good people are good all around.
                    Basically good, honest people don't wish ill on others as easily as antis seem to do regularly.

                    Remember, animal rights is about bans and eliminating uses of animals by humans.
                    Animal welfare is doing all we do with animals, including using some thru slaughter, the best way we can manage, with what we know.

                    When some want to ban this now, that later, they are following animal rights extremists agendas, if they want to admit it to themselves or are fanatics knowing very well what they are after.

                    Animal welfare would be working to make all we do, including slaughter, the best we can make it.

                    Those are different in important ways that we ought to be careful to remember will eventually mean if we get to keep our animals and yes, that means our horses also, or if we lose our rights to have them.
                    Well this is my last post on this subject, too much of a waste of effort,
                    But Bluey, fairfax, the people who you claim want to ban slaughter on this thread other than maybe a couple, have never said that.
                    I and others want it to be done humanely, I for one know it will go on no matter what you or I or anyone says on a silly horse board,
                    But the fact that because we question makes us extreme animal rights activists? I am pretty sure if you take a poll on here, only a few would say they want it banned no matter what.
                    But this is not constructive, our words are thrown back at us, we are belittled, called names. Personally I think it is very sad that people act this way. that is what the internet has done, I can be sure none of us would talk this way to each other in person. So carry on.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Sannois View Post
                      And that makes it fact how?
                      It does not make it fact. Bluey keeps claiming that a friend of hers told her this so it must be true. I don't believe it for one minute. Perhaps Bluey thinks constant repetition of the same words over and over and over somehow turn them into truths..........

                      Comment


                      • To help Bluey out in her oft repeated words of the Dallas Crown plant testing every single horse (as told to her by some person) that is quite obviously (to everyone else) untrue, I think I can guess where her mis-information came from. I did come across a document on the FSIS or USDA site (can't remember now) regarding inspecting horses before slaughter. There was a regulation stating that every horse must be visually inspected prior to slaughter to ensure that it appears healthy and disease free. That's it, the animal must be ambulatory and look ok. Actual testing requirements were 1 in 300 (far less than 1%) animals or at least 1 per week. Hardly testing every single horse for "residues" as stated and no where near enough to be a statistically relevant sample of animals that are very likely to have each come from a different owner, background, etc.
                        Last edited by ADM7040; Mar. 27, 2013, 08:11 AM. Reason: added info
                        Annabelle Mayr, Arcadia Farm
                        Home of Fitz, Austria & Erin
                        Now over the Rainbow Bridge: Daeo, Max, Finn, Jake, Seamus & Pleasure

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by ADM7040 View Post
                          To help Bluey out in her oft repeated words of the Dallas Crown plant testing every single horse (as told to her by some person) that is quite obviously (to everyone else) untrue, I think I can guess where her mis-information came from. I did come across a document on the FSIS or USDA site (can't remember now) regarding inspecting horses before slaughter. There was a regulation stating that every horse must be visually inspected prior to slaughter to ensure that it appears healthy and disease free. That's it, the animal must be ambulatory and look ok. Actual testing requirements were 1 in 300 (far less than 1%) animals or at least 1 per week. Hardly testing every single horse for "residues" as stated and no where near enough to be a statistically relevant sample of animals that are very likely to have each come from a different owner, background, etc.
                          Nope, the fellow doing the sampling and running the test himself told me they did that on each horse and that was confirmed time and again by others that worked there, inspectors also.
                          That also was the plant's protocol and not USDA or any other, so you would not find official records of that or what the testing may have shown to run any statistics on that.

                          Not that this matters anyway today, other than one more way for some to try to call me names.

                          Comment


                          • We're going to give everyone a break, and close this thread and let folks catch their breath.

                            Thanks,
                            Mod 1

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X