• Welcome to the Chronicle Forums.
    Please complete your profile. The forums and the rest of www.chronofhorse.com has single sign-in, so your log in information for one will automatically work for the other. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed here are the views of the individual and do not necessarily reflect the views and opinions of The Chronicle of the Horse.

Announcement

Collapse

Forum rules and no-advertising policy

As a participant on this forum, it is your responsibility to know and follow our rules. Please read this message in its entirety.

Board Rules

1. You’re responsible for what you say.
As outlined in Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, The Chronicle of the Horse and its affiliates, as well Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd., the developers of vBulletin, are not legally responsible for statements made in the forums.

This is a public forum viewed by a wide spectrum of people, so please be mindful of what you say and who might be reading it—details of personal disputes are likely better handled privately. While posters are legally responsible for their statements, the moderators may in their discretion remove or edit posts that violate these rules. Users have the ability to modify or delete their own messages after posting, but administrators generally will not delete posts, threads or accounts upon request.

Outright inflammatory, vulgar, harassing, malicious or otherwise inappropriate statements and criminal charges unsubstantiated by a reputable news source or legal documentation will not be tolerated and will be dealt with at the discretion of the moderators.

2. Conversations in horse-related forums should be horse-related.
The forums are a wonderful source of information and support for members of the horse community. While it’s understandably tempting to share information or search for input on other topics upon which members might have a similar level of knowledge, members must maintain the focus on horses.

3. Keep conversations productive, on topic and civil.
Discussion and disagreement are inevitable and encouraged; personal insults, diatribes and sniping comments are unproductive and unacceptable. Whether a subject is light-hearted or serious, keep posts focused on the current topic and of general interest to other participants of that thread. Utilize the private message feature or personal email where appropriate to address side topics or personal issues not related to the topic at large.

4. No advertising in the discussion forums.
Posts in the discussion forums directly or indirectly advertising horses, jobs, items or services for sale or wanted will be removed at the discretion of the moderators. Use of the private messaging feature or email addresses obtained through users’ profiles for unsolicited advertising is not permitted.

Company representatives may participate in discussions and answer questions about their products or services, or suggest their products on recent threads if they fulfill the criteria of a query. False "testimonials" provided by company affiliates posing as general consumers are not appropriate, and self-promotion of sales, ad campaigns, etc. through the discussion forums is not allowed.

Paid advertising is available on our classifieds site and through the purchase of banner ads. The tightly monitored Giveaways forum permits free listings of genuinely free horses and items available or wanted (on a limited basis). Items offered for trade are not allowed.

Advertising Policy Specifics
When in doubt of whether something you want to post constitutes advertising, please contact a moderator privately in advance for further clarification. Refer to the following points for general guidelines:

Horses – Only general discussion about the buying, leasing, selling and pricing of horses is permitted. If the post contains, or links to, the type of specific information typically found in a sales or wanted ad, and it’s related to a horse for sale, regardless of who’s selling it, it doesn’t belong in the discussion forums.

Stallions – Board members may ask for suggestions on breeding stallion recommendations. Stallion owners may reply to such queries by suggesting their own stallions, only if their horse fits the specific criteria of the original poster. Excessive promotion of a stallion by its owner or related parties is not permitted and will be addressed at the discretion of the moderators.

Services – Members may use the forums to ask for general recommendations of trainers, barns, shippers, farriers, etc., and other members may answer those requests by suggesting themselves or their company, if their services fulfill the specific criteria of the original post. Members may not solicit other members for business if it is not in response to a direct, genuine query.

Products – While members may ask for general opinions and suggestions on equipment, trailers, trucks, etc., they may not list the specific attributes for which they are in the market, as such posts serve as wanted ads.

Event Announcements – Members may post one notification of an upcoming event that may be of interest to fellow members, if the original poster does not benefit financially from the event. Such threads may not be “bumped” excessively. Premium members may post their own notices in the Event Announcements forum.

Charities/Rescues – Announcements for charitable or fundraising events can only be made for 501(c)(3) tax-exempt organizations. Special exceptions may be made, at the moderators’ discretion and direction, for board-related events or fundraising activities in extraordinary circumstances.

Occasional posts regarding horses available for adoption through IRS-registered horse rescue or placement programs are permitted in the appropriate forums, but these threads may be limited at the discretion of the moderators. Individuals may not advertise or make announcements for horses in need of rescue, placement or adoption unless the horse is available through a recognized rescue or placement agency or government-run entity or the thread fits the criteria for and is located in the Giveaways forum.

5. Do not post copyrighted photographs unless you have purchased that photo and have permission to do so.

6. Respect other members.
As members are often passionate about their beliefs and intentions can easily be misinterpreted in this type of environment, try to explore or resolve the inevitable disagreements that arise in the course of threads calmly and rationally.

If you see a post that you feel violates the rules of the board, please click the “alert” button (exclamation point inside of a triangle) in the bottom left corner of the post, which will alert ONLY the moderators to the post in question. They will then take whatever action, or no action, as deemed appropriate for the situation at their discretion. Do not air grievances regarding other posters or the moderators in the discussion forums.

Please be advised that adding another user to your “Ignore” list via your User Control Panel can be a useful tactic, which blocks posts and private messages by members whose commentary you’d rather avoid reading.

7. We have the right to reproduce statements made in the forums.
The Chronicle of the Horse may copy, quote, link to or otherwise reproduce posts, or portions of posts, in print or online for advertising or editorial purposes, if attributed to their original authors, and by posting in this forum, you hereby grant to The Chronicle of the Horse a perpetual, non-exclusive license under copyright and other rights, to do so.

8. We reserve the right to enforce and amend the rules.
The moderators may delete, edit, move or close any post or thread at any time, or refrain from doing any of the foregoing, in their discretion, and may suspend or revoke a user’s membership privileges at any time to maintain adherence to the rules and the general spirit of the forum. These rules may be amended at any time to address the current needs of the board.

Please see our full Terms of Service and Privacy Policy for more information.

Thanks for being a part of the COTH forums!

(Revised 1/26/16)
See more
See less

Cattle industry comes clean about why it supports horse slaughter

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ADM7040 View Post
    Sorry guys, you can keep saying over and over that someone needs to produce "the study" that "the scientists" did that caused the FDA to pull bute from the human market and that does not give you any leg to stand on. What you ARE showing is that you do not understand how the FDA operates. I explained it before, apparently some people understood but others want to remain dogmatic in their belief that the raras are behind it.

    No clinical "study" by "scientists" is behind the FDA pulling bute, instead there were after market reported adverse events in the treated population. I'll try again to make that simple to understand. After the initial controlled clinical trials are conducted on a proposed new drug, the company presents this information to the FDA for approval. If the FDA approves, the drug is then introduced to the general pubic for use. While the drug is being used, adverse events (side effects) are reported to the FDA. If the drug produces unexpected adverse events (things they did not expect from the initial clinical trials) then the drug is subject to be pulled from the market. That is what happened with bute in humans, it produced numerous, serious adverse events that resulted in the FDA pulling its approval from the human market.

    I suppose it is possible that the raras could be behind it. Back in the day (what was it, the 50's) they could have hatched their evil plan against horse slaughter and used their resources to buy off patients and their physicians to somehow fake all these adverse events.

    I keep reading posts from pro-slaughter people stating that rules and regulations currently exist and that good management and enforcement is all that is needed. Well, I agree, the rules and regulations DO exist to make this a legitimate way to slaughter and use "one last time" "some horses" that are part of the unwanted horse population. (I won't even address the enforcement for other rules and regs.) But the ban on bute and other substances are inconveniently part of the current rules and regs. Don't like it? Too bad, spend your efforts to have that changed. I read some others stating that human consumption is not all that is done with these horses. Fine, use them for what is appropriate once the rules and regs are followed. The currently reported less than 1% test rate is abysmal. Test them, all of them and keep the food chain clean.
    Ah, finally, some sense!

    And Danceronice, if the drug is fat soluble, iirc, those are the drugs that do stay and accumulates in fat tissues [brain, breasts, ovaries, testes,...] in the animal and then in the animal that consumes that animal. I gets stored and stays there in the one, then in the consumer.
    If you consume this meat item say once a week for life, and it has the drug in it... that is going to build up in ya'.

    Think Mercury in fish. Bigger fish are more dangerous to consume cause they eat lots and lots of smaller fish laden with mercury. The higher up ion the food chain you go the more dangerous it is to consume as the drug is more concentrated due to their diet.

    Say you have a concentration of something at 1% in water... move up the food chain 10 levels and it's not 10x worse... it's a million. It's an exponential equation.

    Tuna being an apex predator means that they have a much higher concentration than the fish they eat... thus eat it yourself in moderation.

    Furthermore, in my research into Bute I found some suggestions that one of the concerns is not that phenylbutazolidone is the 'issue' [though it is] for human consumption but that in horses it becomes a metabolite, iirc Oxybutazolidone, and that is WAY worse for humans.

    It would be nice if these things were simple and black and white. But when you're talking drugs and bodies, it rarely ever is.
    Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

    http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

    Comment


    • Originally posted by ADM7040 View Post
      Sorry guys, you can keep saying over and over that someone needs to produce "the study" that "the scientists" did that caused the FDA to pull bute from the human market and that does not give you any leg to stand on. What you ARE showing is that you do not understand how the FDA operates. I explained it before, apparently some people understood but others want to remain dogmatic in their belief that the raras are behind it.

      No clinical "study" by "scientists" is behind the FDA pulling bute, instead there were after market reported adverse events in the treated population. I'll try again to make that simple to understand. After the initial controlled clinical trials are conducted on a proposed new drug, the company presents this information to the FDA for approval. If the FDA approves, the drug is then introduced to the general pubic for use. While the drug is being used, adverse events (side effects) are reported to the FDA. If the drug produces unexpected adverse events (things they did not expect from the initial clinical trials) then the drug is subject to be pulled from the market. That is what happened with bute in humans, it produced numerous, serious adverse events that resulted in the FDA pulling its approval from the human market.

      I suppose it is possible that the raras could be behind it. Back in the day (what was it, the 50's) they could have hatched their evil plan against horse slaughter and used their resources to buy off patients and their physicians to somehow fake all these adverse events.

      I keep reading posts from pro-slaughter people stating that rules and regulations currently exist and that good management and enforcement is all that is needed. Well, I agree, the rules and regulations DO exist to make this a legitimate way to slaughter and use "one last time" "some horses" that are part of the unwanted horse population. (I won't even address the enforcement for other rules and regs.) But the ban on bute and other substances are inconveniently part of the current rules and regs. Don't like it? Too bad, spend your efforts to have that changed. I read some others stating that human consumption is not all that is done with these horses. Fine, use them for what is appropriate once the rules and regs are followed. The currently reported less than 1% test rate is abysmal. Test them, all of them and keep the food chain clean.
      Ah, finally, some sense!

      And Danceronice, if the drug is fat soluble, iirc, those are the drugs that do stay and accumulates in fat tissues [brain, breasts, ovaries, testes,...] in the animal and then in the animal that consumes that animal. It gets stored and stays there in the one, then in the consumer.
      If you consume this meat item say once a week for life, and it has the drug in it... that is going to build up in ya'.

      Think Mercury in fish. Bigger fish are more dangerous to consume cause they eat lots and lots of smaller fish laden with mercury. The higher up ion the food chain you go the more dangerous it is to consume as the drug is more concentrated due to their diet.

      Say you have a concentration of something at 1% in water... move up the food chain 10 levels and it's not 10x worse... it's a million. It's an exponential equation.

      Tuna being an apex predator means that they have a much higher concentration than the fish they eat... thus eat it yourself in moderation.

      Furthermore, in my research into Bute I found some suggestions that one of the concerns is not that phenylbutazolidone is the 'issue' [though it is] for human consumption but that in horses it becomes a metabolite, iirc Oxybutazolidone, and that is WAY worse for humans.
      What I also learned was that Bute was used in patients with RA, but then discontinued because of adverse events... it was not that they did any further studies on it in people.. they saw adverse events, and went to another drug that offered relief without the AEs. That kind of info offers us 0 information on it's safety at low level, or any levels.... and the motivation to do those human studies is just not there, if you could get subjects to sign up which I doubt you could. It's not like testing a drug that has some medicinal benefit... this is just to determine how much is toxic... yeah, who signs up for that one?

      It would be nice if these things were simple and black and white. But when you're talking drugs and bodies, it rarely ever is.
      Yo/Yousolong April 23rd, 1985- April 15th, 2014

      http://notesfromadogwalker.com/2012/...m-a-sanctuary/

      Comment

      Working...
      X