• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

Credible threats of suicide will be reported to the police along with identifying user information at our disposal, in addition to referring the user to suicide helpline resources such as 1-800-SUICIDE or 1-800-273-TALK.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 2/8/18)
See more
See less

Sen Ensign on CSPAN 2 NOW..

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Original Poster

    #41
    It was interesting to see that Minnesota voted FOR the amendment...and here, I thought they were all a bunch of pro-slaughter people up there...

    Comment


    • #42
      I have blocked out the name of that piece of dung from Montana--Conrad something. I don't see his name and he wouldn't vote in favor if his life depended on it. Must be in appointment with his (criminal) lawyer.

      Do you suppose this means that county will crawl back into his hole?

      Comment


      • #43
        That piece of dung is no other than Conrad Burns. I used to live in MT and my mother still does - I told her that she better never let me catch her voting for him! She said she never would.

        Comment

        • Original Poster

          #44
          Burns voted "No" as did the other Senator from MT.

          Comment


          • #45
            I'm sad to see that Cornyn voted no. I voted for him last time and will have to seriously rethink how I vote next time.
            ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
            *Phenix* 1990 Trakehner Mare
            *Vanderbilt* 2001 OTTB Gelding

            Comment


            • #46
              What does this mean? Will slaughter houses be forced to shut down?

              Comment


              • #47
                As with Blondy, what does this mean? Will equine slaughter shut down?
                "You gave your life to become the person you are right now. Was it worth it?" Richard Bach

                Comment

                • Original Poster

                  #48
                  I'll try to answer, but Gail or someone else could probably do it better.
                  In order to ship horse meat overseas for human consumption, you must have USDA inspectors present at the slaughter facility. This bill removes the funding for inspectors, so there will be no USDA inspectors. Therefore the meat cannot be shipped overseas for human consumption. Approx 65000 horses are slaughtered ea yr for human consumption. Without a market for the meat, the slaughter houses don't have a reason to exist. This doesn't affect renderers, who take dead livestock and use their parts for other stuff. (But renderers don't slaughter live animals).
                  As county has pointed out on other threads, the horse slaughter industry is driven by demand for horse meat for overseas human consumption, not because there are too many horses.
                  It is not cost effective to try to get around the laws and transport to Canada or MX. There are too many drawbacks (See prev slaughter threads).

                  Comment


                  • #49
                    Just an observation - only a handful of senators east of the Mississippi voted "nay".

                    Comment


                    • #50
                      My senators from PA voted YES! Thank you Sentators Spector and Santorum

                      Comment


                      • #51
                        Question:

                        Since all 3 of the slaughter plants are foreign owned, what would stop the country owning the plant from putting in their own inspectors (for example, the USDA equivilant for Holland). Can this be done? Is it legal?
                        "You gave your life to become the person you are right now. Was it worth it?" Richard Bach

                        Comment


                        • #52
                          Not to rain on your parade.....If they find some way to find another market for this meat...

                          Does this mean that they can slaughter in these plants without vet inspection? As in, no-one to make sure it's humane?

                          What now, will happen to all of these horses that no-one wants? Obviously, there are lots of them...they aren't all feral or whatever.

                          I'm not in foavour of horse slaughter, per se....I'm just wondered, realistically, what now for these animals?

                          Cinder

                          Comment


                          • #53
                            I doubt that the US would allow foreign inspectors to do the job on our soil. I don't see how that can be legal anymore than we could go onto their soil as officials. Government agents of any kind have to work under the guidance of their host country and that would still require our goverment to oversee them in some capacity.

                            <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by Calhoun:
                            Question:

                            Since all 3 of the slaughter plants are foreign owned, what would stop the country owning the plant from putting in their own inspectors (for example, the USDA equivilant for Holland). Can this be done? Is it legal? </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                            Comment


                            • #54
                              Both senators from Wa State voted yes and I also heard Boxer from Ca vote "yes" too! We're not all backwards out west!

                              Comment


                              • #55
                                I'm glad you don't support horseslaughter, it's horrible end to a beautiful animal.

                                I think this means that those horses who were once cruelly slaughtered will now have to either be humanely euthanized if the need to be and those that were stolen will be safer.

                                That leaves less horses that actually need homes and the horse community and related businesses will need to step up as does the pet owner who no longer wants any pet. Once you take on the responsibility of owning a domestic animal you are resposible for their life. I think we've always needed to require that this is a committment. For those few animals that would fall through the cracks we have shelters and sanctuaries.


                                It's an American disgrace that in this wealthy and just country that our animals are too often considered disposable. We must shut down puppy mills and the overbreeding of all companion animals, including horses. It's a matter of holding people personally accountable for their actions.

                                If we have the will to do this it will happen. This starts on the local level, educating the public is the first step. The animal cop shows are a good start, their very popular. Now we need to educate people about the other causes of animal abuse and neglect.
                                <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by cinder88:
                                Not to rain on your parade.....If they find some way to find another market for this meat...

                                Does this mean that they can slaughter in these plants without vet inspection? As in, no-one to make sure it's humane?

                                What now, will happen to all of these horses that no-one wants? Obviously, there are lots of them...they aren't all feral or whatever.

                                I'm not in foavour of horse slaughter, per se....I'm just wondered, realistically, what now for these animals?

                                Cinder </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                Comment


                                • #56
                                  OMIGOD! I CAME IN WORK THIS A.M., CHECKED MY E-MAIL, AND I CAN'T BELIEVE IT! I DID NOT THINK IT WOULD PASS! WOW! Poopoo on my senators Talent and Bond! who voted Nay. I'm going to write them about that. Just seems like the money could be better spent, i.e., Hurricane victims, federal deficit.


                                  WOW!

                                  Comment


                                  • #57
                                    Good idea, tell them they work for you. They should be weary of their next election and get your friends and neighbor to tell them too. Let's watch them squirm.


                                    <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by nettiemaria:
                                    OMIGOD! I CAME IN WORK THIS A.M., CHECKED MY E-MAIL, AND I CAN'T BELIEVE IT! I DID NOT THINK IT WOULD PASS! WOW! Poopoo on my senators Talent and Bond! who voted Nay. I'm going to write them about that. Just seems like the money could be better spent, i.e., Hurricane victims, federal deficit.


                                    WOW! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                    Comment


                                    • #58
                                      I'M STILL FREAKING!!!!!!!! OMIGOD.

                                      I think I'm going to ride my horse straight up to their office in St. Louis, and ask them why they would allow such a horrid death of such a beautiful creature. Really, I'm gonna do it!

                                      I'm also going to send ANOTHER letter in to the paper, hopefully this one won't be poo-pooed on by AN ANTI-ABORTION ACTIVIST!!!!!!! And tell everyone. Yeah! Yeah!!! Yeah!!!!

                                      Comment


                                      • #59
                                        Why would you think evereyone in any state is pro slaughter? Thats not a real bright assuption I think even you would have to admit that if your honest about it.

                                        Now will the oplants actually quit operating Oct 1 is the next question.
                                        Quality doesn\'t cost it pays.

                                        Comment


                                        • #60
                                          I'm prolife and don't want to see these two issues mixed. There are people on both sides of the abortion issue who are against horseslaughter. I think we should stay away from other issues if we are going to see this through successfully or someone will be put off. Let's remember that we all have our right to our opinions and this is a single issue discussion.


                                          We can agree and celebrate the ending of horse slaughter, can't we? I hope so.



                                          <BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-title">quote:</div><div class="ip-ubbcode-quote-content">Originally posted by nettiemaria:
                                          I'M STILL FREAKING!!!!!!!! OMIGOD.

                                          I think I'm going to ride my horse straight up to their office in St. Louis, and ask them why they would allow such a horrid death of such a beautiful creature. Really, I'm gonna do it!

                                          I'm also going to send ANOTHER letter in to the paper, hopefully this one won't be poo-pooed on by AN ANTI-ABORTION ACTIVIST!!!!!!! And tell everyone. Yeah! Yeah!!! Yeah!!!! </div></BLOCKQUOTE>

                                          Comment

                                          Working...
                                          X